Researchers Improve Efficiency of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles By Almost 12% (dispatchtribunal.com) 63
hypnosec writes: A new study has put forward claims that by working on and improving the energy management system (EMS) that decides when the switch from 'all-electric' mode to 'hybrid' mode in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, efficiency of these vehicles can be improved by as much as 12 per cent. Researchers have shown in their lab tests that blended discharge strategies wherein power from the battery is used throughout the trip, have proven to be more efficient at minimizing fuel consumption and emissions.
Re:Gas (Score:5, Insightful)
Since gas is between $1-$2 a gallon now I think the need for hybrids has passed.
"Passed" isn't quite the right word. These prices are something Saudi Arabia is doing on purpose to try to run all the US shale oil producers out of business. If their plan works (Mwaahahahah! Good kitty), presumably they will then be able to go right back up to the higher prices they were selling Oil at 5 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Gas (Score:4, Interesting)
You can hold the price of oil low with oversupply and create market disturbance if you want, but only for so long.
Not so much Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and many others... but the US economy is very diverse for a major petroleum producer.
Re: (Score:3)
Not major, the largest.
Re: (Score:2)
But you see, it isn't even "oversupply."
Rather, it's "decreasing but not eliminating the artificial supply constraint."
Even today's prices are higher than they would be without the cartel.
That said, the world changed with the Saudi policy of letting prices go below our production cost.
Oh, dear, they'll sell us their oil for less than it costs to produce our own. I'm terrified.
And don't throw me in the briar patch, either . . .
hawk
Re: (Score:2)
Still, with US production tapering off slower than anticipated, and world demand lagging, the Saudis would sign on for restricting output if they didn't know what the other OPEC nations would likely do: cheat.
That is the way production cutbacks have worked out, and then the Saudis just lose market share.
Re: (Score:2)
OPEC has been surprisingly stable compared to historic cartels, largely due to the Saudi dominance and willingness to bear the brunt when the inevitable cheating occurred.
They're playing a different game now, though: that shale isn't going away, and the price of producing it is a ceiling on the cartel price.
*All* cartels eventually end by cheating; some just get there faster than others . . .
(And the *real* key to the Debars cartel was somehow convincing people that the least desirable gemstone, the plain w
Re:Gas (Score:4, Interesting)
You missed right after they buy up all the bankrupt shale gas producers.
The middle east is running out of oil. Countries like Dubai are investing heavily in alternative markets to deal with the impending end of black gold - Dubai is basically trying to be a high end tourist resort, for example.
Saudi Arabia is trying to do it another way - buy up the next set of oil producers so the profits can be taken that way - bankrupt the existing oil producers in North America, buy them all up, and then jack up the prices and let the profits flow into the country. So even when they run out of oil, they still own all the companies producing oil in other countries, thus ensuring prosperity of their own.
Plus, I think they also want to bankrupt Iran who because of the nuclear treaty can sell oil on the market again.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Countries like Dubai
You mean countries that are actually cities?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, like Monaco, St. Marino, Vatican or the Principat d'Andorra ... and perhaps two dozen more.
Heck: wikipedia even lists Kuwait as city state, IMHO wrongly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
New companies are constantly formed so what Saudi buys today doesn't lock much in.
As for this 12% efficiency gain... did they calculate the extra cycles on the battery and it's increased expense?
Re: (Score:2)
As for this 12% efficiency gain... did they calculate the extra cycles on the battery and it's increased expense? ;D
That does not influence efficiency
Actually that improvement reduces the amount of cycles, so: there are no extra cycles.
A no brainer if you had bothered to read the article, here, I link it again for you: http://www.dispatchtribunal.co... [dispatchtribunal.com]
Re: (Score:3)
I'd say that Saudi Arabia doesn't much care whether or not shale gets shut down, they can produce oil for less so they are doing that to gain market share. They don't value the oil in the ground and they don't value the distant (beyond 2040) future, so they're looking to maximize their income today. Any hardship on other oil producers, the ecology, or the future is incidental - of no concern to the decision makers who will be long dead when those imagined problems might happen.
Re: (Score:3)
That was the case 6 months ago. Now Saudi Arabia is peeing their pants in fear and regret. Their high prices created the incentive to develop shale extraction and make it economical. There is enough oil shale in the world to produce for decades. Every time I hear a report on what a barrel of shale oil can be produced for it's lower than the last time. OPEC fucked up, big time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They just lower the price so that its below all regernative energy, and if we develop the new solar collector that is even cheaper to produce, oil will get even cheaper. The spiral only ends at the price of the extraction of the fossile sources and that's pretty low, we won't get green energy so cheap in this half of the century, especially as extraction will probably get cheaper as well (better technology etc).
The only real option to meet the 2 degree goal is to get all countries together and to not let th
Re: (Score:3)
The only real option to meet the 2 degree goal is to get all countries together and to not let the stuff out of the earth. Otherwise someone somewhere burns it, whoever it is
Well, at some point, petroleum's value as a chemical feed stock exceeds its value as a fuel. Then, you're not burning it. Petroleum is used for a whole lot of things besides just burning.
Re: (Score:2)
Fossil power plants are mainly running on coal and gas, not on oil.
To undercut renewables you would also need to build up new oil burning power plants ... that is a huge investment.
Industrial revolution of Africa? The chinese are already preparing it.
Yes, and as renewable plants are cheaper and easier, they mainly build those instead of oil/coal or nuclear plants.
Re: (Score:1)
"more efficient at minimizing fuel consumption AND emissions."
Re:Gas [and Emissions] (Score:1)
"If each person swept their own doorstep, the whole world would be clean."
Re:Gas (Score:5, Insightful)
Congratulations on saying the dumbest, most shortsighted thing I've read all week.
Tell that to Bejing (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
I think you mean India.
Car sales are up 4000 percent in India, and as a result, you can't see a thing.
Time to end all fossil fuel subsidies and exemptions, including depreciation and fleet discounts.
That said, hybrids don't help if you drive further distances, or burn up fuel while not moving.
Re: (Score:1)
Hybrids do not burn fuel while moving generally, since they have a "stop-start" feature. The ones that do are running the engine at optimal RPM to product power which will later be used to propel the car.
I wouldn't argue with the rest of it.
Re: (Score:2)
And the engines are usually running in the Atkinson cycle (on an Otto cycle engine), which gives less power, but greater efficiency. Basically in the Atkinson cycle, the intake stroke is shorter than the power stroke - the goal is that when you're at the end of the power stroke, the cylinder pressure is same as atmospheric. Otto cycle engines have the same intake stroke length compared to power
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing you're referring to the US. However there are many countries where various taxes on gas are much higher, so that the dropping oil prices are felt less at the pump.
Re: (Score:2)
There are countries with high taxes, where the gas price is not so close connected to the oil price.
Also: plenty of people own a Hybrid already, so if a simple software change can safe them fuel/money and reduces CO2 output, why not?
Re: (Score:3)
Because that's literally the price anywhere in the world where hybrids could be used ...
Try 5 USD/Gallon
http://www.wolframalpha.com/in... [wolframalpha.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Troll or idiot?
I'm going to pretend idiot and answer you: ... I want to say non-polluting, but that's a lie. Lower polluting plants. Like wind, solar, and possibly even nuclear or fusion. Wind and solar still need
The real need for hybrids is not because of high gas prices, that's only the enabler. The need is to reduce the rate at which CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere. When the technology is more perfected hybrids will be replaced by electrics, and electrical production plants will be phased over to
Re: (Score:2)
Did you ever heard that US isn't the whole world? Gas prices in Europe are still mostly taxes as it should be, and still over 1 EUR per liter, not gallon.
Route customization (Score:3)
Basically what they're doing is optimizing the electric/gas switching for specific routes to make best use of the battery (e.g. plan so that it doesn't run out of juice halfway up a hill). In order to make that generally applicable, each car would have to constantly track location and other telemetry and send it back to a central database to build a map of all common routes. Alternatively, it could also be used as a self contained system that would learn the best strategy for your normal commute, but then it would have no benefit on roads you haven't driven before.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Alternatively, it could also be used as a self contained system that would learn the best strategy for your normal commute, but then it would have no benefit on roads you haven't driven before.
I think you could cover 99% of my driving with less than 100 routes. Especially if I get into the habit of telling the car where I'm planning on going.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The title is correct. They did improve the efficiency by almost 12% in tests, and then another 8% on top of that in simulations. I'm providing exactly as much proof as you did.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be new around here . . :)
hawk
Now I know! (Score:1)
BFD (Score:1)
By manually controlling the switchover between electric mode and hybrid mode in my Prius Plug-in I can get over 20 miles per charge (100Wh/mile), which is double what the car gets if you just let it manage things. Once you figure out that electric mode is more efficient for maintaining speed on flat or downhill ground (low engine load), and gas is more efficient for acceleration and climbing uphill (high engine load), you can push a plug-in far more than the factory programming would achieve.
Range still not enough to be practical (Score:1)