Microsoft To End Nagging Windows 10 Upgrade Notifications In July (theverge.com) 158
An anonymous reader writes: Microsoft has officially announced today it will end the annoying "Get Windows 10" notifications in July, when they end the free Windows 10 upgrade offer. In a statement to WinBeta, Microsoft said in a comment: "Details are still being finalized, but on July 29th the Get Windows 10 app that facilitates the easy upgrade to Windows 10 will be disabled and eventually removed from PCs worldwide. Just as it took time to ramp up and roll out the Get Windows 10 app, it will take time to ramp it down." This is great news for users who have decided to not install Windows 10 for whatever reason. Earlier this week, it was reported that the Windows 10 update has been ruining pro-graming streams. In April, the Windows 10 upgrade screen interrupted a meteorologist's live forecast.
Yep, no more notifications (Score:2, Insightful)
Just installed without asking.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I doubt that Microsoft is going to end this "Free" update campaign with at least one more attempt to push Windows 10 to everyone's computers like it was a security patch.
Re: (Score:2)
Even better, they'll wait until Aug 1, automatically install Win10, and charge you for the privilege.
Still wont be safe to turn on automatic updates. (Score:5, Insightful)
They'll probably double-down on re-enabling the "recommended" updates that add the spyware to previous versions of Windows.
Re: (Score:3)
Why would they spend the time? As far as they are concerned, Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1 are competitors to Windows 10 which costs them more to maintain and with fewer monetization/expansion options, why would they do anything but encourage you to move to the new great future they believe they have created?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Because they already spent the time to make spyware for Windows 7 and 8 and because data harvesting makes them money.
Re: (Score:2)
Citation?
And did they add this 'spyware' after the releases of later operating systems?
Re:Still wont be safe to turn on automatic updates (Score:5, Interesting)
Citation?
And did they add this 'spyware' after the releases of later operating systems?
We don't need to cite that data harvesting makes a company money. It's literally the business plan of several dot-coms.
As far as them adding the telemetry to earlier versions of Windows, it's common knowledge now.
http://techne.alaya.net/?p=124... [alaya.net]
I have personally deselected and hidden these updates only to see them get un-hidden and added automatically as Recommended updates to download and install at a later date. I'd also like to note this had happened more than once with some of these individual updates, and it often happens when I get a large (15-30 updates) list at once from Microsoft. These large groups of updates are not "backed up" updates I have missed since last time. I have Windows Update run as a startup item when I log in to my computer, so I'm manually checking for updates every day on my PC. And every day I get an update for the Windows Defender definitions. But once in awhile I get a dozen or so "important" updates for Windows itself, and it's quite coincidental that one of the updates I had previously hidden is added into that list.
Seems like a orchestrated attempt to get me to install it. Stick it in a large list, and I'm more likely to just say "install all" than actually read the KBs for each or compare them to a list of known problem ones.
Tell me, if these updates are so harmless, why is Microsoft so vehement I install them after I tell them once I don't want them?
Re: (Score:2)
Seems like a orchestrated attempt to get me to install it. Stick it in a large list, and I'm more likely to just say "install all" than actually read the KBs for each or compare them to a list of known problem ones.
in business, its known as a 'shit sandwich'
(no, really. it is.)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
We don't need to cite that data harvesting makes a company money. It's literally the business plan of several dot-coms.
Actually, I rather think you do. Those business plans are typically (1) harvest data, (2) ???, (3) profit.
Sometimes that mystery step (2) is sell it on to advertisers, or use it for targeted advertising. I myself work at Microsoft -- not in the Windows division; our division's product Visual Studio does collect opt-in telemetry, and our missing step (2) is nothing more sinister than "improve the product so that future customers are more likely to want to use it".
Do you think that mystery step (2) in Windows
Re: (Score:2)
Do you think that mystery step (2) in Windows is using it for targeted advertising? or something else? I find it hard to make the leap from telemetry like "anonymized data shows Solitaire is the third-most popular program" (made up datapoint) to "targeting ads to this customer is worth $XYZ", but maybe there's something there that I'm just not seeing.
Maybe you need a Spotlight [theverge.com] to see it better.
Oh, look! It's already happening. [howtogeek.com]
But I'm sure Microsoft did not p
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, look! It's already happening. [howtogeek.com]
But I'm sure Microsoft did not profit in any way financially from that ad.
Your phrase "not profit financially" is shifting the goalposts. The thread was about whether the telemetry data is being monetized.
Your first link was about pointing users, based on their usage, to apps that might might be relevant but they hadn't considered or noticed. Unless and until MS goes down Apple's allegedly planned route of paid app-store search [gamasutra.com], that's not an example.
Your second example was about an ad for Tomb Raider being shown on the lock screen. Again, unless the telemetry influenced the deci
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has to prove what they are doing with their spyware data (it's not "telemetry", stop calling it that) because they encrypt the transfers.
Personally, I don't want any data leaving my systems unless I, the user, explicitly tell it to.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, look! It's already happening. [howtogeek.com]
But I'm sure Microsoft did not profit in any way financially from that ad.
Your phrase "not profit financially" is shifting the goalposts. The thread was about whether the telemetry data is being monetized.
Your first link was about pointing users, based on their usage, to apps that might might be relevant but they hadn't considered or noticed.
You're turning this into a semantics argument now. The original comment [slashdot.org] was that Microsoft was collecting info to make money -- we know that what the AC meant that they used the data in an activity (a "step 2") that made money, not that the act of spying itself gained them greenbacks.
But here you come [slashdot.org]. "Nuh-uhh! You have to do something with the info to make money.
And me [slashdot.org]: "Yeah, they are doing something with the info. Straight from the horses mouth, they use the data to tailor messages to users that appear
Re:Still wont be safe to turn on automatic updates (Score:5, Informative)
Because people paid for those operating systems and expect full support for them for the listed amount of time. Give me a break, Windows 8.1 is essentially brand new and Windows 10 has no features worth mentioning that differentiate it from a Windows 8.1 service pack. Should they list their support as "supported until 2023 or until we change our mind"?
Re: (Score:2)
Windows 8.1 is essentially brand new
It is? Since when is 3 years old in the computer world "brand new"?
Even cars aren't considered "brand new" when they are 3 years old.
Windows 10 has no features worth mentioning that differentiate it from a Windows 8.1 service pack
From that point of view, Windows 10 is just a really fancy Windows Vista service pack, but that isn't how any of this works.
They COULD have made it all Vista and service packs, if everyone was paying yearly sub fees, but since that isn't how Windows is sold, they need new versions to bring in money.
Re: (Score:2)
Essentially brand new because it's only 3 years old. Barely 1/3 into it's expected life span (based upon end of life support). Even a 3 year old car is considered new, though not brand new. Anyone replacing a car in 3 years is too fashion conscience most likely. Replacing an OS in only 3 years is something silly, like getting a new iphone just because there is one. Windows 7 has been in productive service (not limping along) for 6 years. XP is still in service many places and is perfectly fine for man
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, also essentially brand new since you can still buy newly manufactured PCs with Windows 8.1 pre-installed (through October).
For example, they were still selling PCs with XP preinstalled in 2010. So you could say its only 7 years old instead of 14, depending upon when you bought it.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, also essentially brand new since you can still buy newly manufactured PCs with Windows 8.1 pre-installed (through October).
Most of those are older models that simply haven't been updated yet...
And considering that they currently get a free upgrade to Windows 10, you can hardly complain...
In any case, your entire point is meaningless, Windows 8.1 is still mainstream supported with product and feature updates. It is Windows 7 and Windows 8.0 that are out of date.
Re: (Score:2)
Windows 7 is still supported. It's just not "mainstream" support, and what that means is that it won't necessarily get major features and will only get security or other important upgrades (important to the customer that is), and that's what most customers want. I've got 8.1, It was an improvement over Windows 7 if you can get past the metro and the app store (and I like the flat look myself, I though W7 was too glossy and flashy).
Windows 10 could have been just an upgrade; after all they did apologize fo
Re: (Score:1)
Essentially brand new because it's only 3 years old.
In computer terms, 3 years isn't "new" at all...
Even a 3 year old car is considered new, though not brand new. Anyone replacing a car in 3 years is too fashion conscience most likely.
Nope, you couldn't be more wrong...
I replaced my 2012 SUV with the 2015 model because the 2015 model has auto-emergency braking, lane departure warning, cross traffic alert, etc...
The 2012 version didn't have any of that and those are pure safety features.
Replacing an OS in only 3 years is something silly, like getting a new iphone just because there is one.
A 3 year old iPhone is quite different to the new one. That would be the first iPhone 5, and the iPhone 6s is quite different to the iPhone 5 in features and size.
Windows 7 has been in productive service (not limping along) for 6 years.
Windows 7 is showing its age now... it was
Re: (Score:3)
The new version is NOT better. It has changed but change is not always better and Microsoft has proven that.
And I don't care if Microsoft needs money. Everyone needs money but I can't give some to everyone. Microsoft will have to wait in line. Now if they had a useful product then maybe I would consider bumping them ahead in line.
Re: (Score:2)
The new version is NOT better.
You're welcome to that opinion, but I disagree... There isn't anything from 7 that I miss in 10...
Two days ago I had to setup Windows 7 on a computer and it did nothing but remind me why all my computers now run Windows 10. It is superior in every way.
And I don't care if Microsoft needs money.
Of course you don't, nor should you... but it was an answer to the point of "who cares if Microsoft needs money". Clearly they care, so they'll run their business that way.
Expecting anything else is just foolish.
Now if they had a useful product then maybe I would consider bumping them ahead in line.
First, Windows 10 is free right now, so you
Re: (Score:2)
There is some genuinely good stuff in Windows 10, and I know many ordinary users who are quite happy with it. There problem is the spyware. If they hadn't ruined it with built-in malware, it would have been great. Or at least as great as Windows ever gets.
Re: (Score:2)
I hate to bust your bubble here but Microsoft only has mainstream support for Windows 8 (8.1 is a service pack) as well as Windows 10. Take a look here [microsoft.com] and Win 8 is only mainstream supported till January 9, 2018 which is not that far away. Sure you can get extended support for Vista, Win 7 and even Win 8 but you will be paying for that.
Actually, you're the one who has it wrong [redmondmag.com]. Microsoft preempted the original Windows 8 release with the 8.1 release. They no longer support 8.0 [gamespot.com] and the 8.1, Update 1 release [infoworld.com] is the one being supported through 2023.
Think of if like Windows 98 vs 98SE.
Re: (Score:1)
I hate to bust your bubble here but Microsoft only has mainstream support for Windows 8 (8.1 is a service pack) as well as Windows 10. Take a look here [microsoft.com] and Win 8 is only mainstream supported till January 9, 2018 which is not that far away. Sure you can get extended support for Vista, Win 7 and even Win 8 but you will be paying for that.
Actually, you're the one who has it wrong [redmondmag.com]. Microsoft preempted the original Windows 8 release with the 8.1 release. They no longer support 8.0 [gamespot.com] and the 8.1, Update 1 release [infoworld.com] is the one being supported through 2023.
Think of if like Windows 98 vs 98SE.
I will concede that Microsoft only support 8.1 (which is a service pack for 8.0), however mainstream support for 8.1 is January 9, 2018 (as per the Microsoft web site). I did not explain it properly however I did provide the URL for the Microsoft support information site. Even if you still had MS Win 8 you can still get a free upgrade to 8.1 see here [microsoft.com] so even though I was technically wrong in stating Win 8 was mainstream supported till January 9, 2018 there is no associated cost with upgrading to Win 8.1 a
Re: (Score:2)
I will concede that Microsoft only support 8.1 (which is a service pack for 8.0), however mainstream support for 8.1 is January 9, 2018 (as per the Microsoft web site). I did not explain it properly however I did provide the URL for the Microsoft support information site. Even if you still had MS Win 8 you can still get a free upgrade to 8.1 see here [microsoft.com] so even though I was technically wrong in stating Win 8 was mainstream supported till January 9, 2018 there is no associated cost with upgrading to Win 8.1 and getting free "mainstream support" at least until January 9, 2018.
There are two types of support Microsoft provides for their operating systems, they are "mainstream support" which is free while "extended support" requires you to pay for it and somehow I doubt most home PC users would pay for this service.
No, that's still wrong. [microsoft.com]
"Desktop Operating Systems" falls into this category, and it d
Re: (Score:2)
And that's part of the problem Windows 8 is NEW! And yet support expires so incredibly quickly? A grand total of 5 years. I computer will last longer than that. Is Windows a supported operating system that cares about customers, or just a phone app wannabe? It's a shitty move by a shitty company to push their shitty OS, and people still manage to praise them for their mediocrity. Best reason to upgrade always seems to be "you'll have to get it done sooner or later so why not now" which is the sort of
Re: (Score:2)
And that's part of the problem Windows 8 is NEW!
Windows 8.0 is not new... it is currently supported as 8.1, which is a free update to everyone and always will be...
Windows 8.1 will continue to get security updates and patches until 2023...
You clearly are reading what you wish to read if you think anything else...
Re: (Score:2)
As far as they are concerned, Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1 are competitors to Windows 10 which costs them more to maintain and with fewer monetization/expansion options, why would they do anything but encourage you to move to the new great future they believe they have created?
The features for adding telemetry to previous versions of Windows do not add any real customer-facing value. It only benefits Redmond.
After almost a year of "free upgrade offer" and "forced upgrades", Microsoft knows anyone not on 10 is taking proactive steps to stay there. If they get the telemetry added to the customer's previous version of Windows, well there's one less reason to stay on that version -- might as well upgrade to 10 and get the new features.
The fewer people using the older version of Windo
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Four. If they can't manage four operating systems at once then they should stop lying when they say that they can have long term support for four operating systems at once. Maybe that's why the current OS is (temporarily) free, so that they can say "you got it free so stop bothering us" when people are asking support for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Would you rather have them try to update four operating systems, or just one?
I'd rather they quit pestering me to do something I do not want to do.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't be surprised if 10 years from now, ISPs don't allow your out of date computer to connect to the Internet at all
That's about the dumbest thing I've read on /., just as dumb as when I read it 10 years ago, just as dumb as when I read it when /. was young. The ISPs give approximately 0 fucks about how horrible their customers' machines are - they just want the money.
Meanwhile, MS has an obligation to keep patching their OSs until they're ready to piss off their corporate customer base, when is about when the number of corporate customers still on the old OS approaches 0. When people pay actual money for an OS, they d
Re: (Score:2)
That's about the dumbest thing I've read on /.
No, it really isn't, but you can think so all you like...
The ISPs give approximately 0 fucks about how horrible their customers' machines are - they just want the money.
No, you don't get it... sooner or later it will become law...
Meanwhile, MS has an obligation to keep patching their OSs until they're ready to piss off their corporate customer base
Windows as a Service will fix that...
Re: (Score:2)
No, you don't get it... sooner or later it will become law...
Right, like Comcast would let a law happen that would cost it money. We can't even get cell providers to push patches to Android phones, and isn't that the majority of machines on the internet now?
Just wait for the fun the Internet of Unpatched Things!
Re: (Score:2)
Right, like Comcast would let a law happen that would cost it money.
It won't be up to Comcast, it will become a national security matter...
Re: (Score:2)
So you keep asserting in the face of all history. Well, keep your fantasy, if it makes you happy to imagine it.
Re: (Score:2)
I worked for an ISP when the blaster worm was a thing. We suspended internet access for customers whose computer(s) were infected and unpatched, by identifying the traffic that was coming from their pipe.
Now, you were saying something about your lack of understanding about network and technology?
Re: (Score:2)
Is that ISP still in business?
What is the product? (Score:1)
I agree with them, at least as far as patching dangerous errors in the software. In addition, the MSFT model has always been to sell the OS with a new machine, so for as long as that machine lasts...
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with them, at least as far as patching dangerous errors in the software.
You can expect anything you like, clearly the new people at Microsoft feel otherwise.
The days of getting 10 years of support will be here for awhile, but they are not likely to be here forever.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather they quit pestering me to do something I do not want to do.
I understand... I don't want to pay my taxes either, but I have to...
No, you don't understand. If you think these two things are even remotely equivalent, then you're an idiot.
-
You of course are free to run it at home all you like disconnected.
No, I'm free to do whatever the fuck I want to do. Connected, disconnected, I'll run it in whatever state of connectivity I like.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I'm free to do whatever the fuck I want to do. Connected, disconnected, I'll run it in whatever state of connectivity I like.
You are not the first, and won't be the last person, to say something like that...
Lots of people go to jail kicking and screaming "you can't arrest me, I can do whatever I want".
When it becomes illegal to do it, and it will, you won't have that choice. Sooner or later it will.
Re: (Score:2)
You are not the first, and won't be the last person, to say something like that...
Perhaps, but that doesn't mean what I said isn't true.
-
When it becomes illegal to do it, and it will, you won't have that choice. Sooner or later it will.
Whatever. Ease up on the bong, buddy.
Re: (Score:2)
>> I'd rather they quit pestering me to do something I do not want to do.
> I understand... I don't want to pay my taxes either, but I have to...
False equivalence [wikipedia.org] much? You're comparing apples and oranges assuming they are the same thing.
NOT paying taxes is illegal.
NOT upgrading is legal.
> You don't have to like it, but you have to do it.
[[Citation]]
I get to decide what patches to install on my computer, not Microshit.
> If you're online, you have to keep your computer up to date, to do otherwi
Re: (Score:2)
False equivalence much? You're comparing apples and oranges assuming they are the same thing.
NOT paying taxes is illegal.
NOT upgrading is legal.
I have a longer view than the next 5 minutes, unlike some kids these days...
It will, sooner or later, become illegal to connect an unpatched device to the Internet.
It will be for reasons of security, for the same reason it is illegal to drive a car with an emission defeat device. Just because you can physically do it doesn't mean it will be allowed.
That day is coming sooner than you probably think.
Re: (Score:2)
Even driving a car with an emission defeat device is not illegal, unless you installed it as an aftermarket part, such as those designed for "rolling coal". All those Volkswagens running around with their factory installed defeat devices are doing it legally.
And how would such
Re: (Score:2)
I would love if you were right, but unfortunately I think you are not. As mentioned before, smartphone updates are being delayed or denied by carriers, and that is not illegal nor have I heard of any serious intention of making it so.
https://yro.slashdot.org/story... [slashdot.org]
Just because it has been that way in the past doesn't mean it won't change going forward.
Like I said, I have a longer view than 5 minutes from now. The world is changing and slowly people who are not "techies" are waking up to the security concerns of unpatched systems. One of these days, maybe 5 years from now, maybe 15... they'll change the rules to enforce security on the Internet.
The only real way to secure the Internet is to control what connects to it. The days of
Re: (Score:2)
You are claiming that it will be illegal to connect an unpatched computer to the internet in the future, but you apparently are too stupid to realize that patching the computer usually involves connecting it to the internet.
The grand irony is that while you call me an idiot, you don't even understand that you're actually the fool.
Clearly an "unpatched" computer will try and connect, be blocked by the ISP, and directed to run Windows Update (or whatever is similar).
Of course the ISP is going to allow Windows Update to run.
Re: (Score:1)
Would you rather have them try to update four operating systems, or just one?
Actually except for Windows 8 (8.1 is a service pack) all other versions of MS Windows are not mainstream supported unless you subscribe to extended support. You can check out which Microsoft operating systems are supported here [microsoft.com]. Even mainstream Windows 8 will be unsupported come January 9, 2018. So basically Microsoft is really only supporting one other OS version beside MS Windows 10 and that is MS Windows 8
Like it or not you will have to go to Windows 10 unless you give Microsoft the middle finger and
Re: (Score:2)
7 still has more marketshare than 10. After 10 months of a free "upgrade" offer from a 7 year old OS.
Yes, because most people never change the OS that comes with their computers...
Those people will use Windows 7 until 2020 when support ends, then buy a new computer with Windows 11 on it...
Nothing new there...
Re: (Score:3)
I was originally going to wait and see how Windows 10 worked out before upgrading. I heard a few bad things, but things I could deal with by control settings and registry, and because I could get pro edition free. But over time Microsoft has gotten worse, and more information has come out. Even Pro edition is required to accept all updates (not just security updates); Microsoft has been cheating and tricking people into installing their advertisements, "accidentally" downloading copies, adding worse feat
Re: (Score:2)
More likely they will simply release the Windows 10 SE version (secure edition), that you have to pay for, in conjunction with Windows anal probe 10, that you get for free. They would also have to allow up clean-up version for those who want to swap from anal probe to SE (secure edition). It just means the enterprise version just becomes available to typical end users. Also watch out, that means disabling the probes on the free version will also become impossible ie pay or probe extortion.
WooHoo! Of course, I'll believe it when I see it (Score:2)
It will be nice to not have to worry about my Windows 7 development machines not being turned over to the Dark Side.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
It will be nice to not have to worry about my Windows 7 development machines not being turned over to the Dark Side.
Yes it is, however are you aware of Windows 7 support by Microsoft actually expired on January 13, 2015 and unless you have extended support which expires January 14, 2020 you are effectively running on an unsupported operating system. That may be fine for home PC users however it may not be all that good for commercial businesses. Actually just on curiosity what are you developing for since Windows 7 is not longer mainstream supported?
Take a look here [microsoft.com] for more information.
If you are an avid gamer then
Re:WooHoo! Of course, I'll believe it when I see i (Score:5, Insightful)
What kind of valuable support does Microsoft even offer outside of security updates? The updates are it.
Re: (Score:3)
Only "mainstream" support for Windows 7 ended. That only means no new features. No one cares about new features. Extended support is still ongoing though meaning you will get security updates and updates for reliability.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a developer. Things work great on Linux and OSX for developers. Better than that wannabe web and IT oriented Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
What do HTML5 and CSS have to do with Windows support?
Re:WooHoo! Of course, I'll believe it when I see i (Score:4, Informative)
Yes it is, however are you aware of Windows 7 support by Microsoft actually expired on January 13, 2015 and unless you have extended support which expires January 14, 2020 you are effectively running on an unsupported operating system.
You are mistaken...
Microsoft ended mainstream support, which simply means no new product features...
EVERYONE gets extended support for bug fixes and security updates until 2020.
Re: (Score:2)
I actually agree with you... Pro should have more control over the update process...
I completely understand why businesses don't want every single security update going out on day one...
Re: (Score:2)
Not a gamer - development work is for SoC Firmware.
Win7 until 2020 suits me fine.
Re: (Score:2)
unless you have extended support which expires January 14, 2020
You say that as if it's possible for him to not have extended support. Everyone has extended support and Windows 8.1 goes until 2023.
That gives me 7 years to move over to another OS, which is plenty of time.
Windows I can never use. (Score:4, Insightful)
Too little, too late. The damage has been done. (Score:5, Insightful)
.
Yet Microsoft upped the game and started to use what appeared to be malware infestation techniques to try to trick me into getting Windows 10.
Microsoft's reputation and credibility has been all but permanently damaged, imo.
Re:Too little, too late. The damage has been done. (Score:5, Funny)
"Hello, I am a Nigerian prince and I need your help to sneak my OS onto your country's PCs."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft's reputation and credibility has been all but permanently damaged, imo.
I agree, except for the "all but".
We've been actively reducing our dependence on anything from Microsoft ever since Nadella took over, and I doubt our policy will change until the senior management team has changed again and the corporate strategy has changed with it.
Personally, I expect that to happen before Windows 7 support runs out. I don't think they can afford not to have a credible successor available by then, and clearly for many people and businesses that successor is not Windows 10.
Re: (Score:2)
The last time the update that installs Windows 10 came back I wrote to Microsoft. I told them that further attempts to force enable this update would be charged at my standard rate. Next time I'll send them an invoice, and if they don't pay it's on to Small Claims Court.
This technique works well for all sorts of irritations in the UK. TV Licencing harassment, spam, cold callers etc. Works best against large companies who are desperate to avoid having the bailiffs sent in to their offices.
UWP+Windows Store will be the next nags... (Score:5, Informative)
Microsoft seems to have had their heart set of giving away the razor kits, but selling the blades with Windows 10.
Unfortunately, their Windows Store appears to mostly be filled with copy-cat apps and intentional scams - and when you DO buy "apps" from the store, you don't get a proper executable to use as you'd like such as you'd get from GOG or Steam.
What Microsoft is promoting is a 'Universal Windows Platform" or UWP. UWP applications aren't proper windows programs that you can freely use as you're used to. Instead, they're packaged in encrypted folders, and are essentially laden down with heavy DRM, like a new-age DIVX format. That means, no modding except for very limited things developers exactly plan for, no true fullscreen for games (borderless windowed is forced for now), very few graphics options, and essentially everything locked to how an "XBox One" would present things, since that is the basic intention, to allow game developers to simultaneously publish without separate testing or development cycles on all MS-owned platforms.
Expect to get a LOT more pressure in that direction, before they give up on this approach, almost exactly the same as happened with the horrible GFWL initiative years back.
Somehow though, there's still going to be SOME game developers that drink the cool-aide on this, and will publish UWP games. I'd say stick with Steam/GOG/etc on the platform of your choice, and politely and constructively complain on their forums if they don't bother to publish an actual PC port of the game.
Ryan Fenton
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, their Windows Store appears to mostly be filled with copy-cat apps and intentional scams - and when you DO buy "apps" from the store, you don't get a proper executable to use as you'd like such as you'd get from GOG or Steam.
You do know that many Steam titles are protected with DRM that only works when Steam works, right? You cannot for example a "Steam backup" of such a title without having Steam connected to the network, because the restored backup is not playable until it has been blessed.
I'm sure that most of the games I've got now are DRM-less, because most of them are indie titles, but there's some variation on that point.
Re: (Score:3)
Oh, certainly it IS DRM - but outside of some horrible companies sandwiching DRM inside their own bin
Re: (Score:3)
I always check if a game is on GOG first before buying it on Steam. I'll take DRM-free over DRM any day of the week. Even if GOG doesn't have quite as many promotional discounts going.
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that many Steam titles are protected with DRM that only works when Steam works, right?
Many steam games will run perfectly fine without steam running if you go to the executable directly.
English, motherfucker, etc.
UWP is Microsoft's future (Score:3)
This is his they lead you to their walled garden. Eventually UWP will get all the new API versions and updates, such as DirectX, and Win32 will be left to stagnate and eventually will be shed and relegated to legacy VM only.
Re: (Score:2)
The first part, letting Win32 stagnate, is something people have been hoping for for years. The end of OS updates breaking old applications. It's that last part that's the killer.
Just wait for July 31 (Score:4, Insightful)
On July 31, there will be an out-of-band update that will prompt the user, "Would you like to ruin your life and everything in it?" If you select "Yes" then it will install Windows 10. If you select "No" it will install Windows 10 and say, "you're welcome". ;)
it will end the annoying "Get Windows 10" notifica (Score:1)
>> it will end the annoying "Get Windows 10" notifications in July
and replace it with annoying "Buy Windows 10" notifications.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes exactly. But that was the deal - 1 year to freely upgrade. Afterwards, pay us.
Maybe download the updater ISO that includes a valid Win10 install key for your device, without installing it. Possibly it'd still be valid to install after the July window, even if you apply it in a year or two.
(I remember having to apply the November 10586 build over the top of the July 10240 build because the update process was broken, so I wonder what'll happen about the "anniversary update". If it's broken or they start
Re: (Score:2)
If there was a way I could get a free valid copy of Windows 10 now (as an upgrade from my current Windows 7 copy) without actually installing it yet, I would go for it just so I have the option to install it later without paying for it. But I have yet to see a way to do that anywhere.
But if you *did* upgrade to 10 (Score:2)
and you don't have MS Office, Windows 10 will start popping up adds in the desktop UI encouraging you to buy office.
Do they think that people are somehow unaware that Office exists and is available for purchase? Or that you'll fork over the money to buy office to make the stupid pop-ups go away? Or do they just want people to think they're sleazy, obnoxious assholes?
Re: (Score:2)
Well ya, it's a SUBSCRIPTION service. Do you think Microsoft will let you sneak past with a pay-once-use-forever program? That is such an obsolete concept. Next you'll be saying you want to store your files locally instead of in the cloud...
Microsoft lies (Score:2)
You have to be a brain-dead moron with Alzheimer's to believe anything Microsoft states.
Except they won't end the free Windows 10 upgrade (Score:1)
Wtf (Score:2)
So after forcing the software on windows users everywhere, at random times, now they think they can start charging for it and have people bend over? Damn I'm glad I started refusing to use windows back around 3.1.
There's a registry hack (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Linux will never catch on if you need to edit weird files for the computer to just work.
Re: "live forecast" (Score:2)
I hope the person in charge of the seven-second delay/bleep was on the ball. If I'd been that meteorologist, I'm certain there'd have been something to bleep.
It's disturbing ... (Score:3)
... how microsoft installs and uninstalls software on our pcs via updates. You install an update and expect some bugfixes and improvments and end up with a new program installed. You install the next update and the program will be uninstalled. That's not how updates are supposed to work.
And it's scary, what ms might install in the future via an update.
Still pushing hard (Score:2)
Of course they are (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's meant to imply a pro version of a bro-grammer.
Re: (Score:3)
No, pro-graming the metric lobby.
Re: (Score:3)
There's streams about professional graham crackers?
There s'more info if you search Google.
Re: (Score:2)
Score: +1, Flamewar.
Re: (Score:3)
No it doesn't work fine. It has happened several times on Windows 7 that installing certain automatic updates causes the computer to not complete the boot process, requiring System Restore, then going back, then trying all the updates one-by-one to see which one broke the OS.
Re: (Score:2)
I think quite a few of us now solve this problem by not installing any Windows 7 updates by default, and then selectively applying security updates if there's an identified need for them.
Re: (Score:1)
Which is a hell of a lot better than Windows 10, on which you will be unable to refuse the system-breaking update.