Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Android Google Open Source Operating Systems Software News Build Entertainment Technology

Android Wear 2.0 Gets A Keyboard, Standalone Apps, Activity Recognition, New UI (techcrunch.com) 31

An anonymous reader writes: Google unveiled the biggest update to Android Wear yet at Google I/O -- Android Wear version 2.0. Google VP of Engineering for Android Wear David Singleton said the new version represents a "holistic pass across the design of the whole system" and focuses on providing users more glanceable information, improved messaging tools (including support for keyboards, handwriting recognition and smart replies), as well as new fitness and wellness features. The design features improved Material Design aesthetics with an emphasis on color. By default, the navigation drawer is always at the top of the screen and notifications themselves will always show up at the bottom. Android Wear 2.0 features standalone apps that communicate directly over the Internet via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cellular. Apps are no longer exclusively relying on a tethered phone or cloud syncing. There's a Complications API, which allows developers to pass raw data to watch faces. Wear 2.0 adds two new input methods: a swipe-style keyboard for typing and a handwriting recognition mode to sketch letters on your watch's screen to spell out messages. There have also been various Google Fit-related improvements to make Android Wear watches better fitness trackers. Android Wear 2.0 is available today as a developer preview, with the finished product being released this fall.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Android Wear 2.0 Gets A Keyboard, Standalone Apps, Activity Recognition, New UI

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Stop upgrading and updating and changing everything every few months or even years. You need to let people, both users and programmers, catch up to what your hardware and software can do.

    If all you have is a moving target, like SEGA did by launching one console, one upgrade and two more consoles within only a few years, people will move to something more stable. Programmers don't want to waste time making something that will only be used for a few months or a year or two, so they move to something more stab

  • by tom229 ( 1640685 ) on Thursday May 19, 2016 @08:10AM (#52140981)
    Virtually all of this will just make battery life worse, which is the biggest problem with wearables today. They keep trying to jam wearables down our throat without the necessary battery technology to make them viable. Nobody wants to charge their watch every day for the confidence of checking a text message on it.
    • by Shatrat ( 855151 )

      The Withings Activite uses a lithium button cell that lasts for months and costs less than a dollar a piece. It's not a full blown smart watch, more of a health monitor with some analog feedback on the dial. It does seem like the least ugly and most practical wearable available right now. I was considering buying one, but I like the dumbwatch I already have. I agree with you on battery tech. I wouldn't be able to stand having to charge my phone and my watch every day.

    • by quetwo ( 1203948 )

      I've got the Moto 360, and it lasts about 36 hours on heavy use, and about 48 hours with my normal use. This is acceptable in my case -- I drop it on the charging cradle when I go to bed, and it's ready when I'm up. It only takes about 45 minutes for a full charge, so even charging it when I'm getting ready in the morning is not a problem.

      There are other brands that I know are better and many more that have worse battery life. It's a consideration, like like battery life on a phone. But in my case, I fe

    • I love my now fairly old Moto 360. I get about a day and a half of battery life out of it and it usually outlasts my phone and yet fully charges in less than an hour. I charge my phone everyday and just drop my watch on its charger at night. It is no big deal. I love being able to create and changes faces when I want as well as being able to see notifications, appointments, and calls without taking out my phone. Although I own several other nice dumb watches, I don't think I could ever go back.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by tom229 ( 1640685 )
        Most people aren't willing to trade a time piece that lasts several months for one that lasts a mere day simply because it can bluetooth to their phone. You are the exception sir.
  • Version 2.0 exists because version 1.0 was an abject failure in the market. Also applies to Microsoft Surface which is up to version 4 with still no buyers in sight.
    • by Lumpy ( 12016 )

      Surface at it's pricepoint? yep. I bought one used from a student that was desperate for money. got a nice 128gig surface pro with all accessories for $150. at that price it's a fantastic device.

      At the $1600 price point.... it's a failure.

    • by tom229 ( 1640685 )
      I've always wanted to buy one, but they cost more than a MacBook (which I also don't buy) and they run their horrible new versions of Windows with no downgrade options. It's been humorous to watch Microsoft stop feasting on the elephant carcass they already caught, to chase Apple around, nipping at their heels but never quite catching them. I wonder how much money they've burnt in the last 5+ years on this nonsense.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • with the finished product being released this fall.

    It is already fall (autumn) in the southern hemisphere.

Think of it! With VLSI we can pack 100 ENIACs in 1 sq. cm.!

Working...