Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AT&T Businesses Communications The Almighty Buck United States

AT&T Denies Refunds For DirecTV Now Customers, Despite the Service's Performance Issues (techcrunch.com) 88

A number of consumers report they're unable to get a refund for their subscription to AT&T's recently launched streaming service, DirecTV Now -- something they've requested after being unhappy with the new service's performance. From a report on TechCrunch: According to several postings on AT&T's official forums, customers found the only way to get help was through a hard-to-find chat feature, and when they asked the AT&T reps about refunds, the customers were told they were not offered. Writes one user with the handle EIUdrummerboy, after attempting to get a refund via chat, the rep told them specifically: "We do not currently have a policy in place to offer any refunds."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

AT&T Denies Refunds For DirecTV Now Customers, Despite the Service's Performance Issues

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:04PM (#53679779)

    AT&T are pretty much just crooks

  • FCC Complaint (Score:5, Informative)

    by PRMan ( 959735 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:07PM (#53679793)
    As with everything AT&T, they only respond to FCC complaints. People who file FCC complaints HAVE been getting refunds.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Also file a complaint with you state's AG office.

    • Re:FCC Complaint (Score:4, Informative)

      by LeftCoastThinker ( 4697521 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @09:02PM (#53680257)

      This first, file the FCC complaint, and this is also why I pay for these services with my credit card. You can do a charge back and block them from further charges with a simple note to your credit card company. It costs AT&T $35 a pop plus all the involuntary refunds. If a few million users did this, it would definitely get some attention at very high levels. Enough charge backs and the vendor may also lose their accreditation with that credit card (i.e. Visa/MC/American Express) which is a huge deal for them.

    • by SeaFox ( 739806 )

      What are they going to get done in five days? [arstechnica.com]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:12PM (#53679819)

    in Seattle, and they sold quite a few customers that didn't have south-facing apartment in my two buildings. They knew damn well that anyone without a south facing apartment couldn't get DirectTV and even the people with south-facing apartments couldn't get it either due to a taller building to the south that was two stories taller than our own building couldn't either, but they still tried to hold them to a contract. Dial-up and ISDN are the fast connections we can get, but that didn't stop them from still trying to collect.

    • Re:I'm a maintence guy in an apartment building...

      That is fortuitous. I'm in 310. The garage disposer is on the fritz and the heeter is out intermittently.

  • This is by design (Score:4, Insightful)

    by wbr1 ( 2538558 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:15PM (#53679835)
    This of course runs afoul of many countries consumer protection laws. And, any corporation this size has enough funds and legal staff to know this. It also has the ability to set up proper policies before launching a service. Even when rushing to be third to market.

    However, AT&T also knows that any punishment is likely to be a slap on the wrist and an order to comply in the future and is deemed an acceptable expense, and possibly lesser than the expense to set it up right, and respect customers.

    • by Dog-Cow ( 21281 )

      This, of course, has absolutely nothing to do with "many countries", because AT&T does business in one. You can go away now.

    • by EvilSS ( 557649 )

      This of course runs afoul of many countries consumer protection laws. And, any corporation this size has enough funds and legal staff to know this. It also has the ability to set up proper policies before launching a service. Even when rushing to be third to market.

      However, AT&T also knows that any punishment is likely to be a slap on the wrist and an order to comply in the future and is deemed an acceptable expense, and possibly lesser than the expense to set it up right, and respect customers.

      So? It only matters if it runs afoul of one country's consumer protections laws: the US. AT&T doesn't sell Directv Now outside the US so while it's nice other countries have better consumer protection laws, it really doesn't apply to this situation at all.

  • I gave it up before trial was over, due to reception issues.
  • by rmdingler ( 1955220 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:27PM (#53679895) Journal

    ...the rep told them specifically: "We do not currently have a policy in place to offer any refunds."

    As a business owner, it had never occurred to me to present such a clever argument.

    • ...the rep told them specifically: "We do not currently have a policy in place to offer any refunds."

      As a business owner, it had never occurred to me to present such a clever argument.

      I can't wait to use that one on the next person that asks for a refund..."Gee whiz, we'd love to give you your money back but we just never came up with a way to do it...sorry!"

  • It's not DrectTVNow, it's DirectTVNom (nom). It's tasty!
  • by TsuruchiBrian ( 2731979 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:41PM (#53679959)

    I tried to return my season ticket, but they wouldn't give me my money back. They said THEY wanted it.

    --Lenny

    As with everything in life a Simpsons quote captures the heart of the issue. AT&T will say that they *can't* give you your money back, but in reality it just boils down to the fact that they want to have your money more than they want you to have it.

  • by known_coward_69 ( 4151743 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @07:47PM (#53679985)

    it's 2017 and stupid people still pre-order expensive electronics without seeing it in the store, pre-order games that don't work cause of bugs or service issues for weeks at a time and now they sign up for streaming services at release without seeing other people's experience

    you get what you deserve

  • by aussersterne ( 212916 ) on Monday January 16, 2017 @08:21PM (#53680097) Homepage

    Go to your card provider (Visa/MC/Discover/Amex) and tell them to remove the charge because the service was not rendered and/or the charge was improper.

    They will.

    Once AT&T starts getting a lot of chargebacks, they will do something about it.

    I had this sort of thing happen do me years back in NYC with Verizon. I called to cancel, was given a confirmation # and everything, and was still billed again the next month. When called again, furious, the manager I was escalated to said that they could not offer a refund because they did not have that policy. I said I don't care about policy, give me a refund, and he said there was literally no way for him to do that in the system and suggested (of course) that I accept the service for a month, since I'd already paid for it, and then if I didn't want it next month, I could call and cancel [n.b. AGAIN] then.

    I hung up on him, dialed Visa, and had them charge it back. Of course THAT got Verizon's attention and a day or two later I was called by retention or some similar department to offer me a discount if I would stay on, along with a lot of apology garbage.

    I told them I'd rather eat a bug.

    • i canceled after 3 months because direcTV was about half spam channels (home shopping & infomercials) and they said i had to pay for a whole year contract, i immediately called my credit card company and told them i lost the card and to refuse any future charges on it and send me a new card with a new number, that left directv out in the cold with a defunct card number so they cant rob me for a year's worth of payments
    • Go to your card provider (Visa/MC/Discover/Amex) and tell them to remove the charge because the service was not rendered and/or the charge was improper.

      They will.

      Actually that was how things work. But I'm not so sure that this is how things are any more with credit card companies. And I speak from personal experience.

      Things definitely did work that way in the past, but they changed after the "Great Recession". I never lost a dispute until the Great Recession happened. Short version - I bought 2 airline tickets on a small foreign carrier and through various circumstances could not make the trip. I called the carrier and asked for a credit against a futu

    • Sounds like how we ended up canceling our news paper subscription a couple of months ago. I wonder if most people just don't know about chargebacks so companies think they can just fuck over people and get away with it most of the time or if they just assume most people will just take it. Because of the ability to issue a chargeback and other protections I try to run everything I can through my credit card. It gets paid off in full, current outstanding balance not just previous statement balance, each month
  • they dont tell new customers singing up that about half the channels with DirecTV is all home shopping channels! or some other sort if infomertials (spam) yup, that right when you buy DirectTV subscription you are basically paying them to spam you
    • by EvilSS ( 557649 )
      Pretty sure there are none of those on the directv now service. Not that regular cable channels are much better content wise than rotating infomercials anyway....
  • Yeah, I haven't asked for a refund YET; but was thinking about it. It is horrible. It only works with IE or Chrome and then only sometimes. It keeps giving a wrong browser page even saying only works with Chrome or Internet Explorer 11 - gives the error page when running IE11 or Chrome. Then, when it does come up in the browser, it won't actually start streaming - only timing out. I have Comcast internet and I have tried to use it everyday for a week; but it has only started streaming one default show ONCE
  • A class action lawsuit is needed to get AT&T to pay up. No one individual is going to sue for a couple hundred bucks. Go get 'em lawyers.
  • No shit!

    Now that you know I'm being honest, we're talking about a phone company that doesn't even know it's own phone numbers. I can't tell you how many times their business support people have transferred me to non-existent internal phone lines, leaving me to call back and go through it all again.

  • From article:

    Another, who tried to cancel their 7-day free trial was denied a refund even though they cancelled within a week. (The rep told them they had to cancel by 7 PM EST, and the customer was on central time, making them an hour late).

    ...and this, ATT, is why having globalized and outsourced call centers, with machine making decisions that Humans can't override costs, more money than just fucking paying people to do a job and make rational decisions in customer service.

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...