Microsoft Is Laying off 'Thousands' of Staff in a Major Global Sales Reorganization (techcrunch.com) 118
An anonymous reader shares a report: Microsoft is poised to layoff thousands of employees worldwide in a move to reorganize its salesforce. A source with knowledge of the planned downsizing told TechCrunch that the U.S. firm would lay off "thousands" of staff across the world. The restructuring is set to include an organizational merger that involves its enterprise customer unit and one or more of its SME-focused divisions. The changes are set to be announced this coming week, we understand. Microsoft declined to comment. Earlier this weekend, the Puget Sound Business Journal, Bloomberg and The Seattle Times all reported 'major' layoffs related to a move to increase the emphasis on cloud services within Microsoft's sales teams worldwide. Bloomberg said the redundancies would be "some of the most significant in the sales force in years."
QA (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Windows 10 does not use an internal QA staff. It uses Tata Consultancy Group in Bangalore. It's a QA contracting firm that handles firmware and software QA for much of the Fortune 500.
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:QA (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Sure, OSX does all that too, but then I'd have to pay twice as much for half the performance because of the Apple hardware.
I don't know what you're going on about. On a like for like comparison as much as possible, Apple laptops cost about the same or even less than their competition, over the past 8 years when I've bought laptops. Now, you can rightfully argue that the laptop you are happy with costs less than Apple, but if you're needing Apple hardware specs or better, you're not looking any cheaper as far as laptops go. I wish I could say the same about their desktops, hopefully they'll get it right with the desktop (mac pr
Re: (Score:1)
I bought my last laptop a year and a half ago, and it was true then. So I just looked, it appears that Dell's XPS 15" 4K system w/ 1 year premium support comes in at $2188 vs a similarly configured base 15" MBP at $2299 now. (I only bothered with Dell as it was the first thing that looked close spec wise and the pricing hadn't changed all that much from There's a few differences, of course, the 4K touchscreen vs a 2K non touch screen, but the 4K system with any version of windows still has scaling problems
Re: (Score:1)
You cherry picked "a" Dell to make your case.
I picked the system that came closest to meeting my needs a little over a year ago. No cherry picking at all. The MSI rigs didn't cut it then, so I didn't review them again.
Re: (Score:1)
Just simply say, "Hey, wow, looks I was incorrect with regards to Apple's pricing compared to equivalent specs from its competitors' laptop hardware offerings."
As countered throughout this thread's offered comparisons there's just not that major of a difference with equivalent hardware. You get differences if you chop 40% of the performance by selecting a much lesser or older CPU, less ram, or cheaper and much slower SSDs. That wasn't the argument - the argument was that like for like, or as close as you can get, Apple hardware is quite competitive. They just don't offer the range of budget options others do, but that's not what we're comparing here. Budget option
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, and let me know when the 15" MBP with the Core i7 doesn't cost $2399.
Apple 15" MBP no touch pad, upgraded to 512 SSD and the mid-level CPU (100MHz slower peak, but 1 step up would put it several hundred higher)
$2299 - already upgraded
This Asus UX501VW laptop with a Core i7-6700HQ, 4K IPS touchscreen, 512GB PCIe SSD, 16GB DDR4 RAM, is $1079 and has VASTLY better specs than the $2399 MBP in practically all categories. [neweggbusiness.com]
Also, more expensive comparable PC laptops [neweggbusiness.com] that are still priced lower than the 15" MBP only get better and make the (still using outdated DDR3 for some reason...) MBP look like a joke.
I checked the MSI series out when I purchased my last one a little over a year ago - they weren't ready for prime time then, and I'll bet that still holds true today. You will be making tradeoffs with th
Re: (Score:1)
It's $1000 LESS than your MacBook and nearly matches specs...
It didn't come close.
It does NOT however, outclass laptops spec for spec. Period. Quit moving the goalposts.
Actually, it appears it does except for gaming laptops. That is not a reason anyone ever buys a mac today. But, you keep on trying to move the goalposts. Since the top end MBP has a faster CPU than Alienware's top end gaming rig, I'd say CPUs are at least on par with anything else out there today. Memory is limited, but that's directly due to battery life. It is a laptop, and that's one thing I've always needed in a laptop - longer battery life. SSDs in macs are absolutely top end. Lapt
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.pcworld.com/article... [pcworld.com]
Conclusion On paper, the Zenbook Pro is an incredible deal. It features some extremely high-end parts, yet is amazingly affordable compared to its competitors. After spending time with it, however, it becomes clear why it's less expensive, particularly when compared to the Dell XPS 15 with the exact same specs. The Zenbook Pro'ss performance is slightly weaker, and it has subpar speakers and little oddities like uneven keyboard backlighting and that slap-dash Thunderbolt sticker.
If all you care about is GPU, RAM, CPU and HDD then do not buy a Mac. If you're willing to put up with awful keyboards and trackpads and substandard displays to save some money, there are better options. Honestly, I'm not being sarcastic.
Re: (Score:1)
Dell XPS 15 with 4K screen, 16GB ram, 512 SSD (which will be slower than the included Apple SSD, but I'll trade that for the 4K resolution).
Apple 15" MBP no touch pad, upgraded to 512 SSD and the mid-level CPU (100MHz slower peak, but 1 step up would put it several hundred higher)
Dell: $2188
Apple: $2299
Re: (Score:3)
but if you're needing Apple hardware specs or better
then you go Apple, unless you need better, in which case you can't go Apple.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
To keep up battery life, they have to use slower CPUs and GPUs, sub-4k displays, and LPDDR (that last one I don't really have a problem with, except that it limits the amount of RAM as well)
Well, learned something new there - LPDDR is why we do not yet have more than 16GB of RAM on MBPs. Should JEDEC ever get around to extending or creating a new standard that supports 24/32GB, it'd be nice. And since LPDDR seems to be a significant contributor to the longer battery life (note all the other laptops with standard replaceable RAM having 50% or less battery life) I'd say that's a trade-off I'm willing to live with. As for GPUs, Apple has seriously tweaked the discrete vs integrated GPU usage so w
Re: (Score:2)
" On a like for like comparison as much as possible, Apple laptops cost about the same or even less than their competition"
Only if you start with the apple laptop as the baseline, and then customize the PC to match.
This is a bogus approach.
It frames the comparison relative to what apple packaged as opposed to what I want to buy.
Whenever I shop Apple its also an exercise in irritation, I don't want the fastest CPU but I'm forced to pay for it to get the other stuff I want. With a PC I can shop for what i act
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Then you don't need what Apple's selling, and that's fine.
No, it's not fine. Its irritating.
I do need [..]
I hope, for your sake, for next years model apple doesn't decide what you need isn't important.
My current 2015 mbp is tolerable. The missing ethernet is annoying. The new ones... are a joke. More stuff I need stripped out (function keys, ports...) replaced with stuff I don't need like "touchbar and apple pay".
Re: (Score:1)
Then buy the non touchbar version. I fully concur I have no desire to get a touchbar version. I also need function keys and the ESC key is an especially fond key for me. I touch-type, a touchbar isn't going to lend itself well to what I need. So I do hope they continue offering a non-touchbar version. If they don't, I'll likely hang onto the last model that does offer normal keys and then start looking for an alternative 5 years down the road. My shortest lifespan of a mac laptop has been 5 years, I still h
Re: (Score:2)
"Then buy the non touchbar version."
Sure... unless they discontinue it. Which is highly likely.
"My shortest lifespan of a mac laptop has been 5 years, I still have a 2006 MBP running and in daily use"
My old macbook pro is also still in daily use (2010ish)... but a big part of its longevity is is because I was able to add ram and replace the original 5400rpm drive with an SSD. That's a big part of the longevity proposition, and apple's newer stuff doesn't have that. If the new units are long lived its going
Re: (Score:1)
Sure... unless they discontinue it [non touchbar version]. Which is highly likely.
They hopefully learned a lesson with the mac pro. I'm willing to bet a larger proportion of the user base than Apple thinks is really attached to those keys.
My old macbook pro is also still in daily use (2010ish)... but a big part of its longevity is is because I was able to add ram and replace the original 5400rpm drive with an SSD. That's a big part of the longevity proposition, and apple's newer stuff doesn't have that. If the new units are long lived its going to be in spite of apple not thanks to them.
The newer stuff is already using hardware that is as fast and maxed out as possible. LPDDR3 is maxed out at 16GB, which is what the MBPs come with. Newer technology for bigger memory will require hardware support that will need a new logic board, at the least. I'm surprised Apple decided to solder the NVMe chips directly to the board. Hopefully that is
Re: (Score:1)
The CPU in the Alienware is factory overclocked to 4.4GHz though. It is faster.
That would be quite a neat trick, considering the base is 2.9GHz for that CPU. Maybe they're advertising the max turbo mode? I don't know or care, really, because if they're really running that CPU at a base 4.4GHz, it'd a) be smoking hot b) be limited in life span, and c) be an indicator that the battery might last an hour. Also, I'd recommend an asbestos blanket for your lap.
Thanks for pointing that out. LPDDR3 is even slower than DDR3 making it just that much worse than DDR4. Oh and it's DOUBLE the DDR4.
And yet in performance benchmarks for things that matter - ie, real life work, LPDDR3 seems to have exactly 0 effect.
Most people don't carry their laptops everywhere with them. They tend to go in the car to and from home and work. For anything else we use our smartphones and tablets. My laptop is supposed to be a replacement for a full desktop PC, not some high price, low spec Macbook shit.
Then you are no
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the one thing I do that I currently cannot really do on Linux or virtualized Windows is gaming. I hope that VM Vulcan-passthrough will work reasonably before Win7 goes out of maintenance. If not, I will go for one gaming PC with nothing else on it, no email, no browsing (except game-related) and a Linux box for everything else. I already do something similar with customer laptops, just need to get a 4-way KVM switch and that is it.
Re: (Score:2)
the one thing I do that I currently cannot really do on Linux or virtualized Windows is gaming.
1) We must live on different planets, because on the planet I live on, Linux has more games than I can possibly make time to play, and they work great. For example, Doom is super sweet. Dota2 works great. Zillions of great indy games from Humble. Zillions of games from Steam. Most Windows titles work fine on Wine these days. Vulkan is the icing on the cake... performance out the proverbial yinyang.
2) Windows virtualization on Linux is, roughly speaking, perfect, including GPU virtualization. If you're too l
Re: (Score:2)
Call me when Ghost Recon Wildlands plays on Linux...
Re: (Score:1)
I don't care about your gaming faves, I care about mine. Sorry.
Re: (Score:2)
No, but you can't claim that Linux is just as good as Windows then, now can you?
What games play only on Linux and not Windows? There might be a few, but the balance is solidly on the side of Windows.
I first used Linux in the 90's, it has improved by leaps and bounds since then, but it is not going to take over the desktop, and the reasons are not technical in nature...
Re: (Score:2)
I don't claim that Linux is as good as Windows. I claim that Linux is better.
Re: (Score:2)
And for gaming, it isn't. Full stop.
Full idiot. Technically, Linux is better for games than Windows. Higher framerates, smoother update. Vulkan sealed the deal on that. You actually can run a stream and a game server at the same time without hitting oral/anal inversions like Windows gets. (Yes it's true son, check out the frequent reports of game lockups when streaming on Windows.)
There is exactly one thing that prevents some titles from getting onto Linux: illegal trustmaking activity by Microsoft. And that last bastion of Mordor is starting
Re: (Score:2)
No, but you can't claim that Linux is just as good as Windows then, now can you?
Oh wow, you got me! You're right. Linux is way better than Windows. Waaaaaaaaaaaay better. That's why it rules the world.
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't rule the desktop and it never will...
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't rule the desktop and it never will...
Oh yes it will. 1) Own the phone market 2) Own the cloud "office as a service" space 3) Cloud users adopt offline office apps running under Chrome and Firefox with V8 (compatible with cloud services and not giving a fuck about docx) 3) Microsoft shrinks and dies 4) Everybody parties and Russia can't hack
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know where you get your delusions, laser brains...
Re: (Score:2)
Heh, you are a card, you are. Quit your day job, you will make it big as a comedian. As if it is not already a fact that Linux is by far the most installed and used operating system in the known universe.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't care about your gaming faves, I care about mine. Sorry.
Ooh, looky here, a special snowflake with mod points was triggered.
Re: (Score:2)
the one thing I do that I currently cannot really do on Linux or virtualized Windows is gaming.
1) We must live on different planets, because on the planet I live on, Linux has more games than I can possibly make time to play, and they work great.
I don't care about your gaming faves, I care about mine. Sorry. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Windows virtualization on Linux is, roughly speaking, perfect, including GPU virtualization. If you're too lazy to configure Wine then use VMware.
Horse shit. Emulation of older versions of DirectX is pretty good, but there's still lots of games which are unplayable in either vmware or wine, to say nothing of other software packages. And wine is the poster child for regressions, so you wind up having to maintain umpty-ump wine versions.
I have a Linux box and a Windows box, and I even have linux on a small M.2 SSD in my Windows box for those times when I need it to save my bacon. I boot it up in vmware occasionally so that I can update it. I think Linu
Re: (Score:2)
...there's still lots of games which are unplayable in [either] vmware...
You're making that up.
Re: (Score:2)
As I have tried this from time to time for the last 10 years or so, I can only call you utterly clueless.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:QA (Score:4, Funny)
Come on. Surely they won't get rid of both of them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: QA (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Guessing they're sacking the rest of their QA staff, since Windows 10 is clearly coming along so nicely. /snark
I would say that the Samsung, and other tablet makers that use Android, etc, have eaten into MS sales and MS client use. Today, how may people actually write letters or do long documents?
I use wps.com with Linux (MS Clone that is just great). I also use LibreOffice, which generally comes with some Linux distributions.
So, when desktop sales are down, when 80+% of servers are Linux based, a company can't keep staff that only works 4 hours per day.
Who lays off their Sales people? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The company top management forced the crappy Metro UI and insane spyware into Windows. And when sales drop, the blame is of course on salesmen. As a former Windows application software developer I can only wonder how fast the MS has managed to alienate its most loyal customers and developers. Only a five years ago the Windows was the easiest and most profitable platform to develop for, but not anymore.
Re:Who lays off their Sales people? (Score:5, Interesting)
Indeed. I know of at least one large company (~50k employees) that will go all web-terminal before Win7 goes out of support. They looked at Win10 and decided that there was no way they would move to a platform with an ever-changing UI. Of course, all their internal stuff is already all web-apps, they just need to replace MS office with something web-based. But this is a good thing as the MS monopoly has done a huge disservice to the world.
Re: (Score:2)
they just need to replace MS office with something web-based
They could use something like rollApp [rollapp.com], but there's the pesky problem of Outlook, which still lacks an open-source equivalent that duplicates most of its functionality. I would say Outlook is the very last strangle-hold Microsoft has on the corporate market. Every other one of its platforms (the rest of Office, SCCM, Server/Active Directory) contains more than adequate FOSS replacements.
Re: (Score:3)
... but there's the pesky problem of Outlook, which still lacks an open-source equivalent that duplicates most of its functionality. I would say Outlook is the very last strangle-hold Microsoft has on the corporate market.
What functionality is that, specifically? And I mean that as a serious question.
I don't see anything which Outlook does but other calendar and mail solutions do not - and I work with a lot of Outlook users. When we've talked about moving them off Outlook, there has been significant pushback... but it seems to be all about fear of change. They can't articulate anything Outlook does which other software does not also do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is a salesperson needs to do at least 2 things
1) Sale the product
2) Prove the sale would not have happened without them
And this does not even address the quotas and goals that companies set (then change if the goal is obtained.)
Re: (Score:2)
because sales people clearly produce something tangible lol
You don't have to read many Slashdot comments before you realize that most tech-oriented people are going to suck when it comes to relating to customers. That's why you need sales people, who have a different skill set and - unlike the aforementioned tech folks - know how not to piss off most of the people they meet.
Re: (Score:3)
Something ain't right..... mass layoffs in sales?
Yes, it's awful. "Microsoft", "salesforce" and "layoffs" in the same sentence! I never thought I'd see the day, you should see my tears. I'm starting a collection to support those poor guys until they can land a job in some Indian "Windows" support call centre..
Re: (Score:2)
Something ain't right.
True. Microsoft is teh shrink. Rats jumping off. Couldn't happen to a more deserving gang of thugs.
Re: (Score:2)
Work for the evil empire - get shafted ... (Score:2)
... as soon as they do not think they need you anymore. I find it really hard to feel any kind of compassion for those that will get hit.
Typical new fiscal year reorg (Score:4, Informative)
Think Different (Score:1)
Hey Microsoft, instead of reorganizing your sales force, try stop sucking.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Their .NET tools are just a honey pot with a thousand ways to lock you in
My hobo index is up (Score:2)
My hobo index is a leading, and trailing, economic indicator. I live in a small city near the railyard. The number of transients hopping off of the train seems to be at a seasonally adjusted high. As most of these people are the last to be hired and the first to be laid off the indicator is showing a slowing economy. Couple it with the demise of HP, CA, and other legacy companies and I smell a trend.
Re: (Score:1)
The end of decades often brings a recession. We are just about due.
Finally, year of the Linux Desktop! (Score:2)
(insert evil laugh here)
Seriously, this is kind of normal. My MS sales reps and my TAM are all mono-focused on the Cloud and what Azure and Azure Government can do for us to leverage computing (as well as ensure future subscriptions).
They don't even mention phones or mobile devices anymore. The focus is now "how can we move your 200TB of on prem storage into Azure and get your on a subscription model."
PS: Slashdot mods, sorry about the OT introdu
Re: "Layoff" is not a verb, dammit. (Score:2, Funny)
Fuckoff.
License simplification (Score:1)
W00t! (Score:1)
Start the layoffs with the unpaid beta testers/users !
Microsoft is reorganising... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Ass!
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Get a huge bonus for selling the silverware and then get out with a golden parachute. They are a force of destruction, nothing else.
Re: (Score:2)