Internal Kaspersky Investigation Says NSA Worker's Computer Was Infested with Malware (vice.com) 141
A reader shares a report: The personal computer of an NSA worker who took government hacking tools and classified documents home with him was infected with a backdoor trojan, unrelated to these tools, that could have been used by criminal hackers to steal the US government files, according to a new report being released Thursday by Kaspersky Lab in response to recent allegations against the company. The Moscow-based antivirus firm, which has been accused of using its security software to improperly grab NSA hacking tools and classified documents from the NSA worker's home computer and provide them to the Russian government, says the worker had at least 120 other malicious files on his home computer in addition to the backdoor, and that the latter, which had purportedly been created by a Russian criminal hacker and sold in an underground forum, was trying to actively communicate with a malicious command-and-control server during the time Kaspersky is accused of siphoning the US government files from the worker's computer. Costin Raiu, director of the company's Global Research and Analysis Team, told Motherboard that his company's software detected and prevented that communication but there was a period of time when the worker had disabled his Kaspersky software and left his computer unprotected. Raiu says they found evidence that the NSA worker may have been infected with a second backdoor as well, though they saw no sign of it trying to communicate with an external server so they don't know if it was active on his computer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL yeah, I'm surprised they even bothered to throw this out there to the neckbeards at this point. It doesn't seem to have much potential purpose other than lulz.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm so confused. I thought Russia was bad.
No, I'm sure they're paying you a decent rate with benefits as a government employee.
What is that in Russia anyway? $247 a month?
Slashdot should examine the IP addresses of the downmods of this sarcasm.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, the irony of your "(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option." sig.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Every country has spooks. None of them should be trusted, even if they have your best interests in mind, which if you're American the Russian SVR probably doesn't.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:But, but Russians hackers... (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm so confused. I thought Russia was bad.
All governments are "bad", they just use different methods.
That said, if any government gets to spy on me, I'd rather it be a foreign one, simply because they don't have as many opportunities to mess up my life, or terminate it.
Re:But, but Russians hackers... (Score:5, Interesting)
All governments are "bad"...
... but most of them are so grotesquely incompetent it doesn't matter too much.
As Bertrand Russell once observed, ancient Greece was somewhat redeemed by the fact that the police were so inefficient that most decent people were able to escape their attentions.
Re:Dobro pojalovati v rossyu (Score:4, Interesting)
Esli ti schitaesch normalinim pitki v politsii, ubiystva geev, korruptsiu na samom verhu vlasti
While "civilized" countries outsource their torture to Syria or Guantanamo Bay, the end result is similar. The Russians may be more overt, but that is because the west finds different methods of controlling the populace to be more effective (or possibly more cost-effective).
As for the gays, you may want to read up about Alan Turing, who never set foot in Russia.
Corruption is rife everywhere.
tebe konechno ponravitsya rossia.
What does it have to do with anything? I live in Canada, not in Russia, so I care more about CSIS than the FSB.
Russia is no paradise and Putin is no saint, but there are almost 200 countries in the world and a good number of them have a worse track record. Is that an excuse? Of course not, but I prefer to concentrate on what is happening in the country I live in and in those in which I have relatives and friends.
And come to think of it, so do you, since I didn't hear you complaining about Kim Jong-un's reign of terror or the atrocities of Bashar al-Assad.
Rasskazati kak ubili Litvinenko? A vedi on bil v foreign government.
Litvinenko was an ex FSB officer and a personal thorn in Putin's side, hardly a good example.
International assassinations are nothing new. Some countries use Polonium-210, other use drones.
Think what you wish for.
I did not "wish" for anything.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm so confused. I thought Russia was bad.
All governments are "bad", they just use different methods.
That said, if any government gets to spy on me, I'd rather it be a foreign one, simply because they don't have as many opportunities to mess up my life, or terminate it.
Really?
You don't think that a foreign government can:
1. Leak sensitive data online and make it look like it came from your computer?
2. Tell the US that you are a mole for them?
3. Send a foreign operative into your house to kill you?
Your own country is tasked to protect you. At the very least, it wants your taxes.
A foreign government doesn't give a hoot about you, your life, or your family.
Re: (Score:3)
Really?
You don't think that a foreign government can:
1. Leak sensitive data online and make it look like it came from your computer?
2. Tell the US that you are a mole for them?
3. Send a foreign operative into your house to kill you?
What for? Why expend the resources? Why bother with me? Don't they have enough domestic problems?
Your own country is tasked to protect you.
Tell that to Maher Arar.
A foreign government doesn't give a hoot about you, your life, or your family.
And that's the main reason I am less concerned about them than I am about my own.
Re: But, but Russians hackers... (Score:1)
You forgot that a foreign government can also manipulate your country's electorate into choosing a monumentally unsuitable, incompetent, damaging and divisive leader.
Re: (Score:2)
And this would have anything to do with anti-virus...how? I don't like it when Russians try to mess with US elections. (I don't like it when the US messes with other countries' elections, but I seem to be in a minority here.)
Re: But, but Russians hackers... (Score:1)
I was adding to the ways in which a foreign government can mess up someone's life.
Tangential maybe but this is about Kaspersky who are defending themselves from the accusation of being, hosting, or being used as a vector by, Russian spies.
We have this NSA analyst who has access to the source code of their spying tools, copies a zip file containing it and the tools themselves to a USB drive, takes it home and plugs it into his PC which is running antivirus software from a non-friendly state but that's OK bec
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry for the misinterpretation. I agree that the US government should avoid Kaspersky, and that no classified information should be on a computer running Kaspersky.
Re: (Score:3)
As far as I know all those people were either in Russua, Russian citizens, or both.
Therefore, they were terminated by their government (or a local one), which is exactly my point.
I criticize Putin quite vocally, but I doubt he's going to send assassins to Canada to silence me.
On the other hand, an encounter with the local police can easily ruin my day [wikipedia.org].
Yes we scan (Score:4, Funny)
In Russia, anti virus scans you
Re: (Score:2)
Droll! Moderate up.
Re: (Score:3)
Wait a second (Score:2)
Exactly how did Kapersky Lab determine this?
Re:Wait a second (Score:5, Funny)
Exactly how did Kapersky Lab determine this?
By siphoning all the files off his computer, DUH
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Exactly how did Kapersky Lab determine this?
The computer in question was running Kapersky antivirus software, which logs when it discovers viruses and malware.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The computer in question was running Kapersky antivirus software, which logs when it discovers viruses and malware.
But apparently doesn't actually delete or quarantine those malicious files, because they claim that they blocked the malware communication until the end user turned Kaspersky off. So, they detected it, and blocked the symptoms, but didn't bother to remove the infection.
Sounds like a pretty good reason not to run Kaspersky, to me.....
Re:Wait a second (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There was at least one incident where a virus checker found that an important Windows system file was malware, and removed it. Not good.
Re: (Score:2)
Virtually all virus scanners automatically quarantine files, which removes them from their original location, and sometimes encrypts them.
If you think that's unacceptable, then I guess you need to change the settings for anything you run.
laptop had 3 Stooges syndrome like Mr Burns (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or, the guy at FSB who normally writes their press releases had a day off, and the guy that was doing it that day didn't understand the engineering and made an "oops" claim.
Re: (Score:3)
It should be really fucking obvious but it seems you are a bit dim. The person didn't trust US security software for some reason and instead preferred to use Kaspersky security software for some reason. Now for normal security software, the default setting is to send back a report about infections found, so that the security companies can tighten security, that is like so obvious. The idiots world view presented by the lying American establishment is, if you hire a security guard to guard you property and h
Re: (Score:2)
That a NSA employee preferred Kaspersky software over US security software is extremely revealing ie probably you should prefer it as well...
That's like saying I should prefer to eat at McDonald's because an morbidly obese nutritionist prefers to eat at McDonald's. This is the last person on earth anyone should be trying to emulate when it comes to security. He failed at it miserably.
Also no concern at all that those malware reports are traceable back to an individual device? I get reporting new malware, but Kaspersky seems to be able to tie it back to specific client devices which certainly is a problem. There is no reason they need that to a
Re: (Score:2)
Ho ho ho, "'recursive': see 'recursive'".
This witch hunt is ridiculous. (Score:1)
I am American and I can see now that they have fully investigated and have found that they are not to be blamed. Case is closed so now can we go to get back to real problems?
Re: (Score:2)
Americans usually know American English.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Only if "American English" is a confused, ungrammatical mess that speakers of real English can barely understand.
As a qualified speaker of proper English, I can testify that most Russians I know speak better English than most Americans I know.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would your speech impediment affect your writing? Are you speaking into a microphone in Russian and having the people in the next room translate and transcribe it?
Re: This witch hunt is ridiculous. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I work with four Russians (actually only one is from Russia (Moscow), one is from Belarus, one from the Ukraine, and the other I'm not sure - but they're all native Russian language speakers.) They've lived in the US from 20 to 35 years. None of the four speak better English than most Americans I know. Two of them speak pretty well (the owners of the business), the other two range from passable to pretty bad. Even t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: This witch hunt is ridiculous. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No comrade! I am American from good family. My grandfather fought in the Great Patriotic War and my father was top Silovik. Would you like to borrow my thumb drive?
Re: (Score:2)
1) Some Americans are educated, and are fluent also in the Queen's English, and so do in fact differentiate. Although you are almost correct, in that there are very few such people who would also reject capitalization. Oh, wait, you're the one simply failed to quote it correctly! LOL
2) Americans often say "The States." It is used when on, or when discussing, vacations. "I'll reply to the emails when I get back in The States!" It places emphasis on their travel. It is also often used by people who have trave
Re: (Score:2)
If I want to emphasize the dialect I speak (or write), then I may say "American English". Certainly if I'm contrasting it with another variety of English. (I don't, however, write or say "The Queen's English", though I'm aware that the British used to do so. [I don't know current usage.] Instead I'll say "British English". Maybe I'm just a lazy typist.)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but whether "British English" is the default English depends on which country you are in. I *have* heard the language that Canadians speak called "Canadian", or even "Canuk", but normally one would say "English", and if one wanted to be specific "Canadian English". "English" is the generic term which includes, e.g., "Austrailian English", and even "Delhi English".
Re: (Score:2)
India is by far the largest country with English as a native language. Shouldn't that be default?
Re: (Score:2)
You have outed yourself sir !
We don't put spaces before our punctuation. But nice try.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but you do it poorly, also.
I am Russian, born and raised in cold tundra. In part that snows and where we drink vodka.
I can imagine that a lot easier with a Russian accent than yours...
Re: (Score:2)
Everybody knows that not all of Russia is cold snowy tundra, and everybody knows that all of Russia is where they drink vodka.
Except Moscow, which is cold, but they mostly drink bourbon.
Re: (Score:2)
When I visited it in the late 60s, kvass (fermented black bread, not very alcoholic) seemed to be popular also.
Re: (Score:2)
C'mon. Remember to drop your articles. Russian has no counterparts for "a", "an", and "the". You were "born and raised in cold tundra. In part that snows and where we drink vodka." That's a lot better as a written Russian accent.
Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)
NOW they're claiming there was malware on his system (oh, and that's not Kapersky's fault either because the user allegedly turned Kapersky off for a bit) so the leaks might have come from the malware and not from them?
I dunno... I would've led with the latter story FIRST...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Get real. Kaspersky is not out there to infect your computer, steal your secrets (which you stole in the first place), or lie to the world while they hack all the computers. Did you grow up in front of the TV or something? They produce a top AV suite and some of the best research out there, and have been doing so for over a decade. Do you think their record is made up? How often do you see the same amount of research and diligence from your American firms? Never. Ever.
Credible Internal Kaspersky Investigation (Score:3)
What possible reason would Kaspersky have to lie?
Also, in Soviet Russia, antivirus software installs you.
Re:Credible Internal Kaspersky Investigation (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Found the paid russian troll.
Found the broken sarcasm detector.
either way you slice it... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't work when it's turned off [Re:That's a low (Score:3, Informative)
Kaspersky's antivirus doesn't protect against malware? Now you've really thrown down the gauntlet!
It doesn't protect when it's turned off. From TFA:
Re:Doesn't work when it's turned off [Re:That's a (Score:4, Insightful)
Kaspersky's antivirus doesn't protect against malware? Now you've really thrown down the gauntlet!
It doesn't protect when it's turned off. From TFA:
I hope this dork got fired for such incompetence....
Re: (Score:2)
I hope this dork got fired for such incompetence....
Fired? He should be arrested for removing classified information without authorization. As a matter of fact anyone else find it kind of weird that we haven't heard of this happening yet? With all the other leaks, even if this one wasn't intentional they should have come down on him like the hand of god itself to make an example.
Re: (Score:2)
I feel safe knowing the quality of the personnel that spy on us and can have anyone they wish killed by a drone strike without a trial.
FTFY
Strat
Re: Doesn't work when it's turned off [Re:That's a (Score:2)
You know what this increasingly looks like? (Score:5, Insightful)
That looks like some NSA worker used a private USB stick to transfer some of the "internal tools" from his computer to another, forgot about it, stuck it into his computer at home that ran Kaspersky, Kaspersky scanned the stick, the AV heuristics determined the stuff looked kinda fishy, did a closer scan, and eventually sent a copy to Russia. Whether that happened after asking "Hey, dude, something's kinda odd about this file, mind if we analyzed it?" or not is kinda moot now.
And since it would be kinda embarrassing to admit such a blunder and that the NSA, of all agencies, handed their valuable zero days to the Russians... let's rather say those damn Russkies in general and Kaspersky in particular are "hacking" us.
Re: (Score:2)
The NSA really doesn't have that good a reputation for internal security, although it's probably better than it was when the agency was younger.
I seem to have misunderstood... (Score:2)
From the summary: "Raiu says they found evidence that the NSA worker may have been infected with a second backdoor as well..."
I thought computers only had one asshole, and it was generally referred to in polite society as "User".
Re: (Score:2)
Malware writer has malware? (Score:3, Interesting)
So let me get this straight... (Score:3, Insightful)
... he brought home non-government malware that might have stolen the government malware he was working on?
Re: (Score:2)
What's up with the NSA? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For all we know the NSA planted it to see who would pick it up because they realized the Russians had found the same exploit and ne
Re: (Score:2)
The GCHQ and NSA had crypto all worked out until the first networked home/desktop computers of the early 1980's. Real time decryption of junk standard global cryptic systems.
All commercial, NATO/mil/gov, many nations diplomatic, banking encryption that was sold as a standard in the West was totally understood by the NSA and GCHQ from the 1950-80's
The 1980's desktop computers gave the user the abilit
Re: (Score:2)
Those guys are supposed to have a semi-infinite annual budget. They are supposed to hire the best of the best. And they keep getting caught on all sorts of fracas. How incompetent can they be?
They do not pay very well and are quite anal to work for. What kind of people do you think they will get?
The should have known (Score:2)
It was a honeypot (Score:5, Interesting)
The contractor's computer was a honeypot. NSA hacking tools are being released on the dark web and they want to find out how they are being leaked. One theory was that Kaspersky was the culprit. So the NSA intentionally had a contractor put some NSA tools on a laptop that has Kaspersky, and had him put some other malware on there so that Kaspersky antivirus would detect it and wake up, then they watched to see if anyone scanned the NSA hacking tools and downloaded them.
What is happening now is the ensuing PR war. The public won't really learn the truth for years, if ever.
Re: (Score:2)
I think that's why they setup the honeypot: to find out how those tools were leaked. The story that a contractor traveled overseas with secret hacking tools on an laptop with no encrypted hard drive strains believability to the point where the "conspiracy theory logic" seems more reasonable. *shrugs*
Does anyone else thing it'd be funny to ... (Score:1)
... mock the NSA guy for this?
E.g. the Kaspersky guys could say "Look out! Here comes Typhoid Mary!" whenever they saw him. That shit would never get old.
Riiiiiight (Score:1)
And my grandfather, my dad, and I never served in units fighting Russian operatives during the Cold War(s).
Suuuure.
Try another one.
Maybe they'll byte.
wow, that is amazing (Score:2)
In case you're not able to piece it together (Score:1)
Kaspersky AV was installed on a machine full of malware and NSA hacking tools. Kaspersky AV then did its job perfectly, and retrieved samples of all the malware.
America then got wind of this, and because this is 1) embarassing to the NSA, and 2) proves that Kaspersky is a top product, America is now in a full head-on propaganda assault, spreading lies and misinformation that Kaspersky and the Russians (all of them, apparently) are hacking into your computers.
Wake the F up. The only two AV-suites you can tru
Slashdot is Kaspersky running dog (Score:2)
Jim Morrison proposes all-female anti-hacker squad (Score:2)
Echoing the sentiments of such security giants as Howlin' Wolf, Willie Dixon and Chicken Shack, Mr. Morrison, CEO of security company "Doors" was crystal clear about an increased role for women in protecting certain software and hardware ports from unanticipated penetration.
Re: (Score:2)
"The men don't know/But the little girls understand.