Ask Slashdot: What's the Best Media Streaming Device? 206
The network card died on Thelasko's smart TV -- and rather than spend $65 on a new one, they're considering buying a nice, simple streaming box.
I am running a Rygel server on my PC, but rarely use it... I primarily only watch Amazon Prime, Netflix, and YouTube for streaming, and am wondering what Slashdot users have found to be the best option. I'm considering Roku or Chromecast because they are well known and supported. However, I have heard a lot of news about Kodi devices being more hackable.
AppleTV? Amazon Fire TV? The Emtec GEM Box? Building your own from a Raspberry Pi? Leave your own thoughts and suggestions in the comments.
What's the best media streaming device?
AppleTV? Amazon Fire TV? The Emtec GEM Box? Building your own from a Raspberry Pi? Leave your own thoughts and suggestions in the comments.
What's the best media streaming device?
2nd gen FireTV (Score:3)
It has more horse power than the 3rd gen. Ethernet, wifi, SD card slot, and a USB port (which can support a 3rd party USB infrared + MCE remote). On top of that, it allows you to easily sideload 3rd party android apps, either by ADB or using the downloader app in their app store.
The Amazon app store has Netflix, Hulu, amazon Prime Video, and many other streaming video providers.
Unfortunately Amazon doesn't appear to manufacture them anymore, but they still sell certified refurbished ones.
(The newer FireTV 3rd gen is similar, but has 2/3 the processing power, no built-in ethernet, no SD card slot, and only supports an Amazon branded external Ethernet adapter in the USB slot, nothing else. It is a little cheaper,though.)
Re: (Score:3)
2nd Gen FireTV: https://www.amazon.com/Certifi... [amazon.com] ...
The Amazon app store has Netflix, Hulu, amazon Prime Video, and many other streaming video providers.
The poster specifically lists YouTube as a platform he watches, though. Will he be happy with Amazon's workaround for the Google/Amazon spat?
Re: (Score:2)
Also, it didn't support 60 FPS on YouTube back when it had the app. If you like video games or other 60 FPS content it's no good.
Google Chromecast and Kodi work fine.
Re: (Score:2)
if you want video games, don't go for an android-based box. streaming tv and music is 'easy'. being a fast and efficient gaming box is harder.
If gaming is your primary need, get a gaming box that supports streaming apps, not a streaming device that has a few games on it.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll second this vote.
And to answer someone else's question, YouTube via FireFox or Silk is just as good as the crappy app they used to have. I'm not sure how a webservice is a "workaround," though. It's YouTube in a browser.
If you can't get a 2nd Gen, get a Roku.
Roku (Score:3)
Good selection of them. I've got an older model and it does everything fine (supports 4k, but I don't have a 4k TV). Supports all the channels you've specified plus a few others (NFL Sunday ticket etc), and it's not tied to any of the content providers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
but if I wanted to play games, I'd get a console.
Until you visit the website for the indie game you want to buy, find the console you own, and see the notice "We are seeking a publisher to bring $game_title to $console_name" or "Interested in $game_title on $console_name? Sign up for our mailing list to be notified of when crowdfunding begins."
FireTV Stick + Kodi (Score:2)
That's basically it. The newer Fire TV stick is perfectly capable, unlike the laggy first gen. Install Kodi, use native apps for everything else, profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Does Kodi then run as an app on the Fire TV? I.e. does Amazon Prime still work? Also what about Netflix?
Asking because I have a little Kodi box and it's annoying that I need to use my shitty smart TV for Netflix / Prime.
Re: (Score:2)
Does Kodi then run as an app on the Fire TV? I.e. does Amazon Prime still work? Also what about Netflix?
Yes. You will still have to drop out to the normal apps for Netflix and Amazon Prime. Last I checked the Youtube plugin for Kodi wasn't very good, but I haven't tried it in a while.
AppleTV (Score:4, Informative)
Programability near max (Score:5, Informative)
I love it, but on the downside hackability is very low.
Sort of true, but programmability is super high and has a great IDE with a simulator. Anyone can register for a free dev account and play with making apps for the AppleTV, that do whatever you like. You can share them with friends via TestFlight...
Provided you have a recent Mac (Score:2)
programmability is super high and has a great IDE with a simulator. Anyone can register for a free dev account and play with making apps for the AppleTV
Only if your current computer happens to be both Apple brand and relatively recent. An old Mac won't work, nor will a Windows PC nor a Linux PC.
2009 is recent? (Score:2)
Only if your current computer happens to be both Apple brand and relatively recent. An old Mac won't work,
If by "relatively recent" you mean 2009 or so, then yes...
What makes you think you need a newer Mac? Anything 64 bit will do (even some models of Mac earlier than 2009 will work). More memory is better but I've see developers using a MacBook Air... If you can install Sierra on it it will work for Xcode. If someone had an interest they could find a usable machine for fairly cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
macOS Sierra system requirements on Mac mini: Mid 2010 or newer. My Mac mini is from 2009, the last model with the optical drive.
2010 is recent? (Score:2)
Ok, the Mac mini is a little behind some of the other systems (and apparently the MacBook Pro needs a 2010 model, where a MacBook was OK in 2009...).
But still, those are not "recent" systems. No-one points to a seven year old computer and says "that's a pretty recent model". Basically it means there are a ton of used systems around that could be purchased and used to run Xcode, today.
The nice thing is that High Sierrra (10.13) minimum system specs are the same, so it's not like any system you buy that can
More like a month or two (Score:2)
I thought it was around a month, but even so if you are just tinkering why is it a big deal to re-install it to the AppleTV? It's all done remotely, it's not like you have to hook the computer to the AppleTV. You just hit build and run in Xcode and then it's up and running again. If you develop something you really like, you can just pay the $100 fee and put it in the App Store...
Apple TV (Score:4, Informative)
It's easy to setup and it just works. No hacking required and simple enough to use for any age.
It supports Netflix, Amazon Prime, YouTube, sport networks, and many other TV sources. And if you want to play your own content, just install the Plex app and Plex on your computer for free. And when you're not using it, the screen savers are beautiful.
Re: (Score:2)
Hi, actual Apple TV owner here (Score:4, Interesting)
Designers can't seem to get it through their heads that the #1 priority for TV remote is for it to be usable without looking away from the TV
I have not issues with this remote at all. You can tell which way is up by feel, and since you are using the touch surface for most selections you can easily use the remote in the dark, without looking... the battery lasts ages too. The SIRI button is mainly used for searches, and works really well... also if you have an iPhone and a keyboard comes up on the Apple TV, you can just type on your phone.
So touchscreens and touchpads are out
Come on, the control is just swiping across the surface that is like an inch wide, or tapping one of the edges or the center - while you are holding it. Who on earth has such poor motor coordination they cannot manage this? Hint: My three year old niece can use it easily...
You want tactile buttons
They are all tactile. The buttons of course press, but the touchpad ALSO presses, you can feel if you are at an edge to press, you can feel when you are not near an edge to press. Also a touch surface is WAY WAY better for scrolling through lists of things than any buttons, much faster.
Re: Apple TV (Score:2)
I would not go that far but it is polarizing. I like it (but I dont positively love it either) but my dad hates it. Generally I like it better than a hordes-of-buttons monster remote and I can actually type fast with the onscreen keyboard.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The remote for the Apple TV absolutely sucks [knowyourmobile.com]. Designers can't seem to get it through their heads that the #1 priority for TV remote is for it to be usable without looking away from the TV. So touchscreens and touchpads are out (except maybe for keyboard entry). You want tactile buttons so people can find the proper button to press without looking away from the screen. (The Logitech Harmonies make this mistake too.)
There are 6 buttons on the Apple TV remote. Are you saying you can't manage 6 buttons without looking down? How do you touch type? With my Roku, I am stuck hitting the navigation buttons like 100 times to navigate anywhere and the navigation is painfully slow. With the Apple TV, I start a swipe and hold it and it keeps scrolling. The Roku is so much better than the Apple TV for a lot of things (like using a proxy to stream blacked out sports games, etc). The UI is not great at all, however.
Re: (Score:2)
Rather expensive though.
Just get a Raspberry Pi, install Kodi (literally 3 minutes) and share media via Windows shares, NFS, Plex or whatever you like. Your TV remote will control it seamlessly.
You are in full control, no walled garden, and it costs about â40 for everything. Future proof as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Last time I checked, some of Kodi's clients were pretty bad compared to the official ones. It's amazing that it works as well as it does, but a lot of those plugins have historically been pretty awful. Has the situation improved recently?
Re: (Score:3)
Definitely a Roku (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The streaming stick's best use case is on a TV where you can't place an additional b
Re: (Score:2)
No, but only an idiot would buy content from a place which locked playback to the devices of a single vendor.
iTunes on GPD Win (Score:2)
only an idiot would buy content from a place which locked playback to the devices of a single vendor.
By this, you're implying that millions of people who bought an NES, Game Boy, Super NES, Nintendo 64, Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo GameCube, Nintendo DS, Wii, Nintendo 3DS, Wii U, or Nintendo Switch are all idiots. Was this your intent?
Not to mention that any device running Windows (x86 or x86-64), such as the GPD Win 5.5" laptop [wikipedia.org], is also capable of playing iTunes purchases.
Re: (Score:2)
Take your strawman, and go fuck him.
Re: (Score:2)
But why is it desirable that interactive entertainment be treated specially compared to noninteractive entertainment?
Re: (Score:2)
There's no expectation when you purchase game X that it will play anywhere except on the specific platform you bought it for. Because they're coded to proprietary hardware, games are made for a specific platform from day one (with the recognition that they may also be available for other platforms). There's no expectation of cross-plat
Not locked to single vendor (Score:2)
No, but only an idiot would buy content from a place which locked playback to the devices of a single vendor.
Technically you can watch said content on a Windows box using iTunes... :-)
The fact remains Roku is not "everything", AppleTV is. You can hem and haw about reasons why you might choose one service over another to buy TV shows but that simple fact remains true... as does the fact that the AppleTV has a. lot more apps.
P.S. Where do YOU buy TV shows from? Hulu stinks, Prime Video has a worse interface
Re: (Score:3)
Will AppleTV show you if a movie you want to buy are cheaper on other services you have access to? Roku will because they don't play favorites. And also, Roku will even show you if you a movie you want to buy are available on streaming subscription service you already use.
While it does tend to "suggest" iTunes first, AppleTV lets you choose among all the found sources for a particular program/movie without having to jump through hoops of any sort. Sources and Costs, if any, are clearly noted on the listing's result page. Once you get used to the search-results UI, you don't even have to dive into a listing to figure out if there are multiple sources for the content.
All in all, even my extremely tech-averse housemate is able to navigate the AppleTV interface without trouble,
I prefer roku over chromecast (Score:3)
Chromecast is great if all you want to do is stream from a PC or phone but is fairly limited. It is basically a dumb device.
Roku on the other hand just works. It supports every major platform, is content provider neutral and you can even create your own channels. It is easy enough for kids or the technically challenged, and you don't need a separate device to control it.
Re: (Score:2)
I love my Roku. Simple and works.
Free apps for your phone/tablet to control it.
Just a great product.
Re: (Score:2)
Same here. We've used a Roku for years. It just works. SlingTV supports it, too, adding a range of live cable channels (CNN, FS1, FS2, NBCSN, etc.).
I haven't been impressed with live TV. I haven't tried Sling but I tried directv now and it was completely unusable on the Roku. Not sure if a different service or a different device would be better or not.
Odriod C2 running libreelec (Score:2)
Bit old but still my favorite.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll second this. It can play back 4k content in HEVC, making it pretty future proof too.
Nvidia Shield - but depends on your media sources (Score:3)
For a long time I ran an AppleTV and lived in the iTunes world. It was fine, a long time ago, but new/cheaper/better options exist. I personally rip all of my media to a Synology NAS and have started working with 4K media files. If I didn't have the 4k HDR h.265 media and the large digital collection I've amassed, I'd probably have gotten a FireTV - incredibly capable, plenty of streaming options, and cheap. But the 4k files that I have require a whole lot of horsepower, and I wanted to try to future-proof myself for a few years so I got an Nvidia Shield. Love the Android app options (it's fully rootable if you wanna get real custom with it), I run Plex on my Synology NAS with my own media, Kodi/Netflix/Prime all stream well, RetroArch works flawlessly with the Shield game controller so game emulation is super easy. All in all the Shield is pretty much a MPC replacement for fraction of the cost.
Re:Nvidia Shield - with 500GB expansion (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I also got a second game controller and the tv remove as well. I put it to sleep, my projector goes to sleep automatically. I hit the center button on the remote and it all "just wakes up" and is ready to go.
Oh, and no batteries
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Another nice feature is that you can set the Nvidia Shield to handle volume control internally so that things like using projectors and bluetooth speakers that don't understand volume control commands over HDMI can still have their volume controlled directly via the Nvidia Shield.
I also got a second game controller and the tv remove as well. I put it to sleep, my projector goes to sleep automatically. I hit the center button on the remote and it all "just wakes up" and is ready to go.
Oh, and no batteries for the remote or game controllers... all usb rechargable.
The AppleTV also lets you set up its Remote to control your TV or Receiver's volume control, too. Even ones like mine that no idea how to use anything but an IR remote! Took me about 5 seconds to set my AppleTV up to control my oldish, kinda obscure, Receiver's volume.
I'm sticking with (Score:2)
my Nexus Player. $50 3 years ago, well spent...
But I am kind of waiting for a working Amazon Prime/
Netflix and Kodi work well with my home NFS server with a ton of transcoded files from old time radio shows, ,movies and tv shows.
I did add an ethernet/multi-port USB hub and a 2.4 ghz wireless keyboard which made things much, much better...
My summary of the choices, plus recommendation (Score:2)
My observations, not from direct experience (except Roku, which I own), but from stuff I've read. I follow this space fairly closely.
Roku: for simplicity and the largest amount of (legal) streaming options. Some of the UI may not be as slick as the competition, but it's fine. Only some older/smaller channels have pretty old-looking UIs.
Android TV: if you want to pay more and have less simple, legal streaming options, but more general-purpose options, like web browsers, games, and yes, apps that facilitate a
Nintendo to shut down Wii Shop Channel (Score:2)
I feel that the previous two Nintendo consoles (the Wii and Wii-U) are also suitable for your list
Not once Nintendo shuts down Wii Shop Channel at the end of this year [theverge.com]. After that point, the YouTube, Amazon, Hulu, and Netflix clients for Wii will no longer be available to download, and server-side protocol changes may cause previously downloaded clients to cease to function.
I like the refurbished third-gen Apple TV (Score:3)
We've got two of them - they work well, support AirPlay, every streaming service we watch, and the price on the refurbished units was good. The new ATVs cost twice as much and don't really give the average person anything substantial over the third-gen units (unless you care about 4K).
But if you're not in the Apple ecosystem, there's really no strong argument for any Apple TV over a Roku box.
steer clear of Kodi. (Score:2)
PS3 (Score:2)
10 years later, I still can't find anything better. Maybe I need to learn to like stutters and hiccups though...
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, except I've upgraded to the PS4. It handles Amazon, Hulu, Netflix, and Youtube perfectly. It also talks to my Asus RT-N66U router with a built in media server so I can view videos that I've downloaded.
Old School Here (Score:2)
I find just a suitably specced computer connected to one of the HDMI ports on the TV is suitable for all my media needs.
Re: (Score:2)
Same here, put an old XP laptop to work for this, run VLC and pull video files from a shared drive. (It's one of the HP's that came with a little remote, so can turn on and off easily, and a wireless mouse.)
Cubox (Score:2)
Just bear in mind that it has the same limitations as a Raspberry Pi: it can be a fine media player, but it won't handle the DRM'd stuff. So no Netflix or Amazon Prime, but it does have a Youtube plugin (unless the situation with Netflix has changed?). It's also more expensive than a Raspberry Pi, but not i
Roku if you really want to watch stuff (Score:2)
Everything else is riddled with crashes, UI slugishness, missing apps and buffering. Roku just does one thing - playing video, including 4K/HDR on a USB powered stick - and does it really well. I have Android TV too - for Steam streaming with Moonlight and emulators for retro games - but I always use Roku remote for actually watching TV.
Blu-ray player (Score:3)
Those 3 streaming services I can access with my Sony Blu-ray player. It cost £49 and plays CDs, Dvds and Blu-ray. Hopefully Sony is not using it to install DRM malware on the rest of the devices on my home LAN.
AppleTV (Score:3)
It is the only one I have any experience with. I love that the 4th Gen connects to my plex server, and that I can connect to both my US and Japanese itunes accounts without logging out of either. This is useful since I have purchased hundreds of TV shows and Movies from iTunes US store and have Japanese Netflix and Hulu accounts. With the 2nd/3rd Gen I had to log in and out of accounts to go between the two and that kind of sucked.
Generally I am ok with the interface, but what I dislike is how many times I have to click play to watch a movie/show.
Example:
New movie comes out. I go into moive sna purchase it and it auto loads so I can watch it. That's cool cause the chance I want to watch it at time of purchase is high. I get the splash screen with the menu for Play, extras etc, so I choose play, Then it brings me to another screen where it wants to tell me about the plot of the movie I haven't seen, which irritates me because I do not want the plot of the movie, I want to just watch the movie. So I have to click play again to start the movie (those 2 "play clicks my be reverse order but they are both always there). Then if it's a movie I started to watch and didn't finish it'll show up a "play/resume" screen. Why can't the "resume button just be on the splash screen. Why make it so we have to drill into the movie, it's irritating. They do the same with TV shows.
When I click play just start the fricken movie...
Nvidia Shield (Score:2)
Not a fan of the company but the unit is pretty nice and super responsive. They were $50 off around new years for the one with the controller.
It depends where you live (Score:2)
It really depends where you live. I love my Roku, but here in Canada several streaming services don't support the Roku (the Canadian version of Amazon Prime, CraveTV). Here the Fire TV stick might be a better choice, even though the Canadian version doesn't support Alexa.
The AppleTV is badly over-priced, so I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
So I'd say you should do your research. Decide which streaming services you want to use, then find out which devices they work on in your Country.
Nvidia Shield TV (Score:2)
My choice: Roll your own... (Score:2)
Apple TV or long HDMI cable (Score:2)
Another vote for Apple TV, if you're in the ecosystem already. I had a 2nd gen Apple TV that sat in the rack for years, while I opted to use a long HDMI cable between my laptop in the office and the receiver (it helps to have access to a hole saw and the crawlspace). Using a remote control app on my tablet I was able to watch anything I wanted, including the Xfinity web/flash player for live TV -which is blocked from using airplay on the Apple TV screen sharing. Comcast has an app for Roku in beta so I pick
Nvidia Shield TV (Score:2)
Since Nvidia is a high profile player, who also happens to design the SOC and VPU inside, you get the best driver support. They constantly update the system, also the Android version.
For a comparison to other contenders (incl. Roku) chech out the list at: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/s... [nvidia.com]
Your TV. (Score:2)
I've run XBMC since the original XBox. Then had a home built HTPC with Nvidia GPU acceleration to do 1080p smoothly back in 2010. Now have a Kodi on an Amazon fire.
The 'player' I use most is the DLNA one built into my TV. With minidlna running in a jail on my FreeNAS machine.
It's "free". Comes built in. Has been able to handle every codec my TV supports (which happens to be what all my stuff encoded in).
RPI3 with kodi (OSMC) (Score:2)
RPI3 with kodi (OSMC)
It is fast, cheap and very flexible. Kodi 18 will support netflix, but it not yet released... but should be near.
Open, No lock-in, always being updated and improving
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.extremetech.com/wp... [extremetech.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Now with Kodi.
The point was to make a streaming device. As much as I like Kodi the lack of current support for Netflix, Amazon Prime, et al, makes it a really shitty Streaming Device.
Re: (Score:2)
Use Kodi for your personal videos. YouTube, Netflix and Amazon are available as apps for the Xbox. That was the intent.
Though the Xbox's native video player is pretty good as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Xbox One X. Now with Kodi.
Kodi is a great solution for streaming "open" channels and stuff from your local media library, but it doesn't really do Netflix
The Xbox One X does both Kodi [kodi.tv] and Netflix [xbox.com].
Re: (Score:2)
I'll try it again - maybe - once some extremely ambitious team decides to rewrite the front end as a state machine, which is what all UIs are ( at least should be), and the core team realize some kind of coding standard especially with respect to what is configuration and
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, and it performs nicely. And they keep getting newer models. Inexpensive, small, and trouble free.
Roku vs openSUSE Leap 42.3 (Score:3)
My Roku 3 feels like a high quality product in my hands. The remote control, the user interface, even the cute little animation as it boots up. I love the Roku fabric label at the bottom end of the remote control, it orients it in my hand without being obtrusive and reminds me of Levi's Red Tab jeans.
Also, love the fact it gives me a hard-wired network connection, which is a serious bonus if you've got a few WiFi devices in the area; streaming video doesn't wait for the neighbours to stop gaming.
My beefs ar
Re: (Score:2)
Well sure, a computer can do a lot. But I hate watching TV on my computer, I want to watch TV from my couch.
I never liked Chromecast much, because there's no remote for it. Trying to use a smart phone to control something is amazingly clumsy, especially if you've got the lights dim. Ie, turn on phone, unlock phone (slow if it's a pin), get eyes to adjust to light, push pause about 7 seconds too late.
Re:Roku vs openSUSE Leap 42.3 (Score:5, Interesting)
Well sure, a computer can do a lot. But I hate watching TV on my computer, I want to watch TV from my couch.
I never liked Chromecast much, because there's no remote for it. Trying to use a smart phone to control something is amazingly clumsy, especially if you've got the lights dim. Ie, turn on phone, unlock phone (slow if it's a pin), get eyes to adjust to light, push pause about 7 seconds too late.
I hate watching TV on my computer too; that's why wanda (the hostname of my media computer) runs my TV through HDMI.
But all TV sets are computer monitors now, so you may as well get used to a TV with a keyboard. The keyboard sits wirelessly on my coffee table in front of my couch. Glowing keys would be nice but this rig works well enough.
I'm old enough to know what a 1B3GT is and how to tell when I need to replace it. I certainly remember the stack of media equipment I used to have underneath my Sony Trinitron. There was the VCR, the DVD player, the cable box. Now I have wanda under a Samsung HDTV, she plays DVDs and anything else on my home network quite nicely. VHS is gone, I have a really nice Panasonic commercial VCR in my closet in case I ever need it. And, yes, I still have a Sony Betamax SL-HF500 ready to go in case wanda needs to digest anything to digital. I used to work on Quad machines and I'd love to have one, but since my place won't accommodate a forklift truck, I'll have to forgo the 2" tapes of goodness.
Grab an old smartphone, set that up as your remote control with KDE Connect (works AMAZINGLY well), the biggest caveat is that you have to remember to let your remote control charge when it's not in use. Obviously, you can control what the smartphone connects to through your firewall settings on your router.
It's not perfect, but it sure beats the days when "Be Kind, Rewind" stickers were everywhere, TVs took up a lot more space, and your PVR required switching actual cassettes back and forth.
I remember the 6:PM news anchor describing an event and then his usual "Film at 11" - before VCRs and camcorders, TV crews used film, and we'd have to develop the film, dry it, edit it, all before a story could be aired.
Now I can do that from my pocket with a 5-year-old cellphone in my pocket. In 1080p.
Things are a little easier now than doing an A-B roll edit on non-timecoded UMatic. The only thing I really miss is the satisfying clicks and clunks of the VTRs when I was doing it. It was doing something.
Watching a video was far more important when it took effort. Even just going to Blockbuster and renting a videocassette made the whole experience more special.
Can't operate a smartphone by feel (Score:3)
I hate watching TV on my computer too; that's why wanda (the hostname of my media computer) runs my TV through HDMI.
Are wanda and your TV in the same room? Last time I checked, adolf and other Slashdot users were objecting [slashdot.org] like this: "I'm not putting together a living room PC rig just for one game, and I'm not lugging my desktop between rooms or stringing destructive ground-loop-ridden HDMI cables around the house so I can play a game on my PC on my [big TV] in my living room."
Slashdot user FunkSoulBrother [slashdot.org] would "be shocked if there were 150,000 Home Theater PCs properly installed and powerful enough for gaming on the co
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My beefs are with the internal player - needs to support more filetypes - Roku really needs to open that up
What filetypes doesn't it support that you really need? I just finished building a file server with PLEX for my parents, so they could load all of their favorite TV shows and movies onto it. The 1st generation roku's had serious problems with large file sizes, various problems with mkv and so on. The newest versions don't even hiccup at 20GB single files, and plex has no issues with it either.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and it performs nicely. And they keep getting newer models. Inexpensive, small, and trouble free.
It all depends on the apps, my friend. I pay for a streaming service. Their Roku app is garbage. I cannot watch tv on it. It pauses, stutters, restarts, etc. On Apple TV and Amazon Fire devices, it works perfectly. The Roku is connected by ethernet to a gigabit fiber connection, so it is not a network issue. I find myself using my Roku less since I got the Apple TV for free and everything works better on it. The remote is easier to use than a Roku remote and UIs scroll better. However, the Roku is
Re: (Score:2)
Roku screwed the pooch late last year by removing the Optical output on their Ultra... so Roku is basically garbage now. They were my Go To streaming device up until now... but without Optical out, they are functionally useless to a vast swath of users.
Time to move on to a different device, but I don't know what. It's sad... Roku was pretty much best of the best in terms of ease of use and compatibility.
Re: NVIDIA SHIELD (Score:2)
The shield is the best Android TV device, but almost as good and much cheaper is the Xiaomi mi box.
Re: (Score:2)
My SHIELD is a real powerhouse. It also acts as a Chromecast endpoint, can use any Android store apps, and best of all supports audio passthrough with PLEX for DTS goodness!
Lost me at mandatory Google signin. Shield hardware is dated.
Re: (Score:2)
Shield hardware is dated.
Dated how? What media streamer has better hardware? I sure haven't found any.
Re: (Score:2)
Dated how? What media streamer has better hardware? I sure haven't found any.
Shield is using the same processor from 2013. It has a fan and consumes at least twice the power both at idle and while in use compared to my sub $50 SBC at 1/4th the price of shield.
For all that your treated to a mandatory Google account and associated Google/NVIDIA spyware. You have to try not to find a SoC that can't push 4k HEVC @ 60 fps these days.
Re: (Score:3)
Those are things that I don't really care about at all.
However, I can't seem to find another streaming solution that:
* Supports 4k HEVC @ 24/50/60 fps (Roku Ultimate won't do 24)
* Supports DTS-HD, TrueHD, DTS:X, Atmos (Most won't)
* Supports HDR10 and rec2020
* Supports HDMI-CEC (Some won't)
* Has a supported and well maintained plex client (Some)
* Alexa support
* Voice search
* Main search will search across netflix, amazon prime, and plex
Re: (Score:3)
Screw SHIELD. Heil Hydra! (now new and improved without Ward)
Re:Pi 3 you fuckers (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I personally have shunned blueray like the plague from the moment I found out that each disk is designed to carry a blacklist of content producers (which the playback devices must load and adhere to).
Aka: You might have legally(!) bought yourselves a (small) libraries worth of bluerays, but just a single "he done something we don't like" blacklisting and you are left with nothing more than a (large) set of expensive coasters.
And although I'm certain there are some (awkward) work-arounds, the mere fact that blueray is designed in such a way as to, effectivily, punish the customer for a companies misbehaviour is enough to make me barf and give it a wide berth.
So, not that obvious I'm afraid.
Why would someone selling a product purposely include something that runs the risk of the product being unusable by their own customer? Now you have a pissed off customer who can't return an opened media product for a refund, and can only exchange a "defective" product for the same title, which would still not work in their player.
The backlash alone would be enough to destroy this entire "blacklist" justification. Mind providing a link or two to prove this stupidity is actually being used today? Blu-Ray
Because MPAA members require it (Score:2)
Why would someone selling a product purposely include something that runs the risk of the product being unusable by their own customer?
If they didn't, five major western movie distributors would refuse to make their valuable works available for use with the product: Disney, Paramount, Sony, Universal, and Warner. Without support from these distributors, end users are unlikely to buy into a format.
Re: (Score:2)
My Sony Blu-Ray device also has built-in Roku (or Roku-like) functionality. A nice two-in-one solution.
Re: (Score:2)
I looked at these as an option but a little too expensive for what you get. Better to go with a NUC or something small that can be tucked out of the way, and is powerful enough for casual games too.
Re: (Score:2)
the solution to the issue of exFAT may be to set up your own Kodi or Plex (and there are others, possibly without subscription fees) server elsewhere in your home, preferably on the wire instead of the wifi, and have that box host the removable media.
of course, again that's costing more than just replacing that card. but the long term effects, like having your collection available to you when not at home, may be worth it.
That's if you have a large collection of home media, of course.
Re: (Score:2)
that is a fucking awful option for anyone but techo's and fails the wife acceptability test. This isn't just an anti MS post either, Linux machines with Kodi, XBMC etc all fit into this category as they just need to much knowledge to maintain.
Personally this is why I'm a fan of libreelec. A "Just Enough OS" to run Kodi front end. Trivial to install and manage yet you still have access/shell if you want one.
Buy a Roku, apple TV, Fire TV or at worst a chromecast (though that can be just as painful sometimes) whatever your preferred option is and all the latest happily support 4k TV
If you don't mind something that records every key stroke, every letter of every search, every pause, rewind, play, every thing you watch or say into the microphone and uploads it all to god knows who where it will be used for god knows what.
PC can game (Score:2)
Unlike the streaming boxes, PCs are also useful for gaming, and there are far more PC exclusives than (say) PlayStation 4 exclusives. Many older or indie PC games run fine with integrated graphics, especially since Ivy Bridge.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Kodi has a ton of plug-ins for it; Ubuntu+mini (Score:2)