Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses United States

Duolingo To Silicon Valley Workers: Move To Pittsburgh, Where You Can Actually Afford a Home (venturebeat.com) 342

As the cost of living continues to rise in Silicon Valley, tech companies in other parts of the country are getting more aggressive in pitching workers to move to their cities for a better quality of life. From a report: This week, the language-learning platform Duolingo put up an ad along San Francisco's US Highway 101, encouraging residents to move to Pittsburgh where the company's headquarters are based. In Pittsburgh, you can both "work in tech" and "own a home," the ad touted. Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn told VentureBeat in an email that the company was prompted to put up the ad after realizing that most of its Pittsburgh employees who relocated to the city cited the low cost of housing as one of the deciding factors.

Von Ahn said that 85 percent of the company's Pittsburgh-based employees moved to the city from somewhere else. The company has 110 employees, the majority of whom work out of Pittsburgh. "One [employee] who recently joined Duolingo moved from the Bay Area and ended up buying a house almost immediately," von Ahn said. "He said he never would have been able to do that before, but here in Pittsburgh, he found a reasonably priced home on a large plot of land and jumped on the opportunity to be a homeowner and have a huge yard for his dog."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Duolingo To Silicon Valley Workers: Move To Pittsburgh, Where You Can Actually Afford a Home

Comments Filter:
  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Sunday April 01, 2018 @11:44PM (#56365007)
    In my old city there were tons of posts for jobs. It turns out it was the same 3 recruiters posting the same jobs over and over again. There were actually very, very few tech jobs. Meanwhile I left behind several friends who bought houses and got stuck in really shitty dead end jobs when they found out how bad the job market really is. Meanwhile I left behind several friends who bought houses and got stuck in really shitty dead end jobs when they found out how bad the job market really is. They're trapped. Upside down on a house as the job market got worse and/or not making enough money to save for the move.

    I got lucky. I was born there but left for a job I happened to land by a combination of skill and dumb luck. Thing is, I've got a kid in college. As long as I'm willing to live like crap in a big city then the high pay lets me pay for her school. Had I not landed the job I have now I'd still be trapped and she'd be going to a shitty community college and on her way to a crap career.

    So unless Pittsburgh has the jobs for real then techies had best steer clear. And it's damn hard to tell. Maybe fly out there and try meeting with people at the local computer club.
    • by pghmike4 ( 4093035 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @12:08AM (#56365059)
      There are a decent number of jobs in Pittsburgh. Aside from Duolingo, there is a NetApp office, a Google office, a (new) Microsoft development office, Uber's self-driving car lab, Argo's (Ford's) self-driving lab, Aurora's (yet another self-driving car company), CERT, the Software Engineering Institute, the Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center, many jobs at Carnegie Mellon and the University of Pittsburgh, an Apple machine learning office, and a small Amazon development office. There are a bunch of startups, as well.

      That's off the top of my head. Don't get me wrong, even the relatively large offices are less than 1000 employees each; we're not talking about something like Amazon or Microsoft's *home* office, with 10s of thousands of employees. But there are a decent number of interesting jobs in Pittsburgh, and the place has more character than a random Silicon Valley town. And housing is definitely affordable; you can get a 4 BR house in the city for about $400-500K, and probably a bit less in a suburb with a good school system.

      Must love snow :-)
      • Pittsburgh is the world head quarters for Finite Element Analysis. Ansys sells 1 billion dollars worth of mathematics a year. Pure applied math. Governing differential equations and Hermite polynomials and Lagrangians, Jacobians and Laplacians ...
    • by oldgraybeard ( 2939809 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @12:46AM (#56365139)
      The question is, YOU! job postings! You have skills, those skills have a market! And I see most here are concerned about job postings!
      There is a world out there, build something of your own. Why does everyone think they need to be employed by someone?
      I know I am old 62, and over the hump, but I am never going to retire. I when to collage 5 times and in my day had 10k in school debt. I did not get a degree. I educated my self, started a business, paid my old school debt and have been in business for 30 years.

      I wonder if I could do the same today, not sure to be honest.But reality is what it is ;)

      Just my 2 cents ;)
    • So unless Pittsburgh has the jobs for real then techies had best steer clear.

      The city successfully transitioned to a white-collar-based service economy years ago. It will never have the tech market as in the Bay Area, but it is on part with other metropolitan areas like San Jose, Atlanta or Tampa. It's one of the reason why so many people ridiculed Trump with his 'blue collar Pittsburgh" remark last year.

      Obviously, people must keep their eyes open whenever they relocate, even if they relocate to SV.

  • by Ukab the Great ( 87152 ) on Sunday April 01, 2018 @11:53PM (#56365025)

    There are plenty of smart people already here, Duolingo. We don't need more jagoffs from the Bay Area; the managers from Amazon HQ are already enough of a pain in the butt to work with.

  • by RightwingNutjob ( 1302813 ) on Sunday April 01, 2018 @11:59PM (#56365041)
    your neighbors are less likely to be purple-haired weirdos who sexually identify as their own house.
  • by oldgraybeard ( 2939809 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @12:00AM (#56365043)
    There is an important point here. What good is a six figure income, if you have a six figure cost of living?

    Heck, I have been a self employed contract computer programmer for the last 30+ years, I only go to my office 2 miles from my house 2-3 times a month. I work remote on most everything from my home office with 1-2 local on sites a month with my local clients. I didn't even drive my car the last 2 weeks of Feb 2018.

    The illusion that for IT you need to be in one of the high cost urban centers is untrue. Think for yourself, think outside the box.

    Just my 2 cents ;)
    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 02, 2018 @01:37AM (#56365203)

      Think for yourself, think outside the box.

      Where I live I can't even afford the box, you insensitive clod.

    • by Ayano ( 4882157 )
      For in-house IT, on site is one of the few reasons they're not outsourced.

      Software Engineering is a different beast all together.

      Source: my company outsourced 75% of the IT department and I never noticed given how well they speak English for the few times I contact them (pc/laptop upgrade, my dumb butt locking myself out of the intranet).
      • by Threni ( 635302 )

        Ours are now a bunch of mumbling, sniffing, think-accented idiots who are no help because they are graduate level, just following scripts with no understanding of how tech works and consequently no ability to diagnose or speculate things to try when the scripted approach fails. It takes a lot longer to get anything sorted. But hey, they're cheap.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Engineers are required to be licensed and are criminally liable for defective work that harms. Are you under such requirements?

        If no, you are NOT an engineer.

        • Engineers are required to be licensed and are criminally liable for defective work that harms. Are you under such requirements?

          If no, you are NOT an engineer.

          Be that as it may, it's irrelevant to the main topic at hand. But don't let that stop you from riding that strawman, even if it gets you blisters. I'm not judging.

    • Well first:
      "The illusion that you need to be in one of the high cost urban centers is untrue."
      I fixed that for you....but really - stop telling people.

      I have an office 5 mi from my house, which is a 2400 sq ft 5 bedroom American Foursquare built in 1909 which we bought for $100k. With some minor work (done 90% by my wife's dad, actually) we now have something north of 3500 square feet.
      I go to the office when I want a quite, undistracted place to work.
      I'm within 30min (ok, maybe 40) of a major metro downtow

  • by klashn ( 1323433 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @12:09AM (#56365063) Journal
    I feel like home ownership is a major life goal. It's certainly in the best interests of the people at the top as you are enslaved to a 15 or 30 year mortgage and can be counted on to pay into the many avenues of maintenance that comes with home ownership: not only house maintenance, but community maintenance in the form of taxes and bonds.
    • Live where life is good, home ownership is cheaper than rent and your costs are more stable over time!

      Just my 2 cents ;)
      • Living where life is good is subjective though.

        For instance. I live in South Florida currently. I could live west in the suburbs and buy a nice house, but then I'd be in the fucking suburbs where nothing cool ever happens and I'd have a 45 minute drive (or expensive Lyft or Uber) any time I wanted to do things that I consider making life good.

        Or I can live where I do, east of I-95, under the seabreeze, and near the beach and all the other things that I consider "making life good".

        I imagine that wherever you

    • by Pfhorrest ( 545131 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @01:54AM (#56365235) Homepage Journal

      Better enslaved for 15-30 years and then free, than enslaved for life renting.

      • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @11:04AM (#56367055) Journal

        Or, you know, just have sufficient investments to pay the rent. If you want to be successful in life, you need to understand investing - don't be the guy who can only manage to save money as equity. Renting or owning then becomes a decision on its own merits as an investment. Even owning a house outright has a lot of fixed costs.

        Rule of thumb: if houses in the area sell for 100 months' rent (for a reasonably-equivalent place), buy ASAP. If houses in the area sell for 200 months' rent, keep renting. In between? Depends on the deal you can get on the house.

        Real estate speculation is a whole different topic, but I prefer investment to speculation.

      • by cascadingstylesheet ( 140919 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @11:25AM (#56367201) Journal

        Better enslaved for 15-30 years and then free, than enslaved for life renting.

        Depends.

        Typically renting costs $x per month, and buying costs $(x + y) per month.

        If you actually have the y, you could choose to put it into retirement savings for the 30 years instead of buying.

        Depending on your situation, that might actually turn out better than ending up with an ((age when you bought it) + 30 years) old house. YMMV

    • by godrik ( 1287354 )

      I think home ownership here is seen as a proxy. Overall the housing market is correlated with the real estate market. If home ownership is affordable, then rents can not be completely insane.

    • It's certainly in the best interests of the people at the top as you are enslaved to a 15 or 30 year mortgage...

      What you're missing is that home ownership is traditionally one of the only reliable means of wealth generation for the lower middle class. A 30 year mortgage is cheaper than rent, and at the end of that time the equity in the house is usually much more than the outlay of that loan.

      So yes, "enslaved" for 30 years, but coming out of it with probably 2-3x the wealth you went into it. In terms of ROI, that's not great compared to a lot of investments, but when all you have to invest is 10% down, it's reasonabl

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I am still flabbergasted by the number of companies who post positions for developers with "NO REMOTE WORK". In this day and age, a company whose main front-facing presence is a web or mobile app has absolutely -no- excuse to demand in-office presence, given the huge economic gradient presented by some urban centers. If they really want the best talent, drop the requirement for relocation, damn it!

    For example there was an article recently in the news about how Vancouver tech companies couldn't find enough w

  • by Hrrrg ( 565259 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @12:33AM (#56365125)

    Judging from the comments so far, I don't think Duolingo is going to have many takers. However, I lived in Pittsburgh for almost 20 years before I moved back to Ca, so I would like to give it my endorsement. We bought a 5 bedroom house in a good school district for $255k. There's a lot to do in the city. It has museums, professional sports teams, good restaurants, etc... Life is less stressful; people are friendly. It's a family-oriented city, and Pittsburgh is often voted "most livable" city in the U.S. by various magazines. Now, the weather is not great, but it also doesn't get a lot of snow in the winter. Certainly it is nothing like what people imagine if they are still thinking steel mills - those all closed 30-40 years ago. The air is clean and the countryside is beautiful. Now, the big players are health care, research, and universities.
     

  • They are one of the "preinstall AppX Packages" that Windows 10 comes with. Pandora, Bing News, Eclipse, I hate them all.
  • They won't do it (Score:4, Interesting)

    by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @03:15AM (#56365341) Homepage
    This attitude nicely sums up California's view of everywhere else; punching down and speaking truth to the powerless:

    As a tech professional, I would rather eat glass than live in a so called "flyover" state. I have in-demand skills and I have zero desire to live in places that are small minded, lack diversity, and lack interesting and rich culture. The tech sector is chock full of diverse immigrants and unique people who have no desire to live in a conformist mono-chromatic culture. Top tech talents don't want to eat breakfast at the Waffle House.

    • They're like the worst of the upper classes combined with the fervour of religious fanatics. Preaching diversity while all thinking the same and looking down on their fellow man. The 21st century left is now a bunch of arrogant rich people which is why ordinary people are rejecting it.

    • This attitude nicely sums up California's view of everywhere else; punching down and speaking truth to the powerless:

      As a tech professional, I would rather eat glass than live in a so called "flyover" state. I have in-demand skills and I have zero desire to live in places that are small minded, lack diversity, and lack interesting and rich culture. The tech sector is chock full of diverse immigrants and unique people who have no desire to live in a conformist mono-chromatic culture. Top tech talents don't want to eat breakfast at the Waffle House.

      Yep. And that makes me so sad. I so hate having less competition and low cost of living ;)

  • At some point in the near future, this problem will work itself out. Housing prices within reasonable commuting distance to the major tech hubs in CA are already at ludicrous levels.

    Companies are having to pay astronomical salaries to their employees just so their workforce can afford to live nearby. Even then, home ownership is laughable.

    They will, eventually, wise up and move their operations to a lower cost of living area and save gobs of cash from salaries alone. It would be stupid not too and I'm

    • by Shados ( 741919 )

      It's kind of the other way around (originally) right? Hundreds/thousands of pre-IPO Facebook/Google/Whatever folks with too much money for their own good, all at the same time, started buying up stuff. Since they were making so much money, value went up. Now it's "market rate", and even if you work for them remotely (and live in the middle of nowhere), you get very close to the same rate. It's not just to pay for housing either: if you want to hire those folks and those who got hired afterward, you need to

    • They will, eventually, wise up and move their operations to a lower cost of living area and save gobs of cash from salaries alone.

      If companies were too stupid to realize this 20 years ago, then they're too stupid to realize it now or anytime in the future. VPNs and remote work has been a viable concept for well over a decade now, so companies don't even have the lame excuse of having to set up operations where the "talent" is.

      Nothing will change.

      • They will, eventually, wise up and move their operations to a lower cost of living area and save gobs of cash from salaries alone.

        If companies were too stupid to realize this 20 years ago, then they're too stupid to realize it now or anytime in the future. VPNs and remote work has been a viable concept for well over a decade now, so companies don't even have the lame excuse of having to set up operations where the "talent" is.

        Nothing will change.

        But ... if someone lives outside one of the major tech cities, he might pick up some unapproved thoughts!!

  • living is important (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fluffernutter ( 1411889 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @07:53AM (#56365907)
    I was living in an average home on a postage-stamp sized lot. I work from home, so I moved onto a one-acre private treed lot.. In a place where I can get this 10 minutes away from a major city. You would not believe what it has done for my stress level, being able to walk out and see nature every day instead of my neighbors.
  • by reanjr ( 588767 ) on Monday April 02, 2018 @08:53AM (#56366155) Homepage

    This author really think San Franciscans are going to move to Pittsburgh for a cheap home, when they can move to literally any city in the nation other than NYC for a "cheap" home? I think San Franciscans are far more likely to end up in San Diego or some other CA city than Pittsburgh.

    • Don't tell anyone, but you can buy relatively cheap homes in the boroughs of NYC -- and property tax is insanely low. NYC =/= Manhattan.
      • But since most companies are down town, how much time are you wasting every day on the commute? I generally figure that out as part of my salary because the time is useless to me.
        • Not much -- LIRR has a 15 or 20-minute running time from Kew or Jamaica to Penn Station. Eastern Queens is the best-kept secret of NYC, and Jamaica Avenue is like NYC used to be before Rudy G wussified it :)
  • ...Chicago, or Austin, or Denver, or Salt Lake City / Provo.
  • Sure, go work for a "language learning" company in Pittsburgh... till the company gets acquired by another tech company and promptly terms everyone at the current location relocating the IP (intellectual property) back to Silicon Valley. Now your stuck in a location with a mortgage and next to zero tech job prospects.... then the blizzard starts...

If you didn't have to work so hard, you'd have more time to be depressed.

Working...