Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Australia United Kingdom Facebook Privacy

UK, Australia Investigating Facebook Amid Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal (go.com) 40

Both the United Kingdom and Australia said Thursday that they have opened formal investigations into Facebook amid allegations that their citizens' data was improperly shared with Cambridge Analytica. ABC News reports: The Information Commissioner's Office in the U.K. is "looking at how data was collected from a third party app on Facebook and shared with Cambridge Analytica. We are also conducting a broader investigation into how social media platforms were used in political campaigning," according to Commissioner Elizabeth Denham. The office will investigate Facebook, along with 29 other organizations that have not been named.

Earlier Thursday, Australia said it had opened a formal investigation into the tech giant amid allegations that Australian users' data was improperly shared with Cambridge Analytica. "Today I have opened a formal investigation into Facebook, following confirmation from Facebook that the information of over 300,000 Australian users may have been acquired and used without authorization," Angelene Falk, Australia's acting information commissioner and acting privacy commissioner, said. According to Falk, Australia will work with international regulatory agencies to investigate whether Facebook violated the country's privacy act. Under Australian law, the commissioner has the power to issue fines of up to $1.6 million to organizations that fail to comply with the act, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Australia and the U.K. joined the United States and Israel in investigating Facebook's breach of privacy.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK, Australia Investigating Facebook Amid Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal

Comments Filter:
  • by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Thursday April 05, 2018 @08:09PM (#56390345) Homepage

    Looks like Facebook is to be the whipping boy, that terrorist memo was extremely damaging and really problematic when it comes to laws regarding aiding and abetting terrorism, especially when Facebook generates far more views and ad impression during major terrorism incidents. Looks like a joint multi-nation investigation, where privacy as a wedge into the door for a much deeper investigation.

    Reality is social media should be avatar based to take the sting out of it, much too damaging with real personality and ego up to being a punching bag. Sure you can data mine it when real, to manipulate people and society but it is really a bad idea because many can not handle that well. Avatars dealing with real world events is a lot safer, only people's avatars get attacked, rather than the people themselves being attacked.

    Back to the terrorism aspect, if it is found that Facebook was purposefully promoting terrorism to drive views, than they should face the real penalties for that, no just a slap on the wrist because they were not actually involved in terror just promoting terror for profit. Under law, the means do not justify the ends, you pay penalties for the means and that means custodial sentences.

    • Looks like Facebook is to be the whipping boy

      *THIS*. It is interesting that they are going after Facebook rather than going after Cambridge Analytica. A company whose registered address is the home of a dodgy used car sales man. This man is listed on their website as the company director yet denies he is, Cambridge Analytica was registered as a business under the name of his trust, and when asked about it he rushed out to de-register the company. Better still all employees in the company in Australia are fake.

      It's amazing how much here is directed at

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Facebook is shady, because people didn't know that it wasn't just their data that was being shared with Farmville, it was their friends' data. And their friends had not agreed to that. And Facebook knew it was happening, but didn't act quickly to stop it.

        Just failing to build safeguards against that sort of abuse in the first place is pretty shady. In the EU companies handling personal data have a legal obligation to protect it, and it appears that Facebook failed in its duty.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      It's not only that that's an issue from the memo, but that he admitted Facebook was willfully violating data protection law in countries like the UK. That's a real problem for him because you can be held individually responsible in the UK for data breaches if you willfully engaged in them as he has admitted to with his questionable practices claim.

      There is a personal liability clause in most (all?) European data protection law implementations for employees who willfully breach it. It's rarely applied becaus

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      How would avatars help when people want to post photos of themselves? And then tag those photos, and talk about seeing "Dave and Jessica at the party"?

      Even without your real name, it's not hard to link a profile to you. Especially for Facebook, which has bugs all over the web and a detailed graph of your relationships and acquaintances.

      Recently we have been seeing stories about sex workers and clients being recommended to each other on Facebook, despite never having used Facebook for communication. Most lik

  • Saw it coming (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    I really hate being right. As would a lot of tech dwellers out there who would have to agree. But how many of us have steered away from the ridiculousness of Facebook in the first place because we knew something like this would happen? I donâ(TM)t have a profile Iâ(TM)ve never had one and never will.

    I remember when I used to jump on IRC and family, friends, even the freaking police (feds and local) constantly said âoeDonâ(TM)t put anything about your life online because itâ(TM)s rid

  • by Reverend Green ( 4973045 ) on Friday April 06, 2018 @12:10AM (#56391017)

    All the semi-official propaganda organs are really getting their knickers in a twist over this Cambridge Analytical scandal. But the funny thing is, this is 100% business as usual for Facebook.

    The problem is not a couple bad apples at Cambridge Analytica. The real problem is panoptic Big Brother surveillance and the culture that considers it lawful and ethically acceptable. The problem is Facebook itself.

  • Is because Trump may have used the information to target key demographic areas. Obama, Hillary did the same thing in past campaigns...but, I guess since they are "good little democrats"...THEY get a pass.
    • Umm, there are a few differences in HOW Facebook and user data was used by Obama, Hillary and Trump.

      http://www.politifact.com/trut... [politifact.com]

      A relevant summary from that site:

      "The Obama campaign created a Facebook app for supporters to donate, learn of voting requirements, and find nearby houses to canvass. The app asked users’ permission to scan their photos, friends lists, and news feeds. Most users complied.

      The people signing up knew the data they were handing over would be used to support a political camp

When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas

Working...