Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck Crime Government

Hackers Steal Millions From Mexican Banks In Transfer Heist (reuters.com) 29

happyfeet2000 shares a report from Reuters: Thieves siphoned hundreds of millions of pesos out of Mexican banks, including No. 2 Banorte, by creating phantom orders that wired funds to bogus accounts and promptly withdrew the money, two sources close to the government's investigation said. Hackers sent hundreds of false orders to move amounts ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of pesos from banks including Banorte, to fake accounts in other banks, the sources said, and accomplices then emptied the accounts in cash withdrawals in dozens of branch offices. The total amount is estimated to be as much as $20 million (~400 million pesos).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hackers Steal Millions From Mexican Banks In Transfer Heist

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    When I first read " siphoned hundreds of millions of pesos" I thought, wait a second, that's like $200 dollars.

  • they didn't steal any cartel money. /s

    Sounds more like an NSA/CIA operation to drain the funds.

    • Sounds more like an NSA/CIA operation to drain the funds.

      Possible, but I think unlikely. The use of lots of Smurfs might compromise the operation. The NSA/CIA would just wire the money into some opaque jurisdiction.

      • "opaque jurisdiction" = Washington DC, New York, London.

        Two dollars enter. One dollar leaves. Money handlers (and they are very numerous) prosper.

    • Sounds more like an NSA/CIA operation to drain the funds.

      Drain whose funds?

      These people were bank robbers, not spies.

    • Sounds more like an NSA/CIA operation to drain the funds.

      But I thought the deepstate hated Trump, why are they helping to make Mexico pay for the wall?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @06:53PM (#56617646)

    Trump did say Mexico would pay for it...

  • by bobbied ( 2522392 ) on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @07:01PM (#56617684)

    It's good work, if you can get it.

    So.. They didn't have withdraw controls on newly minted accounts that just got funded electronically? They didn't require ID's either? What about verifying you know who's creating these electronic transactions? No?

    Shesh, this is lax security. I'm not saying the banks deserved to be fleeced, but if you cannot be bothered with the minimum of security practices, I'm going to find it hard to shed many tears about your bad luck. Then there is the whole, you don't know who's initiating this transactions electronically so you cannot hold them responsible?

    All I can say is.. I don't want to be a bank...

    • by Anonymous Coward

      In my experience, banks operating in dangerous jurisdicitions like Mexico actually pay a lot more attention to security then their global peers. This is in all likelihood an inside job perpetrated by someone who knew exactly how to work around all the security checks (and perhaps bribe the right people in order to get around them).

  • Isn't that like $2.50?

  • "He said that the central bank’s SPEI interbank transfer system was not compromised but that the problem had to do with software developed by institutions or third-party providers to connect to the payment system. "
  • firewall

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...