New 'Creative Fund' Promises To Back Every Project on Kickstarter (venturebeat.com) 43
All Kickstarter campaigns are getting a show of support, according to a new web site. "Every day, The Creative Fund backs all newly launched projects based on our current patronage." It's the newest offering from BackerKit, which also makes a data management platform for crowdfunding campaigns, and so far they've pledged $1 to 10,594 different Kickstarter projects.
An anonymous reader quotes VentureBeat: One dollar doesn't seem like a lot, but it's just a start. BackerKit cofounder Rosanna Yau says that this is more of a proof of concept, to see if their community is willing to rally around the idea. She and cofounder Maxwell Salzberg have set up a Patreon, a monthly subscription service that enables people to support creators directly. All the donations they receive from that platform will be distributed among Kickstarter projects, and the goal is to make sure all projects have at least one pledge....
Yau says that the company is open to contributing more than a $1 in the future. Its Patreon guidelines say that for each $2,000 milestone reached, the fund will pledge $1 more to all Kickstarter projects. If something doesn't get funded, the fund's pledges will get recycled and re-donated to new projects.
A Medium post says the new fund "supports the entrepreneurial spirit of all independent creators, one dollar at a time....
"Everyone deserves some inspiration and a virtual high-five."
An anonymous reader quotes VentureBeat: One dollar doesn't seem like a lot, but it's just a start. BackerKit cofounder Rosanna Yau says that this is more of a proof of concept, to see if their community is willing to rally around the idea. She and cofounder Maxwell Salzberg have set up a Patreon, a monthly subscription service that enables people to support creators directly. All the donations they receive from that platform will be distributed among Kickstarter projects, and the goal is to make sure all projects have at least one pledge....
Yau says that the company is open to contributing more than a $1 in the future. Its Patreon guidelines say that for each $2,000 milestone reached, the fund will pledge $1 more to all Kickstarter projects. If something doesn't get funded, the fund's pledges will get recycled and re-donated to new projects.
A Medium post says the new fund "supports the entrepreneurial spirit of all independent creators, one dollar at a time....
"Everyone deserves some inspiration and a virtual high-five."
Very optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem with that is that kickstarter is full of half-baked ideas and people trying to sell some random thing they dug up on Alibaba as their own creation.
Personally, what I would want to see instead of a list of very well curated kickstarter projects. A list somebody went through and determined that:
Such a list would go a long way highlighting the people with a good idea that can actually be realize, and bring more money to those who are truly deserving.
They should back them selves (Score:2)
Definitely a half baked idea worthy of kickstarter.
Speaking of which, "half baked" would actually be a good name for kickstarter.
Re: Very optimistic (Score:1)
Itâ(TM)s worse than that. kickstarter is full of fraudsters and people trying to sell snake oil. And that simply drowns out the few real people with great ideas.
Re: Very optimistic (Score:2)
It be sad thing is there's actually a lot more than a few good ideas on there. Most of them however are wallowing in obscure fail while the charlatans and their "crowd funding consultants" burn the city to the grownd
Re: Very optimistic (Score:2)
"It be sad thing". Holy crap does iPhone autocorrect create some humdingers. Machine learning folks, it's the future!
Re: (Score:2)
However, even If what you're suggesting were actually possible, no one would give that away for free on the inter
Re:Very optimistic (Score:4)
I'm not asking for an oracle, but for a good filter.
You don't need a team full of PhDs to figure out that Air Umbrella [kickstarter.com] was an unworkable and terribly impractical idea, or that Solar Roadways was a stupid idea because it compromised both the function of a solar panel and a road to make a whole that was far worse and more expensive than simply building both of those things next to each other.
Lots of people in fact pointed that out. A site staffed by a bunch of volunteers with a decent understanding of physics and electronics would go a long way. And if you have $10K to spend, you could hire a bunch of engineers to take a quick cursory look at a bunch of stuff and give a quick opinion on whether it's obviously stupid or not.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
"It’s kind of fun to do the impossible." — Walt Disney
Re: (Score:2)
In all of your examples, those people were spending their own money to try and achieve their goals -- and more power to them. However, Kickstarter is all about getting other people to spend their money.
This is the key difference and the reason that projects should be vetted before getting supported.
Re: (Score:2)
That's less likely on Kickstarter, there's some very strong guidelines on Kickstarter that generally assure people that the idea isn't as farfetched as one would believe. Though some real doozies do make it through (google BattBump).
In fact, it's IndieGoGo where I don't contribute for many reasons, including very poor project review - it's not uncommo
Re: (Score:3)
Such a list would go a long way highlighting the people with a good idea that can actually be realize, and bring more money to those who are truly deserving.
That's what professional investors are for. I never understood the Kickstarter craze. You want me to plunk down some money, assume all the risk, and my only reward is the product if it's actually made and some token gift? How about giving me a share of the profits instead?
Math? (Score:2)
Even with all the projects that will fail to meet their minimum and have the money return to the fund, it probably still does not compute.
I think I just solved the previous story (Score:2)
Every wind turbine gets a Kickstarter!
Time to start a new Kickstarter then (Score:4, Funny)
I plan on starting ~10,000 Kickstarter projects with a goal of $1.
Re: (Score:2)
You took my idea.
Well, I'll just make TWENTY thousand Kickstarter projects!
Re: (Score:2)
Guys, that will never work! Both your ideas are over 9000 projects!
Participation trophy? (Score:2)
So everyone gets a $1 participation trophy for fulfilling the requirements to be listed?
Well, except for those who don't actually reach the funding goal, they get nothing, this is utterly meaningless for them.
And for those who do reach it, great, they can maybe buy a stick of gum.
Info suck , not fully altruistic (Score:1)
What that $1 backing gets them is automatic updates from kickstarter on the project status. The $1 cost is the price to pay to join the information feed. Sure they could go and mine the kickstarter page but that would be a polling solution and require automated and semi-intelligent page fetches. With the $1 donation backerkit gets emailed on every update and can directly track things.
Call me a glass half empty kind of person but I see this as not fully altruistic.
Silly virtue-signalling PR campaign. (Score:4, Informative)
Creative people are better than other people! See? We support all of them! With: a dollar! Now, pour a bunch of money into OUR account so we can signal some more, and, of course, draw a paycheck for the noble cause of administering this absurd bit of nonsense.
Here's an idea: actually VET the projects, and only support the ones that aren't utterly pointless. Otherwise they might as well say they're supporting all the artists at Burning Man by burning a pile of $1 bills in the parking lot outside their office. Or in the driveway outside mom's basement, wherever this is actually run.
Re: (Score:2)
Creative people aren't better?
No, the vast majority of the people who label themselves "creative" are especially bad at it. Which, as someone who sounds like he owns a nerve that has just been struck, you know. Or should.
The reason that so many people turn to web-based begging sites to fund their lame creative endeavors and completely fail to produce anything of merit, is because they simply aren't cut out for it in the first place. The people who "create everything you ever use in your life" are - generally - gainfully employed, ma
No, they don't (Score:3)
No, not every project or "creator" deserves "inspiration and a virtual high-five." There are too many fraudulent projects or ones that are simply outright idiotic (like the old one to make a heat exchanger in your fridge or freezer to cool your house).
The real world isn't about participation trophies or a medal for effort and propagating that attitude is a strong indicator of immaturity.
It's like... (Score:2)
It's like someone looked at communism and thought 'Woah woah, nice idea, but we don't want to get carried away with all the practical stuff'.
It's like filling up a bucket of water and pouring it into the ocean through a sieve.
So Now I Create 2,000 $1 kickstarter projects (Score:2)
With the project being to make me $1 richer in exchange for a thank you email.
No, no they don't (Score:2)
Participation trophy (Score:2)