San Francisco Gets Its First Cashierless Store (cnbc.com) 94
Last Week, San Francisco got its first completely automated cashierless store, called Standard Market. The store requires users to download their app before they can enter the 1,900-square-foot building. Once they do that, they can enter the store, grab the items they need, and walk out -- all without ever interacting with a cashier. The 27 cameras positioned on the ceiling are supposedly able to identify which items shoppers walk out with. CNBC reports: The start-up behind this operation is Standard Cognition, which has raised $11.2 million in venture capital and formed partnerships with four retail chains around the world. This first market is a prototype to showcase the technology and work on the bugs. The ambitious goal is to add the tech in 100 stores a day (each day!) by 2020. Five of the seven founders came from the Securities and Exchange Commission, where they built artificial intelligence software to detect fraud and trade violations, before starting Standard Cognition in 2017. Now these fraud experts are working to discern something equally complicated: whether I am stealing a snack. The store is very similar to Amazon's cashierless Go market, but differs in that it relies exclusively on the ceiling cameras and AI software to figure out what you're buying. "The goal is to predict, and prevent, shoplifting, because unlike Amazon's Go stores, which have a subway turnstile-like gate for entry and exit, Standard Market has an open door, and the path is clear," reports CNBC. "Once the system decides it has detected potential theft behavior, a store attendant will get a text and walk over for 'a polite conversation,' Standard Cognition's co-founder and chief operating officer, Michael Suswal, said."
Thugs will clean it out in 3...2...1 (Score:1)
But I have a security idea: when the system detects a possible robbery, it will blare The Star-Spangled Banner over the sound system. As the gang takes a knee, the store attendant can invoke 911.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
My iPhone has excellent camaras thank you!
I still use my iPhone 6s and reduce my monthly bill from $80 to $50. As a phone and a video camera, the iPhone 6s isn't obsolete and I use it to make my videos on youtube. As a Sprint very special customer for 20+ years, Sprint will always give me a new iPhone for free if I decide to stop using the 6s as a phone in the next several years.
For a final project in Small Group Communications, my four Vietnamese classmates appointed me to do all the work and be the speake
Re: (Score:2)
So.. you didn't read the part about the 27 cameras? Good luck with your plan buddy.... Hope none of your friends need that reward money...
Erm... 27 cameras... for a 1,900 sq ft store... There will be blind spots everywhere.
Also what do they expect the cameras to do... have the speakers shout "stop or I'll have to say stop again". The number 1 deterrent in shop theft is the human you'll have to look at before leaving. Just recently UK supermarkets found out they'd sold more carrots than they ordered because people were putting through more expensive items like avocado's through as cheap carrots.... because no one watches the self service ti
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your sample is flawed. Yes, most criminals IN PRISON are idiots. But the fact they're in prison pretty much indicates that. it's like saying all race car drivers are bad drivers, but only sampling those involved in crashes and ignoring those who finish normally.
It's the ones that never got caught you need to worry about.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or better yet, it detects you trying to boost something and alerts a friendly customer service rep to go have a chat with you.
And while those two are arguing (the thief being a decoy to just waste time by trying to pocket a candy bar, which he will ultimately pay for after causing a big ruckus), the other 8 guys he came in with go for the high price merch and haul ass out the door. Multiply the number of decoys by the number of loss prevention personnel employed to watch the alerts.
If you think thieves don
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Of course that doesn't stop someone from stealing a phone and using it to gain entry. I'd like to think that someone thought of that possibility and there's already a system in place to handle this, but I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't either.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course that doesn't stop someone from stealing a phone and using it to gain entry.
If you steal a phone, why would you go to where the phone is identified while your face is recorded by 27 cameras?
Even thieves aren't that stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That presumes the cops can be bothered to get off their backsides and go do anything about it... which they don't... and the thieves know it.
Otherwise, who in their right mind would steal a radio transmitter equipped with GPS that can be activated remotely with "Find my iPhone", or the android equivalent, in the first place?
Re: (Score:2)
who in their right mind would steal a radio transmitter equipped with GPS that can be activated remotely with "Find my iPhone", or the android equivalent, in the first place?
Someone who knows how to operate an "off" switch.
Re: (Score:1)
Given that they're apparently training their AI on the fly, even the most clumsy, nervous, blatant shoplifters that any $8/hr mall cop would see coming from a mile away should have a pretty decent success rate, let alone experienced thieves.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Your impotent rage never fails to amuse me.
Re: (Score:2)
Nazi punk-asses like yourself apparently have never seen an actual gang. They would fuck your shit right up lol, faggot nazi bitches.
I heartily agree. [tumblr.com]
It's only the intent that counts. Not consequences (Score:4, Insightful)
This is San Francisco, where what counts is that you had good intentions. Actual consequences of your actions? Consequences smaushcequences.
Free the minks!
Re: (Score:2)
the extreme right and the extreme left both rotate around the end to the same, sad, pathetic place.
Re: (Score:2)
The proverb about the pavement on the road to hell notwithstanding, I'll take good intentions that go awry over active malice any day.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I agree. There was an electronics store that had a security guy at the exit demanding... something. I just told him to piss off. But for some reason, I put up with Sam's club exit checkers. Is this hypocritical?
Re: (Score:3)
I agree. There was an electronics store that had a security guy at the exit demanding... something. I just told him to piss off. But for some reason, I put up with Sam's club exit checkers. Is this hypocritical?
No since you probably signed contract when getting you membership that said that required to let them check you on the way out in exchange for shopping there. While best buy or whoever has no such stipulation and just try to any way.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. There was an electronics store that had a security guy at the exit demanding... something. I just told him to piss off. But for some reason, I put up with Sam's club exit checkers. Is this hypocritical?
No since you probably signed contract when getting you membership that said that required to let them check you on the way out in exchange for shopping there. While best buy or whoever has no such stipulation and just try to any way.
Probably Fry's. Though the Grocery Outlet I used to live near has instituted a receipt checker near the doorway because they have so many problems with theft. Fires have left a lot of people needy and nobody wants to help them. Unfortunately they have hired one of their dumbest employees to do the receipt-checking, so even though I've been shopping there for a decade and regularly filling the cart the girl asked to see my receipt when I went to go get my $1.60 bag of ice to go with my $100 cart of groceries
Re: (Score:2)
You probably look like a scummy mexican, you act like one here. VIVA LA RAZA!!
I actually look more like a Viking.
The problem... (Score:2, Interesting)
The problem isn't one shoplifter. It's a mob of 20 or 25 walking in behind a shopper, cleaning the place out, and running out.
Not that I consider this a problem -- anything that destroys the profit margins of cashless/anti-privacy businesses is a good thing in my book. Bring on the flashmobs!
Re:The problem... (Score:5, Insightful)
People can already do this with regular stores. The fact that regular stores have cashiers is not what stops people doing this.
Re: (Score:2)
So if you had a mob of 20 people ready to commit a crime, you would rob a convenience store, and not of its cash, but of its products?
You wouldn't make a great mafia boss. Take that as a compliment.
First? Texas has had these for 100 years (Score:2)
âSan Francisco Gets Its First Cashierless Store"
First, eh. Texas has had cashierless stores for a hundred years. We call them "vending machines".
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention that Japan had taken the concept of the vending machine to the level of almost being full-sized stores just by themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
You can literally buy dogs from a vending machine in Tokyo now. That's not even a joke:
https://www.dailydot.com/uncli... [dailydot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
fragmented society (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The cashier is too busy texting to respond to customers anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the talking to the cashier that I don't like. It's the waiting in line to get to the cashier in the first place... especially since so many stores cheap out and staff an inadequate number of cashiers these days... that I hate with a burning passion. Frankly, I'd take any of the solutions: enough cashiers to handle the customers in a timely manner, self-checkouts that aren't flakey as hell with scales that are out-of-calibration and always need an override, or totally cashier-less stores.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the talking to the cashier that I don't like. It's the waiting in line to get to the cashier in the first place... especially since so many stores cheap out and staff an inadequate number of cashiers these days... that I hate with a burning passion. Frankly, I'd take any of the solutions: enough cashiers to handle the customers in a timely manner, self-checkouts that aren't flakey as hell with scales that are out-of-calibration and always need an override, or totally cashier-less stores.
Wal-marts self checks have gotten worse with time. It used to work fairly well never had any problems. But then they updated to what looks like a shitty electron app and it has been buggy as hell since. I swear user interfaces peaked 8 to 10 years ago and have gotten worse ever since.
Designs 8-10 yrs ago were "not mobile friendly" (Score:2)
I swear user interfaces peaked 8 to 10 years ago and have gotten worse ever since.
That sort of coincides with the rise in use of fingers on a 4 inch screen at the expense of a mouse and a 19+ inch screen.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not the talking to the cashier that I don't like. It's the waiting in line to get to the cashier in the first place... especially since so many stores cheap out and staff an inadequate number of cashiers these days...
They also just hire inadequate cashiers. Most cashiers are terrible at their jobs, because they don't want to pay anyone what they're worth so people with a clue and a job go find a better job. That's why I use self checkout at e.g. Slaveway — I can check out faster than the cashier, even if I have a few produce items. Of course, I try not to shop at places like that, but the truth is that I rarely see a competent cashier in any grocery store any more, and in precious few other places as well.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's just you...
Robotic pooper scooper (Score:3)
They are doing it the hard Way (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
10 years ago most people were looking at RFID tags as the approach for doing this.
Re: (Score:2)
Raise the minimum wage higher than the cost to roll out tech, this is what you get, fewer jobs
No, not fewer jobs. Just different jobs. SF has an unemployment rate of 2.4%, which is far below the national average. Companies are struggling to find workers. Any displaced cashiers will have no problem finding alternative jobs where they are doing something that is actually productive.
Cashierless stores are being introduced first in high wage locations like SF and Seattle, but once they are debugged and working, they will be deployed everywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously. Everyone here who can rub two brain cells together and sit through some codeacademy courses is calling themselves a NodeJS developer and making six figures these days. Hiring is a beast, signing and referral bonuses are in the five figures now, and it's still damn hard to fill the seats, much less find actual talent. There's barely anyone *left* to be register jockeys; because god forbid those jobs go back to the part-time teenagers who manned registers when I was... well... a teenager.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cool. So then you won't have to uncomfortably look at those people who make you feel sad. Got it.
Re: (Score:2)
walk over for 'a polite conversation' (Score:2)
a store attendant will get a text and walk over for 'a polite conversation
That's great, but how fast can they RUN?
Can't wait... (Score:1)
I just can't wait for the day when I can no longer buy food without a working, charged smartphone with a corporate grocery app installed. [/sarcasm]
The Tenderloin? (Score:2)
Market between 6th and 7th? Yeah. Good luck with that, guys.
Pick Me Up (Score:2)
The turnstile was technically unnecessary since thieves would just hop it anyway. Presumably a stolen phone wouldn't help much since it'd be locked and you'd need to unlock it and go into the app, and the phone you're about to steal might not have the app installed.
I'm skeptical the attendant will be of any use, since there's already a standard technique for dealing with that: have an accomplice tie them up with customer service questions.
I'm really wondering what happens if you pick something up and hand i
Stop I say! (Score:1)
Or I shall be forced to take your picture again.
(again)