Prisons Across the US Are Quietly Building Databases of Incarcerated People's Voice Prints (theintercept.com) 80
In New York and other states across the country, authorities are acquiring technology to extract and digitize the voices of incarcerated people into unique biometric signatures, known as voice prints. From a report: Prison authorities have quietly enrolled hundreds of thousands of incarcerated people's voice prints into large-scale biometric databases. Computer algorithms then draw on these databases to identify the voices taking part in a call and to search for other calls in which the voices of interest are detected. Some programs, like New York's, even analyze the voices of call recipients outside prisons to track which outsiders speak to multiple prisoners regularly.
Corrections officials representing the states of Texas, Florida, and Arkansas, along with Arizona's Yavapai and Pinal counties; Alachua County, Florida; and Travis County, Texas, also confirmed that they are actively using voice recognition technology today. And a review of contracting documents identified other jurisdictions that have acquired similar voice-print capture capabilities: Connecticut and Georgia state corrections officials have signed contracts for the technology
Authorities and prison technology companies say this mass biometric surveillance supports prison security and fraud prevention efforts. But civil liberties advocates argue that the biometric buildup has been neither transparent nor consensual. Some jurisdictions, for example, limit incarcerated people's phone access if they refuse to enroll in the voice recognition system, while others enroll incarcerated people without their knowledge. Once the data exists, they note, it could potentially be used by other agencies, without any say from the public.
Corrections officials representing the states of Texas, Florida, and Arkansas, along with Arizona's Yavapai and Pinal counties; Alachua County, Florida; and Travis County, Texas, also confirmed that they are actively using voice recognition technology today. And a review of contracting documents identified other jurisdictions that have acquired similar voice-print capture capabilities: Connecticut and Georgia state corrections officials have signed contracts for the technology
Authorities and prison technology companies say this mass biometric surveillance supports prison security and fraud prevention efforts. But civil liberties advocates argue that the biometric buildup has been neither transparent nor consensual. Some jurisdictions, for example, limit incarcerated people's phone access if they refuse to enroll in the voice recognition system, while others enroll incarcerated people without their knowledge. Once the data exists, they note, it could potentially be used by other agencies, without any say from the public.
Re: This is nothing. (Score:2)
Yay for cybernetic totalitarianism! Yay dystopia! Yay!!
Re:Being in prison isn't consensual? (Score:4, Informative)
I mean, you read the last part of TFS, but what about the rest? Did you miss this part?
"Some programs, like New York's, even analyze the voices of call recipients outside prisons to track which outsiders speak to multiple prisoners regularly."
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
I mean, you read the last part of TFS, but what about the rest? Did you miss this part?
"Some programs, like New York's, even analyze the voices of call recipients outside prisons to track which outsiders speak to multiple prisoners regularly."
Good point, I had forgotten about that part of the summary when I read the last paragraph. I have never called someone in prison, but if there isn't some kind of "this call is being monitored and reviewed by prison officials and other agencies ..." message at the beginning of the call then I agree there is a problem. IANAL, but a quick Google search seems to confirm there is no reasonable expectation of privacy during a prison phone call, at least in Florida (the first article I found). Which is what I woul
Re: (Score:2)
We let her go for other reasons.
One evening, the phone rings. "This is a call from WTF Prison, for Mary Jones. Will you accept the call and charges?"
"No, I will not". And I hung up.
In this scenario, now my voice print would be captured and logged. Not cool.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
and the people outside of prison ?
Oh, in some ways, the entire US seems like a prison.
We're all prisoners now.
Or, at least that's the way we're sometimes treated.
Re: (Score:1)
The deal is though by calling a prisoner they are fair game to monitor so that you can make sure they are not engaged in criminal activity from prison... I don't see why that would not extend to anything they could do with a recording of the conversation which also seems like a good idea for prisoners.
Re: (Score:2)
"We should be executing 100 times more of them, harvesting there organs and using them for medical expeiments."
You definitely could use one of their grammar-organs.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:mass biometric surveillance (Score:4, Insightful)
I've been to prison and I'd like to see you tell me to my face that I should never have been released. We'd have ourselves a BIG time, you and me.
If you're saying he needs to be legitimately scared to tell you that to your face, you are the type of person who shouldn't have been let out.
Re: (Score:2)
Quit being a cunt. Felons don't lost their right to get pissed, any more than you do.
Of course they can get pissed. But they cannot assault someone which is why the OP was implying would happen.
Re: mass biometric surveillance (Score:1)
Cool. Except when your visit to prison was sponsored by corrupt officials and bogus charges, like if you happen to be their political opposition. Then they get free (for them) state sponsored surveillance on your every move after that.
Re:mass biometric surveillance (Score:5, Informative)
Don't want mass biometric surveillance in prison? Don't do something that would put you in prison, dumb ass. If I had my way, you wouldn't get out again.
That would be all well and good if the laws and justice system in the US were a little more sane. The population of the US is currently 326 million (2017). [google.com] The population of the world is 7.5 billion(2017). [google.com] The 2016 US prison population was 2.3 million [prisonpolicy.org]including federal, state, local, immigration, military, juvenile. and civil detention facilities. The 2016 prison population for the entire world was 10.35 million. [prisonstudies.org] The US has 4.3% of the worlds population but houses 22% of the prisoners in the world. There are also 3.8 million people on probation and 820K on parole. That works out to 6.92 million people who are actively registered in the criminal justice system. That's a little over 2% of the US population.
With the number of laws on the books in the US, damn near the entire population could be arrested on any given day for an infraction. It just matters if you get caught, of if a police officer feels like finding something to charge you for. There are many states that have laws about which positions are legal to have sex with your spouse, in the privacy of your own home. In one of the Carolinas it's illegal to sing off key. There's a town in Arizona that it's illegal to wear suspenders, and another that it's illegal for a woman to wear pants.
There are 646K people incarcerated in local jails. Of those, 70% haven't been convicted yet as the justice system is backed up. There are almost 5500 people who are in civil detention centers in over a dozen states. These are people who were convicted of sexual crimes and have already served their entire sentence. But they are still confined, well, because.
Re:mass biometric surveillance (Score:4, Funny)
In one of the Carolinas it's illegal to sing off key.
The voice print database will be especially useful over there.
Re: (Score:2)
The US has 4.3% of the worlds population but houses 22% of the prisoners in the world.
Obviously something about Americans makes them highly predisposed to being criminals.
Re: mass biometric surveillance (Score:2)
"With the number of laws on the books in the US, damn near the entire population could be arrested on any given day for an infraction."
Alas, it seems we have become Stalin's Soviet Union.
Re: (Score:3)
Most prisoners when released commit more crimes, now we can detect them by their voice.
Well.. We already have their fingerprints and I expect their DNA.. So how's this different?
Personally, I think this is a good idea, but only if the data is only kept until the person in question has fulfilled their sentence, including any time on probation if they are released early. Once the "debt to society" has been paid, delete it.
Re: (Score:2)
Every other criminal they call will have a voice print.
Every non criminal they call is connected to a criminal voice print and is kept on file as a direct new connection to a criminal.
Smart phones, VoIP, OS approved chat software, that big brand virtual assistant/intelligent assistant will all be waiting for that voice print for decades.
Re: Awesome (Score:2)
Yay cybernetic totalitarianism!
Re: (Score:2)
Once the "debt to society" has been paid, delete it.
Like their fingerprints and their DNA.
Purpose (Score:2, Interesting)
The purpose of this is to prevent inmates from hijacking/sharing each other's phone cards and usage of the phone system.
It basically prevents Prisoner A from using Prisoner B's phone time because (s)he won't have the same voice print. This is mostly a good thing, inmates can no longer share phone time, or steal it from each other, or even trade it. Everything inside a prison becomes a valuable commodity to be traded for other commodities.
This is an environment where you someone just might beat you within
Re:Purpose (Score:5, Insightful)
That problem only exists because of the artificial scarcity placed on phone calls, which does more harm than good.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The purpose of this is to prevent inmates from hijacking/sharing each other's phone cards and usage of the phone system.
You actually buy that line?
We let prisoners get buttraped in the shower, shanked in the yard, and allow gangs to form in the population, but we can't have them phone-cards for the phone system we control and directly profit off of getting mixed up, why, that would be downright WRONG!
Sure, we're doing this to help with prison system phone card theft! All of that juicy data collection and biometric collection of prisoners, friends, and family is just an unfortunate side effect! Honest! Well of course we have
Re: (Score:2)
Hops of connections to a criminal and collect it all.
What was once used over a war zone is now collect it all at a federal and state budget level.
Re: Purpose (Score:2)
If you really believe that's the purpose, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, no, no. They're informing you that they may record your call, and therefore pass the legal obligation in two-party-consent states.
Of course, that would mean you could also record the call. (I think, IANAL, you may also have to tell them that this call may be recorded from your side.)
My voice is my passport. Verify me! (Score:2)
My voice is my passport. Verify me!
Queitly? (Score:1)
So they're recording whispers?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Just refuse to convict next time you're on a jury. Or better yet, tell them no, you cannot follow the law because it isn't just. That really gets their attention, and there isn't anything they can do about it because you aren't the convict.
It would be a sad abuse of that power if you used it not because of the particular case but because you didn't like some aspect of the penal system.
criminals (Score:2, Insightful)
By 'incarcerated people', you mean convicted criminals. Also, not 'prisoners', convicted criminals.
Such anger, much despair (Score:2)