Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck Businesses The Courts

After Facing Class-Action Lawsuit, Instacart CEO Says It's Taking Steps To Ensure Tips Are Counted Separately From Wages (www.cbc.ca) 54

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: On the heels of a recently-filed class action lawsuit over wages and tips, as well as drivers and shoppers speaking out about Instacart's alleged practices of subsidizing wages with tips, Instacart is taking steps to ensure tips are counted separately from what Instacart pays shoppers. In a blog post today, Instacart CEO Apoorva Mehta said all shoppers will now have a guaranteed higher base compensation, paid by Instacart. Depending on the region, Instacart says it will pay shoppers between $7 to $10 at a minimum for full-service orders (shopping, picking and delivering) and $5 at a minimum for delivery-only tasks. The company will also stop including tips in its base pay for shoppers.

"After launching our new earnings structure this past October, we noticed that there were small batches where shoppers weren't earning enough for their time," Mehta wrote. "To help with this, we instituted a $10 floor on earnings, inclusive of tips, for all batches. This meant that when Instacart's payment and the customer tip at checkout was below $10, Instacart supplemented the difference. While our intention was to increase the guaranteed payment for small orders, we understand that the inclusion of tips as a part of this guarantee was misguided. We apologize for taking this approach." For the shoppers who were subject that approach, Instacart says it will retroactively pay people whose tips were included in payment minimums.
Previously, Instacart guaranteed its workers at least $10 per job, but workers said Instacart offsets wages with tips from customers. The suit alleges Instacart "intentionally and maliciously misappropriated gratuities in order to pay plaintiff's wages even though Instacart maintained that 100 percent of customer tips went directly to shoppers. Based on this representation, Instacart knew customers would believe their tips were being given to shoppers in addition to wages, not to supplement wages entirely."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

After Facing Class-Action Lawsuit, Instacart CEO Says It's Taking Steps To Ensure Tips Are Counted Separately From Wages

Comments Filter:
  • wacky terminology (Score:4, Informative)

    by magarity ( 164372 ) on Wednesday February 06, 2019 @06:36PM (#58081340)

    WTF is a "shopper" in this context? Normally that's a customer but they seem to be using it to mean employee...

  • what about the full min wage + full IRS mileage??

    Do they still have scheduled shifts and want workers to wait in parking lot in case an order comes in?

    • by Pascoea ( 968200 )

      what about the full min wage + full IRS mileage??

      Most jurisdictions these workers are not employees of Instacart, they are independent contractors accepting an assignment. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that their employee's are paid according to regulations.

      Do they still have scheduled shifts and want workers to wait in parking lot in case an order comes in?

      I've never used instacart, but how it's been described, it is like Uber. You request a shopper/pickup, if there is one in the are they are able to accept the assignment.

    • by Pascoea ( 968200 )
      Shit. I screwed up the markup, my bad.

      what about the full min wage + full IRS mileage??

      Most jurisdictions these workers are not employees of Instacart, they are independent contractors accepting an assignment. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that their employee's are paid according to regulations.

      Do they still have scheduled shifts and want workers to wait in parking lot in case an order comes in?

      I've never used instacart, but how it's been described, it is like Uber. You request a shopper/pickup, if there is one in the are they are able to accept the assignment.

  • No shit. People are just dumb. The company paid wages based on market demands which is exactly how gigs like this work and then the company did the logical thing it sounds like to insure that they were always within the law. The tips were in fact handed to the "shoppers" as stated, but the "wages" in some instances were less than desired because there was less market demand or an oversupply of "shoppers" at certain points. It's called a free market people. It's a good thing. It creates lower prices for good

  • I know where the fucking store is.
  • This is a YC-backed company, so they are associated with this fraud. They had to know of this before okaying and backing it and profiting off of it for 6-7 years so far. Paul Graham should be considered complicit in this and taken into a courtroom.

  • Don't allow employers to subside their wages with you paying extra just because. You've already paid the asking price. 10% extra to let your boss get away with not paying you properly? no.

If all the world's economists were laid end to end, we wouldn't reach a conclusion. -- William Baumol

Working...