Tinder Bypasses Google Play Joining Revolt Against App Store Fee (bloomberg.com) 104
Tinder has joined a growing backlash against app store taxes by bypassing Google Play in a move that could shake up the billion-dollar industry dominated by Google and Apple. From a report: The online dating site launched a new default payment process that skips Google Play and forces users to enter their credit card details straight into Tinder's app, according to new research by Macquarie analyst Ben Schachter. Once a user has entered their payment information, the app not only remembers it, but also removes the choice to swap back to Google Play for future purchases, he wrote. "This is a huge difference," Schachter said in an interview. "It's an incredibly high-margin business for Google bringing in billions of dollars," he said.
Apple and Google launched their app stores in 2008, and they soon grew into powerful marketplaces that matched the creations of millions of independent developers with billions of smartphone users. In exchange, the companies take as much as 30% of revenue. The app economy is expected to grow to $157 billion in 2022, according to App Annie projections. As the market expands, a growing revolt has been gaining steam over the past year. Spotify Technology filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission earlier this year, claiming the cut Apple takes amounts to a tax on competitors. Netflix has recently stopped letting Apple users subscribe via the App Store and Epic Games said last year it wouldn't distribute Fortnite, one of the world's most popular video games, through Google Play.
Apple and Google launched their app stores in 2008, and they soon grew into powerful marketplaces that matched the creations of millions of independent developers with billions of smartphone users. In exchange, the companies take as much as 30% of revenue. The app economy is expected to grow to $157 billion in 2022, according to App Annie projections. As the market expands, a growing revolt has been gaining steam over the past year. Spotify Technology filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission earlier this year, claiming the cut Apple takes amounts to a tax on competitors. Netflix has recently stopped letting Apple users subscribe via the App Store and Epic Games said last year it wouldn't distribute Fortnite, one of the world's most popular video games, through Google Play.
Re: (Score:2)
How do they work?
The reinvented computing in the browser.
Now, they are reinventing computing on smartphones.
They finally got the corporate image of a computer right!
-No longer do you the user have unrestricted access and control of your device (even rooting is frowned upon, and certain apps may not run)
-People have no issue with apps running in the background collecting telemetry with apps that have no business running in the background, nor collecting that data.
-People have no issue with apps that show ads. 15 years ago "Adware" was a heinous crime. Now people expect it!
How could you pass that up? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
#1 I had to look up wtf tinder was and more importantly /.?
#2 wtf/.?! A fscking dating app leaves the play stor?! Wtf cares and the important part why is this even a story/headline on
Bad move (Score:4, Insightful)
How long until Tinder is hacked and credit card details leaked?
The thing I like about in-app purchases for app features, is the distance my data has from the app companies.
It means that an app maker will not have my payment details, which I never wanted them to have.
Usually it means the app maker will only have what personal details I choose to provide them - if they are taking payment directly, then have my entire real name and address and probably some other information they demand you provide.
It also makes sign up a lot harder and more imposing, I have to think they will see subscription decline because of this step...
Netflix went to a model at the end of December where they don't allow subscription via the App Store anymore, and they suddenly have a quarter where for the first time they lose, instead of gain, subscribers. HMM.
I can see where you'd get tired of having a middle-man scrape money off the top of your payments but they are providing a lot of value for customers, you get rid of that value at your peril.
Re:Bad move (Score:4, Insightful)
I was thinking this is a real Sophie's Choice situation. Which evil corp. do you trust to store your CC info?
The one that is separate (Score:2, Insightful)
I was thinking this is a real Sophie's Choice situation. Which evil corp. do you trust to store your CC info?
Yeah I get that angle as well, but so far I think Google and Apple both have managed not to leak payment details - I can't remember any stories along those lines and a search turns up nothing, so I think they have a better track record than even other large companies who regularly seem to have breaches.
But the main reason I like this situation is that a payment handler has as I said all kinds of deta
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Credit cards should be challenge response, they have chips in them, you should not give out your credit number to anyone, put your card in a reader or use nfc to do a challenge response issued by the bank. The bank should not even know the private key stored on your card, just the public one so they can validate the response was right.
But at the moment there is no way of buying something online without giving some one enough information to make other purchases.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
This is why I kinda hope one of the crypto coins actually makes it as a payment method someday, or at least something inspired by it.
Curious why you think blockchain is going to help here.
Blockchain can help validate the authenticity of a transaction after it is made. It does nothing to prevent a fraudulent transaction from happening in the first place. And that's where problems occur. This is why you hear of crypto chain exchanges being wiped out for millions and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They each have different info (Score:1)
So instead of just "the app" having your details, you prefer that "the app" AND Google have all of your information?
They do not though.
Google/Apple have payment information only. They do not have or know account or activity details for an individual application to tie back to your address and real name.
The app makers have whatever else you choose to give them; for many apps that is nothing except maybe a userID, that you create. If an application does require your real name, you can simply say no thanks a
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Apps don't get your payment info. They can see your Google identity and issue a payment request against it. That's it.
On the backend, Google bills your credit card, takes their cut, and pays the vendor.
How tf did you not know this?
Re: (Score:1)
That's just like, your opinion, man (Score:1)
Netflix's bad quarter was due to...
I just implied something, you are stating directly your idea is so...
The fact is both were done around the same time so we'll never know the impact of either change independently. I agree what you say, probably had some impact, but I think the threshold to add a subscription was probably higher and the figure affected most was a miss in adding new subscriptions.
Re: (Score:2)
The threshold where a little bit of inconvenience drops a massive amount of monthly subscribers does not exist. Netflix subscriptions are being billed automatically anyway, so the act of cancelling your Netflix is more inconvenient than the cost itself.
The major problem with Netflix is that they doubled the cost in about 5 years. It used to cost just $8 in 2014 and sales taxes didn't apply, now it's $16 + taxes and fees, some people are paying $21+ for Netflix. They stopped fighting the illegal sales tax co
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Taxes are not, and never have, been illegal, and are needed to pay for critical services and infrastructure in your community.
Then explain Bailey versus Drexel Furniture [wikipedia.org] and the National Firearms Act of 1934 [wikipedia.org]. What revenue purpose did a $200 tax on a $5 shotgun fulfill?
Not a great track record (Score:1)
Have you heart of Match.com? Same company.
That does not inspire confidence [google.com].
If people are hacking accounts they can also get payment details there, including your address and phone number....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Bad move (Score:1)
Google should bite back & fast... (Score:2)
...Once a user has entered their payment information, the app not only remembers it, but also removes the choice to swap back to Google Play for future purchases...
This is a modified Chrome-esque MO... It has worked for Chrome if I may add.
Modus Operandi:
Delist the thing from Google Play...
Return defective links for searches relating to the thing...
Watch [with joy] as those with similar thoughts are forced to think twice.
Re: (Score:2)
Delist the thing from Google Play..
Google is not Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't matter. Google's terms of service mandate if you wish to accept payments, you have to do it through Google unless Google doesn't not offer it in the country.
They did this shortly after implementing in-app purchases after seeing how many developers were using Paypal to pay for free apps.
Google delists apps for many of the same reason Apple does. Violating the terms of agreement is one of them.
Anyhow, I guess we'll have stories about Tinder gettin
Re: (Score:1)
Valve charges 30% in the Steam store. What's their excuse? Or is 30% not actually unreasonable?
Retail store routinely charge margins over 100%.
Re: (Score:2)
Suppose an App Store didn't exist. Suppose that if you wanted to put apps on your phone, you had to visit the website of each and every app publisher individually, and download the app from there. And of course, give them whatever payment info they may require (if any). And of course, take each publisher's word for it that they are not going to fuck you over in some way.
Now suppose that a 3rd party App Store exists, and now you have the option to go there and if you find some app you want, you can download
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. As I indicated above, I'd choose the option that already exists today, with no choice.
is there a “-1, Fanboi” mod option? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It is not that the apple store or google store don't provide value they do. Is it reasonable for them to charge 30%? The developer does most of the work and they just take off the top. Why not charge 99% or 1% or a fixed fee, who knows since they run an effective monopoly there is no way to actually find out is a reasonable charge by market forces.
Also there is no need technical need to give out your credit card number to anyone online, if credit card companies just got there act together.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it reasonable for movie theaters to charge as much as they do for popcorn and soda? By one measure, yes, because people will pay it!
Now, your response to that may be, "but developers don't have a choice." Sure they do. Just like I can choose not to buy the popcorn or soda, or even to go to the movie theater in the first place (usually my choice, by the way), the developer can choose NOT to develop for that phone platform. They can develop for a competing phone platform, they can develop for PCs instead
Re: (Score:2)
^.....eh..its not like you spent 2 years studying the market.... (:
Re: (Score:3)
It is not that the apple store or google store don't provide value they do. Is it reasonable for them to charge 30%? The developer does most of the work and they just take off the top. Why not charge 99% or 1% or a fixed fee, who knows since they run an effective monopoly there is no way to actually find out is a reasonable charge by market forces.
Also there is no need technical need to give out your credit card number to anyone online, if credit card companies just got there act together.
30% was extremely reasonable [imore.com] for a normal app when Apple launched the App Store. If you developed an app at all, publishing it via the telephone providers would give you a much lower part of the revenue. You could of also try to put it on your own website, but who would know about that? There was also a gazillion SDKs and hardware varieties to develop and test for... Here, you had a market place where people could find you, you didn't have to get approved by all the phone companies, you had one SDK with go
Re: (Score:3)
Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
"...and forces users to enter their credit card details straight into Tinder's app, according to new research by Macquarie analyst Ben Schachter. Once a user has entered their payment information, the app not only remembers it, but also removes the choice to swap back to Google Play for future purchases"
There's so much wrong there I hardly know where to start.
Enter my credit card details straight into Tinder? And when I do that I can't go back?
They must have stayed up late dreaming up the most obnoxious features they could add.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Great move (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Great move (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Great move (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Too Easy to Unsubscribe (Score:4, Insightful)
That's the real issue. Google Play makes it impossible for companies to hide behind nonsense that exists solely to prevent people from unsubscribing from the monthly fees these companies want to charge.
Give Tinder your credit card information and good luck finding their hidden unsubscribe button if they even have one. Now they can make you email them and/or provide additional information just to stop paying them every month.
The idea that these 3rd rate companies care about fees is a farce. Low quality sites always pay high fees for processors because of charge backs when the spouses find the accounts.
They're willing to pay higher fees to not be with Google because they'd rather deal with charge backs than easy account cancellations.
Re: (Score:2)
The idea that these 3rd rate companies care about fees is a farce. Low quality sites always pay high fees for processors because of charge backs when the spouses find the accounts.
Well now Tinder will be charged back by their credit card payment processor, rather than by Google. And that will entail fees too. So how exactly will they win?
Tinder is revolting? (Score:2)
The jokes. They just write themselves.
Not quite.... (Score:2)
"In exchange, the companies take as much as 30% of revenue."
No, they take 30% of the app store/in app purchase price. That's a subset of revenue, not all of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Dump them (Score:2)
Google built the platform. They built the store. They maintain it and it's pay to play. De-list Tinder. Your complaints about walled gardens and milking the user are pretty hollow if you aren't actively working on an alternative.