Tech News Site 'The INQUIRER' Is Shutting Down (theinquirer.net) 39
Long-time Slashdot reader pvjr writes that "The Inquirer is giving up the ghost and going dark in March, 2020."
An announcement on the site from the site's editor explains that the change is "due to a recent decline in digital advertising, along with a change of focus for the business..."
"We came, we Inquired, we're off to the pub." The site will remain live until the end of March, but Thursday [was] the final day that we will be publishing new content...
Before joining, I was a long-time admirer of the site, which since its debut in 2001 has energised tech journalism with its fearless attitude, snarky reporting, world-reaching exclusives and its ability to have an, er, bit fun now and again. This is all, of course, because of the fantastic team of journalists behind it...
And that brings me to the most important point of all. Thank you -- yes, you! -- dear reader. Over the past two decades, you have been the lifeblood of this website. Without you, The INQUIRER would have been a short-lived experiment, but your inquisitiveness, support and, er, often honest feedback made The INQUIRER the success that it was.
We'll see you down the pub...
An announcement on the site from the site's editor explains that the change is "due to a recent decline in digital advertising, along with a change of focus for the business..."
"We came, we Inquired, we're off to the pub." The site will remain live until the end of March, but Thursday [was] the final day that we will be publishing new content...
Before joining, I was a long-time admirer of the site, which since its debut in 2001 has energised tech journalism with its fearless attitude, snarky reporting, world-reaching exclusives and its ability to have an, er, bit fun now and again. This is all, of course, because of the fantastic team of journalists behind it...
And that brings me to the most important point of all. Thank you -- yes, you! -- dear reader. Over the past two decades, you have been the lifeblood of this website. Without you, The INQUIRER would have been a short-lived experiment, but your inquisitiveness, support and, er, often honest feedback made The INQUIRER the success that it was.
We'll see you down the pub...
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Pornhab was the best tech news site! Damned hard reporting!
And penetrating. Don't forget penetrating.
You'll be remembered (at least by some people) (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Strange thing that I've never encountered them as a resource, and that's a shame because from your description I'd have most likely found it a useful resource. Possibly the most promotion I've ever heard is the shutting down notice, could be a reason.. I dunno.
'so at least they (still) haven't vanished.' ---Yet. Surely the standard web archives will also loose them one unless someone seeds a swarm, or buys server space to host it. USENET is a perfect example.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:You'll be remembered (at least by some people) (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes if I recall Mike had a fallout with The Register, left and started The Inquirer in defiance.
The War is over..... (Score:2)
So The Register won?
Re: (Score:2)
So The Register won?
Was there even a battle?
I’m only one guy, and an American at that, but - while I read the Register regularly, I’ve never even heard of this particular Inquirer.
Re: The War is over..... (Score:2)
Re: The War is over..... (Score:4, Interesting)
Veteran journalist Mike Magee, now retired and found in pubs here and there, started both. The Inq and El Reg were then sold. He still writes now and then. His staff were crack (not on it) journos who broke many stories and scoffed at the tech titans and could laugh at themselves and the rest of this insane industry. May the Inq RIP.
Re: The War is over..... (Score:1)
Both were very popular.
I still enjoy The Register and enjoy it's witty tone.
Ignore Anonymous Coward. It's still good and full of IT guys giving us the low down on IT disasters.
Re: (Score:2)
Was there even a battle?
Only for a little bit. Once it saw that it could draw more people in by clickbait and outrage bait, it's time was over. The last few years shifting from digital to a gossip rag(like there's a shortage), was them nailing their own coffin shut.
Re: (Score:2)
I read The Register. Have done since before The Inquirer was created.
I don't appreciate the current pushing of various conferences that I can't get to and wouldn't if I could, and they're not really getting the right balance between reporting press releases and doing investigative journalism, but they're still way ahead of the rest of the tech press.
If they haven't deleted my account then I dread to think what must have been said to cause someone else to lose one. I've been acerbic towards multiple contenti
Re: (Score:2)
Did they have a marketing dept.? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe because they don't post many videos to Tiktok.
Re: (Score:2)
I think I remember a Slashdot story back in the day where the founding journalist left the Register to start this one.
I mean, the Register already felt like the Daily Mail of IT back then, the Inquirer seemed even worse.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should have RTFA occasionally on Slashdot. Many of their stories made it here.
As a long time nerd (Score:2)
Who started back before there was an internet -- at least available to the public -- with dial-up and BBSs, I never even heard of it.
Re:As a long time nerd (Score:4, Insightful)
You didn't check into Slashdot enough. Many of there articles made it here. They will be sorely missed.
Re: (Score:1)
Are you sure you're not confusing it with The Register? I've seen many an El Reg article posted to Slashdot. Cannot recall the last time I ever saw a /. article reference The Inq until this one.
Re: Who cares (Score:1)
20 years running is not an abject failure, you judgemental fatass.
Warning - Do not insert dick into toaster. (Score:3)
My hope was up (Score:2)
But then I saw that it wasn't the National Enquirer that folds and I was sad.
'Recent decline in digital advertising' (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The Inquirer was always more hardware centric, which is a niche market relative to The Register's broader hardware, software and technology business focus.
That meant The Register was more often relevant, and so I ended up only going there. The quality of writing wasn't too different, the British humour broadly the same, I just got a more rounded viewpoint from The Register.
I still do.
Damnit I got confused. (Score:2)
I thought this was Charlie Demerjian's site (Semi-Accurate) - he used to work at a rag like the Inquirer I thought.
Be nice to see Charlie not posting on the internet anymore, I don't think there can be much more bias in articles against Intel and for AMD.
(I get supporting the underdog but this guy is ridiculous)
Red-top tabloids focusing on tech/IT (Score:2)