Electric Buses on London's 100 Route Will Play a Soundtrack To Alert Pedestrians To Their Presence (wired.co.uk) 148
Matt Burgess, writing for Wired UK: Last year London's 8,000 or so buses traveled 279 million miles and completed 2.23 billion journeys -- more than half of all bus trips completed in England. But they're not green enough. Yet. According to mayor Sadiq Khan, London has Europe's biggest electric bus fleet with more than 200 currently in use. It's a small fraction of the total number of buses but there are already two fully electric bus routes: 43 (running between Muswell Hill and London Bridge) and 134 (North Finchley to Warren Street). Now the capital's electric buses are set to get a new soundtrack. The purpose? To help protect people around them. As electric vehicles are almost silent at lower speeds, they're potentially dangerous to the pedestrians, who may not be paying attention or live with visual impairments.
(Research from the US Department of Transportation has even suggested people are 40 per cent more likely to be hit by an electric or hybrid car than one with a noisy combustion engine). From July this year, EU regulations stipulate that all new electric need to include an Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System (AVAS). This system must play a sound to alert people to the vehicle when it's moving. Cars moving at speeds of less than 20kph must have a minimum sound level of 56dB and older electric cars have to be retrofitted with a sound system by 2021. The EU regulations also apply to London's buses. In order to create a consistent sound across the city's buses, Transport for London (TfL), the transport regulator, has commissioned a sound to be used by all electric buses in the capital.
(Research from the US Department of Transportation has even suggested people are 40 per cent more likely to be hit by an electric or hybrid car than one with a noisy combustion engine). From July this year, EU regulations stipulate that all new electric need to include an Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System (AVAS). This system must play a sound to alert people to the vehicle when it's moving. Cars moving at speeds of less than 20kph must have a minimum sound level of 56dB and older electric cars have to be retrofitted with a sound system by 2021. The EU regulations also apply to London's buses. In order to create a consistent sound across the city's buses, Transport for London (TfL), the transport regulator, has commissioned a sound to be used by all electric buses in the capital.
The Music From Close Encounters Of The 3rd Kind (Score:2)
Lorry reversing bleepers are bad enough (Score:2, Insightful)
I can't imagine how annoying it will be on roads in the future with crawling traffic consisting of electric vehicles all making some irritating warning sounds simply to ease the conscience of virtue signalling politicians in Brussels.
Just how many people walk into a road just using their ears and not their eyes? Even blind people have help or a guide dog.
Re London - given we're leaving the EU in a month so Kahn doesn't need to do this but he's just another politician who thinks some throwaway gesture politi
Re:Lorry reversing bleepers are bad enough (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"they do not determine laws."
I suggest you go find out how the EU really works, not what the propaganda in The Guardian tells you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for proving you have no idea what the word even means you grade A clown.
Re: (Score:3)
It will be a lot quieter than the current fossil engines chugging away. 56dB is about as loud as a normal conversation.
Re: (Score:2)
You've obviously never heard a modern petrol engine at low revs. They're almost inaudible and bentleys and rollers are silent but I don't notice any warning sounds required for them.
Re: (Score:2)
They are now required for all cars, not just EVs, if the sound level in motion is below 56dB.
Re: (Score:2)
Guess that’s the last time I buy a European car. Back to Toyota I go.
Re: (Score:2)
All cars, eeally? You'll be able to provide a citation for that then won't you.
Re: (Score:2)
Tololololo you must be new here to the internet
Re: (Score:2)
I can't imagine how annoying it will be on roads in the future with crawling traffic consisting of electric vehicles all making some irritating warning sounds simply to ease the conscience of virtue signalling politicians in Brussels.
I can. It will be far less annoying that it is currently. Let your imagination run wild!
Re:Lorry reversing bleepers are bad enough (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Lorry reversing bleepers are bad enough (Score:2)
Except there are millions of near silent vehicle journeys for decades so using traffic noise to determine if it is safe to step out into the road is not valid. You risk killing the cyclist (I personally know of some killed by a pedestrian stepping out into the road and knocking them off their bicycle) or getting yourself killed by the cyclist (there was a high profile case in the UK where this happened recently). I have stopped giving money to blind charities and make no bones about telling them why if they
Is this 2019? (Score:5, Insightful)
Am I wrong or does neither the summary nor the linked article have an actual sample of the new sound? I thought multimedia was invented at some time in the 90s.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think they've decided what sound to use yet and have announced the ruling, to give the big consultancies plenty of time to work out how to charge a vast fortune for licencing whatever new sound they come up with.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think they've decided what sound to use yet and have announced the ruling, to give the big consultancies plenty of time to work out how to charge a vast fortune for licencing whatever new sound they come up with.
The wired.co.uk article did, but ...
Oops, we couldn’t find that track.
SoundCloud.com
Re: (Score:3)
BBC radio 5 posted the noise [twitter.com] a car would be making on twitter, I think the bus would be similar in intent to this. It is bizarre BTW.
Re: (Score:2)
The whole article was about what sound and why they decided on. Minus an actual sound example.
Re: (Score:2)
This is Slashdot. You must be new here.
Re: (Score:2)
The EU rules (if post-Brexit UK will follow those) demand that you can tell from the sound whether the vehicle is accelerating or slowing down. The electric cars on the market that already have this feature emit something that's people recognize as "electric motor hum", changing in pitch with the speed.
The EU rules don't prescribe the exact sound, so aftermarket kits doing "beep beep beep" might show up. (I hope not.)
Related slashdot story: https://slashdot.org/story/360... [slashdot.org] "Drivers May Choose Electric Car
Re: (Score:2)
It was, but like many people, I have my PC default on mute anyways. Mostly because multi-media web is a bad idea.
What really gets me, is if I am trying to look up syntax or to see if there is an easy command to a programming language being directed to a youtube video. Where I am forced to watch the video for a quick answer to a small question.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A useless youtube video. Have you watched the video before posting? Can you guess what is missing?
Won't someone think of the people? (Score:5, Insightful)
Won't someone think of the people? That is, the people who live near bus routes or any busy roads - like me. I have been looking forward to a quieter life in future - quieter roads with quieter vehicles. Having laws that require vehicles to be noisy will remove any chance that my quality of life might improve. Cars are already much quieter than they used to be a couple of decades ago, leaving buses and motorcycles as the main noisemakers. I don't look forward to a constant stream of artificial noise instead of a quiet future.
Well done, legislators of the world. You're making my life worse.
Re: (Score:3)
"Well done, legislators of the world. You're making my life worse."
The thing about politicans is that if they had any brains (as opposed to merely the gift of the gab) they wouldn't be in politics but would be in business earning a fortune or some other discpline actually doing something useful.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Won't someone think of the people? (Score:5, Insightful)
That is, the people who live near bus routes or any busy roads - like me.
They are thinking of you. The end result of this will be orders of magnitude quieter than what you are currently getting.
You're welcome.
Re: (Score:3)
So you're okay with the low rumbling of diesel engines then?
EV sounds (Vehicle Sounds for Pedestrians, VSP) are typically higher pitch an somewhat melodic (and very sci-fi), so they don't carry as far and don't penetrate structures as easily as low frequency sounds. If you're indoors or more than ~50 feet away you probably won't hear it. The same can't be said for a diesel engine.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Audis are unreliable pisspots and VAG cheats at diesel emissions. You would also need two or three of them to move a transit bus. Mercedes 5 cylinder diesels are also more reliable, but Mercedes also cheats. Those wacky Germans...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
>"Cars are already much quieter than they used to be a couple of decades ago, leaving buses and motorcycles as the main noisemakers."
Modern motorcycles (especially 3+ cylinder) are also much quieter than in the past. The problem is that many idiots immediately rip off the stock muffler and replace it with something extremely annoying. They do this for three reasons- they incorrectly think it will improve performance (which it does not), and/or they have the "look at me" syndrome, and/or they think it i
Re: (Score:2)
People do this with their cheap old Honda Civics too. I call them "Mighty Mufflers" Because all it does is forces people to pay attention to them, often in annoyance on how crappy their car really is.
Re: (Score:2)
And don't forget about the 10,000 Watt stereo system speakers placed OUTSIDE the car ...
Re: (Score:2)
>"03 Shadow Spirit 1100. It has a definite performance and gas mileage between stock pipes and the Jardin's "
2003 isn't terribly "modern" anymore :) But I should have qualified a bit more and use "generally." For example example someone could pull that it makes any difference, I can probably pull dozens where it doesn't... especially on "Make no mistake, I would prefer my bike to be absolutely silent, as in you cannot hear exhaust, drivetrain or tire noise. That would be mighty cool."
Agreed. I am hopi
Re: (Score:2)
>" I can probably pull dozens where it doesn't... especially on "Make no mistake, I "
Sorry, it should be obvious, but I made an error quoting in my response. Should have been:
--------------------
I can probably pull dozens where it doesn't...
>"Make no mistake, I "
Re: (Score:2)
Well as long as we have motorized transportation intersecting pedestrians we will need some additional noises for general safety.
I drive a Prius, I was riding a road where some kids were playing basket ball in the street. I drove up to the area, they kept playing, I waited for a few seconds, where I saw a kid turn their head towards my car and they didn't notice me, until I honked my horn and scared the heck out of them, because they didn't realize there was a car there, even when they glanced in my directi
Re: (Score:2)
Omg! I’ve had this exact thing happen with my ICE. Clearly ALL cars need to be noisier. Someone call Brussels!
Re: (Score:2)
Simulated engine sounds... You turn around expecting to see a Harley and it's an electric bus.
I guess they have forgotten the deaf (Score:2)
So they will need sound and flashing lights at a minimum.
Probably a cow catcher on the front to shunt the morbidly stupid out of the way as well.
Re: (Score:2)
The deaf often know to look out for traffic, having no sense of hearing, they need to rely on their sight for their safety. People who are blind need their hearing and feeling to navigate a city.
People with all their senses will sometimes feel that they can be distracted, looking at their phones while judging their safety while crossing the street.
On a tangent. Did you realize if in the 1980's if I said their is a safety problem because everyone was looking at their phones in 2020. They would be very conf
Re: I guess they have forgotten the deaf (Score:2)
Problem is it never was morally acceptable to use traffic noise to determine if it is safe to step out into the road. You risk killing a cyclist and/or yourself so encouraging this behaviour is beyond stupid. Then again the blind are and entitled bunch who get no money from me anymore for lobbying for this.
Re: (Score:2)
Soundtrack choice (Score:3)
Godzilla (Score:2)
A little known report (Score:2)
There has been talk that the tune selected was What have I done to deserve this from the Pet Shop Boys
We all know what it will be. . . (Score:2)
Maybe they won't figure it out for a while, but eventually the soundtrack will be advertisements. Given the nature of bus rountes, the advertisements might actually be locally applicable. . . like for the sandwich shop around the corner from the stop.
Ice Cream Truck? (Score:2)
In the US, people might mistake that for an ice cream truck. Mmmm . . . ice cream.
disappointed (Score:2)
Surely this should have been a job for Brian Eno.
Loud pipes ... (Score:2)
But seriously, OID (opiate induced deafness) [opiates.com] is a serious problem in Seattle. The bums jaywalking just look crazy. In reality they can't hear the traffic coming.
Re: (Score:2)
Just play advertisements and make money. (Score:2)
Deja Vu (Score:2)
When electric buses were introduced a century ago, they were known as "the silent death" because of how quiet they were, sneaking up on people with no warning.
They just need to make the motors run louder to be more on par with buses running old fashioned diesel engines. A bit quieter, but loud enough that people know they are coming.
Jingle Bells (Score:2)
Why not use jingle bells? That's the very reason they existed, the "One Horse Open Sleigh" song is actually portraying an old winter road safety device, to warn people you were riding it. The original (thanksgiving) song was about just having fun with racing sleighs, no Xmas content at all. But its no accident that they often play that sound with Santa's sleight, perhaps there was a time when all of them had to, because they were too silent sliding on snow and the horse steps completely muffled by the snow.
What about motorized wheelchairs? (Score:2)
Re:Brexit (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Brexit (Score:5, Interesting)
The obvious answer is a requirement for pedestrians moving at under 20kph to emit silly noises at 56dB
OK, so now we will need a "Ministry of Silly Noises" . . .
How about deaf and blind folks carry a buzzer transponder in their pocket that alerts them when an electric vehicle is nearby, instead of broadcasting constant noise? Maybe there can even be "An App for That"?
Of course, people who like to wander around absent mindlessly, not paying attention, can buy these things, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Most humans come with a pair of eyeballs and a brain... no wait... I think we may have just found a human missing the brain...
People still get hit by shit that makes a lot of noise and die. The human brain is a suicidal machine sometimes. The more noise it hears the more it tends to shut the noise off and tune them out. So no... adding noise to shit is only going to add noise pollution... it is not going to save anyone's life by any meaningful degrees because the people that are going to die from the noi
Re: (Score:2)
Now explain, what the fuck does that post have to do with the buzzers the parent proposed?
Reliability (Score:3)
The joke aside about "Pocket Sily Noise Transponder 3000!(tm)(c)"
This poses a reliability problem.
- You could more or less immediately notice if your car is making noise or not.
- You won't necessarily be able to know it the guy you see is carrying a pocket transponder and if the transponder is actually working as it should (or battery flat, or vibration can't be felt in handbag, etc.).
---
Which also bring us to the more generic problem:
you can't even be sure if the guy is actually hearing the car's speaker n
Re: (Score:3)
>"The current standard is to always assume any pedestrian (or any other person) isn't aware of the car you're driving until you've made eye contact. No eye contact, automatically assume you're undetected."
Actually, if you have ever driven motorcycles, you quickly learn that eye contact means far less than you thought. You STILL have to assume that others do not see you or see you and you don't "register." You have to drive like everyone is out to kill you and base things only on the way they act/behave
Re:Brexit (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
indeed, so all the people living near bus route can now be subjected to some annoyingly distracting sound designed soley to warn you a bus (crawling along so slowly you'd get no more than a bruise if you did get hit by it) is right next to you.
You're far more likely to be hurt by a cyclist running a red light in London than you are by a bus, whose average speed is now 9.2 mph.
Re: (Score:2)
Then you'll understand.
Re: Brexit (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Brexit (Score:2)
Unless the intended sound is that of a diesel bus?
Re: Brexit (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
you reckon. "bus is moving, please mind the bus".
"bus is moving, please mind the bus"
"bus is moving, please mind the bus"
"bus is moving, please mind the bus"
maybe they could broadcast some adverts to make the sound instead. Imagine that!
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, you do know that existing buses already make a lot of noise?
Done correctly, the noise emitted by an electric bus would probably be nowhere near as intrusive.
Re: (Score:2)
Call me foolish, but being hit by a bus at 10mph is something I would really want to avoid. Glancing blow, you will probably be okay; hit on the head by the wing mirror? Probably not.
Re: Brexit (Score:2)
The irony is that the U.K. will probably still be influenced by European regulations, as part of future trade agreements, without getting to vote on those regulations. This is no different to US trade partners being influenced by US regulations.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah and US regulations are influenced by California, which are influenced by San Francisco, which boils down to about 250 activists and another 600 people doing the actual voting, largely based on the fliers that are handed to them (written by those same 250 activists) as they walk into the voting booth.
Re: (Score:2)
Remember "vehicle reversing"? They switched to that horrible screeching noise because apparently it's better at getting your attention.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I thought that horrible screeching noise was from a partially disabled reversing beeper! :)
But people not noticing a huge red vehicle approaching them?
Umm, Darwinism if they get flattened by it, there is a reason we are taught at school to look to the left, look to the right, and look to the left again before crossing a road.
Re: (Score:2)
Particularly on works sites it can be very noisy. Power tools, generators, construction vehicles, people shouting over it all. Radio on in the corner.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Umm, Darwinism if they get flattened by it, there is a reason we are taught at school to look to the left, look to the right, and look to the left again before crossing a road.
Thank you. Came here to say the same thing. Apparently we're now so preoccupied with a three inch screen we can't be bothered to use any common sense. Instead, we'll come up with convoluted and complicated processes to protect us from our own dereliction of personal responsibility.
This will be like those green markers placed in the
Re: (Score:2)
"it's almost if we want the stupid people to keep propagating."
Yes... yes we do... politicians need them so they can get votes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, Darwinism if they get flattened by it, there is a reason we are taught at school to look to the left, look to the right, and look to the left again before crossing a road.
Imagine you're blind. Now what?
Look left, look right, look left again?
Re:how about just a message (Score:4, Interesting)
Look left, look right, look left again?
What if you're deaf? Do they just play the noise louder? I'm all for equal protection, but I think additional noise pollution isn't the answer. With the unavoidable proliferation of all-electric vehicles, our entire vehicle-pedestrian practice needs a top-to-bottom redesign.
Re: (Score:2)
If they're deaf they can apply the look left, look right, look left again principle. If they're both deaf and blind then I have no idea.
I've started drinking since earlier so I'm gonna guess they apply the YOLO principle.
Re: (Score:2)
"Look left, look right, look left again?"
Nope, this is Britain. the vehicle in the closest lane is approaching from your right.
Re: (Score:2)
That explains why I keep getting knocked over so often.
That and the drinking.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, Darwinism if they get flattened by it, there is a reason we are taught at school to look to the left, look to the right, and look to the left again before crossing a road.
If you're a bus passenger, the last thing you want to deal with is the trip interruption that attends a pedestrian being hit. Aside from that, I rather doubt that inattentiveness is an inherited trait.
Re: (Score:2)
The solution to that problem "trip interruption" is not making noise. It is simply to not interrupt the trip.
After the obstruction gets run over a few times barely a bump will be noticed.
Mind the gap? (Score:3)
"Mind the bus !"
"Mind the bus !"
"Mind the bus !"
etc...
Re:how about just a message (Score:5, Funny)
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round
If they want a more British song, they could just have Postman Pat on an endless loop.
Postman Pat, Postman Pat, Postman Pat and his black & white cat...
People will hear the buses coming, but after a month of this they'll jump under them voluntarily.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My vote's for "Stayin' Alive" by the Bee Gees.
Re: (Score:2)
"Look out for the bus" repeated endlessly and loudly
Brits don't "look out" for things; they "mind" them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because Brussels doesn’t have trolleybuses? Brexit really needs to happen and happen quick.
Re: What about trolley buses? (Score:2)
Except the RNIB where one of the lead groups lobbying for this. Entitled twats.
Re:Phone Zombies (Score:4, Interesting)
Sometimes nothing will catch their attention. One day I saw a fire engine, a pumper, with all of its lights on and the sirens on. It had come to a stop at a red light and was just starting to cross into the intersection after making sure the vehicles in the opposite direction had stopped. Just as it was about a quarter of the way across a person on the opposite side started to walk across with the light. The driver of the fire engine had to slam on the brakes and then blasted the horn. The person just continued on his way.
How the intersection is set and the layout of the doors of the ground level store means that the pedestrian would have seen the flashing lights of the fire engine reflected off of the doors. Since the fire engine was only the width of a street away there's no way he didn't hear the sirens or horn. Yet he just strolled across as if the world revolved around him.