Unremovable Malware Found Preinstalled on Low-End Smartphone Sold in the US (zdnet.com) 56
Low-end smartphones sold to Americans with low-income via a government-subsidized program contain unremovable malware, security firm Malware bytes said today in a report. From a report: The smartphone model is Unimax (UMX) U686CL, a low-end Android-based smartphone made in China and sold by Assurance Wireless, a cell phone service provider part of the Virgin Mobile group. The telco sells cell phones part of Lifeline, a government program that subsidizes phone service for low-income Americans. "In late 2019, we saw several complaints in our support system from users with a government-issued phone reporting that some of its pre-installed apps were malicious," Malwarebytes said in a report published today. The company said it purchased a UMX U686CL smartphone and analyzed it to confirm the reports it was receiving.
Isn't virgin mobile shutting down? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Who buys a phone from a dead company, anyway?
I know several people who would be all over that. Some folks demand everything be rock bottom in price, because price is their touchstone.
Re: (Score:2)
I know several people who would be all over that. Some folks demand everything be rock bottom in price, because price is their touchstone.
Used caskets for sale! :-D
Re: (Score:1)
I know several people who would be all over that. Some folks demand everything be rock bottom in price, because price is their touchstone.
Used caskets for sale! :-D
50 percent less goo!
Re: (Score:3)
' Some folks demand everything be rock bottom in price'
The problem is that these are government subsidized phones [Obama phones]. And Unimax isn't the only company doing this, ANS also does the exact same thing. No matter what the user blocks from execution on the phone, it calls malware for installation.
So, not only are these companies making their income from the US Government, they are also installing addware using the bandwidth allocated to the plan that WE PAY FOR.
In addition, these phones are generall
Re: (Score:3)
' Some folks demand everything be rock bottom in price'
The problem is that these are government subsidized phones [Obama phones]. And Unimax isn't the only company doing this, ANS also does the exact same thing. No matter what the user blocks from execution on the phone, it calls malware for installation.
So, not only are these companies making their income from the US Government, they are also installing addware using the bandwidth allocated to the plan that WE PAY FOR.
In addition, these phones are generally given to those that have the least knowledge or availability for support, or to know better.
It's a criminal enterprise that the providers of subsidized phones have been doing without anyone saying one word, or without accountability. This is done to those that need the most protection, it's shameful.
I'm not saying that people should want these phones or that the govmint should be giving them away. I am saying that there are people in here that would scap them up based on cheapness.
Re:Malware on your Obama Phone??? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Malware on your Obama Phone??? (Score:5, Informative)
The program was started under FDR as the Rural Electrification Act of 1936.
It was amended in 1944 to include loans to telephone companies and establish a "Rural Telephone Administration". Modified by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Then, as you said, updated to include cell phones by Bush2.
Re: (Score:1)
So they are Franklinphones. Sounds too close to "Frankenphones", which may be appropriate.
Re: (Score:2)
The man in gauze! The man in gauze!
Re: (Score:2)
A much bigger problem. A society that thinks mass surveillance should be an exportable good.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Andro... [reddit.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Malware on your Obama Phone??? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Zdx97A63s [youtube.com]
So .. (Score:1)
Open Source Alternatives? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Does installing aftermarket ROMs count?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Yes but unfortunately no recent phones have official Lineage builds and much fewer have Sailfish OS even though that's even closer to a Linux experience. The best bet is to buy a Librem
Re:Open Source Alternatives? (Score:4)
I think you really need to figure out what your goals are with a smartphone. There are usually solutions to fit your needs. LineageOS is usually a happy medium. You can lock down system apps or feed them false data. It's also modified AOSP instead of modified Android, though you can install open-gapps on it if you want and lock them down like any other system app.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm currently trying to install LineageOS with microG, to access Google services (email, calendar) without having Google binary blobs running on my phone. This feels like it should be a fairly common use case, but it's an absolute pain in the neck.
Multiple levels of flashing the phone - a "recovery" which seems to be the equivalent of a BIOS, followed by the system itself - then installing some sort of shim (DavX5) to convert between the DAV calendar/contacts standard and whatever the heck Google uses, inp
Re: (Score:3)
If you really can't stand using gapps, my recommendation at the moment is to find a way to get out of the Google ecosystem
Re: (Score:2)
"Trial" date. (Score:3)
Kind of sucks to be poor. And now they're a trial group for "how to spy on the masses". Soon as they figure out "undetected" they'll be good to go.
Sounds like the government program was Chinese (Score:3, Insightful)
People suggesting they "buy" phones from somewhere else probably don't know that these phones and the services were pretty much free for low income people, and it's not like they had a choice where the junk phones came from.
The providers of these phones should be held responsible for not bothering to do a minimal security check before deploying something like 20 million "free" phones to the financially strapped.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Product Recall (Score:2)
Probably won't happen, but it should.
So.. who put the malware in? (Score:3)
So.. who put the malware in?
TFA doesn't say other than "it's unclear."
1. Could it be the chinese? From context in TFA, could be.
2. Could be the US Government? I'm sure there are some in The Bureaucracy who would love to see what "The People" are doing with these phones. Who they text. What they text.
3. Could be general incompetence, *again* -- > the most likely explanation. But I'd be very curious about #2...
Re: (Score:2)
TFA is unclear because Malwarebytes sells more products if they can scare you by making it sound like the chinese are spying on you. I've seen this crap in action. It's the phone manufacturer making extra money throwing ads onto the screen.
To be clear though: If you can't flash the phone the only option is to disable the software since it can't be removed by design
"The most likey explanation". (Score:1)
No, just the one you need the most, to keep your distortion up of how there is no evil and all is well and everyone is merely incompetent and stupid.
Just make it official, and start a religion already! I even have a cool name: The Blackeyers!
I'm selling buckets of sand for your heads starting right now!
Source: I got relatives who actually see the insides of the shit that is happening out there. I know you will never believe me, and you should never just believe anyway, but what you hear as "consipracy theor
Re: (Score:2)
Ohai , known trollop of a fake account.
Re: So.. who put the malware in? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Why "chinese"? That come from who's ass?
Read TFA you twit. Answer's in there. I'm not giving it to you for free. Read, goddamn it.
Re: So.. who put the malware in? (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm sure there are some in The Bureaucracy who would love to see what "The People" are doing with these phones. Who they text. What they text.
Doubtful. The people who get these phones are not at all interesting.
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, because it's always the rich people who rise up against the status quo and start riots and stuffs.
Never the poor and downtrodden, the disenfranchised, oh noes.
Why would anyone want to watch those smelly buggers?
There is only a couple hundred million of them.
Let them eat cake.
Re: (Score:2)
These are people literally turning to the government to give them a cell phone. They are not revolutionaries.
Re: (Score:2)
Had that on local ones, a decade ago. (Score:2)
Computers too.
And I don't just mean IME or some funny EFI/firmware.
Look Everywhere (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, most apps installed on smartphones have embedded trackers and in-app advertising. Your phone's OS even has a delightful 'advertising ID' to help out these wonderful people. It is nigh-impossible to use a modern smartphone without encountering such 'features.'
In other words, this article is a (regrettable) instance of business as usual for the smartphone industry.
Damn commies! (Score:2)
FYI.... (Score:1)