Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Earth

Microsoft Is Also Launching a New $1 Billion 'Climate Innovation Fund' (geekwire.com) 24

As part of Microsoft's effort to reduce more atmospheric carbon than it emits, the company has announced a $1 billion "Climate Innovation Fund," reports GeekWire: Microsoft said the new fund will leverage its balance sheet to loan money and take equity stakes in ventures to encourage the development of new environmental innovations. The money will be invested over the next four years. The company cited four criteria for investments, including sustainability initiatives, market impact, technological advances, and climate equity, addressing the tendency of climate change to disproportionately hurt people in developing countries.

"We deeply understand this is just a fraction of what is needed to solve this problem," said Amy Hood, the company's chief financial officer, outlining the plan at the event Thursday morning.... Microsoft said it is signing the United Nations' 1.5-degree Business Ambition Pledge, and said it will publicly track its progress in an annual Environmental Sustainability Report.

The article notes that Bill Gates "reviewed Microsoft's new initiative but wasn't involved in its creation." Gates has his own $1 billion Breakthrough Energy Ventures fund and has meanwhile also invested in mini nuclear reactors to address climate change.

And this spring he'll release a book titled "How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Is Also Launching a New $1 Billion 'Climate Innovation Fund'

Comments Filter:
  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday January 18, 2020 @12:00PM (#59632920)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Is this something good? Spending a billion dollars to try to figure out how to capitalize on climate change?

      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by Chas ( 5144 )

        If it facilitates climate remediation?

        SURE it's a good thing.

        Nobody out there is operating a charity.

        And governments aren't going to just DECREE this shit into existence.
        Nor is implementing communism.

        So we need market-based solutions. Which have to be developed and paid for.

      • They will most likely need to build a huge power hungry data center in Utah to analyze this.
    • I'm not an ardent fan of microsoft, but when a company does something good, when they don't have to, you have to give them credit.

      Microsoft doesn't have to? Of course they do. They see the writing on the wall. There's been congressional hearings on how "big tech" has been producing so much CO2. Microsoft knew that if they didn't change their image willingly, while they still had some say in how the reductions would come, then they could face government regulations that they might not like.

      There's also the competition from the likes of Apple and Google. Apple put a bunch of solar PV panels on the roof of it's new building, somethi

    • Unfortunately, this fund sounds like a lottery no worse than any online casino. However, there is profit in the online casino, for each person personally. And I recommend to read the site https://slots-online-canada.co... [slots-online-canada.com], for more information. Only honest reviews on gambling establishments.
  • Is to provide $1B in angel funding and take stock in the early years of the greenwashing industry bubble.

    So... pollute, invest, profit?

  • Microsoft has the Corporate Cancer (https://www.amazon.com/Corporate-Cancer-Miracles-Millions-Company-ebook/dp/B081D58P1X). It won't be long before they are gone.

  • and all work on useless garbage like this. There is no drive to actually make good software. It's all useless virtue signaling.

  • Shaming people into changing their ways will get only a small percentage of the change we need (especially if the shaming is done by condescending celebrities). This approach completely misunderstands human nature, at least in the short term.

    Passing regulations and enacting treaties will get a larger percentage of the change we need, but still probably not enough. Worse, those routes are slow-moving, filled with unintended consequences, and require huge battles. Even if they can bring enough change in the e

  • know which climate change black hole all that money will disappear in to.

    Just my 2 cents ;)
  • CSR through fund raising similar to donating to charity. There are many good causes and climate change probably one with profit potential. Finding a way to sustain and advance life a goal most would like to support but some struggle more than others due to circumstances beyond their control. Propaganda part of the way humans socialize. This sounds more interesting than another gig business model.

The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude.

Working...