US Bans WeChat Pay, Alipay and Six More Chinese Payment Apps (appleinsider.com) 55
The Trump administration says that Chinese payment apps, including WeChat Pay, are a threat to national security. By Executive Order, all US transactions with these apps must cease within 45 days. AppleInsider reports: President Trump has issued an Executive Order banning US transactions with a range of Chinese payment platform apps from February 18, 2021. The order says this "aggressive action" must be taken because the apps have access to the data of a large number of users. "[The] pace and pervasiveness of the spread in the United States of certain connected mobile and desktop applications," says the Executive Order, "and other software developed or controlled by persons in the People's Republic of China, to include Hong Kong and Macau (China), continue to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States." "At this time, action must be taken to address the threat posed by these Chinese connected software applications," it continues.
The most prominent apps named are WeChat Pay and Alipay. The order also lists the lesser-known payment systems QQ Wallet, Tencent QQ, CamScanner, SHAREit, VMate, and WPS Office. US firms have 45 days from the date of the order to comply. However, the specifics of precisely which types of transactions are to be banned is yet to be announced. "The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law," says the order. "[Any] transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with persons that develop or control the following Chinese connected software applications, or with their subsidiaries."
The most prominent apps named are WeChat Pay and Alipay. The order also lists the lesser-known payment systems QQ Wallet, Tencent QQ, CamScanner, SHAREit, VMate, and WPS Office. US firms have 45 days from the date of the order to comply. However, the specifics of precisely which types of transactions are to be banned is yet to be announced. "The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law," says the order. "[Any] transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with persons that develop or control the following Chinese connected software applications, or with their subsidiaries."
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, right.
Presidents and other elites never get put in jail. You're dreaming if you seriously think Trump is going to jail.
Trump has as much chance of being put in jail as Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton, or Joe/Hunter Biden.
Re: Arrest Trump Now!!!!! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Are you really saying that a person can establish their own "brand" and use that, like a proxy, to commit crimes? To encourage rioters? To commit sedition?
"It wasn't me, it was my accountant. Not me, it was my Twitter account."
No, the parent is pretty clearly saying that to punish, you must show evidence that the person was aware of the crime. I thought the bar was even higher than that.
Re: Arrest Trump Now!!!!! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm saying that Donald Trump can't be put in jail for one of the buildings with his name on them falling down any more than George Foreman can be put in jail for one of the grills with his name on them electrocuting someone. There's George Foreman the brand and there's George Foreman the person. To put the person in jail for something the people acting under the brand did means you have to show that the person responsible for those actions was the same person as the brand.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Wow. This is the first time that I have seen a comment rated "(Score:-1, Insightful)". The passions that Trump causes are astounding.
I'm okay with this (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
These are used by Chinese tourists visiting the United States. By banning them the main loss will be American companies losing sales to tourists.
I expect most will ignore it for now and wait to see what Biden does.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I've never seen businesses in the US that accept them as payment methods. Are they popular on the West Coast?
The only time I've seen them used is by Chinese in the US paying for stuff for back in China, or sending money home.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Really? I've never seen businesses in the US that accept them as payment methods. Are they popular on the West Coast?
You must not shop at Walgreens. At least 3,000 of their stores accept Alipay.
Alipay, The World’s Leading Digital Payment Platform, Now Available at Thousands of Walgreens Stores Nationwide [walgreens.com]
But since acceptance of Alipay by U.S. retailers is designed for the convenience of Chinese tourists, you'll probably find most places that accept it to be located in cities that are popular Chinese tourist destinations such as San Francisco.
PIER 39 Partners with Alipay to Deliver a Seamless Payment Experience for Ch [pier39.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know but they are accepted at many places in the UK and getting more popular by the day. Lots of shops advertise support for things like AliPay so they can get the tourist money.
Re: (Score:1)
Really? Someone from China comes to the USA and is looking to buy a snack, some batteries, a bottle of Tylenol, but don't because the retailer doesn't support some payment app or another? Don't they have cash? A credit card? Will people cancel their trip over it?
Is this what people do in the USA? I'll see people use Apple Pay or whatever but if it doesn't work then they sigh or shrug, then they pull out some cash or a credit card. They don't walk away empty handed.
Re: I'm okay with this (Score:2)
Re: I'm okay with this (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Tourists will bring some cash and cards of course, but if you make it really easy for them to pay using the same mobile apps that they use at home they are likely to spend more.
It's basic economics. Any barrier, no matter how slight, to trade will inevitably reduce trade. Stuff like foreign currency conversion fees or the hassle of getting foreign cash are both barriers when compared to just using your phone exactly like you do at home.
Re: (Score:2)
> main loss will be American companies
Ween yourselves from easy Chinese money. Everything carries a cost. Ask the Australians who just recently learnt their lessons and the Canadians who just start to realise the same.
Re: (Score:2)
My business is in a tourist town in california so I have some personal experience.
While I have taken payments thru these apps in the past, a ban is unlikely to have a meaningful impact on shopkeepers.
The chinese tourists usually arrive by the tour bus load, with a tour guide/handler who shepherds them from store to store, and translates for them if needed, as well as helping them pay for their souvenirs. (They almost all have US dollars and freshly issued payment cards, but don't necessarily know the diffe
Re: (Score:1)
Who exactly gives a shit what you are OK with?
Not that I care much (Score:2)
How do they know (Score:4, Insightful)
How will the US government know if I'm paying someone with WeChat Pay? If I'm using WeChat, the connection is encrypted. The US government doesn't know what I'm doing in the WeChat App. I could be playing a game or paying someone 50k USD. Are they banning WeChat?
What if I'm an American in China and I use WeChat Pay?
Re: How do they know (Score:2)
I imagine it will affect bank payments, credit card payments to and from. I haven't used aliexpress in a while, but when I did a couple of years ago you could get some "free" money if you signed up to alipay (I didn't, but I assume some did).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I see that (Score:1)
the "orange man evil" trope has already beat out the "collecting personal data and shipping it overseas is bad" trope.
Re: (Score:1)
Huge Pumpkinhead bad.
Very bad.
Going to gitmo.
Re: (Score:2)
Going to gitmo twice.
I did not know... (Score:2)
Since when does the government employ any of those apps?
Re: (Score:1)
There are threats to national security other than some foreign adversary getting some government secrets.
If a nation can't provide it's onw food, fuel, clothing, or any of a number of critical commodities and is reliant on other nations for this then that is a threat to national security. A nation could be starved to death, at least economically, by a trade embargo.
If a nation is seeing a foreign adversary suck up a bunch of bank account numbers then that can be used to mess with the economy. Or at least
CamScanner contained a trojan dropper (Score:2)
"recent versions of the app shipped with an advertising library containing a malicious module. (...) the module extracts and runs another malicious module from an encrypted file included in the appâ(TM)s resources. This âoedroppedâ malware, in turn, is a Trojan downloader that downloads more malicious modules" https://www.kaspersky.com/blog... [kaspersky.com]
Those jobs are gone (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:1)
We should hear from judges next (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Invalidated by arrest & impeachment? (Score:2)
more about it (Score:1)