The Secret, Essential Geography of the Office (wired.com) 101
A workplace has its own informal cardinal directions: elevatorward, kitchenward, bathroomward. It's a map we share. From an essay: I love visiting offices, listening to their hum. Literally: I sometimes went to a giant financial firm where they traded different kinds of securities on different floors, and if it was a big day in bonds the fourth floor would be loud, loud; the fifth floor, though, focused on shorter-term investments, would be almost silent. You could hear the economy. I enjoy the rituals of visiting. First, there is security: How long will I wait? Who will greet me in the lobby, should I ever gain access -- a human whose job is to handle ingress and egress, or is each person expected to greet their own visitors? Will I get a VISITOR sticker, and will the sticker change color in a day, for security purposes? Is the coffee brought to me or may I get it myself? Sometimes you learn that people have had sex in a given office, which is hard to forget. There are cardinal directions -- elevatorward, kitchenward, bathroomward. Favored stalls. Better sinks. Teensy little geographies shared between humans.
I have a friend who worked at the White House, back in calmer times, and he told me about some of his workplace battles. I said to him one of the dumbest things I've ever said in my life: "The White House seems like a really political place to work." I still cringe to think of it. Yet it's a place where power is absolutely explicit and geography means everything. And "place," as Tuan points out, is really a proxy for time. The president might summon anyone any moment of the day, from anywhere in the nation. If you work in one of the rare offices in the West Wing, instead of across the alley at the enormous Executive Office Building, you can be in the Oval Office in a minute. It's purely about time, measured in the count of footsteps between you and power. Everyone knows that. The West Wing offices themselves absolutely suck. The whole place smells weird.
I have a friend who worked at the White House, back in calmer times, and he told me about some of his workplace battles. I said to him one of the dumbest things I've ever said in my life: "The White House seems like a really political place to work." I still cringe to think of it. Yet it's a place where power is absolutely explicit and geography means everything. And "place," as Tuan points out, is really a proxy for time. The president might summon anyone any moment of the day, from anywhere in the nation. If you work in one of the rare offices in the West Wing, instead of across the alley at the enormous Executive Office Building, you can be in the Oval Office in a minute. It's purely about time, measured in the count of footsteps between you and power. Everyone knows that. The West Wing offices themselves absolutely suck. The whole place smells weird.
Why remote work is no substitute (Score:4, Interesting)
I've been laughing at the "we'll never go back to work" articles for months. Come ON, everybody who knows the terms "face time" and "elevator speech" know that the most-prized thing you can get is physical presence with the Boss, that nothing like physical presence is ever half as convincing.
The West Wing thing, I recall from flipping through a few pages of G. Stephanopoulos autobio in a bookstore after the Clinton administration. When they demoted him from being the actual press secretary giving the daily briefing, they gave him an office right next to the Oval to make him feel less demoted (until he took a hint and left, anyway). He says expressly that the fights over who gets to be how many steps from the Oval are the most vicious in the biz.
And that's over being 30 seconds away versus one minute. So you can spare me your remote work. It'll be a declaration you have no high career ambitions. Actually coming in to the office every day will be the new wearing-a-suit every day, to signal your desire to rise. (NB: Always pushing the message from above down to the troops, and never pushing messages uphill, is still your defining characteristic to adopt.)
Re:Why remote work is no substitute (Score:4, Insightful)
So you can spare me your remote work. It'll be a declaration you have no high career ambitions.
Everyone knew this already, so take your office and shove it where the fluorescent lights don't shine.
Re:Why remote work is no substitute (Score:5, Insightful)
So...you're happy you're settling?
Yes. Some of us like our job, are good at it, are paid well to do it, and have no desire to "move up". I have absolutely no desire, none whatsoever, to have my bosses job. If/When I get bored I'll go find another company to do the same thing for. You call it "settling" some of us call that "satisfied".
Re: Why remote work is no substitute (Score:2)
I sold my businesses. 9-5 is nice, with HR dept (Score:5, Insightful)
> Your happy to languish somewhere you'll never be at the top? Interesting, I am started my own business so I could be the boss. But I suppose some people are happy to just settle.
I hope you enjoy it. I was the boss for 15 years.
The guy who ultimately had to deal with everything.
Whatever crap was going on was ultimately my responsibility.
After a while I got tired of running a business - thinking about group insurance plans, a dozen different kinds of taxes, all the human issues that come with employing people. Some bullshit happens early Sunday morning - I have to deal with it.
For all of that, sometimes I'd make good money. Sometimes not. No telling how much money I'd make next month.
I took a job where I didn't have to worry about any of that crap.
I do the work I love, 9-5. The HR department compares insurance plans every year and gets me taken care of. I have a predictable healthy paycheck. I love it.
I'm glad I spent some time running my own companies.
I'm really glad I'm not doing that anymore.
Some would say you're settling, being on the job 24/7 without even knowing for sure you're going to get a paycheck. There are benefits and drawbacks to every job and every position. Different people prefer different things at different times in their lives.
I hope, for the sake of your business, your employees, and yourself, that you think through the fact that your employees aren't lazy dumbasses just because they've decided to let you have the stress. If you treat them the way you treated GP, for the same reason, that's going to make working for you suck. That will hurt your business.
Re:I sold my businesses. 9-5 is nice, with HR dept (Score:4, Informative)
I hope, for the sake of your business, your employees, and yourself, that you think through the fact that your employees aren't lazy dumbasses just because they've decided to let you have the stress.
That's all you really needed to say. Believe it or not, there are people out there that are honestly happy being a janitor (or whatever). And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Re:I sold my businesses. 9-5 is nice, with HR dept (Score:5, Interesting)
> Believe it or not, there are people out there that are honestly happy being a janitor (or whatever). And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
And even more people whose perfect job for them is senior architect or whatever. It's not a choice between the top or the bottom, it's finding the role that fits you best. The role, not the level.
A lot of people got into a particular line of business because they enjoy doing the work in that business. Once they move into top management, they'd have a completely different career - managing a business. They'd have to stop doing the very things that attracted them to their career in the first place.
I really enjoyed starting businesses and running SMALL businesses for a while. I hated running an established business. So I went back to what I always enjoyed - challenging programming tasks.
My ultimate perfect job, which I had for a while and I'm moving toward again, is teaching younger programmers how to make robust systems. I don't want to be their manager and deal with the politics of trying to get the budget to hire more people. I want to be their mentor. My former team gave me the nickname "sensei". That's what the local hacker club calls me, sensei. Which means elder or teacher. That's my "do what you love and you'll never have to work a day in your life".
Re: (Score:1)
My former team gave me the nickname "sensei". That's what the local hacker club calls me, sensei.
Around here, we just call you "douchebag".
Re: I sold my businesses. 9-5 is nice, with HR dep (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Right, right, you failed at being the boss, so you're gonna tell us all about how to do the job.
Put a cork in it, wow.
Re: (Score:3)
Some parts I didn't do so well.
My biggest failure as a leader was making comments similar to the one I'm replying to now.
Re: (Score:2)
You dumb ass, you've been commenting here for a long time, you say toxic shit left and right, about everybody and everything.
That means everybody under you hates you, hates working for you, and wants you to fail. Including the people who would otherwise be good workers.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, some people have resting bitch face. My natural resting state is asshole. My native language is assholese.
I've been an asshole for a long time; I've had a lot of practice so I've eventually gotten pretty good at it. I could reply to you that way. We could see who can be a bigger asshole, you or me.
But being an asshole is not a good thing. That's not what I want to do.
Any time you see me being an asshole, you are invited to point it out it me. "Hey Ray, you're being an asshole again" would be fine.
Re: (Score:2)
I can relate.
Being an asshole, in spite of not wanting to be (and sometimes not being aware of it until after the fact), is one of my many problems.
Some folks blame my Asperger's. but, since I also know plenty of Aspies who are *not* assholes, I have trouble hiding behind that excuse.
Note: usually, when I'm in full-asshole mode, I've been provoked; however, again, that isn't really the best excuse. Although I have not yet learned any non-asshole ways to deal with, say, people who leave dirty dishes in the
Re: (Score:2)
This is going to sound trite, but it works for me.
It actually works so I'm not too bothered, it puts me in a better mood.
> Although I have not yet learned any non-asshole ways to deal with, say, people who leave dirty dishes in the sink overnight to attract rodents
I now rinse out the bowl.
Yep, if there's a bowl with a bunch of chili in the sink, I rinse it out. Then there's no longer a dirty bowl in the sink.
I really didn't like that idea at first. It helped to think about the wonderful things my wife
Re: (Score:2)
Being boss is nothing by itself (Score:2)
> Your happy to languish somewhere you'll never be at the top?
> I am started my own business so I could be the boss.
I started my own business because my bosses sucked at doing the work expected them to do. After more than 25 years "in the business" I know what I do well and enjoy doing. Being "the boss" includes many responsibilities I don't enjoy and tasks I am not especially good at. I often had leading roles but I avoided becoming "the boss" for as long as people were available that I considered m
Re: (Score:2)
Being "at the top" is not the goal for me. I enjoy being technical, and doing creative things. Frankly, I'm doing the dream job, and am being paid very well to do it. I don't want to do my boss' job, and I certainly don't want my boss' boss' job. Don't get me wrong, they're great people (and help me set goals/objectives as opposed to being bossy), but I'm just not interested in what they do for a paycheck.
Re: (Score:2)
Not everyone validates their existence solely through work. For many people work is a means to an end, not their entire life.
I say this as someone who has moved up and has prospects to move further, although my main career goal was to reach the management level I am at now. Higher up doesn't appeal to me much but if the situation was right I would think about it.
Having workers who are actually good at and like their jobs is also massively underrated. We managers can go on about our importance to the orga
Re: (Score:2)
Languish? Funny choice of words. I languished my way to retiring very comfortably in my lake house, with a pension, 401k, and a lot fewer headaches. But to each his/her own. Maybe your level of comfort requires a seven digit income, mine doesn't and yet I can afford pretty much anything I want.
Re: (Score:2)
You're one of those dicks that doesn't understand the concept of "enough", aren't you? I thought so.
Re: (Score:1)
Live to work or work to live (Score:2)
So...you're happy you're settling? OK.
Live to work, or work to live. Lots of people are happy with the second, and, it's no more (or less)
"settling" than living to work is. For those dedicated to the second path, their primary passion, first love,
true purpose is not what they do. The job simply provides the means to live the dream and ambition, instead of
being the dream and ambition.
It's the route chosen by many creative personalities (writers, artists, musicians, etc.), avid amateur sports participants,
volunteers, dedicated hobbiests, travel
Re: (Score:2)
So...you're happy you're settling? OK.
Depends on what you mean by settling. I retired at 60, after reaching a peak position where I managed ~50 engineers. In the office, I shared space with other managers at my level, and while none of us are what I'd call wealthy, we were all comfortable...very comfortable. We were frequently able to do our work from home because most of it involved spreadsheets and conference calls. If you're all about power, do it the other way, but it's not necessary if you're more interested in the job you do, and the
Why not just walk into the CEO's office (Score:3)
Seriously though, this strikes me as somebody who hasn't done a lot of work in a modern enterprise with more than 100 employees. I do, and I don't get near decision makers and the like. When I do they say a few nice words to make me feel like I'm contributing and then blow me off.
The way you get ahead in 2020+ is you get a college degree (so you can get past HR filters) and you go to another company, get a bit of experience for you
Re: (Score:3)
Nobody works their way up from the mail room anymore and hasn't since the early 90s.
You may move up a position or two within a company, and get a couple extra percent raise to go with it, but you're right on: The only way to make money and actually advance is to move companies.
The folks I know actively avoid moving up (Score:2)
I've seen companies do this with people who weren't actually middle managers and suddenly find they lost somebody they needed. Good times. But the ax still came down.
Re:Why remote work is no substitute (Score:5, Interesting)
the most-prized thing you can get is physical presence with the Boss
The Chinese have a saying: "The mountains are high, and the emperor is far away."
Back when I worked for a little aviation company that was on the brink of losing its manufacturing certification due to bad IT practices, our group was tasked with developing a solution. The first thing the wiser heads did was to move us off campus. So management with a vested interest in the legacy process couldn't just drop by and screw with the process. Our product was a success. The FAA loved it. The company kept its certification. And all the bosses whose lives were touched by the change were absolutely livid with rage.
I've worked on a few other projects where, despite the open office plan, management procured a private office for me. Because I had to get work done, not participate in the office football pool. Competent management knows who is getting work done, whether they are behind a closed door, 20 miles away or three states over. When management started rounding up all the workers and bringing them into one office, layoffs were coming.
Re:Why remote work is no substitute (Score:5, Funny)
Competent management
Is that some kind of rare bird?
Re: (Score:2)
Is that some kind of rare bird?
Very rare. [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Competent management
Is that some kind of rare bird?
No, but, it's usually included in the list of oxymoron examples found in most reputable dictionaries.
Re: (Score:2)
Competent management
Is that some kind of rare bird?
Often as not, it's as rare as competent people in any position. If you're not working for competent management, it's time to find another job.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess it's kind of political advancement versus competency in role issue. It shouldn't be a contrast but face time with the boss does get people promoted even if they aren't necessarily the top person for the job. They are around when the decision needs to be made, the boss knows them and likes them ... and they win.
Conversely competent management will let people have and office with a closed door when they need too, or a desk in the middle of the cubicle farm, or work from home whatever is needed for the
Re: (Score:2)
I guess it's kind of political advancement versus competency in role issue.
Sounds like you are working for a company where management positions are rewards for past performance, or brown-nosing. Instead of as positions of responsibility.
I've worked at a number of places where they had to drag people kicking and screaming into team leader/management roles. I've made more money than many of my supervisors, did work that I liked and didn't have to deal with the herding cats effort that is managing employees.
Re: (Score:2)
Interchangeable cog issue I think. We need "developer" to be "team lead". I know a "developer" and he's nice and wants the job so ...
People issues generally are hard. People often don't know whether or not they'll like a role, and the role can change out from under you. You're a team lead of 6 smart independent devs everythings gravy. Then 3 leave and 10 newbie's get hired, now you got 2x the people and it becomes a handholding exercise, and a bunch of stupid mistakes for different reasons start happening.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh an obvious example of this military. Not sure if still the case but the Canadian army used to have a mandatory promotion date for officers. Say 4yrs for a LT, you are either promoted by then or let go because you are not-promotable. Basically if you aren't good enough to promote you aren't good enough to keep around because you are taking a spot that could be filled by someone else that would be.
The Boss stopped listening to me ages ago (Score:3)
I watched the last of what you're describing fade away in the last 4 years. You might have made it up
Re: (Score:2)
I've been heavily compartmentalized. I don't get near a serious decision maker anymore.
Same here and frankly I like it that way. I'm content to watch them compete and screw each other over. Meanwhile I just bank my pay and relax.
Do you work in Agile development teams (Score:2)
Which impose lots of process. Well defined roles. The team members do not comment on the requirements etc.
Team members don't need to commit (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which impose lots of process. Well defined roles. The team members do not comment on the requirements etc.
In my role I participate in all the Agile/Scrum/Whatever, but from a distance.
I sort of orbit the group doing what I do but I don't get sucked into discussions about details because I'm not a developer. So I don't have to get all down and dirty with epics and user stories and features. I do a super-minimal amount of it to log my work, but that's it. I don't live or die by Jira metrics.
For me, Agile/Scrum meetings are like going to the zoo- watch quietly and don't get to close to the animals.
Re: (Score:1)
"He says expressly that the fights over who gets to be how many steps from the Oval are the most vicious in the biz." - Yes I have no doubt about that. As sad and depressing as that is, I have no doubt that the slimy opportunists that occupy the white house are only concerned about power. The well being of the country, the fate of American citizens as a whole - none of that is important to these people. Thank you for confirming what I have firmly believed for a very long time - our federal government, and t
Re: (Score:2)
Or you're interested in doing something other than succeeding via sucking up to the boss. That type of person is fairly rare, and they already do whatever they want, so sure, the biggest additional group will be the people who work to live.
Re: (Score:2)
"And that's over being 30 seconds away versus one minute. So you can spare me your remote work. It'll be a declaration you have no high career ambitions."
Lol, my ambitions have been more than met, and this kind of desperate, petty grasping for power makes me want to puke. What a bunch of sad-assed LOSERS.
Feel free to show up and brown-nose your way to Heaven. I'll be the laughing at the cringiness of it all.
People like you are the reason I avoid offices. Like is better when you're not there.
Re: (Score:2)
and "elevator speech" know that the most-prized thing you can get is physical presence with the Boss, that nothing like physical presence is ever half as convincing.
If your abilities and ideas rely on tacts reserved mostly for used car salesmen then I feel sorry for you.
Me on the other hand, it's been a good 9 years since I worked for someone on the same continent as me. That hasn't stopped an endless string of promotions, project ideas being sanctioned to execute, nor half the company fighting for me to be on their team in the recent organisational reshuffle.
Maybe you need some ideas that stand on their own and don't need to be promoted exclusively on opportunity for
Re: (Score:2)
And that's over being 30 seconds away versus one minute. So you can spare me your remote work. It'll be a declaration you have no high career ambitions. Actually coming in to the office every day will be the new wearing-a-suit every day, to signal your desire to rise. (NB: Always pushing the message from above down to the troops, and never pushing messages uphill, is still your defining characteristic to adopt.)
Let us sing the praises of the traditional office, where petty politics run rampant,rumour runs rampant and appearances always matter more than substance. The losers who put in the requisite time and energy to always do high-volume, quality work, will never have the time to devote to playing the promotion game. And promoting them would be a mistake - businesses cannot afford to lose the production.
How about those with "high career ambitions" get to return to the office? Leave the rest to work remotely in
Re: (Score:2)
If you work for any kind of global, or even national, company there are essentially people who are remote to you 100% of the time. Are you saying that you can't tell which of those people is any good?
Also, your company doesn't have any employees who are 100% remote? We're not exactly on the bleeding edge and we have people who are, even in the very very old school aspects of our business. Look to newer employees in more cutting edge areas and there are even more.
You don't have management or salespeople w
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: West wing smells (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I've never noticed any strange smells. Nor in the east wing or the residence. Is that something Trump added?
Yeah, that was Trump. He's gone now.
Shhh! It's a secret. (Score:1)
Cubed: A Secret History of the Workplace
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00F... [amazon.com]
What I find it interesting is how culture changes. (Score:3)
With just the office changes, how much the work culture changes... My current employer my whole team had changed, or reorganized the offices about 4 times.
Even with the same people, just having people sit in a different spot, or different building does a lot.
Sometimes it goes from a very stressful fast pace environment, to a lax environment where we are just working on what we need to work on. Just because we are out of earshot of the gossip, but also at the same time, things happen in the organization that seem to hit us out of left field because we are out of the loop.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, this has been observed before
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway's_law [wikipedia.org]
By physically rearranging things, the lines of communication have been changed, some people made effectively harder to reach, others easier, which can bring a level of order, or form barriers that dissuade small distractions
Office Geography (Score:1)
I once worked on the FX trading floor of a London back. FX shared the floor with bonds to the left and some kind of commodity traders to the right. Mostly FX traders. The 'real' FX traders, as there were a lot of support staff, had their own smoking lounge and their own catering. No need to go down the the main cafeteria for coffee or lunch.
One day Germany shifted the Basis rate 30 points and the DM, yes it was a while ago, vs everything else took off. Even the bond traders stood and watched the action
Re: (Score:1)
Regards to sex in a office, the head of building security for a branch office of a multi-national was recorded on CCTV bonking his secretary in one of the lifts.
How did that end up?
Re: (Score:1)
I cannot imagine it ended well. I don't really care about consensual sex between adults (although between a boss and secretary I'd be concerned about sexual harassment taking place), but I'd certainly fire a head of building security who wasn't able to either avoid or delete the CC footage. That just shows incompetence.
I hate seeing stories like this (Score:2)
10 years ago I would have wanted to be in the office because I wanted to network. But everything has been broken down into discreate tasks (despite my best efforts) so that there isn't any cross pollination between departments to speak of. You can jump ship to another dept (if your bos
Re: (Score:1)
But everything has been broken down into discrete tasks (despite my best efforts) so that there isn't any cross pollination between departments to speak of.
That's really frustrating, I have that problem, too.
Re: (Score:3)
I mentioned this elsewhere, but the way you get ahead now is by bouncing from one company to the next, taking any skills or industry knowledge with you. That process started about 15 years ago and it was fully developed long before COVID hit.
Pay attention, young'ns, because this is the Truth. A few years at one place is plenty (unless you happen to love it).
The fact is that you will NEVER get a yearly salary bump that even approaches the bump that occurs when you change jobs.
Presidential status (Score:1)
The President can also extinguish a large fraction of the human race by pushing a button. So, yeah, I suppose that might appeal to somebody who enjoys power.
Re: (Score:1)
https://i.redd.it/y9ec66g2kzc6... [i.redd.it]
The geography of the what? (Score:2)
Where you can put your "open office" geography. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The idea was hatched from the mind of some faceless bean counting drone. Management sees open offices as beneficial in the following ways:
1) It saves money because those partition walls are probably kind of expensive
2) It saves money because, without the partition walls, you can stuff more people into the same floorspace as before
3) It allows management to keep an eye on you. It gives them an excuse to stroll the aisle. When they stop to chat with you, rest assured it is not because they care about your wif
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think for creative types, or others that don't require "heads down" concentration work
Wait, what?! That is fucking stupid, just shut up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Nah. It's all #2.
1) Versus an engineer's salary, the cost of those cube walls is trivial. Depending on the level of the engineer and how fancy a cube you buy; a productivity boost of 2% all the way down to .5% from cutting down noise and distractions; and you've made up for the cost of the cube in less than a year.
3) Management doesn't need to keep an eye on me because first off, I'm not a fuckup. Second, my git commit history and the code I review and the issues I resolve demonstrate my productivity more
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it's mostly #2. I was just shooting from the hip :-)
BTW, management doesn't need to keep an eye on me either. My boss trusts me to get stuff done and stays out of my way and lets me do my work. Not everyone is as lucky to have a boss like that.
Where I work only VP and above get an office. And they are usually empty because they are in meetings or visiting someone offsite.
Abomination indeed. Hardly anyone I have spoken to actually likes the open office thing. I hope I'll never see another one again.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, as an engineer in the construction industry, almost every office project I've worked on was largely open offices. (The exce
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I dunno...I've heard all those "culture" justifications in the past but for me I don't need to be sitting 6 feet away from someone to form a good working relationship with them. Culture is something that develops over time and I earn the trust of my workmates not by how many times we hang out after work but by my work ethic and honesty.
Having said that, I only speak for me and my personal work preferences. If it works for you that's cool but given the choice I'll be building culture from my home offic
Re: (Score:2)
No fucking way I'm giving up my home office to go back to the open office farm.
Damn straight.
My last several positions have been remote and I am *done* with going into the office.
Re: (Score:2)
Me too and if that means I miss out on the next promotion as a result of working remotely so be it. I'm happy doing what I'm doing and doing it where I like to do it.
Re: (Score:2)
The only promotion I'm interested in is my promotion to the exalted rank of "Retired". But in the meantime I have corporate wallets to plunder, arrrr matey!
Re: (Score:2)
2) It saves money because, without the partition walls, you can stuff more people into the same floorspace as before.
Occupancy fire codes, number of exits, and bathrooms don't all go away with the walls. No, its the power trip, I always try to look annoyed when a boss is nearby. Happy slaves need more work to do, I've seen this many times.
Re: (Score:2)
Whoever thought of the "open office" idea concept... should be drawn and quartered
It was either Frank Lloyd Wright, or the client John Larkin of the Larkin Soap Company.
Simple Answer: Lazy, Easy Management keeping tabs (Score:3)
Whoever thought of the "open office" idea concept, and whoever decided to bring it into the tech world should be drawn and quartered. Who the hell would think it's a good idea to take a profession that typically needs absolute concentration and throw them in the most distracting office environment imaginable?
Yup. So I know some managers who swear by it. They're not the best, nor the brightest. They will proclaim swivel chair meetings and reducing barriers to collaboration, but a few have admitted it is also because it is easier to keep tabs on you.
The open office concept means the manager can stand in a corner and see everything you're working on. He/she can quickly get status just by walking from desk to desk. He/she can see how long you've been working on something and confirm you're actually working
"You rang?" (Score:1)
Nothing roller skates can't solve.
An essay composed by a redundant middle manager (Score:3)
Geez, really? (Score:3)
"I enjoy the rituals of visiting. First, there is security: How long will I wait? Who will greet me in the lobby, should I ever gain access -- a human whose job is to handle ingress and egress, or is each person expected to greet their own visitors? Will I get a VISITOR sticker, and will the sticker change color in a day, for security purposes? Is the coffee brought to me or may I get it myself?"
Wow, this may be one of the unintentionally saddest things I've read in a while, but who am I to judge?
I mean, hey, if you like offices, have at it. Knock yer socks off, baby. You do you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Your calling someone you don't know an asshole
1) This may shock you, but you don't always have to know someone to know they're an asshole.
2) I'm also 100% sure that at some time you've made the exact same snap judgement about people that you don't know. Yes, 100% sure.
Re: (Score:1)
So with COVID-19 hopefully wrapping up soon-ish (Score:4, Insightful)
It appears the middle-managers are realizing they're about to be exposed for the useless tools they are, and are trying to fight back.
Never understood the purpose of Wired magazine (Score:2)
A few years ago someone gave me a subscription to Wired as a gift. It's a truly odd magazine. I never did figure out what the magazine was supposed to be about. It's not about IT, programming, computer science, technology, or making really. It seems to be some kind of hipster lifestyle fluff. This article is a prime example. What is its point? Why did someone submit it to slashdot? Inquiring minds want to know. I guess it promotes entertaining conversation about how our lives used to be before the pan
Is this the post-COVID world? (Score:2)
This is a pointless and stupid post. (Score:2)