Richard Stallman Says He Has Returned To the Free Software Foundation Board of Directors and Doesn't Intend To Resign Again (theregister.com) 275
Richard M Stallman, founder and former president of the Free Software Foundation (FSF), announced at the organisation's LibrePlanet virtual event that he has rejoined the board and does not intend to resign again. From a report: Stallman spoke at the event yesterday on the subject of unjust computing -- covering locked-down operating systems, non-free client software, user-restricting app stores, and more. Before the talk he stated: "I have an announcement to make. I'm now on the Free Software Foundation Board of Directors once again. We were working on a video to announce this with, but that turned out to be difficult, we didn't have experience doing that sort of thing so it didn't get finished but here is the announcement. Some of you will be happy at this, and some might be disappointed, but who knows? In any case, that's how it is, and I'm not planning to resign a second time."
Stallman resigned both as president and FSF board member in September 2019, saying: "I am doing this due to pressure on the Foundation and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations of what I have said." This followed remarks he made concerning MIT professor Marvin Minsky, who died in 2016, and his association with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Stallman's resignation was welcomed at the time by some prominent free software advocates including GNOME executive director Neil McGovern and FSF sister organisation FSF Europe.
Stallman resigned both as president and FSF board member in September 2019, saying: "I am doing this due to pressure on the Foundation and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations of what I have said." This followed remarks he made concerning MIT professor Marvin Minsky, who died in 2016, and his association with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Stallman's resignation was welcomed at the time by some prominent free software advocates including GNOME executive director Neil McGovern and FSF sister organisation FSF Europe.
Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
I think he's an absolute Communist, but you gotta give it to the guy: you can't cancel someone who doesn't give a fuck.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:4, Insightful)
Another way to view this is that the FSF has decided that the ship should go down with its captain.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
Or that the Internet's attention span has been exceeded and nobody cares anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
The response across multiple sites suggests that this is not the case.
Re: (Score:3)
A search for Richard Stallman turns up stories about him resigning on CNN, Arstechnica, Wired, ycombinator, ZDNet and a bunch of others.
Arstechnica seems to have a note about him coming back. Looks like your "multiple sites" makes it a mostly niche or internal discussion. I.e. nobody cares anymore.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Informative)
Meh, to my eyes Stallman has always been a political figure. His essays are inflammatory, not just arguing that free software is a good policy but that anything else is immoral. He has followers, many of whom are zealots.
To be fair, he's a politician who puts his effort where his mouth is and actually writes stuff and releases it for free, but his message has always been political and moralistic. Comparing him to Marx is not really such a bad analogy. He got burned by another political, moralistic, crusade. I don't think it was fair, and I think that sort of hysterical witch hunting is terribly damaging to any organization, but I also don't think people who release software without the source code are the spawn of satan.
Re: (Score:3)
"My way is the right and true way and believing anything else makes you a bad person" is an inflammatory argument.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
It's not like FSF matters -- free software was fine way before the FSF came to be
in 1985. The Berkeley Distribution pre-dated FSF by many years, and before
that real men used the public domain for free software distribution.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not like FSF matters -- free software was fine way before the FSF came to be
in 1985
No it wasn't. Back when I got in, Linux and the FSF toolchain was the only practical way to go.
Re: (Score:3)
Berkeley Distribution was not free in some sense. You needed a Unix license first before you could use BSD, primarily because so much of BSD was modifications to the AT&T code. 1991 had the first version with most AT&T code removed (Net/2). The first BSD license from of the modern form was 1988.
Sharing of code, especially the non-AT&T part (such as vi) was more open certainly and most people didn't worry about licensing much or cared to read them or whatnot. "Feel free", meaning if you can m
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
I feel much the same about RMS. He's interesting in a lot of ways, certainly intelligent, and absolutely beats to his own drum. Unfortunately his activist behavior and far left politics undermines much of the good that he's had to say and that he's done over the years.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
Would you consider Noam Chomsky less of a brilliant linguist for his personal beliefs which in some areas likely overlap with those of Stallman, yet have no bearing on his work in that field? I don't think I've seen either be particularly pushy when it comes to their personal politics or other beliefs and I suspect they're both intelligent enough to realize that those should be separated out from their other work.
If anything they should be held up as example to others that don't seem to realize that it's possible to have a belief, even one out at the fringes, that doesn't need to be shoved down everyone else's throats or consume your identity as a person. But even if a person wants to make themselves an insufferable waver of some cause's flag, I don't think it undermines their accomplishments as long as they keep their personal beliefs out of their professional capacity.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't think you have to agree with him on anything outside his position with respect to FOSS to appreciate it or agree with his positions on that matter. No other person will have their beliefs fully align with your own and I think trying to dismiss or put someone down based on their personal beliefs that they keep out of their professional work and role to be a bit immature.
Would you consider Noam Chomsky less of a brilliant linguist for his personal beliefs which in some areas likely overlap with those of Stallman, yet have no bearing on his work in that field? I don't think I've seen either be particularly pushy when it comes to their personal politics or other beliefs and I suspect they're both intelligent enough to realize that those should be separated out from their other work.
This! so very much this!
We are reaching a weird point where forces are demanding purtiy of thought and ideology that must weigh more important than actual proficiency.
Which by the way, is the exact opposite of meritocracy, where ability is considered in the mix. Where if you wore a sombrero at a sorority party has become a thoughtcrime, that while you might be the best at what you do, your presumed disrespect means that the inlcusive people have the right to exclude you.
And the inclusive crowd is showing them selves to have mandatory political belief tests that are causeinf them to decrease the size of their tent just as the far right's ascendency requires s shrinking tent.
Watch what you say or do or think, because the iclusive people are looking for peoplel to lose their jobs for wrongthink.
And just so we're all clear, I don't care for his politics, or Chomsky's. I do know what happens when a group determines that one's worth is based upon political beliefs and is successful in ridding the undesireables that do not think as prescribed.
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
50 years ago, the ACLU and others fought to defend literal Nazis marching to harass minority groups, because they recognized that when society blocks people you don't like, people you do like won't be far behind.
In 2021, Amazon changes its app icon because some snowflake thought it looked like Hitler's mustache. Thanks, progressives!
Re: (Score:2)
50 years ago, the ACLU and others fought to defend literal Nazis marching to harass minority groups, because they recognized that when society blocks people you don't like, people you do like won't be far behind.
In 2021, Amazon changes its app icon because some snowflake thought it looked like Hitler's mustache. Thanks, progressives!
Kinda kookoo, isn't it? Which makes me wonder why their main logo hasn't been canceled, because it looks like a raging circumcised boner.
Which is really sexist.
Re: (Score:3)
I think the purity of thought people are an extreme minority and highly wrong-headed. And don't blame this on the left either, remember all those who lost their jobs during the McCarthy witchhunt eras, or those refusing to let someone they suspect is gay from being a teacher. But the human race is also a wrong-headed race when you get down to it, and political correctness occurs no matter what the politics. The human race is also highly hypocritical, unable to see that they never practice what they preach
Re: (Score:2)
I heard Hitler like cookies.
Therefore, obviously, we all must hate cookies, lest we agree with Hitler.
I wonder how your post made it past the Slashdot Code of conduct filter. I generally call him Hister today.
Re: (Score:3)
"We are reaching a weird point where forces are demanding purtiy of thought and ideology that must weigh more important than actual proficiency."
Why is this weird? It's been the norm for thousand of years. The only real difference now is for once the people in power feeling the effects.
It isn't that I disagree with you. Book banning has been in vogue by both right and left, and I might not that the far left is not in as much a place of authority as they think they are. It's called overreach, which in recent years has caused Republicans a lot of problems.
One of the interesting aspects of this is the Dr Seuss situation. Without saying it is a good thing or not, more than a few on the far right wanted Dr Seuss banned because they believed he was a communist
The problem with the far left'
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't much care about Stallman's politics outside of software. When discussing software advocacy he is an esteemed subject matter expert and more often than not right. Outside of that narrow topic he's just some dude. An old, weird dude who may be autistic.
But when he talks about software and software freedom I listen. Because he knows his stuff, has a good track record and if for any other reason started the movement and deserves respect.
There is a modern moral panic where people are no longer allowed to have nuanced or complex opinions. The ideas and feelings are strangely reminiscent of past religious moral crusades. I thought we were past it all but just as people can let just a little bit of power go to their heads, it seems when the shoe is on the other foot the cycle starts again.
Its funny when they eat their own. When the twitter inquisition digs up a joke from 20 years ago that was funny then but its offensive now. If it happens to someone who has done unto others, then it couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. Ultimately that will be the downfall of the movement. There will be nobody left to be outraged when everyone has been kicked off the internet.
Its sad when they don't and actually ruin people's lives. The Open Source movement has been dealt some serious blows the last 5 years from many important contributors being kicked out of their own projects by newcomers who's biggest achievement hasn't been submitting any code but has been "growing diversity".
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Its sad when they don't and actually ruin people's lives. The Open Source movement has been dealt some serious blows the last 5 years from many important contributors being kicked out of their own projects by newcomers who's biggest achievement hasn't been submitting any code but has been "growing diversity".
Which is why I can't stress enough
1) NEVER Apologize - it won't save you, it will only enable them to victimize you more
2) Adopt a scorched earth policy when possible. Make it clear to all involved you will do you damnedest to make sure they all fail. Expecting you to go quietly into the sunset is not in the carts. You'll sue, you claim exclusive rights any property involved you have and drag everyone else thru the mud as well. None of that will succeed in saving you, it will likely make it hurt worse but a
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Wow that's terrible advice
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The Open Source movement has been dealt some serious blows the last 5 years from many important contributors being kicked out of their own projects by newcomers who's biggest achievement hasn't been submitting any code but has been "growing diversity".
"Their own" projects? Got examples of that -- and what damage really, to those projects? Logically they must have others working on them to have been removed by their teammates...
Re: Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:3)
It *is* religion. A set of beliefs that tolerate no dissent, that see the world in stark black and white. Convert or be outcast. Stallman attempted nuance, he pointed out that accusation is not conviction. He is not a true believer, therefore he is a heretic. He should never have resigned. At least he has corrected that mi
Re:Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps you should separate his views on software from his views on politics.
RMS and the FSF have had a beneficial effect on software.
RMS's views on politics are outside the Overton Window and can be ignored.
Aspies tend to veer to the extremes. We are often either libertarians or commies. That doesn't make our views on other issues any less valid.
Re: Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:2)
We are often either libertarians or commies. That doesn't make our views on other issues any less valid.
Be that as it may, a small but significant number of these people think they can be both at once.
That runs beyond "weird" and "quirky" territory and into "no demonstrable grasp on reality" land.
Re: (Score:3)
"Aspies tend to veer to the extremes. We are often either libertarians or commies. That doesn't make our views on other issues any less valid"
Wouldn't having a tendency to veer to the extremes make your views on other issues suspect?
Re: (Score:3)
His far left attitude lead him to copyleft and lead him to do all the work on GNU that he did. That in turn provided a ready made userland for Linus' kernel to use. Then the combination beat the pants off of the capitalist inspired proprietary Unix flavors.
That huge success story happened in part because people with a good idea didn't have to fork over pallet loads of cash they didn't have or play "mother may I" with a bunch of suits.
Re: (Score:3)
Also I have absolutely no problem with his brand of communism in software. Intellectual property is an artificial state created construct and would not exist in a free market.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:2)
That trade used to look like grain in exchange for bread and slaves in exchange for rum.
Fiat currency and fiat property are necessary if you want to grow beyond that by doing things like storing value, pooling resources, and spreading risk in exchange for deferred gratification.
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly it feels like you are trying expand 'intellectual property' from its actual definition of government enforced artificial monopoly control of ideas to be most any intellectual concept. Governments didn't invent useful thoughts or intellectual concepts with utility, those are not intellectual property
Re: (Score:2)
The Market isn't some mythical beast that was found in the wild. It is wholly a human construct which has been warped and misshapen by crony-capitalism to the point that it would be unrecognizable to J.S. Mill.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Gotta admire the man's determination (Score:2)
The problem is the communists and the libertarians go too far in their respective directions regarding intellectual property rights. A middle ground supporting both ip enforcement and a strong fair use doctrine is necessary, but middle grounds tend to be unpopular in politics these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Intellectual property is the artificial mental construct that enables the market (also an artificial mental construct, along with thr concept of currency and enforceable contracts) to exist in the first place.
Username checks out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The problem isn't cancelling HIM. RMS will always be RMS. The problem is cancelling what he touches, and thus includes the FSF. The board let him go because he was basically causing a huge distraction for the FSF board. Instead of being able to concentrate on free software, the FSF was being inundated with unpleasant associations.
It's already hard enough to promote free software - not just
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Good for him. (Score:3, Informative)
That's not all that he wrote. He made very specific speculations about what happened by way of making excuses for Minsky: https://www.vice.com/en/articl... [vice.com] . Take Vice's spin with a grain of salt, but Stallman wrote a lot more about it than simply that he refused too believe accusations against his friend without evidence.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
What is your claim? That the emails quoted there are fabricated? I already recommended disregarding Vice's spin, but they quote emails. Are they wrong in claiming that Stallman wrote the things they quote?
Re: Good for him. (Score:5, Informative)
This, exactly. Ignore what Vice says, but they did provide the actual email chain to review. RMS went way out on a limb about "willingness" while admitting these were children. Children cannot consent, not to mention the entire felony aspect of what accusations were made. Willing or not, a felony is a felony.
Re: Good for him. (Score:5, Insightful)
Children cannot consent
She was only a child because of the legal jurisdiction.
It was perfectly legal for Prince Andrew to have sex with her because the age of consent in England is 16.
Minsky (allegedly) raped her because the age of consent in the US Virgin Islands is 18. If the sex had happened in the British Virgin Islands or back in Boston, it would have been legal.
It was illegal to transport her, but neither Minsky nor Andrew did the transporting.
Willing or not, a felony is a felony.
Minsky was dead when the accusations were made and unable to defend himself. He was never convicted of any felony.
What Richard said was insensitive and showed a lack of appreciation for woke-outrage, but he wasn't wrong.
Re: Good for him. (Score:5, Informative)
...Minsky (allegedly) raped her because the age of consent in the US Virgin Islands is 18.
Wrong!
This is the part where everybody gets the facts in the allegation incorrect. There is no allegation of rape (statutory or otherwise). Giuffre was directed to do an action, which, if it had happened, would have been rape. But she didn't ever actually allege it happened.
Specifically, her deposition said that Ghislaine Maxwell directed her (at the time age 17) to go to Epstein's private island in order to have sex with Minsky. ...it continues to say that she did fly to Epstein's private island... but the deposition stops at that point. She never actually say that she did have sex with Minsky.
There was no allegation of rape. From all the facts we are given, she may have to the island, told Minsky "let's have sex," and Minsky replied "no thanks, you're just a kid". Or for that matter, she doesn't even say she even met Minsky, much less propositioned him.
The deposition is here, if you want the details on what she said: https://drive.google.com/file/... [google.com]
(It also has a lot of gaps. But those facts don't seem to be in doubt.)
Re: (Score:3)
Part of what Stallman wrote, quoting someone else, was this:
Stallman seems to be arguing for some idealized, universal definition of "rape". That is neither achievable nor reasonable. Different countries have different laws about what constitutes rape,
Re: (Score:3)
Vice is about as believable as Gawker. Thanks for playing, and better luck next time.
Vice cited a named source for their information—an MIT alum named Selam Jie Gano—and linked to an article in which Selam provides even more details [medium.com]. Vice's believability, poor as it is, has no bearing on the matter.
The emails from Stallman went out to a large mailing list that includes nearly the entire CS department at MIT, from which they were then forwarded on to others, including Selam. As such, if what Selam posted was in any way false or misleading, it should be trivially easy to refute th
Summary (Score:5, Informative)
Vice is about as believable as Gawker. Thanks for playing, and better luck next time.
-jcr
This Reddit post I quoted in /.'s original coverage is still the most concise explanation I've seen (and yes, it reinforces how Vice and Gawker and Daily Beast and other such outlets are trash):
https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... [slashdot.org]
Good summary from reddit [reddit.com] (since Vice is not a credible source):
Context: In a recently unsealed deposition a woman testified that, at the age of 17, Epstein told her to have sex with Marvin Minsky. Minsky was a founder of the MIT Media Lab and pioneer in A.I. who died in 2016. Stallman argued on a mailing list (in response to a statement from a protest organizer accusing Minsky of sexual assault) that, while he condemned Epstein, Minsky likely did not know she was being coerced:
Some SJW responded by writing a Medium post called "Remove Richard Stallman [archive.is]". Media outlets like Vice [archive.is] and The Daily Beast [archive.is] then lied and misquoted Stallman as saying that the woman was likely "entirely willing" and as "defending Epstein". He has now been pressured to resign from MIT [stallman.org]
Furthermore the deposition doesn't say she had sex with Minsky, only that Epstein told her to do so, and according to physicist Greg Benford she propositioned Minsky and he turned her down [archive.is]:
This seems like a complete validation of the distinction Stallman was making. If what Minsky knew doesn't matter, if there's no difference between "Minsky sexually assaulted a woman" and "Epstein told a 17-year-old to have sex with Minsky without his knowledge or consent", then why did he turn her down?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How is that a good explanation? You, and that reddit comment, start getting things wrong in the first sentence. Giuffre testified that Ghislaine Maxwell -- not Jeffrey Epstein -- directed her to have sex with Minsky (and with many others).
If Minsky accepted the offer of sex with Giuffre, and as you point out he may not have, the crime would not hinge on whether she acted like she was willing or not. It would hinge on whether she was younger than 18, and he was older than (as I read the laws) 23. There i
Re: (Score:2)
Vice is about as believable as Gawker. Thanks for playing, and better luck next time.
-jcr
Are you implying you somehow won a game? With nothing more than an ad hominem attack? Maybe you can provide either evidence or at least a written counterclaim that the sources (the full text of which was published by vice) is somehow incorrect?
Stop acting so childish and actually come up with some substance. I've seen you post, you're normally much better than this.
Re: (Score:2)
Take Vice's spin with a grain of salt
but Stallman wrote a lot more about it than simply that he refused too believe accusations against his friend without evidence.
Uh...pick one? If it's a spin to be taken with a grain of salt, why would I simultaneously take it seriously?
Re: (Score:2)
There is what Vice quoted from Stallman's emails, and what Vice wrote beyond the quotes. The latter is Vice's spin. And, yes, they could misleadingly quote from emails -- but they provided a PDF of the email chain, only blocking out some of the personal names and email addresses of people involved. You can see it yourself, it is right at the bottom of the article I linked to. You can judge Stallman based on what he wrote without relying on Vice's opinion of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh...pick one? If it's a spin to be taken with a grain of salt, why would I simultaneously take it seriously?
The suggestion is that you take the facts seriously while ignoring their opinion on the matter. Vice cites a named source and links to additional details from that source. The facts are the facts and are deserving of serious consideration, regardless of any words Vice put to paper on the subject.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You suggested there was a contradiction in something that was said. I pointed out that there wasn't. What you do with the facts is your own business. I'm fine with you drawing your own conclusions. After all, when it comes to anything even remotely close to these sorts of topics, any attempt at a nuanced argument gets blown out by people saying that the subject is a horrible person for not being on their side completely.
I still think Stallman is an unlikeable sleazeball who was characteristically inconsider
The exact words that he said (Score:5, Informative)
I don't think that's what he said. In this post I'm not going to comment on MY opinion about what he said. Here I'm going to just quote exactly what he said. Here are his exact words, at the bottom of this image https://bit.ly/2PeBK0y [bit.ly]
The email thread was about Minsky. Stallman said:
--
> Giuffre was 17 at the time; this makes it __rape__ in the Virgin Islands.
Does it really? I think it is morally absurd to define "rape" in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17. I think the existence of a dispute about that supports my point that the term "sexual assault" is slippery, so we ought to use more concrete terms when accusing anyone.
--
He also said:
--
The injustice is in the word "assaulting". The term "sexual assault is so vague and slippery that it facilitates accusation inflation: taking claims that someone did X and leading people to think of it as Y, which is much worse than X.
--
"we ought to use more concrete terms when accusing anyone"
It seems that rather than saying "Minsky raped her", Stallman thought it would be more appropriate to say something like "Minsky had sex with a 17yo who had apparently been coerced by Epstein." Readers can make up their own mind about your own thoughts about that.
Re: (Score:3)
I read it as he finally learned lesson 0; never ever apologize to the mob. EVER, does not matter even if YOU actually think you may have been wrong. They are just looking a for someone crucify to assuage their own misplaced guilt or atone for their own sins, they are nothing but a primitive cult looking for right sort of virgin to throw into the volcano.
The only actions you can take are 1) ignore them if your power position is actually such that responding to them raises their profile, not dignifying them w
Orwell's sheep stampede (Score:5, Insightful)
Back at the time there seemed to be surge demanding Stallings resign simply for having his name in the same news article as Epstein's name and the sort of impression that he "did something that wasn't totally an effort to murder Epstein with his own hands." The clamor drowned out all rational discussion and no fact could get traction trying to resist it.
That's how these things go. Something similar happened to Al Franken and he also ended up quitting when he should not have. I could name others but don't want to draw that many hate responses just now. But you have to wonder who is next to be pulled under by a righteousness tsunami.
Although we have to be vigilant and active with people who abuse their power to sexually (and otherwise) bully other people, this also creates an environment where political points and money can be made by stampeding the sheep. The only solution to that is to somehow create a culture of "not overreacting" but I don't see how that is going to happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck. People have always loved to engage in some good righteous fury. They ain't called witch hunts for nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
I found them very disturbing. To her credit, Nancy Pelosi tries to gets people like this kicked out of the Democrat party. They're better off without those albatrosses.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you find photos like this [blogspot.com] disturbing as well? That's his "victim" there. There's video with her on stage doing this and much more repeatedly but I don't have time to go find it for you. I didn't see any calls to end her career. In contrast, the photo you are so upset by he never touches her. So why that double standard?
Re: (Score:3)
People demanded he resign for saying Epstein's teenage prostitutes were all willing participants.
Early in the thread, Stallman insists that the “most plausible scenario” is that Epstein’s underage victims were “entirely willing” while being trafficked.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People demanded he resign for saying Epstein's teenage prostitutes were all willing participants.
It's unreasonable to ask someone to resign for saying something he didn't say.
Early in the thread, Stallman insists that the “most plausible scenario” is that Epstein’s underage victims were “entirely willing” while being trafficked.
He never said such a thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Vice has the actual email chain. Go look at the link further up.
Re: (Score:2)
Stallman. Apologies and that is after reviewing it twice. Something to do with Monday and coffee.
Re: (Score:2)
The difference of course is Franken is a sack of shit who got exactly what he deserved. He had been a load participant in woke cancel guilty even if proven innocent culture.
It turned round on him, but in his case it was in no-way unfair - he'd of done it to anyone else if he thought it was politically expedient.
Re: (Score:3)
Are you talking about Linux? He didn't fuss about the naming of the kernel, which was as you say someone else's project. It was about the naming of the OS, most of which was already in place before Linus showed up.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Progress = 25% Passion 75% Pragmatic (Score:5, Interesting)
Stallman is 95% Passion and 5% Pragmatic. They are a lot of people who are onboard with the idea of Free and Open Software, as well are against on how it has been manipulated by going to the cloud, which he did warn us about before it was such a problem.
However While Stallman is good at pointing out the problems and saying how bad it is, he doesn't do much on trying to find a good solution to the problem which is practical for the bulk of the people.
People still want to make a career around writing software. So their work will need to be monetized in some particular way. Stallmans profit methodologies are out of date or impractical.
1. Distribution: With storage cheap and internet speeds fast, is is super easy to download the software vs getting it on Tape/Disk/CD/DVD. As well being bundled with a set of software that you may not need anyways is just a waste.
2. Consulting/Support Services: All fine and good, unless your software that you wrote, you had put in a lot of time and effort into making it easy to use and reliable.
3. Giving away a tangential product that a company needed developed but not part of their core business. (Eg. IBM Supporting Linux Kernel Development) Where you may get stuck on spending money on resources to support and improve a product that will not affect your core business.
4. Donations. All fine and good, but if your product is useful but not popular, you often cannot bring in the good will to keep it going
Building software isn't cheap or easy. Most hobbyist may make something, then get tired of it and it will die off. To keep a product running and supported you need a dedicated team, and not all FOSS software will be a Linux or Apache. But just a special use tool that a few people would care about.
Re: (Score:2)
xkcd.com/2347
Hey Slashdot, since when does three slashes in a post qualifies as ASCII art?
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot one other method, and likely the one Stallman formed his viewpoint under: academia. It's an environment that works well for developing core components (BSD kernel) and analytical tools (R lang), but not commercial products.
Re: (Score:2)
unless your software that you wrote, you had put in a lot of time and effort into making it easy to use and reliable.
Well than you have only yourself to blame.
Re: (Score:2)
2. Consulting/Support Services: All fine and good, unless your software that you wrote, you had put in a lot of time and effort into making it easy to use and reliable.
I'll push back a little on this one. In my experience when you make your software easier to use and more reliable not only is it more widely used but the people who use it will try to do more with it.
Both factors which allow you to sell more Consulting/Support Services.
Not to mention the fact that the best support contracts are the ones where the customer never calls you because they don't have a problem.
Re: (Score:3)
While Stallman is good at pointing out the problems and saying how bad it is, he doesn't do much on trying to find a good solution to the problem which is practical for the bulk of the people.
Which are the most annoying kinds of people.
"You all are doing it wrong!"
"We know it's not perfect but we haven't been able to come up with a better way. Do you know of a better way?"
"Yeah, you should use a perpetual motion machine to power it!"
"Ok cool. Thanks for the input but we're going to keep using this approach."
"Whatever, I see big oil got to you already." *Smugly walks away*
Why would they take him back? (Score:2, Interesting)
On one level, I have Stallman's work, life and devotion to walking the walk but he's a loose cannon that I would think an organization like the FSF would like to keep from coming back on board (to keep with the sailing metaphor). I like to visualize the FSF as a reasonable, measured and calculated response to the likes of Microsoft, Google and Apple, all of which are reasonable, measured and calculated in the way they are trying to take away people's rights to their data (and their lives). At some point i
I had stopped my membership (Score:5, Insightful)
No I will carefully reconsider.
FYI: Without RMS there would not have been the FSF and there would not have been the GPL. Without the GPL the Linux Kernel would have probably been taken hostage using any means possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
No I will carefully reconsider.
FYI: Without RMS there would not have been the FSF and there would not have been the GPL. Without the GPL the Linux Kernel would have probably been taken hostage using any means possible.
True, but what's more important? Honouring RMS's legacy in this specific way or furthering the objectives of Free Software?
10-15 years ago I remember tons of /. stories about the FSF and RMS. Now? Not so much outside of this controversy.
Open source as a movement and business has exploded but the FSF as a thought leader is becoming irrelevant. There's a lot of important conversations happening about cloud computing, data ownership, data portability, and privacy. And frankly, when those discussions happen the
Re: (Score:3)
He didn't get the President title back as part of his reappointment to the Board.
Oh really? (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, no shit, all the good video editing software is commercial and closed-source.
Re: (Score:2)
This made me laugh. RMS using film because cameras and phones use closed source video codecs.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. I am making videos for my class this semester. I am using cinelerra-gg which work in linux and is GPL.
It is probably one of the better one there is. (pitivi is very limited in features; I could not even get kdenlive to do basic editting without crashes). But cinelerra-gg is still not great. I have encountered so many bugs and so many WTF user interface design, it is not even funny.
Now that I know how to do the things I need, I'll keep it for the rest of the semester. But the tool definitely gets in th
Re:Oh really? (Score:5, Insightful)
How do you debunk something like a total misrepresentation of his questioning weather it's correct to flat out say Minski "raped a 17-year-old" when that 17-year-old had been trafficked and coerced into propositioning him as well as given strict orders not to let anyone know she was underage? Specially when criticism of the media as a whole is heavily associated with a section of the Trump-supporting far right?
If people couldn't understand the nuance of "Is it appropriate to call him a flat-out rapist when he was intentionally kept in the dark" in the first place, how are they going to understand it now?
Have no plans (Score:2)
Usually when people say that it means they may do it.
Hah! Microsoft lackeys! So it has come to this. (Score:2)
[1] Randall Munroe. 2007. Open Source. Retrieved March 22, 2021 from https://xkcd.com/225/ [xkcd.com]
Re:Don't like it? (Score:5, Insightful)
The FSF wouldn't be what it is without Stallman, and isn't what it should have become because of Stallman.
Re: (Score:2)
The FSF wouldn't be what it is without Stallman, and isn't what it should have become because of Stallman.
Well that's certainly a polite way of telling him you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't.
Re: (Score:2)
A.K.A. "Eat my shorts!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Although perceived as nonsense, Stallman maintains a totally purist sense of "free", and mixing your peas with your potatoes is a no-no in his philosophy.
This said, the same monolithic thinking is what got him in trouble, as regards his defense of Minsky. If the FSF wants his energy, which has been considerable, they also have to re-admit his strident philosophical basis. The FSF may want this. Few others have given the energy to the ideology that he has. My own opinion is that he needs to retire and let ot
Re:Don't like it? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
It's tough to know. I am not a libertarian, but I acknowledge the value of open ideals. Opacity is the obvious enemy of transparency, and transparency is where truth lives. Stallman understands that ideologically. Is "open" truth? I believe so, and I strive for it.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, it's hard to discuss Stallman without seeing a lot of varying opinions about him. Often so far off topic it's almost laughable. But he really is the picture of something it would be hard not to...
Anyways, I've always viewed him as a sort of proud parent. Always pulling the pictures out, always talking about it, and rightly so.
My own opinion is that he needs to retire and let others take the lead.
... Maybe... but that's gotta be the hardest thing for a proud parent to ever do.
Re: (Score:2)
No one can deny his energy; GNU permeates the computing world. This said, any proud parent can step back and let the kids take the lead. Hyper-focused individuals have great difficulty doing this for he same reasons that engineers make poor sales people. As the lore goes, the difference between a salesperson and an engineer is 10^6 vs 10-^6.
At one time, that hyper-focus was needed. Mentoring a new generation seems the right thing to do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Said every member of every last generation when looking at their progeny. If you can't trust, you're sunk anyway.