CNN Says 'Move Over, Bitcoin. Ethereum is at an All-Time High' (cnn.com) 104
CNN writes:
Bitcoin prices continued their rebound Saturday, rising about 6% to nearly $58,000. But the world's largest cryptocurrency has been overshadowed lately by its younger sibling, Ethereum.
Ethereum, or ether for short, hit a new record high Saturday of just over $2,900. Ether prices have nearly quadrupled in 2021, soaring 290%. Bitcoin has had a great run too this year, doubling in value.
The total value of all Ethereum in circulation is now about $333 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. Bitcoin's market value is nearly $1.1 trillion. While there are thousands of cryptocurrencies — including the Elon Musk tweet-fueled Dogecoin — Bitcoin and ether account for nearly two-thirds of the entire $2.2 trillion global crypto market...
Ethereum has enjoyed an even bigger surge than Bitcoin because it is the cryptocurrency of choice for the purchases of many non-fungible tokens, or NFTs — which have taken the art and broader collectibles world by storm.
Ethereum, or ether for short, hit a new record high Saturday of just over $2,900. Ether prices have nearly quadrupled in 2021, soaring 290%. Bitcoin has had a great run too this year, doubling in value.
The total value of all Ethereum in circulation is now about $333 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. Bitcoin's market value is nearly $1.1 trillion. While there are thousands of cryptocurrencies — including the Elon Musk tweet-fueled Dogecoin — Bitcoin and ether account for nearly two-thirds of the entire $2.2 trillion global crypto market...
Ethereum has enjoyed an even bigger surge than Bitcoin because it is the cryptocurrency of choice for the purchases of many non-fungible tokens, or NFTs — which have taken the art and broader collectibles world by storm.
In for a penny, out for a pound. (Score:3, Informative)
Once they some changes [digiconomist.net] they'll be more efficient than Bitcoin.
Re:In for a penny, out for a pound. (Score:5, Funny)
I think you a word there.
Re: (Score:1)
Pyrite > Ethereum (Score:4, Informative)
Please a minimum due diligence is required. Ethereum follows the same philosophy as Theranos did:
Here are 7 reasons I am not optimistic about Ethereum’s long-term future.
#1. It is not immutable and can be censored. The developers can roll back transactions and change the rules whenever they want. They can also be pressured by others – such as governments.
#2. ETH's scarcity is artificial. The developers – who prefer inflation – control its monetary policy, which is arbitrary, uncapped, and challenging to audit.
What will the ETH supply be in 5 years?
It could be 120 million, 500 million, 200 billion, 2 trillion... nobody knows.
#3. Ethereum’s large premine created ownership centralization and legal risk as the US government may consider it the sale of an unregistered security. With so much dependent on Vitalik Buterin and others, there is also significant leadership risk.
#4. Ethereum’s network infrastructure is not decentralized. Infura, which relies on Amazon, could be a single point of failure.
If Ethereum ultimately depends on Amazon, why not just use a faster and more efficient centralized database system like AWS?
#5. There is an unclear use case. What real-world problems does Ethereum solve to provide economic value?
Instead, ETH tends to latch on to ever-changing use cases, mostly centered around hype cycles, buzzwords, and narratives that come and go.
#6. The economics of the token model are not appealing.
Many people who buy crypto tokens are confused. They think they own some sort of scarce asset or ownership stake. That would be similar to mistaking Chuck E. Cheese arcade tokens for shares in Chuck E. Cheese the company.
#7. Ethereum is an early-stage experiment and has enormous implementation risk.
The Ethereum ecosystem was not built upon a workable finished product, but rather the ever-changing theories and promises of an alpha-stage experiment. I don’t believe this is a stable foundation.
Describing Ethereum as “decentralized” is misleading because every aspect of it is centralized.
When it comes to decentralization, it's black and white. There are no shades of gray. That becomes crystal clear when something goes wrong.
By contrast, Bitcoin has a crystal clear use case. It’s a hard money monetary system that is accessible to anybody and controlled by nobody. It works in the real world and it solves probably mankind’s biggest problem which is storing and exchanging value reliably.
https://twitter.com/NickGiambr... [twitter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You could change chess to use red and green pieces.
Get everyone to realize old chess is racist and everyone would switch to new chess.
Only white supremacists now use bitcons, so all the legitimate businesses start banning them as well. It all goes downhill from there.
You could make infinite versions with different colours and names. Same as bitcoins. Tradition and faith are the only things backing bitcoin over any other coin.
Or someone could just make a better coin instead.
How about non-Satoshi-coin - i
Re: (Score:2)
If you change the color of chess pieces, nobody will know who moves first, and you will play alone.
They are smart enough to play chess..
They'll figure it out... It's not like they are AI's or bitcoin zealots.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin has several forks already, some of which are actually quite successful.
Re:Pyrite Ethereum (Score:2)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bit... [github.com]
Re:Pyrite Ethereum (Score:2)
Famous for being famous.
Re: Pyrite > Ethereum (Score:2)
Re: Pyrite Ethereum (Score:2)
clearly a bi-metal standard is better than a gold standard.
Re:Pyrite Ethereum (Score:1)
i fear a bit for the innovation
Re: Pyrite > Ethereum (Score:2)
Re:Pyrite Ethereum (Score:2)
Obviously ETH threatens you. Otherwise you wouldn't post so much FUD, and you're always doing it as AC.
Re: (Score:2)
LOLOLOL whatever.
Bullshit.
I dump BTC as quickly as I can and won't touch it. It's hard to even transfer it anymore.
Re:Pyrite Ethereum (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
A shitcoin is anything promoted as a form of money whose supply is easy to increase. In other words, anything other than gold or bitcoin.
Spoiler alert: All cryptocurrencies are shitcoins.
Anyone can hard fork Bitcoin's source and change the rules. If 51% of the miners decide it is advantageous to run the new fork, that's now Bitcoin. If you think a democratic 51% decision is always going to produce the best possible outcome, you've clearly not been following American politics.
Re: (Score:1)
Forking Bitcoin is the same as forking the game of chess, you could and you will play alone. You should look at BCASH.
Bitcoin is a genuinely decentralized system, this means the miners have no say, they follow the rules or accept to work for nothing. This is the same in the real world, if you confuse Gold with Pyrite, nobody will pay you.
A 51% attack is impossible to execute. Central plannings always fail, and if you try anyway:
51% attack on BTC is really hard. Not only do you have to get 51% of the hash po
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin Cash is successful. So yes, let's look at them. They aren't "playing alone".
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, most Bitcoin miners are using ASICs designed for the SHA256 algo particular to Bitcoin. They're pretty much stuck mining the same PoW algo no matter what.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying that Bitcoin miners AREN'T using ASICs?
Re: (Score:2)
You're so stupid. ETH isn't even a unit of currency. That definition of "shitcoin" is inapplicable. Typical Bitcoin maximalist bullshit.
Re: (Score:1)
Where are the savings? (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, it's a typo, but about the substance?
Having studied Bitcoin, my shortest description is that it's a kind of lottery. You buy lottery tickets by calculating checksums, and the more energy you can waste on calculating checksums, the better your chance of winning the next round and "mining" some Bitcoin. However the factor controlling the lottery is just the timing of when the next block needs to be signed.
My first guess is that the other cryptocurrencies have better lotteries or alternative mechanisms t
Re: (Score:1)
you are actually on the right track there. the blockchain technologies asked the same question - a few years ago and ended up with what is known as Proof of Stake consensus, which is where Ethereum is eventually headed - instead of burning electricity solving useless mathematical problems ("Proof of Work" consensus), you deposit ("stake") the cryptocurrency you own and earn interest by "minting" (not "mining") currency. there are a few ways to make it work depending on how the next coin is minted based on t
Re: (Score:2)
Can you explain why IBM closed the blockchain department after failing to develop anything? Is this some kind of a repeat of the 2017 hype because of Bitcoin?
Re: Where are the savings? (Score:2)
If you're asking me, then I was retired before IBM dumped blockchain. It was still regarded as a promising new technology at that time, though no one had any product ideas that weren't solvable with other approaches. I have read some stuff about blockchain, and that might be coloring my description. I haven't seen any problems for which blockchain is the only solution.
Re: (Score:1)
nobody wants red tulips (Score:1)
the real money is in yellow tulips.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
At least with tulips, when all else fails you can eat the bulbs, like the Dutch did during their WW2 famine.
CNN also says "Fear sells" (Score:4, Informative)
CNN? (Score:4, Informative)
CNN is full of shit, this is like a former 98 pound weakling walking into the gym, weighing himself at 100 pounds, and saying to Arnie "Move over, Terminator!"
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure is. I don't feel the need to lose karma answering a bunch of anonymous cowards. You don't want to be answered as an anonymous coward, post using an account. Till then, AC get answered by an AC.
Re: (Score:2)
Weird I saw a site that said Trump told 1 million lies and the liberal media never lied once. I'll see if I can remember where it was.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
In my experience if CNN reports it then believe the opposite. One of the main reasons that CNN shut down the comments section on the web page is because people kept correcting their reports. It was making the reporters look incompetent, and showing the bias of CNN's reporting.
Re: (Score:3)
Cut out a man's tongue etc etc etc
More pumping? (Score:1)
Can /. please stop treating every change in the value of a random cryptocoin as news?
Re: (Score:2)
Can /. please stop treating every change in the value of a random cryptocoin as news?
The pump/FUD news cycle is the crypto market. The coins' values are what the public perceives them to be, and the changing public perception is what controls the tides of the crypto market.
If tomorrow Musk tweets that Litecoin is hot shit, buckle up buckaroos..
Its Coinbase offering staking at 6% (Score:3)
Coinbase has enabled staking on ETH, and lots of people are locking down the ETH to 2.0 with returns. So suddenly a huge chunk is going out of circulation. Once the ability to sell staked ETH starts, its going to fall, but till then enjoy the ride
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you're right. PoS is supposed to replace all PoW mining, at least eventually. The EF's plans for block rewards were such that:
1). Combined PoS and PoW rewards under the current regime would not exceed that of previous PoW
2). Total rewards would become reduced over time, such that token burn - once implemented - would drive ETH into a deflationary cycle
In other words, PoS isn't going to increase the total ETH supply any moreso than did PoW; additionally, the plan is that eventually, ETH will
Yay let's pump up another bullshit fiat currency! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ETH isn't a currency. I don't understand why people think you can buy and sell with it. You can't, or at least shouldn't. ETH tokens are time shares on a universal supercomputer. You need ETH to execute smart contracts on their public blockchain. The public Ethereum blockchain is intended to (eventually) tie together numerous private blockchains, though I'm not sure if they're sorted out atomic swaps of assets between those blockchains yet.
If the idea of buying time on a supercomputer doesn't excite yo
It will be interesting (Score:2)
At some point, a non proof-of-work crypto solution will become viable and take the world by storm. I have no idea what its key to viability will be, or how you get sufficient “proof of stake” to make it happen, but I am surprised it hasn’t already. Between organized crime, titans of industry, Wall Street, and a few “second-tier” governments it would seem to be a solvable problem even with limited resources, non-existent trust, and conflicting interests.
Re: (Score:2)
well there's now Chia that allows you to stake (really just lease) your SSD storage space.
currently, blockchain is basically an open world-wide replicated database accessible to everyone which operates in such a fashion that it pays (in its cryptocurrency) to those who host it (node owners). today existing chains can mostly hold short pieces of information, perhaps enough to run a text-only Twitter clone, but not enough to do much of anything else. now with Chia, the blockchain could eventually evolve to th
The real economy is about to go into freefall (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
What's behind those pushing these crypto currencies.
Greed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ETH isn't a currency. If you want to know what it is and why people are hyping it, then you should probably start reading more material about blockchain in general instead of getting mesmerized by discussions of price.
Re: (Score:1)
I could start my own crypto currency and then get other foo^H^H^H investors to ‘invest’ in it. Hype the market and then get out before the bubble bursts. Maybe @burtosis is right and the conventional financial markets are also so much vapourware.
Hurry! (Score:2)
cryptocurrencies. headshake (Score:1)
So what? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In a word, yes. But it hasn't lived up to its expectations; that is, to say, Ethereum could have accomplished so much more by now. Or at least it should have.
Re: thank the lord i was born before computers (Score:2)
That's surprising because computers have been part of life even in my father's era [wikipedia.org]. And in my grandfather's generation they had niche use for digital and electromechanical computers such as in Navy torpedo fire control computers. It wasn't exactly science fiction at the time for anyone born in the early 20th century to think they might see or even have need for a computer.