Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth United States

Lake Mead Falls To Lowest Level Since 1930s Amid Worsening Drought (axios.com) 172

Amid an intensifying drought, Lake Mead in Nevada, the nation's largest reservoir by volume, reached its lowest level since the 1930s late Wednesday. From a report: The record low is due to a combination of years of punishing drought that's worsening across the Southwest, as well as challenges in managing water resources for a burgeoning population. The record-low reading, as well as expected subsequent drops in the lake, are almost certain to trigger a federal "water shortage" declaration later this summer, which would set off cuts in water allocations to several states. Lake Mead, which sits along the border between Nevada and Arizona, is part of the vast Colorado River basin that provides water for agriculture and human consumption to seven states, and also generates electricity at the massive Hoover Dam.

Cuts in water supplies, to be determined in August, would affect the region's farmers, residents of sprawling cities such as Las Vegas, and others. Already, the Hoover Dam is operating below its maximum capacity, and it could see a further reduction in power generation as the summer goes on. Years of unusually dry conditions along with a growing population and water resource decisions have helped lead to the situation. As of Thursday morning, the Bureau of Reclamation showed Lake Mead's hourly water levels dipped to 1,071.48 feet Thursday, and remained below the previous record set on July 1, 2016.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lake Mead Falls To Lowest Level Since 1930s Amid Worsening Drought

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:08PM (#61473762)

    Stop living in a fucking desert!

    • by Glyphn ( 652286 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:16PM (#61473796)

      CliffsNotes for "Dune"

    • Sam Kinison [youtube.com] was prescient. We're not starving, but... you know what it's going to be 100 years from now? SAND!!!

    • If they have a lake of mead, it can't be *that* bad.
    • by arglebargle_xiv ( 2212710 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:58PM (#61473966)
      It's OK, we'll get the Forestry Service to move the moon [theguardian.com] and that'll fix things.
      • by Farmer Tim ( 530755 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @02:01PM (#61474200) Journal

        I never thought of Texans as being particularly “woke”, but choosing equal opportunity over merit and electing a congressman with an obvious intellectual disability is remarkably progressive.

      • And the snowflakes wonder why we laugh at then when they vote for Republicans.

      • Louie's sarcasm is so powerful it overwhelms even the mighty /. experts
      • by EvilSS ( 557649 )
        I think the Forestry service official just wiffed on an opportunity to massively increase their budget to "study" the issue.
    • by hey! ( 33014 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:37PM (#61474100) Homepage Journal

      Nevada population and milestones:
      1864: 64,000 ; statehood
      1911: 81,000 ; Las Vegas founded
      1925: 89,000 ; Hoover Dam construction begins
      1931: 94,000 ; gambling officially legalized
      1935: 100,000 ;Hoover Dam am is completed; population figure includes over 5,000 construction workers
      1940: 113,000 ; work begins on first casino resort in Las Vegas
      1955: 237,000 ; first high rise casino resort built
      1960: 291,000 ; rate of growth turns sharply upward, driven by the adoption of air conditioning
      1965: 444,000 ;
      1970: 488,738 ;
      1975: 619,972 ;
      1980: 847,639 ;
      1985: 980,653 ;
      1990: 1,219,000;
      1995: 1,526,000;
      2000: 1,880,000;
      2005: 2,407,000
      2010: 2,665,000
      2015: 2,867,000
      2020: 3,104,614; start of present drought; most of state experiences extreme conditions

      There are over three million people living in a place that originally supported sixty four thousand. That's due to two things: the Hoover Dam, and air conditioning. 75% of Nevadans live in the Las Vegas area, which gets 90% of its water from Lake Meade.

      Nevada as we know it is a relatively new thing. Under the US west's "First in time, first in line" water rights doctrine, if Lake Meade can't supply all its users, the shortfall will be made up by reducing water supplied to Las Vegas in order to supply California's prior claim.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Stop living in a fucking desert!

      No, if you're a coastal city of fifteen million, stop using our water. Desalinate your own.

      • How about we ship you sea water and you can desalinate it yourself? Too expensive? Oh, that sucks for you then...

        • by Locutus ( 9039 )
          What was the population of AZ back in 1922 when the CO river water rights were written up?
          I guess somehow there wasn't enough to get a decent piece of the pie so crying about it now is crying about history and why there were nothing but dusty towns in AZ for hundreds of years. BTW, there's that desert thing again.

          LoB
        • And how are you going to ship all that sea water? By boat, I suppose? That'll require even more water, dumbass! /sarcasm

      • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

        "Our" water? I think you'll find that the rights to the water are actually with the people that you're telling to desalinate the water, rather than with you, and likely have been for more than a century.

  • by Fly Swatter ( 30498 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:12PM (#61473776) Homepage
    It's no longer unusual if it has been happening for years... and I bet all those low flow water fixtures delayed this by a about a week!

    -Capt. Short Sighted reporting for duty!
    • You have to think of it in hours. Those faucets extended water usage by an additional 168 hours. Whew, not to bad now is it.
    • It's no longer unusual if it has been happening for years... and I bet all those low flow water fixtures delayed this by a about a week!

      -Capt. Short Sighted reporting for duty!

      Depends on the timescale. A few years out of a thousand is unusual. A few years out of 10 isn't.

    • nah, just a day delay cuz everyone flushes twice to clear the bowl
  • In the past few months, several people I know who were snow birds living in Arizona have put their places on the market and are moving back to the Great Lakes region.

    The water shortages are real, folks.

    • Re:Wet your whistle (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Vancorps ( 746090 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:31PM (#61473850)

      Pretty extreme reaction to not having grass. Living in AZ myself I have desert landscaping, I do not water any of it.

      The city I live in has not even asked us to conserve water in the 20 years or so I've lived here. Water shortages are real, be the impacts are not nearly as far reaching. Neighborhoods and parks are designed to funnel ground water so it can be captured for instance. It has been that way for 40 years. We know we're living in a desert and the three months where it sucks still leaves us with 9 months where its awesome, and I grew up in the Great Lakes region where it is the other way around.

      • Obviously YMMV, but, as a lifelong resident of the Great Lakes region - one of the warmer but snowier parts (Cleveland, Ohio area) - I'd say that to those who are acclimated to it, 6 to 9 months out of the year are generally pleasant.

        You have to be OK with snow and with a moderate amount of humidity. But I grew up with much more of both than we see now, plus I'm usually someplace either air-conditioned or breezy, and in either event, it's fine. The only thing I wish we didn't have are frequent ice storms

        • I always hated driving around mud season and in winter, too many times sliding into snowbanks myself or helping others get out of their predicament so I can get to work or school.

          If you enjoy winter sports it definitely helps but seasonal affective disorder is real. Again its the opposite here, during the 9 months of the year when the weather is great people are mostly pleasant, when its 110+ road rage is real and people can be generally simply crazy despite the fact they are nice and cool in their cars, h

          • Not a lot of mud here as long as you stay on the road network.

            As for SAD, getting enough vitamin D helps a lot, and, almost equivalently, so does being out in the sun at least when it is possible. People who don't eat seafood also need iodine supplements, because we have chemicals in the environment that will otherwise cause thyroid and metabolic problems.

            The extremes of heat here - not 110F usually, more like 90-95F + extreme humidity - do bring out the worst in what I'd have to admit are already some of

      • by gtall ( 79522 )

        Judging from the map at
                https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu... [unl.edu]
        there is blob of the state in the middle that doesn't seem as bad as the rest. Regardless, that map does not paint a pretty picture for water throughout the American West.

    • Unless they are farmers, the water shortages will have little effect on their lives.

      85% of water use in the Colorado basin goes to agriculture. Much of the rest goes to industry. Of the small percentage that goes to residential customers, most of the water is used to irrigate lawns.

      So get rid of your lawn, replace it with sensible xeriscaped landscaping and you're done.

      I live in California. My water doesn't come from the Colorado River, but I am still affected by the drought. My yard is mostly rocks and

  • by bradley13 ( 1118935 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:23PM (#61473820) Homepage

    If you dig into the historical data, you find that droughts in the Southwest are common. There was one in 2000-2004, for example. Severe, long-term droughts occur regularly, certainly more than once a century (based on tree-ring data, there have been 8 since 1500).

    The real cause of water shortages is over-use. Las Vegas and it's 40 golf courses. Growing populations in desert cities. Agriculture that cannot exist without constant irrigation. It's a desert, and that means limited water supplies. In New Mexico. The "Rio Grande", by the time it leaves the state, is basically dry - this was already true when I was a kid, way too long ago. The water table has been dropping for decades, and drilling ever deeper wells will eventually hit a limit.

    The answer is quite simple: Water is a limited resource, and should be priced accordingly. Annul historical water rights to public water sources. Start charging what the market will bear. Increase the price of water until demand drops to a sustainable level. People won't want to spend a fortune watering their grass every day. Golf courses will close. Agriculture will turn to crops that take less water. Basic economics works.

    • by Monoman ( 8745 )

      Follow the money. Who asked for, voted for, and permitted so much water could be used for things like gold courses in a desert? ?

    • by King_TJ ( 85913 )

      Agree ... but the real problem here is similar to the "food shortage/starvation" problems we see in some parts of the world. It's a distribution issue more than a resource issue. Like someone else posted here, there's water coming from other areas that could be sent via pipeline to the west coast. You'd have the big up-front cost, obviously ... but you'd pay for that over X number of years with a moderate price increase on the water. And then, the customer invested in a solution rather than paying for the

      • California farmers pay $70 for an acre-foot of water. An acre-foot is 325851 gallons. That is $0.0002 per gallon.

        There is absolutely no way that water can be piped from other regions at that price.

        Pipelines are not the answer. The answer is to price water properly so farmers stop growing subsidized rice in the desert.

        • by King_TJ ( 85913 )

          How are farmers paying so little per gallon for water? Is this untreated water, or is this another ridiculous government subsidy of some sort? Because I guarantee my residential water rates, even in the midwest, mean I'm paying FAR more than that, with prices typically tiered so they charge MORE per gallon once usage goes above X number of thousand of gallons in a month.

        • The Central Valley of California is the most efficient productive farmland in the country.
          From the USGS:

          Using fewer than 1% of U.S. farmland, the Central Valley supplies 8% of U.S. agricultural output (by value) and produces 1/4 of the Nation's food, including 40% of the Nation's fruits, nuts, and other table foods.

          At has an excellent climate for growing crops, with year-round growing seasons.

          It is responsible for production of more of the US' food supply than several states combined in the great plains.

          Just something to keep in mind while you're foaming at the mouth and making shit up (The Central Valley is a desert? Fucking spare me.)

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      One can look in the historical record and find any trend you want, but the climate is changing and we have to change with it. Yes, the fundamental problem is too many people having too many babies and each wanting a refrigerator and play station, but it is simply climate change denial

      You canâ(TM)t build a house next to a forest because forest fires burn hotter and faster now and there is no time to get out. You have to build for more frequent and fierce hurricanes because the water is warmer. And th

    • The answer is quite simple: Water is a limited resource, and should be priced accordingly. Annul historical water rights to public water sources. Start charging what the market will bear. Increase the price of water until demand drops to a sustainable level. People won't want to spend a fortune watering their grass every day. Golf courses will close. Agriculture will turn to crops that take less water. Basic economics works.

      I don't disagree with your basic premise, but

      It depends on where you live. Here in the soggy Northeast, we have more issues with flooding than water shortages. That rain we get every other day - most of it goes into recharging groundwater.

      But a lot of people don't want to live in places where it snows, or in the summer, it has 99 percent humidity. But that's what makes us such a pretty shade of green.

      The problems start where people in say, Cali, decide that the entire country shares their predicament.

      • by shmlco ( 594907 )

        So collect water from the soggy NW and send it south to be turned into food.

        I mean, if we can propose building a pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico just to move some oil, we ought to be able to make some that run down the coast.

        • So collect water from the soggy NW and send it south to be turned into food.

          I mean, if we can propose building a pipeline from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico just to move some oil, we ought to be able to make some that run down the coast.

          There has been some call for a pipeline from Lake Michigan or Superior to Cali. The people in the area tend not to like that idea. https://www.freep.com/story/ne... [freep.com]

          I think that they have a bit of concern that what the Southwestern states have done to the Colorado river might mess with their local water system. Can you imagine drying up the Columbia? It becomes an issue of who gives and who takes the water.

          As for using NW USA water, the same issues apply. In for a dime, and in a few years they want all

    • It's the historical water rights issue. While I am loath to claw back someone's contractual rights, even old ones, this is an instance that really needs to be looked at. The original 1922 Colorado River Compact did not account for the virtuous (vicious?) circle that the availability of this water would create in the desert southwest.

      It's time for a change, and some folks will get a shorter end of the stick than others. For instance AZ 'spends' 72% of it's water on agriculture. No doubt that is an indus

    • by SkuzBuket ( 820246 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:08PM (#61474006)
      Yeah, this is what every uninformed commentator and casual observer thinks, but really could not be any further from the truth.

      The Colorado River Compact was signed in 1922, and it is what has determined water allocations ever since. In the Lower Colorado Basin (of which Lake Mead is part) allocations within the US are as follows:

      California 58.70% 4.40 million acreft/year (172 m/s)
      Arizona 37.30% 2.80 million acreft/year (109 m/s)
      Nevada 4.00% 0.30 million acreft/year (12 m/s)

      The Upper basin has it's own allocations, and Mexico has guaranteed minimums as well.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

      So your 'golf courses in the desert' comment regarding to Las Vegas water usage only refers to 4% of the usage at most. Beyond that, Las Vegas is actually one of the most efficient cities for water usage in the country, which results in Nevada not using their entire allocation, and selling the excess to California. Las Vegas has been very forward-thinking, offering cash to homeowners that convert their lawns to desert landscape - which in total consumed FAR more water than your golf courses. Finally, many of the golf courses in the valley are both strategically located in washes (reduced damage during flash floods, while also 'naturally' watering with drainage water), and then are also supplied with recycled water for additional irrigation.
      https://www.lvvwd.com/water-sy... [lvvwd.com]

      The VAST majority of water usage in any of the states does not go to cities, but to agriculture. The problem is much less about a few thousand acres of golf courses, and much more about millions of acres of farm, pasture and crops that are in places that really don't make sense. But until the CRC is amended, this problem is likely to persist, as the farmers are all guaranteed their allotments.

      The real problem is that the Colorado River Compact was set after observing water flows over a few seasons, which, unknown at the time, were El Nino years, and had higher than average flows of water. Ever since then, the amount of water flow guaranteed to the states (and perhaps Mexico) has been unrealistic and has been bound to run into problems, which have been exacerbated by long periods of drought in the last few decades.
    • Golf courses use far less water than you think. Most of them rely heavily on reclaimed water sources. One problem is the housing infrastructure. The water that goes into your toilets and lawn sprinklers is the same water that comes from the faucet. Yes, you can drink the toilet water. If they ever figured out a reclaimed water solution for houses (and buildings), our water problems would disappear. Although you'd have to teach the dog not to drink out of the toilet.
      • Although you'd have to teach the dog not to drink out of the toilet.

        Toilets typically have a lid which solves the problem of dogs drinking from it.

      • Yes, you can drink the toilet water.

        You can drink the toilet tank water. It can be a useful source in an emergency. I'd recommend against drinking the toilet bowl water though, even if the dog likes it..

    • I agree largely with what you are saying but..

      > Annul historical water rights to public water sources.

      That right there is the heart of the issue, one thing that makes economics also work is contract enforcement. Governments unilaterally ripping up contracts tends to end badly, and in the US, directly unconstitutional. So you have to somehow persuade either a court or the farmer why the contract is no longer valid or somehow get it altered.

    • Don't forget the farms in the desert owned by Saudi Arabia growing food to send to Saudi Arabia and the fact that California has been sucking the rest of the Southwest dry for decades to grow food in the desert and quench it's oversized cities' thirst. Oh, and the desert farmers in California are paying about 1/10th what the people pay for their water.
    • by gtall ( 79522 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @02:25PM (#61474312)

      No, the real reason is lack of rain and snow pack. See the map here

            https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu... [unl.edu]

      That's drought not caused by over use.

    • The solution to a resource needed to live isn't too jack up the price, it's to make more. Desalinization plants. Yes, they have problems, but there's that scarcity mindset rearing its head again. What happened to the America that flew to the moon? We used to look at problems as something to be solved. Now we look at them as a thing to make rent off of...
      • Desalination plants are a good idea, but obviously too good an idea because environmental boors constantly rail against them and file unending serial lawsuits to tie up the development for decades. A big desal project in Huntington Beach has been mired in continuous enviro legal challenges despite the fact the development firm has built a fully operating, productive desal plant in San Diego; the San Diego County water situation was stabilized by the desal waters being pumped into the aquifers to bolster the
        • What I see is people calling for the problems to be solved. This is the problem the left wing always has. We are killjoys. Whatever you want to do we're going to find problems with it. And yes we're going to make suggestions on fixing those problems. Often if not always the help of experts. But it gives us a bad reputation because the other side just says that they can fix everything by keeping everything the same. And that's a very attractive proposition
  • by catmistake ( 814204 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @12:24PM (#61473822) Journal
    The Army Corp of Engineers dumps about a half a trillion gallons of water from Lake Okeechobee into the Intercoastal Waterways every year, creating massive algae blooms and fish dieoffs. The Southwest should get it together and pay for a pipeline to take that wasted water and put it to good use.
    • The west coast has that problem already, nearly 90% of all rainfall ends up in the Pacific Ocean in less than a day following the rain. It's been reported that during a recent medium sized storm in SoCal, over 4 billion gallons of water flowed out to sea on the first day.
      Recently LA County water managers have begun considering how to modify the paved rivers from being merely giant sewers that route water to the ocean, so that water can seep into the ground or can be mechanically injected into the ground. A
  • The level of Lake Mead depends in large part on the amount of power generated by Hoover dam plus the water taken for irrigation and the city of Los Angeles. Stop trying to irrigate a desert and run air conditioning and it will recover.

  • by crunchygranola ( 1954152 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:02PM (#61473980)

    This means it will be lowest level ever since the reservoir was first filled starting in 1935 (it took a couple of years to fill).

  • by couchslug ( 175151 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:07PM (#61474002)

    Farming what should not be farmed (the US has immense acreage of arable land) was bound to backfire along with settling the Mafia artifact that is Las Vegas, so handy for a pleasure palace because it (was) in the middle of nowhere. Without Nellis AFB (a reasonable use for wasteland) that would probably not have happened.

    Not a problem though. When the water runs out the rich farmers descendants can simply move. Ditto the Vegas population who mostly moved to live there in the first place. Nothing is permanent and even cities are just clusters built for economic reasons which can be abandoned for economic reasons.

    • by DaveV1.0 ( 203135 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:22PM (#61474048) Journal

      Farming what should not be farmed

      Did you know that a lot of that is being done by farms owned by Saudi Arabia to grow food to send to Saudia Arabia?

      • That's fine, as long as we're not stopping solutions to the water crisis. The US can, with enough desalinization plants, feed the world. We should. It'll make a better and more stable world. We need to stop fighting among ourselves.
      • Did you know that a lot of that is being done by farms owned by Saudi Arabia to grow food to send to Saudia Arabia?

        Otherwise known as America's export economy. Why are you complaining? Farming is one of the things America is still good at. You've destroyed every other industry and converted them to a service, you going to do that with food next?

      • by belthize ( 990217 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @05:42PM (#61474886)

        How the fuck is this 'informative'. Saudi Arabian ownership of land in the southwest (or all of the US) is tiny compared to other nations like Canada and Germany. Saudi Arabia owns around 20-25K acres in California and Arizona. The Imperial Valley alone is 500K acres.

        The proper sentence is:

        Did you know that much less than 1% of that is being done by farms owned by Saudi Arabia.

        I get it if you dislike the Saudi's (I do) but try to be somewhat accurate.

  • maybe Growth = Progress is not so true there.

  • by DaveV1.0 ( 203135 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:21PM (#61474042) Journal
    You know, the state that has hijacked vast amounts of water in the Southwest so it can populate and grow food in a desert. And, the water used to grow the food in the desert is being sold for 1/10th of what is paid by people living in cities.
    • Well, You can blame it on California if you'd like.
      But where do all those people come from?
      Some from sex to be sure, but the rest are migrants from the WHOLE REST of the country!
      All you migrants to California, GO HOME! And get offa my lawn!
      LOL

  • by Ziest ( 143204 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:22PM (#61474046) Homepage

    Read "Cadillac Desert" by Marc Reisner. This book came out in 1986 and there was a 4 part documentation on PBS in 1996. The Southwest has gone through a number of mega droughts over the centuries, some that lasted decades. One of the hallmarks of the Americans is we don't listen to warnings.

  • I am sure the lake has waves and ripples more than 0.01 feet in amplitude. The wind can also create a height difference of more than 0.01 feet around the periphery of the lake. How do they then measure it so precisely?
    • by theshowmecanuck ( 703852 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @02:22PM (#61474298) Journal
      They use the same tools that software project managers use to describe the amount of progress to management.
    • Whatever methodology is used doesn't matter, using that method 1071.48 is the new low measurement. Unless they start changing the methodology or find an error and start changing historical data.. Sort of like how they keep changing the high temp measurements for historical data with the result making the global warming part of climate change look like a bigger temp swing.
  • What they can't grow there anymore we'll get from Mexico. Also Brazil after they've cleared more rain forest for our needs.
  • Comparing it to the water levels of the 1930's is hardly fair. Lake Mead is largely formed by the Hoover Dam which wasn't completed until 1936. I'm not saying there isn't a drought, but the title is a little disingenuous.

    • by gtall ( 79522 )

      No, the title is not disingenuous, look at the map:

            https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu... [unl.edu]

    • by EvilSS ( 557649 )

      Comparing it to the water levels of the 1930's is hardly fair. Lake Mead is largely formed by the Hoover Dam which wasn't completed until 1936. I'm not saying there isn't a drought, but the title is a little disingenuous.

      Wouldn't that make the headline more fair? It's the lowest it's been since before the Hoover Dam was built, and if you want to exclude years before the dam, then you could say it's at a all time record low.

  • Don't worry, when the hydroelectric power from the dams stop, someone will figure out they're doing it wrong.
  • ...you mean the lake that was man made in 1935?

  • I took a tour of the Hoover Dam ten or so years ago and seem to recall that if the water level got low enough it represented a risk to the structure of the dam, as it requires the weight of the water behind it to keep it in place. It was a long time ago, and I might have been drunk from a rafting trip - anyone know anything about this?
    • If the dam would fall over from not enough water holding it up, it would have fallen over when first constructed and before the lake filled the first time.

      • I don't think it is that simple. I can envision the dam "settling" into position as the water piles up behind it, compressing the shoreline along the dam foundation regions. The land comes to conform to the dam given the force behind it, and perhaps to some extent the dam comes to conform to the land. If nothing else, when the force is removed, the dam may return to its original position and shape, resulting in gaps between the foundation and land. The dam today structurally speaking is not exactly the
  • If you consider the goal of eventually colonizing Mars, or any other planet or moon, problems like this are a huge chance to try some extreme ideas for helping improve the global climate. One idea would be to use a combination of desalinization plants and pumping, and make a new HUGE lake in the middle of the desert. Pumping water from the Pacific ocean to fill this new lake with clean water on a massive scale would add a lot of moisture to the air as it evaporates. On such a large scale, this could r

  • Oh wait.. those are banned now...

  • Removing Lake Powell would only be a stop gap measure, but it would save Lake Mead for a few years. What needs to happen is to re-allocate the Colorado River water based on current drought levels (not on the 1930's above average levels) and change how farmers use water. Agriculture uses far more water than cities. Also stop growing crops that use a lot of water in the desert. Farmers will adapt if given the right incentives like subsidies to switch from wasteful flood irrigation to more efficient forms. It
  • by WindBourne ( 631190 ) on Thursday June 10, 2021 @11:38PM (#61475702) Journal
    It is dropping because California is taking more than DOUBLE what they are entitled to. We have to have California STOP STEALING THE WATER.
    And the only solution is to require that California make heavy use of desalinated water as well as their own water.

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...