How International Scam Artists Pulled off an Epic Theft of Covid Benefits (nbcnews.com) 60
Russian mobsters, Chinese hackers and Nigerian scammers have used stolen identities to plunder tens of billions of dollars in pandemic aid, officials say. From a report: In June, the FBI got a warrant to hunt through the Google accounts of Abedemi Rufai, a Nigerian state government official. What they found, they said in a sworn affidavit, was all the ingredients for a "massive" cyberfraud on U.S. government benefits: stolen bank, credit card and tax information of Americans. Money transfers. And emails showing dozens of false unemployment claims in seven states that paid out $350,000. Rufai was arrested in May at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York as he prepared to fly first class back to Nigeria, according to court records. He is being held without bail in Washington state, where he has pleaded not guilty to five counts of wire fraud.
Rufai's case offers a small window into what law enforcement officials and private experts say is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against the U.S., a significant part of it carried out by foreigners. Russian mobsters, Chinese hackers and Nigerian scammers have used stolen identities to plunder tens of billions of dollars in Covid benefits, spiriting the money overseas in a massive transfer of wealth from U.S. taxpayers, officials and experts say. And they say it is still happening. Among the ripest targets for the cybertheft have been jobless programs. The federal government cannot say for sure how much of the more than $900 billion in pandemic-related unemployment relief has been stolen, but credible estimates range from $87 million to $400 billion -- at least half of which went to foreign criminals, law enforcement officials say.
Rufai's case offers a small window into what law enforcement officials and private experts say is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against the U.S., a significant part of it carried out by foreigners. Russian mobsters, Chinese hackers and Nigerian scammers have used stolen identities to plunder tens of billions of dollars in Covid benefits, spiriting the money overseas in a massive transfer of wealth from U.S. taxpayers, officials and experts say. And they say it is still happening. Among the ripest targets for the cybertheft have been jobless programs. The federal government cannot say for sure how much of the more than $900 billion in pandemic-related unemployment relief has been stolen, but credible estimates range from $87 million to $400 billion -- at least half of which went to foreign criminals, law enforcement officials say.
credible estimates (Score:5, Insightful)
credible estimates range from $87 million to $400 billion
Estimates of that range can't all be credible. At least some of them are highly speculative.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's just unemployment..it gets worse even for the rent relief. The feds have $$$$ out there already allocated to help pay for those that soon will be evicted, but neither landlords or tenants can
Re: credible estimates (Score:4, Interesting)
Almost none of it was directly paid by the Federal government. Instead the Federal government gave the money to States to distribute as they saw for. So if there is massive fraud here, your anger is better focused on the state politicians that put in place flawed rollouts.
Re: (Score:1)
Well this happened because of a prior perception that the federal government was easier to compromise due to a lack of local vested interests. I think now we can see that any local, state, or country-wide department made of disorganized idiots can be compromised easily by organized crime.
Re: (Score:2)
Almost none of it was directly paid by the Federal government. Instead the Federal government gave the money to States to distribute as they saw for. So if there is massive fraud here, your anger is better focused on the state politicians that put in place flawed rollouts.
My lady still hasn't gotten any of her stimulus checks. The IRS is claiming her return is fraudulent (it isn't) and the phones are busy nonstop and the nearest office is four hours away. So frankly, fuck the fucking feds, and fuck the fucking fucks who defend them without knowing what they fuck they are talking about.
Re: (Score:2)
And which party systematically defunds the IRS?
As part of the current "infrastructure" bills, there's a significant funding restoration for the IRS so they can do better - which in turn will raise revenue because they'll be able to crack down on tax fraud. One party is fighting hard against that idea.
Re: (Score:2)
The GOP has systematically defunded the IRS. I wasn't here to defend conservacucks, so your tone is inexplicable.
Re: (Score:2)
Usually the people who most lambast the Federal government (as in the tone from your comment that I was replying to) are conservatives. Nothing in your response indicated the opposite. You don't really have the moral high ground to get offended by tone after you already leveraged expletives.
Re: (Score:2)
Who said I was offended? I'm solely confused as to why you expect to be taken seriously.
Re: credible estimates (Score:2)
Do you even read your own comments?
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, so do other people. And I have excellent karma any time I haven't been modbombed. Guess the people have spoken.
Re: (Score:2)
So do I, what's the point of your tangents?
Re: (Score:2)
...And yet, honest, actual Americans can't hardly get through all the red tape
Really? The last right wing talking point I heard was that it was so easy to get this that people are actively choosing unemployment instead of going and finding jobs.
Which is it? It's like every right wing talking point is a quantum paradox, kind of like your Mexican Schrödinger's immigrants who somehow steal your jobs and mooch off unemployment benefits all at the same time.
Re: (Score:3)
Which is it?
It is both. Some people have great difficulty. Others have no problem. It depends on their circumstances.
I had payments denied because of my income level.
My wife's business has contractors that received unemployment benefits despite continuing contract payments and not being "employed" in the first place. They were handed free money for no valid reason and with no reprecussions.
Re: (Score:2)
Many "professional poor", those who rely extensively on unemployment and housing assistance, have deferred seeking employment. For many with limited skills who did service labor, it was partly a safety choice. For many others, they've been caring for children who could not attend day care or school.
The red tape is there on purpose (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
in Afghanistan, where the Taliban are clearly the minority
The Taliban are from the Pashtun tribe, which is a majority of Afghans. The national government and army are mostly Tajiks and Hazaras, which are minorities.
The national gov't has 180k troops (Score:2)
Ethnic minorities aren't the issue here. It's more a rural/city divide. The sad thing is those city folk are about to be dragged back into the stone age...
One more thing (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That's a depressing thought.
Re: (Score:2)
It's also happened repeatedly in Afghnistan. It happened when the Soviet Union conquered Afgnanistan, and it happened after several previous British invasions.
Re: (Score:2)
I can vouch for the unemployment clusterfuck. Starting in March last year the state's unemployment website was down for a couple weeks, and the phone line was completely dead (wouldn't even ring) for months. Once you got your application in, if there was any issue with it - your former employer disputed a detail, or any reason they needed to speak with you whatsoever - tough luck. You can't speak to anyone.
I actually got my application approved mere days before the rush, and I received benefits for a few mo
Shitbags (Score:1)
Shitbag's gotta shit.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess someone with modpoints was offended that I called people who take advantage of crises to steal money "shitbags."
Wow! (Score:3)
I wonder how many Russian gangsters bathed in swathes of Trump checks and blessed his name.
Re: (Score:1)
https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
A web page on the site of the Republican National Committee detailing former President Donald Trump’s work on issues related to terrorism and the Middle East disappeared over the weekend as Taliban militants took control of Kabul and toppled Afghanistan’s government.
The page, which returned a 404 error as of Monday but could still be seen on archive sites, dealt with a number of issues including the Trump administration’s negotiations with the Taliban as we
Within the normal range... (Score:2)
... of domestic benefit fraud.
If you print it. (Score:1, Troll)
Oh but that's inconvenient. Well too bad.
Re: (Score:1)
Requiring an ID is "racist".
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Only if you think any certain races are inherently unable to do something as simple and basic as go get a free government ID.
Re: (Score:2)
They give out free ID cards? Sweet, you have a link?
Re: (Score:2)
Hey dipshit, they aren't free!
Re: (Score:2)
They're not free. The ID's almost all require fees, and proof of residency such as bills in your name and a lease agreement, along with social security cards and/or a birth certificate. Getting to the office during business hours, with all of that in hand, can be very difficult for someone who's not kept their birth certificate carefully filed away.
Re: (Score:1)
Requiring ID isn't racist. Not having sufficient govt offices & services in areas where poor people live (read poor, "under served" neighbourhoods) isn't racist. If you make getting govt ID an onerous task for any specific group of people & then require that ID to participate in society, that isn't necessarily racist.
What is racist is the federal govt policy of "redlining" since the 1930s (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]), which in turn, leads to the adverse effects on particular ethnic groups
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Redlining was federal govt policy implemented by the Federal Housing Administration (That's in the first paragraph of the history of redlining from Wikipedia). It was also coordinated consistently across the entire country. It's since been outlawed but many companies in the real estate sector still (quietly) practise it to this day. Even if they stopped tomorrow, the damage has already been done & can't be undone without substantial reparations. Requiring ID isn't redlining & I didn't say it was. Th
Re: (Score:2)
Just make them free and staff the goddamn post office or whoever issues them on Saturdays and Sundays. That's it.
Re: (Score:2)
Hell, we can't even convince them to show an ID for voting....one of the most basic and important things we can do as citizens.
We have more requirements to board a fucking airplane than to cash a govt check, get a check of vote.
$350,000 is not epic (Score:2)
We put thieves and crooks in charge (Score:3)
This is small potatoes (Score:4, Interesting)
My personal favorite were the airlines who took billions and subsidies to not do layoffs, did the layoffs anyway, kept the money and are now complaining because the people they laid off went out and found other jobs and they're having a hard time getting them to come back. I'm sure they very much like to bring in a bunch of h-1b's.
The point is we are easily distracted by relatively pointless things. Yeah it would be nice to not have all this fraud (never mind the administration that oversaw that fraud). But it's less than 1/100 what's been permanently extracted from the economy. And unless and until the money that was extracted is restored we're never going to go back to normal.
Re: (Score:3)
My personal favorite were the airlines who took billions and subsidies to not do layoffs, did the layoffs anyway, kept the money and are now complaining because the people they laid off went out and found other jobs and they're having a hard time getting them to come back.
Is this the same airline industry where each of the players lost money to the tune of ~$7bn despite taking the subsidies and doing the layoffs?
Well colour me fucking surprised that when a subsidy isn't enough that business doesn't work out all rainbows and roses.
At least one of them made a profit (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the American Airlines with a full year net LOSS of $8.9bn? That's some subsidy if the government is taking money away rather than giving it /sarcasm.
They simply should have been required to keep the employees on staff even if they were sitting around doing nothing.
Yeah, let's keep afloat by hopes and dreams. Hint: The subsidy existed not so some stewardess keeps her job. It existed so that post pandemic there is still an Airline that can take you places.
Will you me or anyone below C-level see any of it
Maybe put some more effort into understanding the purpose of a subsidy. Hint: It's got nothing to do with you me *or* C-levels seeing any of it.
Nigerian princes? (Score:2)
I thought the articles might be about US billionaires who got furlough money for their yacht-crews in Belize.
Government is not essential (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
New name! (Score:2)
Tons and tons of fake unemployment (Score:1)
I have about fifty employees, about half of them "filed" for unemployment. Even my dad who is semiretired filed. Lots of paperwork for me to report and clean up all the fraud. Just assume your SSN is completely pwn3d at this point.