Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security News

Hacker Lawyer Jay Leiderman Is Dead at 50 (gizmodo.com) 79

Jay Leiderman, a California defense attorney known for his whistleblower advocacy and defense of political dissidents and hackers, was confirmed dead in Ventura County on Thursday. He was 50 years old. From a report: Dubbed the "Hacktivist's Advocate" by The Atlantic in 2012, Leiderman gained national attention for his pro-bono work for clients accused of crashing corporate and government websites, including members of the group Anonymous. They were rarely good cases.

Leiderman's hacking clients had a nagging habit of openly admitting to the things they were accused of doing. One spent a decade fleeing authorities in several countries, giving interviews, all the while on the lam. (The client was just captured in June.) Still, their causes struck a chord with the Queens-born attorney, who'd long held to a rebellious legal philosophy. After a city in California passed a law criminalizing homelessness, the same client knocked one of its websites offline for half an hour. Where the FBI saw a felony computer crime worth up to 15 years in prison, Leiderman saw a peaceful protest against an unjust law -- a protest, he noted, that caused no perceptible harm.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Hacker Lawyer Jay Leiderman Is Dead at 50

Comments Filter:
    • Heart disease is the #1 killer in the US. But yeah, I'm sure it's a conspiracy to kill a guy who was in poor health and rarely won his cases.
      • What if he did himself in to reduce own carbon footprint?

      • by LKM ( 227954 )
        This is also a guy who had an incredibly stressful job, and was probably getting attacked from all sides all the time. A friend of mine, in his 50s, also died of a heart attack just a few months ago. This is an incredibly common way to die for people in their 50s, particularly if they have high-stress jobs, and/or risk factors like weight issues, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or if they're smokers.
        • by thomst ( 1640045 )

          LKM observed:

          This is also a guy who had an incredibly stressful job, and was probably getting attacked from all sides all the time. A friend of mine, in his 50s, also died of a heart attack just a few months ago. This is an incredibly common way to die for people in their 50s, particularly if they have high-stress jobs, and/or risk factors like weight issues, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or if they're smokers.

          In the USA, the average age of death from heart attack is 35 for males. We're just not very good at outliving our peak reproductive years, because evolution doesn't give a damn about individual survival.

          See: Mayflies ...

  • Dead at 50? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by rolytnz ( 1769750 )
    Hmm, "an apparent heart attack". I would say he was enough of a thorn in the side of the establishment, he was inhumed.
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Unlikely. This draws attention to his work and likely does more harm that good to his enemies. People sometimes die unexpectedly. 50 is not uncommon for a heart attack and even the first one can kill a person.

      In addition, any covert hit comes with a really bad risk of discovery and that rarely makes it worthwhile.

      • by aitikin ( 909209 )

        Unlikely. This draws attention to his work and likely does more harm that good to his enemies. People sometimes die unexpectedly. 50 is not uncommon for a heart attack and even the first one can kill a person.

        This is a very valid point. For all we know, the dude ate steak every night, popped Pez like a 4 year old, and had a coke habit.

        In addition, any covert hit comes with a really bad risk of discovery and that rarely makes it worthwhile.

        Never seems to stop the Russians.

        • by gweihir ( 88907 )

          Unlikely. This draws attention to his work and likely does more harm that good to his enemies. People sometimes die unexpectedly. 50 is not uncommon for a heart attack and even the first one can kill a person.

          This is a very valid point. For all we know, the dude ate steak every night, popped Pez like a 4 year old, and had a coke habit.

          Thanks. Or maybe he just got unlucky.

          In addition, any covert hit comes with a really bad risk of discovery and that rarely makes it worthwhile.

          Never seems to stop the Russians.

          Yes. But they are already seen as the evil empire by the west. Imagine what would happen if it became known the US does assassinations domestically.

      • by Wolfrider ( 856 )

        " Only the good die young " --B. Joel

        / he will be missed

    • Hmm, "an apparent heart attack". I would say he was enough of a thorn in the side of the establishment, he was inhumed.

      Did he ever represent someone who hacked the Clinton Foundation?

      (possibly my most blatant troll ever)

      • by aitikin ( 909209 )

        Sadly, Poe's Law [wikipedia.org] came into play for me reading your statement until I got to the parenthetical portion.

        Link included in case some newbie has no clue...

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      That's the line I was expecting, but near as I can tell he hadn't been much of a thorn yet. Ergo the proper conspiracy theory is that he was finally onto something, so...

      But how quickly they forgot Michael Hastings. He was a much bigger thorn and I think he was onto many things.

  • ...no one thinking he's just hired permanently by the NSA "never to be seen in public again" ?

    • He wasn't doing the hacking... he was defending people accused of hacking, after they got caught.

      Hard to see this as anything but a sad single entry from the list of 655K Americans who die of heart disease every year.

  • This article unwittingly politicizes the legal system.

    The lawyer's personal beliefs aren't supposed to be associated to the legal system.

    Given such an association,
    going after lawyers becomes fair game.

    • by An Ominous Cow Erred ( 28892 ) on Friday September 10, 2021 @08:27AM (#61781899)

      There's no rule saying that an attorney can't share personal beliefs or interests with the client, nor one saying that they can't choose to take a client if it is in the interest of their political or personal beliefs.

      The rule only says that an attorney can't let their personal beliefs prevent them from providing competent and enthusiastic representation for their client. If you think your client is great that's fine, but if you think your client is a shitbag you STILL have to provide good representation. Moreover if you think the opposition are shitbags then that's fine, they're the adversary -- your job is to oppose them, which you still have to do even if you hold that adversary in high regard.

      The law doesn't expect attorneys to be robots, just that they have to put their personal feelings aside if they conflict with the client's interests.

      There's also no rule against seeking out clients that you agree with. It's considered bad practice to, for personal reasons, consistently *reject* clients that offer to pay your customary rates, and in the case of appointed defense attorneys it's sometimes not even an option if there isn't a clear conflict of interest or scheduling, but you're free to promote yourself to the people you particularly want to represent.

    • I guess somebody should have told Giuliani.
      • by aitikin ( 909209 )

        I guess somebody should have told Giuliani.

        Last I checked, he's suspended from practice by NY's Bar association, so...

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...