Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses The Almighty Buck

Elon Musk's SpaceX Hits $100 Billion Valuation (cnbc.com) 59

The valuation of Elon Musk's SpaceX crossed $100 billion following a share sale by existing investors announced this week. CNBC reports: SpaceX has an agreement with new and existing investors to sell up to $755 million in stock from insiders at $560 a share, according to multiple people familiar with the deal -- increasing the company's valuation to $100.3 billion. The company did not raise new capital at this time, sources said, with the purchase offer representing a secondary sale of existing shares. The new share price is an increase of 33% from SpaceX's last valuation of $74 billion at $419.99 a share in February, when the company raised nearly $1.2 billion. The company had a similar secondary transaction in February, with a deal for insiders to sell up to $750 million at the time. SpaceX's new valuation makes it one of the rare private "centicorn" or "hectocorn" companies in the world -- a $1 billion unicorn 100 times over. Musk's SpaceX is now the second-most valuable private company in the world, according to CB Insights, behind only China's Bytedance and jumping past fintech firm Stripe.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Elon Musk's SpaceX Hits $100 Billion Valuation

Comments Filter:
  • by iamnotx0r ( 7683968 ) on Friday October 08, 2021 @04:34PM (#61873681)
    Now if they could get StarLink to me. :)
  • by The New Guy 2.0 ( 3497907 ) on Friday October 08, 2021 @04:52PM (#61873709)

    It was a share pass between one investment group and another here. The selling group gets all the cash on this move, the buying group gets shares. Because it was a higher price than last trade, it moves the valuation / market cap up. Not bad, a $1B company that hasn't done much in reality yet, but has a lot on the whiteboards.

    • by hdyoung ( 5182939 ) on Friday October 08, 2021 @05:27PM (#61873795)
      You must not invest much. Stocks are valued based on 1) what they are doing now and 2) their growth potential.

      SpaceX current activities? One of the few US launch companies that's actually sending rockets up, and doing it at a pretty competitive price. In addition, they have the only re-useable rocket system in operation at the moment. A pretty good current portfolio. SpaceX potential for the future? Off-the-charts. No other launch company comes close. Their future systems are in active development, not just some on-paper multi-trillion boondoggle system like the other companies. SpaceX is building prototypes, launching them, crashing and burning them up, learning, and iterating fast. No other space company comes close. And, as much as the space-haters claim otherwise, humanity is headed into space sooner or layer, in a big way. If we don't we won't last very long as a species. Hm. I'm not a musk fanboy, but there's a good reason his companies are valued where they are.

      In other words, SpaceX has a growth story that literally tells itself. Tesla is the same way - the only premium electric vehicle maker on the planet with full production capabilities, and expanding said production capabilities by the month. That's why they're valued where they are.

      Compare that to Facebook. Try listening to their executives tie themselves into knots explaining how they're gonna double their market share. Try to ignore the fact that most people under the age of 40 actively dislikes them, and they're starting to lose their luster with oldsters as well. Now, try keeping a straight face.

      I'm not saying Musk is god and Facebook is doomed to failure. Companies can surprise. But SpaceX and Tesla are valued high for damn good reasons.
      • My point was that this transaction didn't involve Musk... he's left with paper value up, he didn't get cash from this.

        • by ac22 ( 7754550 )

          Not bad, a $1B company that hasn't done much in reality yet, but has a lot on the whiteboards.

          The fact that you are talking about a "$1 billion company" when the story is discussing a $100 billion valuation reveals a lot about your understanding of the story. Are $1B and $100B so similar to you that you don't notice the difference? I assume you wouldn't notice if Apple and Microsoft were referred to as $200 trillion companies, instead of $2 trillion.

          • Checking 00000000 okay, missing a few zeros, typo.

            • by ac22 ( 7754550 )

              It may start out as a "typo", but if you don't immediately realise your mistake after posting, then it's just a basic inability to understand how much things are worth. An intelligent human should be able to estimate numbers to within 1 degree of magnitude. Could the population of the world be 700 million? Could the US National debt be $267 Trillion? If you're not sure, then you don't have much of a head for numbers, and I wouldn't be particularly confident about any financial opinions that you chose to exp

      • You must not invest much. Stocks are valued based on 1) what they are doing now and 2) their growth potential.

        SpaceX current activities? One of the few US launch companies that's actually sending rockets up, and doing it at a pretty competitive price. In addition, they have the only re-useable rocket system in operation at the moment. A pretty good current portfolio. SpaceX potential for the future? Off-the-charts.

        Most of us would be beyond satisfied, having founded a company on the bleeding edge of technology, let alone if it ever became a hundred billion dollar outfit... and this is Musk's second most valuable enterprise, with Tesla valued at five or six times that of SpaceX.

        Fucking Crazy.

        • by Lohkay ( 1658931 )

          The fact that it is that far behind Tesla's valuation is the crazy part in my book. Sure it is all speculation at this point but with starlink which will revolutionize internet accessibility and if they can achieve what they want with starship, it will revolutionize space access, there is NO WAY this shouldn't be worth 10x Tesla. You can bet if I was able to, I'd buy shares.

          • The fact that it is that far behind Tesla's valuation is the crazy part in my book.

            Like the men said, it's not based on reality, but the perception of reality. Most people who pay attention to space stuff at all have been fed a steady diet of "space is worthless as there's nothing important we can do there that we can't do here and it will cost 28047238904723 * infinity dollars to do asteroid mining so it will never happen" but anyone who can afford an EV and even some who can't can arrange to get behind the wheel of one and try it out.

      • Stocks are valued based on perception of 1) what they are doing now and 2) their growth potential and what what 1 and 2 might be in the near or far future, as perceived by people willing and able to put money behind their perceptions.

        There, fixed that for you. (And yes, I do have money invested, and no, I won't ever claim to know what's what. I've just found that reality and state of companies isn't strongly related to the stock price. A degree in psychology will likely get you further on the stock marke

    • hasn't done much in reality yet

      In about 15 years, they went from 0 to a 75% market share in worldwide commercial launch activity, while simultaneously causing that market to grow by several hundred % (through lowering launch cost, and through Starlink). What planet do you live on to call that 'not much'?

  • by leafares ( 4852281 ) on Friday October 08, 2021 @05:35PM (#61873805)
    .... way to go Elon! Keep pushing forward!
    • Elon has made excellent contributions but nobody deserves $100B. Honestly, all this really says is that our tax system has failed spectacularly.

      • Let's say he got taxed 50% (ridiculous). Would anyone "deserve" $50B?
        • A progressive tax doesn't stop at such paltry percentages.

          • throw-in a communist dictatorship while you're at it. ;-)
            • Look up the history of top US tax rates because it used to be 94%.

              • Because that's sane and reasonable....
                • It absolutely was because it kept the executives from just giving themselves all the money and screwing workers. If they just gave themselves the money then they would lose almost all of it and then the government has the ability to use the money for the workers.

                  You have very little understanding of how badly our economic system has been broken and they've convinced people like you that fixing it would be communism/socialism/authoritarianism/etc. You believe their lies and perpetuate a system of extreme i

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday October 08, 2021 @06:34PM (#61873907)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • I believe a lot of credit should go to the the engineering team members who figured out how to simulate the rocket for testing the software and safely land the darn thing. So abot 75% of that credit probably belongs to that lone engineer who spent her / his nights figuring out how not to explode / tilt over / slam into ground / go off course etc. My applause to the engineers of the team!

C'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas l'Informatique. -- Bosquet [on seeing the IBM 4341]

Working...