Senate Confirms FCC Chair Rosenworcel To Another Term, Narrowly Avoiding a Republican Majority (cnbc.com) 41
The Senate voted 68-31 to confirm Federal Communications Commission Chair Jessica Rosenworcel, the first woman to hold that title, to another five-year term, narrowly avoiding a Republican majority at the agency once her current term was set to expire at the end of the year. From a report: Rosenworcel gained the support of key Republicans, including Senate Commerce Committee Ranking Member Roger Wicker, R-Miss. President Joe Biden waited a historically long period to nominate Rosenworcel as well as former FCC official Gigi Sohn to a commissioner role. That prolonged period threatened to temporarily give the two Republicans on the commission a majority, since Rosenworcel would have had to leave the commission at the New Year if she was not confirmed to another term by then. While the role of acting chair, which sets the agenda for the agency, would go to the remaining Democrat on the commission until a permanent chair could be confirmed, the agency would likely not have been able to push forward anything but the most bipartisan of measures. Even with Rosenworcel's confirmation, the commission is set to remain stalemated on more controversial issues until a fifth commissioner is confirmed. Biden has signaled a desire to return to the net neutrality rules adopted by the FCC during the Obama administration, which were later repealed by the agency under former President Donald Trump. Republicans on the commission have continued to signal opposition to reclassifying broadband providers under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, which the industry has argued would unfairly open the possibility of price regulation of their services. Companies subject to the reclassification included internet service providers like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast, parent company of CNBC owner NBCUniversal.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be talking about tubes...
The FCC versus the Bolsheviks (Score:2)
Well, you got me to look at the AC. Thank you. NOT. Turned out there was an excellent reason he wanted no credit for the brain fart. (As usual.) If you have to play with the troll, can't you at least fix the Subject? Going for Funny is a feeble excuse in this case because the AC's foundation was too weak for your joke. I doubt any joke could have stooped low enough.
Only aspect that struck me about the story was that 18 (19?) of the neo-Bolsheviks broke ranks. Just goes to show McConnell isn't yet as good as
Re: (Score:2)
Now if a individual industry wants to pay more on top of what the subscribers already pay for even better service, I have never seen the problem with that. We live with Private Parking Lots and Toll Roads every day on public owned infrastructure, this is private owned infrastructure.
Extending your car analogy, we have toll lanes in many places where wealthy people get home on time while the unwashed masses sit in traffic. I see the same thing happening on the Internet. My company can't compete with Google.
I wouldn't really care either way if Comcast didn't own the poles in my region. That's already anti-competitive so whatever happens will be in their favor.
Re: (Score:1)
...on roads subsized by sales taxes. To put it another way, we pay those "unwashed masses" to sit in traffic, shifting part of the cost onto people who can't afford cars. Tolls don't do that. [planetizen.com]
Another way we shift the cost of driving onto our poorest is the way cities in the USA force business owners to provide more parking for their customers than what the business owner might think is economica
Who cares about Dem or GOP labels (Score:4, Insightful)
"Narrowly avoiding a Republican majority" - That's a fallacious sucker's viewpoint.
Give me someone that actually listens to both sides of ALL types (Dem vs. GOP, corporations vs. citizens vs. government, etc.) and does what's best for the long-term for the people in all walks of life.
Is that inefficient? Yes. Tough to get things done? Definitely. But inefficient progress is far superior to whiplashes between policy changes by those in power. And it keeps those in power in check.
At this point they matter (Score:3, Interesting)
Tourists (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh please those were friendly tourists on Jan 6th. Even Andrew Clyde says so. https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
Would you like to see a picture of Andrew Clyde on that day?
https://twitter.com/SethAbrams... [twitter.com]
Mr. Clyde looks pretty scared. In fact he screamed in terror when those "tourists" paid him a visit that day. He still maintains nothing bad happened. https://www.gainesvilletimes.c... [gainesvilletimes.com]
Ronald Reagan is a leftist if you sit him next to current day republicans.
YouTuber Beau of the fifth column (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Another god damn idiot. Is something in the air today. No rapist and no religious extremists, no bullets where fired or dodged. Unless you count the one that murdered that young girl, Ashli Babbitt. Yes, she was murdered and if you don't agree, then you are wrong, an idiot, and your option doesn't count.
Re: (Score:3)
Fine if Garland was such a bad nominee give him a hearing and vote on it (Republicans had more than enough votes to keep him from being confirmed). McConnell wouldn't even do that and just refused to accept any Obama nominees for consideration since it was near the end of his term. Then to put a cherry on the sundae McConnell decided he had no problem with accepting a Trump nominee just weeks before an election.
who's doing such a great job, with such gems as labeling parents who disagree with school boards as "domestic terrorists."
There is a problem with this argument. That problem is that Garland never called parents "domesti
Oh you're fricking kidding me (Score:2, Informative)
No he never called them domestic terrorists, he just treated them as such and then lied to congress about the administration's collaboration with the teacher's union.
McConnell couldn't give him a hearing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The boomers are dying off, and their replacements, Gen X/M/Z, are so broke they're not turning conservative
When the boomers die off, they aren't taking it with them. The biggest generational transfer of wealth in history will create a lot of Republicans.
Major corporations are taking it with them (Score:2)
We're either going to get a new New deal or the elites are going to have to clamp down in order
Re: (Score:2)
the cost of the medical care that keeps them alive keeps going up and up.
The cost of medical care for seniors is mostly dumped on the taxpayers.
They're doing reverse mortgages
Fewer than 1% of American homes have reserves mortgages.
it's not Gen x buying them it's large corporations who then rent it out.
Which means the shareholders own them. That wealth is transferred when the shareholders die.
generational wealth isn't being transferred.
How so? Golden coffins? Have boomers figured out how to take it with them?
Re: (Score:2)
When did he accept the results? He held quite a few rallies after leaving the white house with the core theme being that the election was stolen. He's a bit quieter about it now but mostly since he's trying to get a lot of money from donors to build a facade of a social network platform. Trump certainly did not accept the election results on January 6th for sure, he was pressuring Pence up to that dayto step in and nullify the electoral college vote.
I don't think anyone is ever going to hear Trump say "I
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I want someone who will talk to conservatives and liberals, not someone who will talk to the GOP and Dems. That may be a small distinction, but I think it's becoming more and more important. There are two ways to get good policy, crowdsourced majority opinion or relatively unbiased experts. The latter is almost impossible to come by in a biased selection process, and the GOP is increasingly opposed to representational democracy because of the legacy of disproportionate political power held by rural states a
Re: (Score:2)
Especially when the policies of both major parties seem to be doing the opposite of what the other party wants rather than thinking things through and deciding what's best.
Usually though it comes down to a policy of "doing what's best for the telecom that sent me the biggest check."
The Republican party wields power (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
"Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won."
-- Barack Hussein Obama, three days after being inaugurated
"You don't like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to change it. But don't break it. Don't break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That's not being faithful to what this country's about."
-- Barack Hussein Obama
Re: (Score:2)
I honestly can't tell what you're point is (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"The beginning of wisdom is calling things by their right names." -- Confucious.
Hey, maybe starting a "fuck you, I won" non-dialogue wasn't a good idea? It was good when your man was in office but now that it's being used against you it's bad? How does that even work? Why aren't you suffering damaging cognitive dissonance from holding two contradictory ideas at once?
The Senate vote was 68-31. That sounds bipartisan (Score:2)
"President Joe Biden waited a historically long period to nominate Rosenworcel as well as former FCC official Gigi Sohn to a commissioner role."
"Narrowly avoiding a Republican majority" (Score:3)
Um ... thank goodness, I guess I'm supposed to say?
Is this Slashdot, or Slate?