Mumbai Becomes First South Asian City To Detail Net-Zero Roadmap (bloomberg.com) 29
Mumbai announced detailed plans to zero out carbon emissions by 2050, a target that puts it two decades ahead of India's national goal and makes it the first city in South Asia to set such a timeline. From a report: In the plan announced Sunday, India's financial center, home to south Asia's biggest corporations, stock bourses and the central bank, has proposed exhaustive changes to the way it manages energy, water, air, waste, green spaces and transport for its 19 million residents. "We don't have the luxury of time," said Aaditya Thackeray, environment minister of the state of Maharashtra of which Mumbai is the capital. Without intervention, the effects of climate change could cost India $35 trillion over the next 50 years. India's richest city, Mumbai is also home to tremendous poverty, with slums and fishing villages along the southern coast that date to British rule. By 2050, rising sea levels are expected to flood those parts of the city. In total, unabated climate change could cost the city $920 million.
Sounds like poverty problem solved by climate? (Score:1)
It sounds like if they just let nature keep on present course, it will solve their poverty problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Unlikely, because the poor aren't just going to quietly drown when the water starts rising. They are going to migrate, and eventually just take what they need to survive.
Re: (Score:2)
Riiight... because when the sea level rises, they are going to leave instead of moving closer, simply taking the resources they need to live. You're an analytical genius. /s
Russian allies (Score:1)
The Russians have really bamboozled us all with this green carbon neutral crap.
Re: (Score:2)
India is a Russian ally and it looking to help finance the Ukranian war
At the UN, India abstained but did not support Russa. Only Belarus, Eritrea, NK, and Syria voted with Russia. India has also declined to boycott Russian oil, but it is an exaggeration to say that means India is financing the war.
The Russians have really bamboozled us all with this green carbon neutral crap.
One silver lining of the invasion is that the cost of relying on our geopolitical rivals for energy has given a big boost to local green energy.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
small steps (Score:2)
Electric buses will at least help clean up the in-city air. I assume they will install heat pumps and electric stoves. A drop in the ocean but you have to start somewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
I assume they will install heat pumps
For what? Mumbai is further south than Havana or Honolulu.
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike ordinary A/C units, heat pumps do both cooling and heating. And are relatively efficient at both.
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike ordinary A/C units, heat pumps do both cooling and heating. And are relatively efficient at both.
There is no point paying for both when you will only use one.
Just install an AC. There is no reason a Mumbai resident will ever need heat. It is a tropical city.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are correct, heat pumps are about the same efficiency as ordinary A/C.
Re: (Score:2)
Heat pumps won't help with air conditioning efficiency (since they are just air conditioners with reversing valves) and they have little need for heating. Electric stoves could help improve health a lot though, if they are currently cooking over open fires.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure there is a lot of open fire cooking in a densely populated city. I was assuming that gas stoves would be replaced with electric. Usually the path to "green", at least in the West, is to electrify everything and get the electricity from green sources.
But the Bloomberg article is short on details, maybe the initiative is just to make all the municipal services green.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It is probably a lot more then $920 million in damage, a significant portion of the city would be under water due to rising sea level. Realistically, Mumbai going net zero alone probably would not have much effect on that but it might make the air fit to breathe.
"The research, carried by many newspapers including The Indian Express, indicates that anthropogenic climate change will inundate significant sections of Mumbai by 2050. Unless the city takes significant action in the next three decades, the sea wil
Announced during a Heat Wave (Score:2)
How exactly in 15 years are they going to go green with 100% of power as it grows 7% per year.? 30% more cars even if they are all electric will require more concrete, street lights and be lined by more retail open late into the evening.
Re: (Score:2)
How exactly are they going to keep the lights on with 100% of power as it grows 7% per year?
Oh right, they will just build more capacity. The only question is if it's dirty coal, expensive nuclear or renewable.
Re: Announced during a Heat Wave (Score:2)
They'll just shinny up a power pole [quoracdn.net] and connect their AC. And then riot when the lights go out.
Re: (Score:2)
How exactly in 15 years are they going to go green with 100% of power
By cheating.
Re: (Score:2)
Geez, stupid article (Score:2)
For example, it doesn't mention that Mumbai is sorta-like India's Silicon Valley. Most of the programmers I've worked with over the years were from there.
So this is a big deal. Wonder if they're looking at seawalls.
Re: (Score:2)
The tech capital of India is Bangalore/Bengalooru. Closely followed by Madras/Chennai and Hyderabad. Mumbai is the New York of India, bustling, crowded, never sleeping, home to the stock market, used to be industrial now simply urban ...
South India is poorer in natural resources and thus escaped the curse. They have to invest in human resources and they have done very well. Kerala was the first state t
Too little too late (Score:2)
Changes in emissions have a ~30-year latency before they show effect. It is what you do now that matters for what the effect will be then.
(Disclaimer: Heard at a lecture at a "alumni" meet-and-greet day at my uni, not my field)
They need an accountant. (Score:2)
Brilliant solution, spend $1.7 BILLION on buses alone, plus god-only-knows how many more billions to avoid that $0.92 billion worth of "impact".
I'm sorry, that just does not sound sane.