Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck Businesses Technology

A Minsky Moment for Venture Capital? (ft.com) 24

Venture capital returns have puked this year. The next dangerous stage is investor outflows. Financial Times: Back in the halcyon days of ... early 2021, it looked like venture capital was the hottest game in town. Hedge funds were piling in. Even private equity firms were getting involved in early-stage company investing. Investors loved the combination of fat returns and the lack of volatility in private markets. But the VC cycle now looks like it has hit a sudden stop. Refinitiv's venture capital index, which uses the performance of individual VC portfolios and listed stocks to mimic the performance of the broader industry, tanked another 24.2 per cent in April, taking its 2022 loss to a comically bad 45.8 per cent (NB, the Nasdaq is "only" down 19.7 per cent YTD).

That is comfortably its worst monthly performance since worst of the dotcom bust two decades ago. Of course, a lot of venture capital funds are unlikely to be marking down their books to anywhere near these levels. Some may just be doing better than others (performance persistence is higher in VC than in any other investment industry), but the advantage of private market accounting and negotiated and infrequent funding rounds means that valuations and returns can be massaged a little. There might even be a bit of schadenfreude at the pain suffered by Tiger Global lately, which many venture capitalists saw as an annoyingly uppity interloper-dilettante in Silicon Valley. But the reality is that the bottom has dropped out of tech stock valuations lately -- both public and private -- and anyone who is not marking down their positions heavily might actually unnerve investors more than assuage them.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Minsky Moment for Venture Capital?

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    These leeches deserve every bit of bovine excrement that flies in their direction.
    I'd like it that anyone telling the world that they are a VC gets not only run out of town but out of state and told never to return. J.D. Vance are you listening?
    Your career is well past its 'Sell By Date'. Time to start pushing that broom in the corner diner.

  • Reminds me of 2007 (Score:5, Insightful)

    by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @12:55PM (#62503176) Journal
    Of course, a lot of venture capital funds are unlikely to be marking down their books to anywhere near these levels.

    Remember back in the day when we were told, "This time it's different" as Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, et al were furiously using debt to buy more debt? Remember when we were told mark-to-market was passe and not to worry because everything was under control?

    If these VCs are not doing mark-to-market, for whatever reason, it's a virtual guarantee the same thing will happen now which happened in 2007.
  • by klipclop ( 6724090 ) on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:05PM (#62503206)
    Lots of hot money flowed into a lot of these IPOd companies and the share prices went parabolic. Now that money is flowing out. People should remember that stock prices are set on the margin, so it's easy to see these big drops as everyone runs for the door. If you held these stocks, sucks for you. If you were waiting for sanity to return, looks like there might be some opportunities to buy...
  • by rbrander ( 73222 ) on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:11PM (#62503222) Homepage

    They quit funding excellence in product development some time ago. The business model in recent years has been to "dominate a space" (food delivery 'space', online tax 'space', etc) - monopolize a service. And that the monopoly is most-simply bought, by just heavily funding one player to take out the others.

    F those guys.

    • I often wonder how much better software would be if it were just written by people who started a company and never took capital for "growth".
    • Dont sweat it. This is a problem that’ll fix itself. These VC guys want to copy Amazon or Facebook so bad. but they fail to realize that you cant actually buy dominance that easily . Zuckerberg and Bezos largely stumbled into their dominance. It involved a lot of hard work but even more luck and lucky decisions.

      Witness what happened to Uber. They tried to artificially “dominate the space” by pouring $$ into ride sharing. For a while, rides were cheap. Until the investors tired of bleed
  • Nothing explains it in the summary, and TFA is paywalled, and I'm not signing up for anything there.

    About the only thing I can think of is that is somehow related to some prediction Marvin Minksy made about AI.

  • I Didn't Know (Score:4, Informative)

    by Kunedog ( 1033226 ) on Wednesday May 04, 2022 @01:40PM (#62503306)
    In case you didn't either:
    https://www.investopedia.com/t... [investopedia.com]

    Minsky Moment refers to the onset of a market collapse brought on by the reckless speculative activity that defines an unsustainable bullish period. Minsky Moment is named after economist Hyman Minsky and defines the point in time where the sudden decline in market sentiment inevitably leads to a market crash.

    • Well, there's also the usual Wikipedia entry [wikipedia.org] for a bit more context:

      The term was coined by Paul McCulley of PIMCO in 1998, to describe the 1998 Russian financial crisis, and was named after economist Hyman Minsky, who noted that bankers, traders, and other financiers periodically played the role of arsonists, setting the entire economy ablaze. Minsky opposed the deregulation that characterized the 1980s.

      The entry has the usual links and references for further inquiry.

We warn the reader in advance that the proof presented here depends on a clever but highly unmotivated trick. -- Howard Anton, "Elementary Linear Algebra"

Working...