An Ad Company Is Teaming Up With US Carriers To Take Over Your Lock Screen (androidpolice.com) 126
A Google-backed ad company called Glance is looking to launch in the US, and it brings media content, news, and casual games to Android lock screens. Android Police reports: If you're not familiar with Glance, you can count yourself lucky. The lock screen platform is part of the pre-installed software on many, if not most, Android phones sold in India and other Asian markets, and it has also made its way to the EU on a few select brands. Glance says that since it was launched in 2019, it has become part of over 400 million sold smartphones. The service has taken it upon itself to monetize the lock screen, pushing news and ad feeds right into people's faces before they even unlock their phones. It's a subsidiary of Indian advertising behemoth InMobi, focusing on mobile-first ads.
According to a TechCrunch report, the service is looking to launch in the US within the next two months. The company is negotiating with US carriers to look into partnerships and to become part of the out-of-the-box experience of "several smartphone models by next month." In contrast to Asia, where the company is working directly with smartphone manufacturers, Glance seems to focus on carriers in the US. This makes sense, given the iron grip mobile operators have on the smartphone market.
Based on my experience with Glance on a few Vivo review units (like the Vivo X80 Pro), the lock screen feed tries hard to become part of your routine. Occasional notifications and swipe suggestions on the lock screen nudge you to interact with it. Once you give in and open the feed, it will override your lock screen wallpaper with its content, making you change back to your preferred wallpaper manually. [...] As for the US launch, there is no word on what exactly the feed is going to look like. We would expect a healthy middle ground between the Indian and the European version in the beginning as to not put off people, though it wouldn't be surprising if the company quickly turns things up given that consumer protection is weaker in the US than in the EU. One thing is certain: An entry in the US market will give Glance the opportunity to access users with more money to spend than many in Asian countries. This should allow Glance to ask advertisers for higher prices, allowing the company to grow even faster.
According to a TechCrunch report, the service is looking to launch in the US within the next two months. The company is negotiating with US carriers to look into partnerships and to become part of the out-of-the-box experience of "several smartphone models by next month." In contrast to Asia, where the company is working directly with smartphone manufacturers, Glance seems to focus on carriers in the US. This makes sense, given the iron grip mobile operators have on the smartphone market.
Based on my experience with Glance on a few Vivo review units (like the Vivo X80 Pro), the lock screen feed tries hard to become part of your routine. Occasional notifications and swipe suggestions on the lock screen nudge you to interact with it. Once you give in and open the feed, it will override your lock screen wallpaper with its content, making you change back to your preferred wallpaper manually. [...] As for the US launch, there is no word on what exactly the feed is going to look like. We would expect a healthy middle ground between the Indian and the European version in the beginning as to not put off people, though it wouldn't be surprising if the company quickly turns things up given that consumer protection is weaker in the US than in the EU. One thing is certain: An entry in the US market will give Glance the opportunity to access users with more money to spend than many in Asian countries. This should allow Glance to ask advertisers for higher prices, allowing the company to grow even faster.
Fuggggno (Score:5, Insightful)
Who's going to pay for the damage? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because one thing I can absolutely guarantee you: Malware will follow soon after.
Re:Who's going to pay for the damage? (Score:5, Informative)
Heh, malware is already installed by carriers. A talk at Google IO (Android devel conference) mentioned that 90% of security problems on Android phones are from what the carriers add.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly true. I've also had samsung phones that felt really slow, even the home button was laggy. I switched to Cyanogen (a community based android) and it was WAY faster. It also didn't kill apps aggressively, so you could *gasp* multitask instead. Seems like Samsung was crazy aggressive on killing background apps to help with the benchmarks.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Who's going to pay for the damage? (Score:4, Funny)
not to mention the damage to my phone after I throw it across the room because Glance is fucking annoying me.
Re: (Score:2)
Follow? Sounds like Glance IS malware to me.
Re: (Score:3)
This reminds me of when ad places discovered that they could use push notifications for their spam. It took third party apps, rooting, then finally Google stepping up to the place and offering a relatively quick way to block/silence those things.
This might just be something that pushes more people towards iOS...
Apple would not allow it (Score:5, Insightful)
That is why some people are willing to pay a premium price over becoming an ad-slave in the Android ecosystem.
Re:Apple would not allow it (Score:5, Insightful)
Similarly if you buy a Pixel straight from Google (not from a carrier) you get none of the carrier specific adware/malware. No ads come from the phone itself. Sure surfing the web, youtube (without premium), and various ad supported services support ads, same as the iphone. I can't think of any case where a Pixel would show you an ad, where a iPhone wouldn't.
Re: (Score:3)
Browsing websites, Safari has an ad blocker.
Re:Apple would not allow it (Score:5, Insightful)
Browsing websites, Apple users are only allowed to use Safari, whose ad blocking capabilities are grossly inferior to numerous options on Android.
You can not spin only being able to use one browser engine as a positive.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
> webkit, which is basically Safari.
And also Chrome and Opera and Edge. So you're really just missing out on Firefox/Gecko and, if you're the sort to hop on Brendan Eich's anti-LGBT hate train, whatever engine brave runs on.
Re: (Score:2)
Google forked from WebKit nearly a decade ago and has long gone their own way. Edge, Opera, and Brave are based on Chromium, which is different enough that it's no longer really WebKit. So anything on iOS/iPadOS really is basically on Safari,
Re: (Score:2)
It's my understanding that this isn't true. All browsers that render on the phone must use webkit. If the processing happens server/cloud side, the browser can use any software.
How is this different from all browsers needing to be a skin for webkit? You're basically saying exactly the same thing, with the "exception" being some sort of app with server/cloud side rendering that clearly would not qualify under the traditional definition of a web browser.
Re: (Score:2)
Are Server/cloud based browsers uncommon, sure, just like what I said before. Are they nice for low processing power and low wattage situations, yes.
Consider the definition you supplied: "A web browser (also referred to as an Internet browser or simply a browser) is application software for accessing the World Wide Web or a local website." By that definition, a "web browser" that uses server side rendering is not a web browser since it does not access the world wide web or a local website. It's just a display panel for some middleman software that relays a rendered version of a site on the World Wide Web. It's the server doing the the accessing. How wou
Re: (Score:2)
You try to make the argument that because a browser relies on some degree of third party hardware, that it's not a web browser. For the typical user, if DNS is down, so is the Internet(or your DNS over http provider). If OCSP for a site is down, that site is down.
The World Wide Web is based on a set of standards. Take a look at https://www.w3.org/standards/ [w3.org]. Especially the web architecture section. A web browser is, more or less, a piece of software that implements those standards. Not all web browsers implement the entire set or implement them perfectly, and they may implement other standards including some proprietary ones as well. Generally though, to be a web browser, a piece of software has to make an attempt to target the core standards. The kind of software t
Re: (Score:2)
If the processing happens server/cloud side
What... like put a MITM between yourself and the website that can decrypt all of the data?
Re:Apple would not allow it (Score:5, Informative)
Every browser on iOS/iPadOS is required to use Safari's rendering engine. So, they aren't really browsers so much as different UIs for Safari. The one exception was the Opera Mini browser where pages would be rendered by Opera servers and then sent to the app. AFAIK, that app is no longer around.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Say what? There are a long list of browsers for the iPhone available. I have several on mine. I have no idea what you are claiming, it you are not simply woefully misinformed.
Literally all browsers on iDevices (literally all iPhones, iPods of yesteryear, and iPads) must use the system browser component. Every single web browser on an iDevice is just a different GUI on Safari [9to5mac.com]. Some of these perform additional ad blocking functions, but just like Chrome, that means that you cannot perform some types of ad blocking because you are limited by what the browser engine will actually let you do.
Suggesting that I'm misinformed demonstrates the spectacular depth of your ignorance, and als
Re: (Score:2)
Purify [purify-app.com] is an effective ad and tracker blocker for Safari on iOS. It's much like NoScript. By default scripts from the primary domain are not allowed to run - you have to white-list the sites which should be allowed to do pretty much anything.
It's a bit more hands on than some people like, at least early on. And it cost a few bucks.
One rather annoying thing (relevant to the point about all iOS browsers having to use WebKit) is that, inexplicably (at least to me), Purify seemingly only works in Safari (not ot
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not saying you can't block ads, scripts, etc. What I'm saying is that you can't prevent some content from being downloaded even if blocked. This is a characteristic of all browsers which aren't Firefox-based today. In the extreme case this potentially leads to a vulnerability being exploited, but more realistically it just represents an annoying drain to performance which nonetheless should not be occurring.
Apple prevents you from using competing browser engines ostensibly in order to protect their app
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, but given their ad network they are tracking you on whatever phone you use.
Re: Apple would not allow it (Score:2)
Summary of this whole thread:
"MY chains are shinier and prettier then YOUR chains!!"
"NUH-UH!! MY chains are shinier!"
Here's a clue...
You're still in fucking chains. Welcome to Kapitalist Amerika, comrade! You have been the product for years now, and they even have you paying for the privilege in most cases. Sure glad we have FreeDumbâï!
Re: (Score:2)
It also could be a web site that automatically enabled its notifications through Chrome.
Re: (Score:2)
That is why some people are willing to pay a premium price over becoming an ad-slave in the Android ecosystem.
Not only are consumers paying Apple a premium, on top of that Apple's own ad business is skyrocketing because of their limitations on third party ads. Source [emarketer.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That is why some people are willing to pay a premium price over becoming an ad-slave in the Android ecosystem.
Not only are consumers paying Apple a premium, on top of that Apple's own ad business is skyrocketing because of their limitations on third party ads. Source [emarketer.com]
There are no ads on my iPhone's lock screen and never have been and since I don't have to pay for whatever ads I am forced to see I don't see what problem there is here which an ad blocker can't solve.
Re: (Score:2)
Same with my Android phone...
Re: (Score:3)
There are no ads on my iPhone's lock screen and never have been and since I don't have to pay for whatever ads I am forced to see
On the contrary, you have paid Apple for an ad delivery device, on which they control who is allowed to advertise to you and how in such a way that they are the primary beneficiaries. You have literally paid Apple to monopolize advertising to you on your device. That these ads are not on the lock screen is true, but besides the point being made.
Re: (Score:2)
Outside of browsing the web, I don't believe I've ever seen an ad on my iPhone....
I assumed it was the same on Android....but apparently I'm wrong?
Re: (Score:2)
Outside of browsing the web, I don't believe I've ever seen an ad on my iPhone....
I assumed it was the same on Android....but apparently I'm wrong?
When Apple harasses me to "setup iPay" every time the phone is updated, that is an ad. Every time they prompt me to buy iCloud space (any time I want to view a photo), that is an ad. Just because they are ads for Apple products doesn't mean they aren't ads.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't guess I ever saw those.
I did eventually get the Apple Card, so that I could save an extra 6% a few years ago when I bought my Mac Pro....and I did get iCloud later, to help keep my parent's phones backed up on my acct so I can help them, etc.
Bu
Re: (Score:3)
I bought a Moto phone direct from Moto and the closest thing it had to crapware was faceboot installed on the user side, meaning I could uninstall it and have it go away and get the space back. And it was not expensive by any reasonably measurement. You do not have to overpay for your phone and be treated like a child who can't handle having a headphone port or they might stick a toothpick in it in order to not have crapware on your phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is just still figuring out whether it's more profitable to sell that to carriers or to just screw you with their own ads, that's all.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is just still figuring out whether it's more profitable to sell that to carriers or to just screw you with their own ads, that's all.
The only Apple ads I know of are in the App Store. An App Store ad appears as a search result, and it's labeled as an ad. There's nothing in normal everyday use.
It's of course possible there are other Apple ads I don't happen to see, but I don't know of any.
Re: (Score:2)
Give it time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Lose customers over this? To whom, first of all, and if anything, Apple fans have by now shown that they put up with pretty much any kind of hoops Apple wants them to jump through just so they are allowed to continue using Apple's products.
Re:Apple would not allow it (Score:5, Informative)
Manufacturers do sell unlocked Android phones without ads. This has been the case for years. All you have to do is a bit of research to figure out what the near-stock Android versions are called, and plop down $200 or $300 for an unlocked phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is why some people are willing to pay a premium price over becoming an ad-slave in the Android ecosystem.
Which is another reason the governments of the world need to step in a curb Apple's monopolistic behaviors. It should NOT be up to Apple what carriers can and cannot do with the phones they sell.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My Android phone doesn't show me any ads.
I assume this will only happen in the USA on the phones that are supplied by "carriers".
Re: (Score:2)
I assume this will only happen in the USA on the phones that are supplied by "carriers".
It also happens in the paranoid minds of many slashdot users.
I've owned many different Android phones with Google services since 2010 and I've never been shown an ad outside of the webpages I browse.
*sigh* (Score:1)
In fact, I've been waiting for it
Re: *sigh* (Score:2)
Advertisers still think everything is a 1960s television.
Re: (Score:2)
They also still think we can't do anything about their crap but to grin and bear it.
Shh. Don't disturb their slumber.
Re: (Score:2)
I would not walk out of a phone store carrying a phone with this installed on it. Absolutely hell no.
Jailbreak + Custom rom (Score:2)
LineageOS solves the problem (Score:2)
I got so fed up with Google deciding what I liked that I finally moved over to LineageOS. I have no complaints. My phone my way.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem I keep running into is that the "smart"phones I can get my grubby mitts on are all "no longer supported".
Step 1: Find your device's home on XDA-Developers
Step 2: Download unofficial but working LineageOS ROM
Unless you bought some weird niche phone that sucks and therefore no one cares about it, or you bought a phone whose bootloader you can't unlock (in either case you should have done more research before purchase) you should be able to follow this recipe.
Re: (Score:2)
LineageOS still tries very hard to keep up with the googles, and that means lots of devices no dev can be arsed to build new images for this release, that might've been supported previously. The hardware is fine, it's the throwing away support in newer versions that's the culprit.
This was a really big problem before android 9 or whatever when the graphics drivers became detached from the kernel. Now you can upgrade the kernel even without vendor support, so supporting newer versions of LineageOS on older, unsupported hardware is much easier. However, except for very special devices with lots of interest, nothing is going to be supported forever. And a lot of the lowest end free phones out there are old models whose parts still happen to be affordably available. So yeah, that's a thi
More ads = evil (Score:2)
Yet another reason to buy a PIxel (or iphone) instead of any phone from a carrier with crapware.
"In advertising or marketing? Kill yourself." (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, but as soon as someone in advertising or marketing kills themselves, the next one will take their place. The existence of marketing and advertising is only a symptom, and it's not them who did put the dollars on fucking everything, either. It's a world-ruling economic operating system that needs advertising and marketing because under its rules profit is the one and only purpose of enterprise, and profit potential is the one and only control parameter.
Re: (Score:3)
The person doing the evil stuff is always the culprit. You can't Nuremberg your way out of it. It's not the system. It is you. Will someone else do it if you don't? Maybe, maybe not. Then they're the culprit and should follow Bill Hicks' advice.
Re: (Score:2)
The person doing the evil stuff is always the culprit.
Right, and the person doing the most evil stuff is at the top of the organization. By the time you get down to advertisers they're just doing the most minor of evil deeds. It's nothing compared to making business decisions that do harm for profit, which is more likely as they get bigger.
Re: (Score:2)
Someone being a bigger asshole doesn't absolve you of anything. Your evil is not "nothing". In fact, bigger evil relies on you doing the dirty work.
Re: (Score:2)
In fact, bigger evil relies on you doing the dirty work.
It also relies on you needing a job, which is why it's always promoting capitalism, which is really just a science of keeping the plebes in need.
Re: (Score:2)
You are responsible for the things you do. You are not "just following orders". Being abused does not give license to being abusive. Being exploited does not give license to exploit. It's similar to "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind", except you're not even retaliating, just being evil because other people are evil too.
Re: (Score:2)
You are responsible for the things you do.
Funny how you absolve the people responsible for creating the situation for their responsibility. Lick them boots harder
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not absolving anyone. They're responsible for what they do, but their wrongdoing doesn't make yours any less wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
It is the system that produces those persons to begin with, and it does not go away by wishing those persons to kill themselves even if they all would.
(In your logic, the prisoner would also be the culprit for a totalitarian prison system.)
Re: (Score:2)
Amen to this
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Stupid position. Advertisement and marketing has a range, from the corrupt shitbags, to those who simply announce the existance of something.
You would literally own nothing without advertising and marketing. Advertising and marketing is the listing of houses and rental properties. It is the website you Google when thinking about buying a new car, it's the collection of cloths a company choses to display in the outlet store, it's the layout of the shop that presented you the products you like.
Now quick go ou
Re: (Score:2)
Now quick go out and buy that thing you don't know exists form the company you don't know exists, let me see you do it without advertising and marketing.
That was true 20 years ago before search engines. When I want a car I will search, when I want a watch I will search, when I'm watching a Tv show or anything else advertisers can go kill themselves.
Google has a shop button, they can earn their place on the shopping pages and nowhere else, and then world just got better for everyone. The twits and feces of the web have their own pages, why not ads? Sponsor content with one phrase "see our ad page", nothing else.
Re: "In advertising or marketing? Kill yourself." (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The irony is whoever posted that is earning ad revenue from it. Makes you think.
So your phone isn't...actually locked? (Score:2)
If you can interact with it, and presumably not only view content but spend money, then...your phone isn't actually locked, is it?
Perhaps more to the point: They want my attention, they want me to view their content, then they're paying me. Right? Right???
No. I thought not. Another parasite that does not need to exist...
Re: (Score:2)
Wow (Score:4, Funny)
Really trying to drive users to Apple's iPhone, aren't they?
Re: (Score:2)
Or a Featurephone [wikipedia.org]. I just bought one to replace a 2G phone that lasted me 15 years (on the same battery), because the network will no longer support it.
Re: (Score:2)
Same reason I don;t plan to get an iPhone, price is insane.
BUT I do have one from my job, and working with that is a lot nicer and cleaner than the minefield that is android phones...
Ugh. No thanks.. uh, how much? (Score:2)
Well if I can own a new iPhone I don't need or want it. No thanks. Actually I would pay $10/month over my $150/month to remove it. But if you say it will reduce monthly charges to zero then a lot of people might be willing to go for it. Funny how if you put your iPhone face down Siri ignores you and the display turns off.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, Apple copied that feature from Motorola, whose Moto Actions software will put your Moto phone into Do Not Disturb mode when placed face down. They also have a few other cool gestures including chop for flashlight and twist for phone.
I know a company who is going to benefit from this (Score:5, Funny)
I can't wait to get a full-screen ad on my 'droid lock screen... Showing an iPhone, saying: "tired of the goddamn ads? Go Apple."
I will click on this ad.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't have moderator points today, so I'll just say "It's funny because it's true!"
get fucked (Score:2)
that can fuck completely off.
Ads I would like to see (Score:2)
GrapheneOS (Score:5, Informative)
This type of crap is why I use GrapheneOS [grapheneos.org] and try to be as Google-free and FOSS as possible on my phone. Though it's apparently possible to run Google Play Store and apps installed using it in a sandbox on an isolated profile if there's something you really need. I haven't tried that because I just want to avoid this whole mess and toxic ecosystem as much as possible. Smart phones offer a lot of benefits but they come with so much deal-breaking baggage too like ads, push notifications, single point of failure (because we do damned near everything on them), malware etc.
GrapheneOS was founded by a security researcher and started by porting OpenBSD libc code and various kernel patches to Android and has grown since then. It's nice to feel as in control of my phone as I do my desktops and laptops running Linux.
Wouldn't happen with an IPhone (Score:2)
So I'm sure Apple just likes this and will repost it everywhere.
Who will pay for the net bandwidth used ? (Score:3)
Probably the user :-( This is why the user needs to be able to switch it off.
Wait... "select"? (Score:2)
"The lock screen platform is part of the pre-installed software on many, if not most, Android phones sold in India and other Asian markets, and it has also made its way to the EU on a few select brands."
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
There is one simple fix to most of this, so simple (Score:4, Informative)
As long as I can turn it off (Score:2)
I don't care as long as I can turn it off.
I thought Android was the let the user have contro (Score:2)
Easy solution (Score:2)
Buy an unlocked phone.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with almost all phones in the US is that these things don't come from "The Phone", but instead from the carrier, who basically leases you the phone, and has a fuckload of crapware installed on it as factory default which you can't remove.
Think Samsung phones with all the garbage, but then more garbage, and you can't turn it off at all like you can with all the Samsung nonsense.
(Example when I had one of the carrier bound phones, it was only possible to listen to voicemails using the app the carr
Re: (Score:2)
When I had one of the carrier bound phones, it was only possible to listen to voicemails using the app the carrier had preinstalled, and not by just calling a service number)
How do you check voicemail from a different device?
What carrier? I'm on Verizon, and not only can you call your own number to access Voicemail, you can also use alternate voicemail services.
Re: (Score:2)
AT&T way back on a crappy ass Nokia :)
Re: (Score:2)
Samsung TVs have ads? (Score:3)
Fortunately I live in Europe where there is less of this bullshit. I was in the US for a month earlier this year and the Samsung TV I was using over there literally launched straight into a home page festooned with ads and upselling.
"Upselling"? Upsetlling what? Were you by chance using the hotel's TV system, which is how you order food and services and pay the bill? That's the hotel's software.
I haven't heard of normal Samsung TVs booting into random advertisements. (But someone please comment if that's true.)
I use Amazon for TV (Firestick) and it certainly doesn't do that. It just offers a row of trailers I can watch, if I open them up. Which is how all streaming sticks work in my limited experience.
Re:Samsung TVs have ads? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If you buy your phone from a shitty carrier, they will do shitty things to your phone.
If you buy your phone from the manufacturer (or at least an unlocked model from a reseller) then you don't have to worry about this. So this won't be a problem, right? Because this is Slashdot, and people here are smart enough to buy carrier/provider unlocked phones, right?
Re: (Score:2)
I hope Google doesn't put it on Pixels. There's no way I'm paying for a flagship phone with ads on the lock screen.
It's not outside the realm of possibility, but I see it as extremely unlikely — or if they do put it on there, you will likely be able to turn it off. Part of the selling point of Pixel devices is the lack of crapware. TFA explicitly says that this software is being bundled by carriers, not by manufacturers. It's absolutely normal, and has been literally since the feature phone days, for carriers to dick up your phone. Literally back in the flip phone days I was using Motorola service software to unfu