Virtual Classes Are Now Permanent Offerings at Some US Schools (wsj.com) 60
Districts in Texas, California and New York are creating full-time remote learning this fall for the first time. From a report: Fourth-graders at the iLearn Virtual School in Dallas began class Thursday morning with an icebreaker. Their teacher Sumala Paidi asked them, "What superpower would you choose for yourself, if you could pick any?" The dozen children in the class responded with wishes for super speed or the ability to fly. One girl chose invisibility, so she could "take a cake, and eat it all myself." It could be a scene from a school classroom anywhere in the U.S. Except these students, unlike nearly every student learning at this juncture of the pandemic, were piping in via Zoom, and Ms. Paidi was teaching them from a remote office, with a camera and laptop. School districts in Texas, New York and California are creating permanent, full-time virtual schools for the first time ever this year, in a nationwide movement that has gained steam since the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 prompted schools to back and forth between in-person and remote learning.
A 2021 survey of 291 U.S. school districts by Rand found a surge in the number that offered virtual schools for students after the height of the pandemic. Roughly 26% of the 291 districts were offering remote lessons as a full-time option last year, compared with 3% before the pandemic, according to the Santa Monica, Calif., research organization. Superintendents say virtual schools are a niche product meant to enroll a minority of students for whom remote classes make more sense than going to school. Less than 6% of students chose virtual classes among the districts that had them in 2021, according to Rand. The virtual option might be appropriate for about 4% of students in Dallas, according to a study commissioned by officials there last year. The city's iLearn Academy, which opened Aug. 15 with the start of classes, enrolls about 120 students in grades three through eight. The iLearn Virtual School is a fit for students who might experience social anxiety or whose families might be moving, said principal Monica Morris. Classes of roughly 20 students meet via Zoom at 8:30 a.m. and participate in live and prerecorded lessons until 2:30 p.m. each school day, Ms. Morris said, in a schedule that mirrors that of a typical in-person school.
A 2021 survey of 291 U.S. school districts by Rand found a surge in the number that offered virtual schools for students after the height of the pandemic. Roughly 26% of the 291 districts were offering remote lessons as a full-time option last year, compared with 3% before the pandemic, according to the Santa Monica, Calif., research organization. Superintendents say virtual schools are a niche product meant to enroll a minority of students for whom remote classes make more sense than going to school. Less than 6% of students chose virtual classes among the districts that had them in 2021, according to Rand. The virtual option might be appropriate for about 4% of students in Dallas, according to a study commissioned by officials there last year. The city's iLearn Academy, which opened Aug. 15 with the start of classes, enrolls about 120 students in grades three through eight. The iLearn Virtual School is a fit for students who might experience social anxiety or whose families might be moving, said principal Monica Morris. Classes of roughly 20 students meet via Zoom at 8:30 a.m. and participate in live and prerecorded lessons until 2:30 p.m. each school day, Ms. Morris said, in a schedule that mirrors that of a typical in-person school.
Virtual classes (Score:3)
...will get you a virtual job.
You never have to leave the house.
Welcome to Solaria, just the robots still suck.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
And thanks to global warming we won't be able to harvest pearls to clutch.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Coastal area near me is known for farmed and wild oysters and farmed clams... the big issues are high water temps and red tide (bacterial bloom, nasty stuff)
Re: (Score:3)
... will also get you a life-long prescription for anti-depressants because you will fail to develop natural means of regulating your mood during puberty.
A semi-permanent revenue stream created by physical and psychological addiction?
I'm sorry, what exactly is the "problem" here? I don't see any at all.
- Big Pharma
Re: (Score:2)
"... will also get you a life-long prescription for anti-depressants because you will fail to develop natural means of regulating your mood during puberty."
These are woke students, single kids from older parents.
They have warnings on the old testament that it contains genocide, slavery, murder and ritual killings, so that the little darlings don't get excited.
Re: (Score:2)
Socializing children (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No one cares if you are good, they care if you have kissed there ass enough.
Skills and values mean nothing.
Partial is the future (Score:2)
All things in moderation. Remote learning should gradually increase in percent as the student gets older, because the average future office will probably be partially remote, and students need to get used to it.
Office space is expensive* and commutes waste time and fuel and green air. There will be "collaboration days" with physical meetings, and "get work done" days remote.
* It's relatively cheap now because offices were over-built. Excess will be burned off and prices will rise again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Why? These trains seem worth saving to you?
https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
Re: Partial is the future (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Because that's the real root of homelessness, is that it's too comfortable and easy to be homeless, that's why homeless people are recognizable by their trademark huge smiles.
Indeed. See San Francisco for an extreme example. There's a reason why the rest of the nation's drug bums head to SF, and it's not just because other cities give them bus tickets.
Not everyone wants help. Many don't. You see them on the streets gladly living in a dug-fueled squalor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Hooray! (Score:2)
... to raising a generation that's anxious, isolated, and poorly socialized. Yeah, parents can make "pods", but the pods will probably be composed of people in their own socioeconomic stratum. Bully for a more stratified society.
If anything, in-person public school should be mandatory; private schools, religious schools, and homeschooling should be severely restricted if not banned outright.
Don't let the austerity pimps get a hold of this.. (Score:2)
Sooner or later, the austerians will realize that homestuck education (even with buying students a $100 Chromebook) is cheaper than maintaining a building, hiring teachers with a proper student:teacher ratio, and running extracurricular activities. In-person education will become a privilege for the wealthy or well-connected.
Isaac Asimov predicted this in "The Fun They Had..." in 1951:
http://web1.nbed.nb.ca/sites/A... [nbed.nb.ca]
Re: (Score:2)
They're called charter schools and are being pushed heavily by Republicans.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We should improve public education, not steal money away from it.
I submit that it's a bit more nuanced than this. Suppose, for example, that it costs School 1 $10,000/student/year to educate that student. If, instead, that student is going to School 2, then School 1 isn't incurring the expense of educating that student.
I don't think it's unreasonable for a parent to prefer that at least some of the money go to School 2, and I submit that it's no more stealing money away from School 1 when that school isn't responsible for educating the student, any more than it is steali
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
School 2 should at least be another public school, ideally within walking/biking distance for environmental reasons.
It seems it's nearly impossible to have a rational conversation on this topic. Odds are good that the school within walking/biking distance is School 1, the taxpayer funded school that the parents would prefer their children didn't attend for whatever reason.
There's a case you are making here that's vaguely decent, and that's the idea of giving parents the ability to send kids to schools in adjacent districts if they'd like. However, this fails to avoid the "stealing money away" problem, it just shifts it a
Re: (Score:2)
-They have to provide the same level of services to all students (private schools generally do not take students with severe disabilities because they are too expensive to educate for private schools).
-They must be free for anyone who wants in.
-They must be subject to the same oversight as public schools.
Virtual classes are cool (Score:2)
But exams ought to be at authorized test centers or with an in-home proctor (for disabled).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Virtual classes are cool (Score:2)
Uh, that is very important but can be done in the playground, meetups, and neighborhoods. Who says school is.the optimal setting for that. I would say some of my best friends I met in my neighborhood, not school. We could have required group activities or something like that. Exams at home is dumb because one of the criteria to graduate or go to a top college is exam performance. We should not enable a huge gap between cheaters and non-cheaters.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or really? https://scholar.harvard.edu/jl... [harvard.edu] Also, you don't think that leads to clique formation, bullying, and even more tribalism? In spite of public schools, socioeconomic stratification is getting worse. With virtual classes, even a poor kid living in the inner city could have access to the world's best teaching.
Re: Virtual classes are cool (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, what? Pretty sure you'd have to murder a lot of people to be able to do forced "education" and social experimentation. Also, banning of private schools has not worked anywhere. Aside from the fact that it is both evil and immoral, you know that some countries have tried that and it hasn't worked. Private schools save the government tens of billions of dollars that can go into public education instead. What happened in countries that have banned private education is that the kids of politicians and ric
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Huh? When did i say that? Do you have problems with reading comprehension?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You weren't talking about "enforcing public education." First, the USA is not Finland .. there are many cultural differences. Plus, Finland never took away the right to education at private schools; which is what you are talking about. Second, you were talking about taking away the right of people to choose any aspects of their kids education --such as who teaches them and where they learn. If you take that right away from people .. you will need the military and cops you defunded to enforce it. There are m
Re: Virtual classes are cool (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you really arguing for the right of bigoted parents to send their kids to private schools to avoid them being around people of the wrong shade of skin color?
Parents want the right to choose who their kids can be around, and how. Yes. And many would die to protect that right. Do you think YOU somehow have the right to decide those things? If a parent wants to teach their kid that it is OK to eat meat. That's their right. There are certain rights that a parent has, that are inviolable regardless of society's beliefs and needs. You don't get to decide what somebody else teaches their own kid. If a parent wants his kid to go to a school that has extra math focus th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So is raising them to eat meat. Get DYFS on that too.
Re: (Score:2)
You think the only reason to put a kid in private school is to make them racist? There are many reasons, besides racism to want your kid to go to private school. I bet most racists went to public school. If private school is racist how do you explain the fact that every race puts their kids in private school? Heck Obama went to private school in Hawaii. Oh wait, you didn't know that there are black kids in private school? You are a racist to think black people don't want to go to private school. By the way,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
WTF (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What the pandemic showed us is how primitive our schools are, hanging on to outdated and ineffective methods because, "that's how we've always done it, and we don't know any better." The experience failed because the whole public education system has never progressed beyond the 19th century.
Re: (Score:2)
What the pandemic showed us is how primitive our schools are, hanging on to outdated and ineffective methods because, "that's how we've always done it, and we don't know any better." The experience failed because the whole public education system has never progressed beyond the 19th century.
If that were true then the job applicants I see would be able to handle complicated mathematics like addition and division. The 19th century was miles ahead of us in terms of education as far as I can see in everything except reach.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What the pandemic also showed us is that sending kids to school during a pandemic so that half of the class is absent at any given time is also an abject failure.
Great for Some (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand (Score:1)
Job loss (Score:2)
Without exposing as many young children to the horrors of public elementary and middle schools a whole lot of therapists are going to be out of work!
Virtual Classes (Score:2)