Taiwan President Says She Looks Forward To Producing 'Democracy Chips' With US (reuters.com) 72
Taiwan looks forward to producing "democracy chips" with the United States, President Tsai Ing-wen told the visiting governor of the U.S. state of Arizona, Doug Ducey, on Thursday, the latest in a string of senior officials from the county to visit. From a report: Taiwan has been keen to show the United States, its most important international backer and arms supplier despite the lack of formal diplomatic ties, that it is a reliable friend as a global chip crunch impacts auto production and consumer electronics. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, a major Apple supplier and the world's largest contract chipmaker, is constructing a $12 billion plant in Arizona.
"In the face of authoritarian expansionism and the challenges of the post-pandemic era, Taiwan seeks to bolster cooperation with the United States in the semiconductor and other high-tech industries," Tsai said at the meeting in the presidential office in Taipei. "This will help build more secure and more resilient supply chains. We look forward to jointly producing democracy chips to safeguard the interests of our democratic partners and create greater prosperity."
"In the face of authoritarian expansionism and the challenges of the post-pandemic era, Taiwan seeks to bolster cooperation with the United States in the semiconductor and other high-tech industries," Tsai said at the meeting in the presidential office in Taipei. "This will help build more secure and more resilient supply chains. We look forward to jointly producing democracy chips to safeguard the interests of our democratic partners and create greater prosperity."
Chips (Score:3)
They better be as yummy as "Freedom Fries".
Re: (Score:2)
They better be as yummy as "Freedom Fries".
Democracy Chips are great on a sandwich - especially with a side of Freedom Fries!
you can have your billion dollar birthday fires! (Score:2)
you can have your billion dollar birthday fires!
Re: (Score:3)
Reminds me of Torches of Freedom [youtu.be] propaganda from Big Tobacco. (From the Century of Self documentary.)
Re: (Score:2)
They're the exact same thing, that's just what the British call them. They've been at odds with the French a lot longer than the USA has.
Re: (Score:2)
Now I want fish & chips... is it lunch time yet?
Re: (Score:2)
They better be as yummy as "Freedom Fries".
En_US = Freedom Fries
En_UK = Democracy Chips
Know you're languages.
Re: (Score:2)
They better be as yummy as "Freedom Fries".
En_US = Freedom Fries
En_UK = Democracy Chips
Know you're languages.
That seems very anglo-centric . . . I get US=Fries, England=Chips . . . but what about the Welsh? Also, Ireland=Bea and Scotland=Beea
Hmmm.
Re: (Score:2)
"One-China principle" commonly known as the Henry Kissinger Screwup.
Democracy chips (Score:3, Interesting)
Are they referring to the injectable mind-control chips they use in the "vaccines"?
Re: (Score:2)
How do they make sure you got at least 1 chip in your dose? What happens if you get 10 chips in your dose?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How do they make sure you got at least 1 chip in your dose? What happens if you get 10 chips in your dose?
They link together into a mesh network and then start communicating with the replicator ship in orbit.
Re: (Score:2)
You'd put the chips in the needles, ofc.
Re: (Score:2)
Clearly, you are part of the conspiracy!
What else can you tell us about how the program works?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh shit, busted! Back to 8chan!
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like we have an outlier.
Re: (Score:2)
Where can you get those chips? Are they available on newegg? I need them for a "project."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Too bad it is not possible to transplant a massively profitable economy. Otherwise any nation with any sense would beg to accept Taiwan's population.
And yes, the US has room for 24M people. We'll have that many more people here by 2030 if we do nothing.
Sorry (Score:1, Interesting)
Chips? Taiwan can expect a fat zilchynada from the US. We all know the USA will do absolutely zero. The proper move for the USA to protect Taiwan is to work with Taiwan and EU intelligence agencies to support anti-Xi people/organizations within China. That's what China and Russia did to gift us with Trump .. why can't we do the same to them? Except not put a nationalist looney. For fucks sake, the CIA has a $XX billion dollar budget and they really don't seem to know anything about China and have zero conne
Re: (Score:2)
Taiwan can expect a fat zilchynada from the US. We all know the USA will do absolutely zero.
The US has sold a lot of really nice weapons to Taiwan.
Re: (Score:2)
For fucks sake, the CIA has a $XX billion dollar budget and they really don't seem to know anything about China and have zero connections there. It's like everything they know about China is stuff they see on the news or on google maps satell.
And how would you know what the CIA knows. I am betting that as an intelligence agency, the CIA does not divulge what they know about other countries and what assets they might have in other countries. Heck, the CIA had agents in the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Did they broadcast that to the world? No. Did you ever think there was a reason for that?
Re:Sorry (Score:5, Informative)
The CIA used to have a well-developed network of agents in China. Then they screwed up in a phenomenal manner. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018... [foreignpolicy.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Seems like their first mistake was using a bespoke system instead of relying on an end-to-end-encrypted messaging system that is also used by the general public, so that there's no suspicious encrypted traffic that looks different from anybody else's. Hide in plain sight.
Re: (Score:2)
China blocks [protocol.com] those kinds of apps at the Great Firewall. You can't hide in non-existent traffic.
Re: (Score:2)
China blocks [protocol.com] those kinds of apps at the Great Firewall. You can't hide in non-existent traffic.
If I understand correctly, there are a couple of different levels of access. The sorts of contacts that the CIA would probably want to work with are likely to be higher-level government officials, etc., which I would assume would have similar access to what foreign visitors have.
Also, AFAIK iMessage is still allowed, and it is end-to-end encrypted as long as you turn off iCloud backups.
Re: Sorry (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Destroy Taiwan in a day... sure... if they nuked it.
Actually taking it over is another story. With current forces and tech they'd lose and it would be very costly.
And on top of that, even if they took over Taiwan militarily in a month, which would be a miracle, where do you think a fuck ton of china's food and energy comes from? That's right, the sea and other countries. They'll be out of food and energy in no time.
China is not attacking Taiwan and sure as hell can't take it over in a day. That's sheer
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Please see my reply to other person here:
https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Re: Sorry (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with you. War is the option of last resort and no I was not in any way suggesting nor do I believe we should engage in military conflict over IP theft. No one I know of thinks that.
As far as a China vs Taiwan+US+maybe other war goes...
China has the obvious advantage in range. They have zero modern combat experience, never performed an amphibious invasion (a super complex and difficult military tactic you don't just magically do on any random Tuesday), their weapon systems sound ominous on paper,
Re: (Score:1)
China can easily blockade Taiwan and easily get troops over to it once line
Re: (Score:1)
I think the US simply -has- to defend Taiwan. Directly and all in.
Anything less and the entire western alliance system collapses if we become untrustworthy to defend our allies after we've said so countless times. Becoming a paper tiger joke to the world is far more expensive than fighting China over Taiwan.
Why would we -not- fight China? At things stand now we will win. It won't be easy but we'll win. If we want to go there and guarantee a win we can wreck their entire country by doing things like des
Re: (Score:2)
Taiwan is a very good ally of the United States who does not wish to be part of the Chinese Communist Party (a brutal authoritarian dictatorship - that was actually improving for a while, but President Pooh Bear totally reversed all of that progress).
We are willing to protect Taiwan because it's morally right, economically beneficial, and strategically wise from a military standpoint.
Re: (Score:1)
We are willing to protect Taiwan because it's morally right, economically beneficial, and strategically wise from a military standpoint.
Puh-lease. These are politicians and the military you are talking about: they don't have morals, and they want more control of things themselves. "Supporting democracy" is just how they sell to the proles certain plans that they already made.
Currently it seems like a little chip-production protectionism is in vogue (although I suspect that won't continue indefinitely: the oligarchs steer the government towards globalism, most of the time; whereas protectionism is a kind of market inefficiency, most of the
Re: (Score:2)
If China wanted to destroy Taiwan, they could do it in a single day.
Vladimir, is that you?
Re: Sorry (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Chips? Taiwan can expect a fat zilchynada from the US. We all know the USA will do absolutely zero.
Nah - not only is Taiwan economically important, but militarily the island is too strategic to the region to let China control it. The US would intervene militarily in the event of an attack, which is why despite every time being "This is the last straw!!!!!" (eg, the Soviet proverb of China's Final Warning [wikipedia.org]). all China does is posture and do "exercises" rather than actually attack Taiwan. Its basically Operation Temper Tantrum from them.
Re: (Score:1)
That's what China and Russia did to gift us with Trump ..
Oh please! Just stop! We did it to ourselves.. All his corrupt predecessors gifted us with Trump. I watched it happen for 60 years. Or do you believe we're really so weak, then indeed we are doomed
Democracy Chips (Score:2)
Delicious with a little salsa and cheese.
"In the face of authoritarian expansionism" (Score:3, Insightful)
I feel like Americans complaining about authoritarian expansionism is like Louis CK complaining about Bill Cosby's conduct. One is MUCH MUCH MUCH worse than the other...but man...we used to be a much better role model in the whole democracy thing.
Re: (Score:2)
but man...we used to be a much better role model in the whole democracy thing.
When
Re: (Score:2)
Democracy - the least worst system.
Re:"In the face of authoritarian expansionism" (Score:5, Insightful)
Rod Blagovich trying to sell Obama's vacated Senator seat (2014).
The Teapot Dome Scandal [wikipedia.org] of 1921-23.
Watergate.
The numerous scandals [wikipedia.org] of the Grant administration, 1868-1876.
McCarthyism.
The US has always had it's fair share of issues, from outright corruption to trends towards authoritarianism and fascism from both the Left and the Right. And yet, the US is better. Why? Because we're open about our faults and acknowledge them. And more importantly, our interests are not so entrenched that even a guy as bad as Trump can be eliminated from office and held accountable through an admittedly messy, long, loud, political, legal process, and that power can transfer back without violence.
Xi and many in the CCP are just as corrupt, particularly given the egregious human rights abuses that the CCP overseas. Do you really think any members of the CCP can be removed from power all the way to the top and held accountable for their actions without a violent coup?
Any system will be ruined by humans, because humans are just fallible beings. The thing about the US system is that those fallible beings can be removed and a new regime put into place in a peaceful transfer of power. One can argue Jan 6, but that only proves my point: when an outgoing administration incited violence to hold on to power, it still lost and the victorious administration won in a peaceful way. In that one element alone, the US system is a shining beacon on the hill.
Re: "In the face of authoritarian expansionism" (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
we used to be a much better role model in the whole democracy thing.
America has always been an oligarchy, and it has literally attacked democracies in other countries because their increase in democracy decreased their alignment with our interests. America's success has been founded in large part (in addition to even more divisive stuff I won't go into now) on squandering natural capital.
Re: (Score:3)
Sadly, I had to think a minute to wonder if she was referring to ours or theirs.
What the hell are you talking about? The last time the US permanently acquired any territory following what could even remotely be considered an act of aggression was the Tripartite Convention in 1899. Ever since then it only acquired a few territories designated to its jurisdiction by the UN after WWII, all of which have been ceded as we had always planned to do.
Sure, you could argue that the US is imperialistic, though that's not always a bad thing. The sanctions we placed on Russia are by definition an a
We can still pull back (Score:2)
A bold statement (Score:5, Interesting)
Honestly I'm impressed. If she can say this and follow through with it then China clearly has less power over her than it exercised over Jack Ma.
Re: (Score:2)
Jack Ma doesn't have a navy, Air Force and army backed with US weapons.
Re: (Score:3)
And yet they established in the actual US Constitution, you know, the document that really matters, a method whereby the citizens of the country elect representatives to, you know, represent them in the government and make the laws. You know, what's called "representative democracy" [wikipedia.org]
The whole "it's not a democracy its a republic" is just a word game to distract from facing actual issues. At first it was just a stupid way to deflect away from the negative aspects of "states rights" but now I get the feelin
Re: (Score:1)
Actually it is a democratic republic if we're going to play dictionary.
The actual laws and such are made by representatives as per a republic.
How we get those representatives is via a democratic vote. But they could have been chosen by dice, foot race, most money, largest nose or anything else and still be a republic.
The senate wasn't originally chosen by democratic vote of citizens either. That came later.
Re: (Score:2)
and if we really want to play term pedant I could say its technically a federal presidential republic.
fact is we don't do any of those other things to choose representatives. if we did it would not be considered democratic. but citizens vote therefore we have democracy.
even before the secenteenth amendment though people still voted for congressional senators because they would vote for the state representatives that would then choose the federal senator. if enough state reps are elected who support repla
Re: (Score:1)
Yea citizens vote. To elect representatives. In our republic.
Maybe this will help,
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all"
Our pledge is to the republic, not to the democracy.
As far as the 17th goes, thanks for filling in the details of pre-17th senatorial representation which is a great description of how a republic works.
In a true democracy the people vote on the issues.
Re: (Score:2)
You can have a republic that is not democratic. At least to me the democratic part is what keeps the republic part operating. A republic is just "rule by the people". Parliaments are republics, crowned monarchies are republics, etc etc.
Representative democracy != direct democracy and it's a bit dishonest to say direct democracy is the only thing that is actually democracy.
Also don't twist my words, i did not say declaring the US a republic is un-American I said those who declare it not-a-democracy are un
Re: (Score:1)
I gave you an entire post chock full of real examples and quotes showing this is a republic. You ignored all of it and just went off on whatever tangent. I'm done here if you're going to be intellectually dishonest. This could have been interesting but you refused to go along as what I at first assumed was as an educated adult. I was wrong about you. My error.
So I'm going to lower myself to your level and stop.
Here goes:
It's a republic and you're an un-American neener poopy head for saying it's anythin
I wish (Score:2)
You call the Democracy Chips... (Score:1)
Time for Migration? (Score:3)