US House Committee To Hold Hearing on FTX Collapse and Crypto Fall Out (theblock.co) 75
The House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing next month on FTX's collapse and the broader implications for the digital asset industry. From a report: The committee says it expects to hear from "the companies and individuals involved, the companies and individuals involved, including Sam Bankman-Fried, Alameda Research, Binance, FTX, and related entities, among others," for a hearing to take place in December. "Oversight is one of Congress' most critical functions and we must get to the bottom of this for FTX's customers and the American people," said Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., the top committee Republican, in a statement. "It's essential that we hold bad actors accountable so responsible players can harness technology to build a more inclusive financial system." Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the current but likely outgoing chair of the House Financial Services Committee, added: "The fall of FTX has posed tremendous harm to over one million users, many of whom were everyday people who invested their hard-earned savings into the FTX cryptocurrency exchange, only to watch it all disappear within a matter of seconds. Unfortunately, this event is just one out of many examples of cryptocurrency platforms that have collapsed just this past year."
"Digital Asset Industry" is the problem. (Score:5, Insightful)
Industry does something useful, this is not an industry, it's mountain of Ponzi schemes.
Re:Are they also.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Your link doesn't say the dude was the second largest contributor.
That wasn't the issue. (Score:4, Informative)
The issue was "the second largest democratic party donor".
The list shows the "ten biggest donors", and sure enough, the second biggest with Affiliation: Democrat is that dude.
So yeah, that link does show exactly that.
Re: (Score:1)
Snopes Fact-Check: Is it true that the supplied link says "the dude was the second largest contributor"?
Although the website does indicate FTX was the second largest contributor to the democratic party it doesn't literally say "the dude was the second largest contributor." Therefore Snopes finds this to be false.
Re: Are they also.. (Score:2)
Re:That's no tin-foil hat... (Score:4, Interesting)
Regardless of whether he donated to the Democrats or not, the "moronic QAnon conspiracy" would involve believing that has anything to do with FTX's business model, implosion, or this hearing. FTX's co-CEO donated to the Republicans over half what Sam donated to the Democrats, so tens of millions were spent on both parties.
Re: Are they also.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have this hypothesis that there's a bunch of people (the ones that started the whole "movement") come together every couple weeks, get drunk and try to find some harebrained conspiracy nuttery that is SO dumb that even their idiots won't believe it.
So far, they had no luck coming up with something so completely bananas that even their dupes don't fall for it, but they continue, with increasingly more and more insane bullshittery.
Good luck fellows!
Re: (Score:2)
I'm afraid they'll have to switch to drinking furniture polish to come up with something that far out there...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What dastardly secrets do you think they would uncover exactly? I know right-wing idiots are shrieking about this, but do you have an actual allegation against the recipients of the money?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The details of the allegation that I've read (on The Hill) were that he gave lots of money to a PAC that supported anti-progressive Democrats in the primaries. (It wasn't clear that that was all that it supported, but it also wasn't clear that it wasn't.)
Crypto Bros were trying to buy off Democrats (Score:2, Insightful)
One of the major reasons c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That didn't happen. It's just insane to assume Democratic politicians risked prison time and scandal and putting their trust in some 20-something tech bro just to fund a tiny portion of their operation. And what is even less probable is that a country involved in an existential fight for its existence is going to be wasting money like that.
Re:Are they also.. (Score:5, Informative)
Are they also going to investigate why the owner of FTX was the second largest democratic party donor, next to Soros?
Considering Ryan Salame, FTX's co-CEO, gave a similarly large amount of donations to the GOP, it looks like the company's leadership was spreading the wealth across both parties.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It is typical to donate to both candidates/parties -that way whomever wins owes you a favor.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is it normal for a government entity to be indebted to a corporation? I thought there was a special term for that.
Re: (Score:2)
Campaign contributions... aka legal bribery
Re: (Score:1)
Agreed, but good luck getting any partisans to admit that in the current political climate. And strictly from the working-class point of view, it makes no difference if big business is in bed the gov't or vice-versa. Either way, the working class is screwed.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
democratic
In your rush to gotcha the poster, you fail basic reading comprehension.
Re:Are they also.. (Score:4, Insightful)
He bragged about being second. Repeatedly. This isn't from Tucker Carlson - it's straight from the horse's mouth:
https://fortune.com/2022/11/10... [fortune.com]
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-t... [nbcnews.com]
"Bankman-Fried was the second-largest Democratic donor this election cycle by a longshot, according to the most recently available campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission, second only to philanthropist George Soros."
There's a hilarious piece of disinformation claiming he was giving only to "anti-progressive democrats" in the primaries.
"He donated more than $39.7 million to primarily Democratic causes during the 2022 federal election cycle, including six-figure checks to the Democratic National Committee and the Senate Democrats' main super PAC, as well as $6 million to the super PAC leading Democrats' efforts to hold the House."
I would note that the money that he was giving is very likely the money that his victims are looking for.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought crypto was worthless? What are you worried about in that case?
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on whether the House's investigation continues long enough for a Republican to gain control of the committee.
Re: (Score:2)
Will they also investigate why the CEO of FTX gave $24 million to Republicans?
https://www.politico.com/news/... [politico.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Are they also going to investigate why the owner of FTX was the second largest democratic party donor, next to Soros?
I don't see why. It seems pretty obvious that he was dumping money into primaries to nominate candidates who shared his interests [vox.com].
To be honest it's one of the more effective ways to advance your policy goals since the primary is the only competitive vote in most districts, but his biggest best lost the primary. So it doesn't look like he got much in the way of influence and he certainly didn't have any real impact on the general election itself.
Re: (Score:2)
Are they also going to investigate why the owner of FTX was the second largest democratic party donor, next to Soros?
Why would they? Is donating to a political party an act that warrants investigation? Can you point to specific legislation that unfairly benefitted FTX over other crypto companies and was fraudulently created? If not it's business as usual for the lobby world.
Your post is known as "whataboutism" and it is really lame.
Innocent victims they weren't (Score:5, Insightful)
tremendous harm to over one million users, many of whom were everyday people who invested their hard-earned
I could believe that 5 years ago - maybe 3 years ago tops if I'm being really generous - that ordinary people with honest intentions could still be suckered into investing in play money. But since then, you'd have to be living under a particularly large rock to not know that cryptocurrencies are a get-rich-quick scheme that border on a Ponzi scheme, that will collapse under its own weight of utter bullshit sooner or later.
So I don't buy it. FTX was founded in 2019, well after financially cautious people had learned to stay clear the fuck away from the bullshit. Therefore, the victims of the FTX debacle are bound to be people who wanted to get rich quick, knew the risks, gambled and lost. And I have zero sympathy for them.
Re:Innocent victims they weren't (Score:5, Insightful)
You have to protect the stupid from themselves or they'll drag you down with them. You're not wealthy enough to stand on your own. I don't think there's anyone here bothering with this forum who qualifies as independently wealthy. Fortunately it looks like crypto is going to get nipped in the bud before it causes a 2008 style market crash.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm fairly certain the collapse of the cryptocurrency ecosystem has minimal impact on the real economy, precisely because the true value of their holdings was entirely fictional. Even relatively poor people will not be affected by the idiots who lost their money in crypto.
Because it's collapsing now (Score:3)
Remember Mortgage Backed Securities? Remember 2008? Now imagine that, but instead of houses as the underlining asset it was bits on a thumbdrive.
Re: (Score:2)
I think we dodged a bullet with that one. Had crypto stayed buoyant for a few more years, we likely would have seen derivatives and other securities related to currencies and exchanges... so when crypto did implode, it wasn't just something that is something to watch from afar with a big of popcorn, but something that would take a bunch of banks with it, forcing the Federal government to have to do another TARP bailout.
Funny thing, reading Slashdot topics on this, there seemed to be a lot of people who tho
If only that were true (Score:2)
I'm fairly certain the collapse of the cryptocurrency ecosystem has minimal impact on the real economy, precisely because the true value of their holdings was entirely fictional
Sadly that's not at all the case (the lack of impact on the real economy) because LOTS of the modern financial industry is tied up with crypto at this point - including a lot of exposure by every major bank.
There are going to be a lot of ripple effects from the crypto fraud implosion, we've only just seen the start of it.
Re: (Score:1)
You have to protect the stupid from themselves or they'll drag you down with them.
No, you have to handle cryptocurrency like we do with reclaimed water. Keep the reclaimed shit water in differently colored pipes, make absolutely sure it's never cross-connected to the regular municipal water supply, and put big signs next to anything the water comes out of warning that it's not for drinking. If people want to use the shit water for its intended purpose to irrigate their lawns, or drink it because they're stupid, that's on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I'm going to steal it.
We don't do that (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Therefore, the victims of the FTX debacle are bound to be people who wanted to get rich quick, knew the risks, gambled and lost. And I have zero sympathy for them.
But when you're wealthy and cry "foul!" to a politician, they tend to listen. However, if your water is contaminated with lead but you're poor, forget it.
Re: (Score:3)
At first I thought the FTX collapse was just the normal stupidity, but the more I learn, the worse it seems.
It's like if someone offered to buy lottery tickets for you (which is dumb in and of itself) but instead of buying the lottery tickets, they lent your money to a friend who spent it on hookers and blow.
And then on top of that, they lied about loaning money to their friend, and covered up the loans in the hopes that auditors wouldn't catch on.
Re: (Score:2)
Some people can always be suckered into magic money making schemes. There apparently is a personality type that thinks they are smarter than everybody else with regards to money (while being more below average) and that is an ideal victim. These people also have a very hard time learning from mistakes (because they would then have to first acknowledge their limits) and some fall for pretty much the same scam multiple times. I do not remember the numbers, but it was more than 1%. So there are always plenty o
Re: (Score:2)
Had dinner with some friends who are 70+ years old, about three months ago. They were going on and on about crypto, and were thinking they ought to get in on it. I tried to tell them the facts, but they did not want to hear it. Their son (or was it their grandson?) had recently invested heavily in (I forget, ETH or BTC) and said he was making a killing and looking forward to being rich soon.
Typical middle class ordinary people, highly educated. Retired from professional jobs in engineering and finance. I th
Re: (Score:2)
When I talk with people about crypto, I ask them to hold their horses, and tell me how they have invested:
Oh, an account with an exchange? That's not a bank. Your funds can gox [sic] at any time into someone else's pocket.
An app on a phone? Phones have innate security, but so do cars. They are not rated, vetted, nor certified for high value transactions where compromise can mean incredible losses.
A hardware wallet? That's cute, and at least offers a semblance of protection... but you start getting into
Re: (Score:2)
What a load of (Score:2)
"It's essential that we hold bad actors accountable so responsible players can harness technology to build a more inclusive financial system."
This just goes to show how truly out of touch our representatives are with reality. The reason the financial system isn't more inclusive is because the average American doesn't have money to gamble on high-risk investments. No amount of fancy technology or regulation can solve the issue of an idiot who absolutely insists on spending his rent money on a JPEG of a bored ape.
If it wasn't crypto, these people would've just lost their money investing in something equally stupid that they believed would lead to
Re: (Score:2)
If it wasn't crypto, these people would've just lost their money investing in something equally stupid that they believed would lead to a large return.
Yeah, but you see, the government doesn't like crypto because it competes with their own lotteries for stupid people's money, and they won't be having that.
Every law enforcement group on the planet (Score:2, Troll)
Giving this amount of electricity and electronics these nincompoops waste it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.
There is a great video discussing what happened (Score:2)
Upper Echelon has a great video [slashdot.org] discussing how FTX collapsed. The red flags where there all along, just no one paid any attention to them.
Re: (Score:3)
Whoops, forgot to preview:
FTX Power, Politics and Money [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Greed makes people blind to the most obvious red flags...
No, not that! (Score:1)
"Dammit!" said the House member. "This is costing good Americans many billions of dollars! We need investigation and punishment!"
"Compared to trillions lost due to high inflation?"
"That's the American People's fault for electing us!"
Re: (Score:3)
"Compared to trillions lost due to high inflation?" -- "That's the American People's fault for electing us!"
I'm a bit lost here. Is the high UK inflation due to the American People electing Biden? Or is it completely unrelated, and instead due to the UK people electing Boris Johnson? And the high German inflation? And French inflation? And ...
Re: (Score:2)
Inflation didn't come from the politicos. It came from businesses with the JIT model who realized that as soon as they couldn't make stuff, just jack up prices and assume demand is inelastic. Supply chain chokepoints combined with pent-up demand from 2020, coupled with record high quarterly profits for companies across the board is what spiked inflation.
Re: (Score:2)
This. Perhaps what we need is a windfall profits tax and pump that money back into the economy at the bottom, since otherwise those who profited will do their damndest to make sure the money stops flowing when it gets to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Some European countries are enacting taxes on windfalls and stock buy-backs. At least when companies do this, it can at least help the government provide for more infrastructure.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
what about COINBASE ? (Score:2)
what what WHAAAAAAT???? (Score:2)
No, they can't regulate crypto! It's the stick-it-to-tha-man investment! No regulation! All self-regulated! The market will sort it out, leave your hands off crypto!
Don't you fucking dare throw tax money at saving these idiots!
It's a simple case: blatant fraud (Score:2)
What FTX did is almost 100% fungible with what MF Global did in the stonk market years ago when it was run by former Sen Jon Corzine. That is, bill itself as a brokerage and then take client funds and use them in the same way an investment fund would. That's highly illegal (but MF Global AFAIK never received real punishment) already. It's just simple fraud. SBF should be going to prison for a very long time under **existing** law, and anyone arguing otherwise without a JD and saying they know the law and it
HELP (Score:1)