Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

Supercomputer Re-Creates One of the Most Famous Pictures of Earth 18

sciencehabit shares a report from Science Magazine: Fifty years ago today, astronauts aboard Apollo 17, NASA's last crewed mission to the Moon, took an iconic photograph of our planet. The image became known as the Blue Marble -- the first fully illuminated picture of Earth, in color, taken by a person. Now, scientists have re-created that image during a test run of a cutting-edge digital climate model. The model can simulate climatic phenomena, such as storms and ocean eddies, at 1-kilometer resolution, as much as 100 times sharper than typical global simulations.

To re-create the swirling winds of the Blue Marble -- including a cyclone over the Indian Ocean -- the researchers fed weather records from 1972 into the supercomputer-powered software. The resulting world captured distinctive features of the region, such as upwelling waters off the coast of Namibia and long, reedlike cloud coverage. Experts say the stunt highlights the growing sophistication of high-resolution climate models. Those are expected to form the core of the European Union's Destination Earth project, which aims to create a 'digital twin' of Earth to better forecast extreme weather and guide preparation plans.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Supercomputer Re-Creates One of the Most Famous Pictures of Earth

Comments Filter:
  • They invent the time machine and send back a still image.

  • Looking at the image, Marbles.jpg [mpimet.mpg.de], it seems that Antarctica is covered my much less cloud in the model. Which means less thermal radiation reflected into space, which means increased warming. In the model.

    I realise this is just one image from one day, but I just had to say.

    • by znrt ( 2424692 )

      my guess is they tweaked the input until their algorithm produced the desired image in an acceptable number of iterations, so any value this has is mostly artistic. i could be utterly wrong, though, because in observing the finest /. traditions i have barely read even the abstract.

      • The moon landings are fake, so both images are fake/generated. However, this technology might be interesting to use on a real event, for example, to check the conditions that led to the flying saucer crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
        • None of this is happening. Your medication is not working. We're sorry about the side effects, but we need to increase the dosage.
        • I have used similar technology to prove that the Proxima Centuri craft crashed due to lightning at Roswell and that Apollo 11 could not have landed on the moon as the weather at Tranquility Base was cloudy that day.

          But you won't read about that in the Mainstream Media.
          • Neil Armstrong, just like Columbus, miscalculated just how far away the destination was. As a result he ended up landing on Mars instead. To avoid embarrassment NASA did the broadcast in black and white so that no one could see the red tint. Buzz Aldrin remained a bitter man all his life because he had only set foot on Mars and never the moon, so he'd punch punch anyone calling the moon landing a hoax as it reminded him of that failure. The Blue Marble photo on the other hand, was just a painting done b

  • What is the point of using a supercomputer fake a historic image?
    How much did it cost the American taxpayer?

news: gotcha

Working...