Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

US Inflation Cools Again, Giving Fed Room To Downshift on Rates (bloomberg.com) 83

US inflation continued to slow in December, adding to evidence price pressures have peaked and offering the Federal Reserve room to slow the pace of interest-rate hikes next month. From a report: Excluding food and energy, the consumer price index rose 0.3% last month and was up 5.7% from a year earlier, according to a Labor Department report Thursday. Economists see the gauge -- known as the core CPI -- as a better indicator of underlying inflation than the headline measure. The overall CPI fell 0.1% from the prior month, with cheaper energy costs fueling the first decline in 2 1/2 years. The measure was up 6.5% from a year earlier.

US stock futures dropped before paring losses and Treasuries fluctuated. All of the figures matched the median estimates in a Bloomberg survey of economists. The data, when paired with prior months' lower-than-expected readings, point to more consistent signs that inflation is easing and may pave the way for the Fed to downshift to a quarter-point hike at their next meeting ending Feb. 1. That said, the central bank's work is far from over. Resilient consumer demand, particularly for services, paired with a tight labor market threaten to keep upward pressure on prices.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Inflation Cools Again, Giving Fed Room To Downshift on Rates

Comments Filter:
  • Do people think the Federal Reserve can let its guard down?

    • The Fed was so embarrassed that it was so slow to raise rates, that now, it's going to overreact and keep raising them even if the facts on the ground say they shouldn't.

      • by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @10:20AM (#63202690)

        There is a 12 to 18-month lag between changing interest rates and the effect on the economy. So it isn't the "facts on the ground" today that matter, but what those facts will be a year from now.

        The Fed is trying to steer the economy while only seeing the rearview mirror. I don't envy them.

        • by thejam ( 655457 )

          If the Fed instead targeted zero zero inflation, then wouldn't it be easier? I think the instability (variability) of inflation increases with the inflation target. Imagine a 20% inflation target (perhaps selected to make debts disappear quickly). It seems really unlikely that the Fed would be able to stay close to that figure. If the Fed targeted zero, then everyone would intuitively be able to help encourage it, because no calculation is required: there'd be a universal expectation that overall price

          • by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @11:35AM (#63202928)

            As I have heard it described the Fed shoots for 2-3% because in the case of if they overshoot they are trying to avoid deflation. In reality they know the ideal number is 0 but they prioritizie the stability of a small but predictable inflation rate.

            Now whether this is methodology is beneficial or correct? I have heard compelling arguments on both direction, that a small amount of deflation is not that worrisome to some that describe it as very worrisome. Economics is a "soft" science for a reason.

        • There is a 12 to 18-month lag between changing interest rates and the effect on the economy. So it isn't the "facts on the ground" today that matter, but what those facts will be a year from now.

          The Fed is trying to steer the economy while only seeing the rearview mirror. I don't envy them.

          This.

          That there was going to be inflation after coming out of Covid times was inevitable. Given the resulting shortages of things like fuel, it was simply going to happen.

          As well, that time lag has some interesting aspects. The seeds of the present inflation were planted during the Trump administration.

          Doing some financial history, and when problems happen, and the lag effect, one can come up with surprising causes that to not fit one's narrative.

          I'm not certain how many people noticed, but we c

          • That there was going to be inflation after coming out of Covid times was inevitable. Given the resulting shortages of things like fuel, it was simply going to happen.

            Yes, and the Ukraine War was a black swan event that nobody expected 18 months ago, and very few were expecting even 12 months ago.

            • Yes, and the Ukraine War was a black swan event that nobody expected 18 months ago, and very few were expecting even 12 months ago.

              I saw the pictures of troop concentrations and heard the warnings, I just didn't believe Putin would be dumb enough to go through with it.

              What it really shows is that Putin was surprisingly unaware how the world would perceive his actions. He may not understand how they perceive him today.

        • I'm sure some things take 12 to 18 months to respond, but real estate has been faster than that. Mortgage rates started climbing a few months before the Fed actually raised rates. Anecdotally, prices seem to be falling in my area and in the area I recently moved from.

          Of course, falling real estate prices, but dramatically higher financing prices won't lead to lower rents or lower mortgage payments and thus might not affect CPI.

        • Thatâ(TM)s BS. You raise the rates today and tomorrow your mortgage for that house you wanted will go up significantly. The impacts on the market are immediate and one of the reasons the fed should really stay out of setting rates altogether.

          The government just did a 1.7 trillion dollar spending package which will cost nearly 5 trillion over the next decade, the only reason the Fed doesnâ(TM)t want to raise rates is to pretend that spending has no impact on inflation. If they were truly honest, th

    • Do people think the Federal Reserve can let its guard down?

      tl;dr answer: No.

      The Fed report released numbers that were expected by economists, so the markets are generally happy about that; no surprises.

      Yes, the report does show that inflation appears to be slowing (month-on-month), but the unemployment rate is not slowing.

      That means there is a risk of a "wage-price spiral" where wages chase prices and prices chase wages. Breaking that spiral can be very ugly in economic terms and very difficult for the Fed to accomplish.

      As long as the inflation rate is higher than

      • Obligatory Youtube clip

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

      • The Fed is telegraphing that they will slow/stop rates at around 5.25% give or take. What I think is going to surprise the markets is that the fed is going to hold them there for all of 2023 and maybe much longer. Somehow many people are expecting rates to start going down again around summer. That is not going to happen. Take a look at the double bump of inflation in the 70's. The fed blinked and inflation came right back. The markets got used to the idea that 0-1% interest rates are the norm. Historically
        • Somehow many people are expecting rates to start going down again around summer. That is not going to happen. Take a look at the double bump of inflation in the 70's. The fed blinked and inflation came right back. The markets got used to the idea that 0-1% interest rates are the norm.

          In June, when the annual inflation rate is negative, I imagine they're going to be thinking differently. 33% of the visible CPI is shelter, a lagging indicator that is serving only to make things look worse than they already

      • by ebyrob ( 165903 )

        That means there is a risk of a "wage-price spiral" where wages chase prices and prices chase wages. Breaking that spiral can be very ugly in economic terms and very difficult for the Fed to accomplish.

        Egads! What do those employers and workers think this is? A free market economy or something!

      • That means there is a risk of a "wage-price spiral" where wages chase prices and prices chase wages

        Except reality has shown nothing of the sort even remotely in play. Wage growth has been declining for 9 months straight: https://www.usatoday.com/story... [usatoday.com]

        On top of that, consumer inflation expectations (which tend to drive wage expectations) have been tracking downward since June: https://tradingeconomics.com/u... [tradingeconomics.com]

        The Fed is flat out ignoring all these facts with their eyes staring blankly at the rear vie

    • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @10:44AM (#63202776)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by quonset ( 4839537 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @11:00AM (#63202820)

        Inflation is normally fought by the Fed because it's normally caused by the economy being "too good", and people arbitrarily raising prices because others can afford it. Right now though it's being caused by shortages.

        False, to an extent (see below for the exceptions). Companies are raising prices far beyond the added costs of inflation because they can [forbes.com]. Their logic is they can raise prices by claiming inflation AND because they've raised wages (they really havent, but that's another story). If people are making more money then they can afford to pay more.

        There's a reason corporate profits are the highest they've been [npr.org] in 70 years.

        How does raising interest rates deal with shortages? It doesn't. It exacerbates the issue. It causes businesses who should be investing in dealing with those shortages to underinvest or even contract.

        Explain how farmers and egg producers can invest in more animals, particularly chickens which were killed by the millions [marketwatch.com] because of avian flu.

        This is the exact same situation pork producers were in when they killed millions of hogs during covid thinking people wouldn't be buying meat. The same for cattle. They simply killed their inventory because the government would use taxpayer money to prop them up, rather than sending the animals to be butchered and bought on the open market. One can't magically produce animals. That takes time.

        As been said before, the Fed is raising rates in an effort to stop rising wages and kick people out of work. The Fed does not work for the people, only a small slice of people.

        • by thejam ( 655457 )

          I was just reading earlier that there's now an expectation that profits will fall.

        • Comment removed based on user account deletion
          • And we know what's going on, we know the entire supply system is disrupted right now. We know the vast majority of massive, noticeable, price increases over the last year or two have been because of that disruption.

            That's an excuse. If you're telling me private industry can't get its act together after two years to unblock what did exist, then they are miserable failures. I use this exact term every time I go into a grocery store and see the cat food shelves being empty. There is zero excuse for that to

            • I use this exact term every time I go into a grocery store and see the cat food shelves being empty. There is zero excuse for that to be happening at this time.

              Yes, especially when the dog food shelves are full. If they can get dog food to the markets, why can't they get cat food as well? Maybe they think that the cats can just go outside and catch mice and birds, but what about all of the indoor cats that are never allowed outside?
            • That's an excuse. If you're telling me private industry can't get its act together after two years to unblock what did exist, then they are miserable failures. I use this exact term every time I go into a grocery store and see the cat food shelves being empty. There is zero excuse for that to be happening at this time. None. It's just the incompetence of private industry which then uses this excuse to raise prices.

              Where is it you are seeing bare shelves, or anything less than full shelves in stores in the

        • False, to an extent (see below for the exceptions). Companies are raising prices far beyond the added costs of inflation because they can [forbes.com]. Their logic is they can raise prices by claiming inflation AND because they've raised wages (they really havent, but that's another story). If people are making more money then they can afford to pay more.

          There's a reason corporate profits are the highest they've been [npr.org] in 70 years.

          Where does this "added cost of inflation" come in? Just like an extra itemized checkbox on the bill? Why was it there in the first place?

          This is simply ignorant of what inflation is. The companies raising prices is the inflation, not some extra thing that is happening on top of it.

          Imagine you went into a shop with $20 in your pocket and decide you really want a collectible - price unmarked - but are debating because you still want to have some money leftover for a snack. You discuss with the shopkeeper, wh

      • Prices are not shooting down. A reduction in the rate of inflation is just a reduction in the slope of the line of prices. It just means that they're accelerating by less than previously.
        • by ranton ( 36917 )

          Prices are not shooting down.
          A reduction in the rate of inflation is just a reduction in the slope of the line of prices. It just means that they're accelerating by less than previously.

          It doesn't mean that either. It is a measure of year over year inflation, so the number staying the same or less than last month simply means inflation has not increased. Inflation has been effectively 0% since June if you look at the monthly inflation rates over the last few years.

          If inflation continues to stay constant, we would expect the inflation rate to drop to roughly 6% in January (since Jan '22 inflation was 0.5% higher than Dec '21 inflation).

        • Prices are not shooting down.

          Yes, they are: https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/... [cargurus.com]
          Or just look at the CPI chart: https://www.bls.gov/news.relea... [bls.gov]

          Any negative number in the month columns is a decrease, not just less acceleration. You'll see many of them in the Sept-Dec timeframe, particularly in energy, fuel, vehicles, and commodities less food and energy. The average of CPI readings for the past 6 months is already below 2%. And that will only accelerate. That 6.5% annual rate they're throwing around is

      • something that's still going on because people are still catching COVID and nothing's being done to minimize its spread not that "Oh it doesn't matter, we have vaccines for it and cures!"

        I don't think covid is really that much of a factor anymore.

        The current variants just aren't deadly to most people and therefore, not much of a threat.

        Of course this is anecdotal....but I've known several people that have had it, all ages, and body types (fat, skinny)...and the effect has been from nothing more than a ru

    • by Z80a ( 971949 )

      Inflation is not the only reason to raise the rates. It's the best excuse, but there are other things that the dollar specifically win by doing it.

    • Better question: is the President going to create more money out of thin air? If not, other than everything costing about 11% more, inflation is no longer an issue (until someone starts printing money again.

      If, on the other hand, the President decides to **poof** some more money into existence then inflation is going to be with us a while.

      Note that prices are NEVER going back down to where they were before the President created $2.2T out of thin air. Mostly because, while inflation is bad, deflation is

    • Check out the history books: this bout of inflation is following exactly the same course as the one that came after the end of WWII, and predictably so for the core reasons behind were the same in both cases.
  • by DeplorableCodeMonkey ( 4828467 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @10:49AM (#63202786)

    Excluding food and energy

    "Excluding two of the biggest expenses the bottom 98% of society have, inflation didn't grow much."

    Why not just throw in housing while we're at it? I bet that would drive inflation down to 0.1%

    • Yep. Inflation didn't grow much, except for what hurts middle and lower income families the most....
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        Which is where we should turn our heads from monetary policy and start looking at fiscal, social, and foriegn policy.

        Food and energy get excluded from the measures the monetary policy guys use because they are often volatile and would mask other trends.

        Here we see the trend "inflation" is 6.5% well above the target AND we have an enviornment were food and engery are also seeing explosive price growth. We look at what our policy makers are doing - and rather than "promoting the general welfare...to o

        • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

          We look at what our policy makers are doing - and rather than "promoting the general welfare...to ourselves and our posterity" they seem to be doing everything they can - ensuring the war in Ukraine continues, embracing policies hostile to domestic energy development, allowing China to take over large agro-business and more

          The war in Ukraine is only being prolonged because we believe in democracy well enough that it's worth fighting for. As in, we give the Ukrainians military support so they can defend thei

    • I will tell you more, they are not even counting real increases in housing prices, they use the so called 'owners equivalent rent', which doesn't measure anything but an imaginary number.

      Actually all of their numbers are imaginary, if the public was allowed to see real numbers it would become obvious that the government has failed.

    • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @12:24PM (#63203070) Journal

      Food and energy are often excluded in analyses of inflation because they are historically very volatile even during "normal" times, making comparisons difficult. Multiple metrics are published, including those that include food & energy for those who wish to study them. Thus, I doubt this was done to hoodwink the audience; it's just a common economist practice in action.

  • by TomGreenhaw ( 929233 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @11:00AM (#63202818)
    The Producer Price Index helps forecast what will trickle to consumers. This comes out on 1/18/2023 for the US.
  • You can't cool inflation without mass layoffs and there haven't been mass way off yet. Clearly we need to raise interest rates again. /s

    Seriously Google the phrase "Jerome Powell causes layoffs". He's openly said the goal is to cause layoffs. Which is to say he's trying to get you fired. The theory is you'll spend less and take a lower paying job and work unpaid overtime and then the magnanimous corporations will pass the savings on to you.

    Another fun thing to Google is "fire one million". That one w
    • Another fun thing to Google is "fire one million". That one was from 1997. We've been using mass layoffs since then at least to control inflation. If you've ever lost a job you didn't want to lose odds are you can thank the Federal reserve for taking it out of your hide.
      Good news tovarish! Once we fix those pesky Kulaks then the 5 year plans shall bring forth a great leap forward, what could possibly go wrong?
    • by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      The economy is tradeoff. Maybe someday we'll find a way to optimize all factors and make everybody happy, but until that breakthrough, we have to use the tools we have.

  • by gflash ( 6321000 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @12:51PM (#63203150)
    The way we publicize inflation is very misleading. Down the bottom of this page is the inflation table going back to 1913.

    So if you look at last 12 months you can calculate it via:

    2021 Dec - 278.802

    2022 Dec - 296.797

    12-month inflation rate = (296.797 / 278.802) - 1) * 100 = 6.45%

    But most of this inflation occurred in the first part of 2022. If you look at the last 6 months you instead get this:

    2022 June - 296.311

    6-month inflation rate = (296.797 / 296.311) - 1) * 100 = 0.16%

    Which essentially points to an almost 0% inflation rate if it continues for the next 6 months. Given this I am questioning how many more (if any) interest rate hikes the Federal Reserve should really do.

    • by gflash ( 6321000 )
      Forgot link: https://www.usinflationcalcula... [usinflatio...ulator.com]
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I think projecting the next six months inflation using the last six months is unlikely to be accurate. The reason that they usually compare year-over-year is to minimize seasonal variation.

      The June-December inflation rate varied from -1.5% to +2.6% over the last decade, with an average of almost zero (0.2%). On the other hand, the Dec-June inflation rate ranged from +0.3% to 6.3% over the last decade. The +0.3% is a low outlier and occurred in the first half 2020 during initial COVID shutdowns, by the wa

      • by gflash ( 6321000 )
        Sure, it could be optimistic to think 0% will continue for the next six months.

        But even if it doesn't - say inflation spikes again and we average 4% annualized over the next 6 months, that brings us to 2.2% annual percent in June. Say 6% and that brings us to only over 3.2% annual in June.

        What is the thing that will make inflation go higher again in the next six months? Gas prices have fallen. A lot of the supply side issues are going away. For example shipping costs are back to normal after going nuts

  • Anyone who cares knows where to look for financial info. Turning Slashdot into Yahoo is idiotic.

  • by kaatochacha ( 651922 ) on Thursday January 12, 2023 @02:26PM (#63203408)
    Excluding ( important things that actually make it go up), inflation is down.
  • and breaks ten of her bones in December, then in January he only breaks eight more of her bones... thus the abuse has cooled a bit, and the thug has "dramatically improved" the situation. He should obviously get some sort of reward and lots of good press coverage, right?

    right?

    It's stories like this one that tell you the "free press" is nothing of the sort; it's totally partisan and in the tank. It's taking bad news (highest inflation in decades) and spinning it as a positive achievement. This article would

    • by Duhavid ( 677874 )

      If the one detail that makes the difference in inflation rate is our President, why is inflation up all over the world?
      Why is it, mostly, better here than elsewhere?

Truly simple systems... require infinite testing. -- Norman Augustine

Working...