Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education

Students Lost One-Third of a School Year To Pandemic, Study Finds (nytimes.com) 71

Children experienced learning deficits during the Covid pandemic that amounted to about one-third of a school year's worth of knowledge and skills, according to a new global analysis, and had not recovered from those losses more than two years later. The New York Times reports: Learning delays and regressions were most severe in developing countries and among students from low-income backgrounds, researchers said, worsening existing disparities and threatening to follow children into higher education and the work force. The analysis, published Monday in the journal Nature Human Behavior and drawing on data from 15 countries, provided the most comprehensive account to date of the academic hardships wrought by the pandemic. The findings suggest that the challenges of remote learning -- coupled with other stressors that plagued children and families throughout the pandemic -- were not rectified when school doors reopened.

"In order to recover what was lost, we have to be doing more than just getting back to normal," said Bastian Betthauser, a researcher at the Center for Research on Social Inequalities at Sciences Po in Paris, who was a co-author on the review. He urged officials worldwide to provide intensive summer programs and tutoring initiatives that target poorer students who fell furthest behind. Thomas Kane, the faculty director of the Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard, who has studied school interruptions in the United States, reviewed the global analysis. Without immediate and aggressive intervention, he said, "learning loss will be the longest-lasting and most inequitable legacy of the pandemic."

[...] Because children have a finite capacity to absorb new material, Mr. Betthauser said, teachers cannot simply move faster or extend school hours, and traditional interventions like private tutoring rarely target the most disadvantaged groups. Without creative solutions, he said, the labor market ought to "brace for serious downstream effects." Children who were in school during the pandemic could lose about $70,000 in earnings over their lifetimes if the deficits aren't recovered, according to Eric Hanushek, an economist at the Hoover Institution at Stanford. In some states, pandemic-era students could ultimately earn almost 10 percent less than those who were educated just before the pandemic. The societal losses, he said, could amount to $28 trillion over the rest of the century.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Students Lost One-Third of a School Year To Pandemic, Study Finds

Comments Filter:
  • by iggymanz ( 596061 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @08:36PM (#63252541)

    A couple years after graduation you'll lose more than that anyway. Not seeing much of a problem, really.

    • by Arethan ( 223197 )

      I assume your point here is that time diminishes all unused attributes -- ie, use it or lose it. And, in that case, you aren't wrong.

      I used to be able to perform calculus 2 equations with a napkin and a calculator (TI85 for life), and now I cannot even do that.
      Linear equations? Well that's just addition and multiplication so that's hard to fuck up, but selecting the right one for the occasion and I'm lost. Sorry to my alleged career in 3d graphics, but it never materialized...

      Still, I feel it's like a bike,

      • I used to be able to use cursive. In fact, I'm old enough were all my essays growing up where done this way.

        For the life of me, I cannot even get my hand to move when trying outside of my signature

      • I had a terrible linear algebra prof, so I really never learned it. I could do enough by rote actions to do homework and tests, but I never learned the meanings behind all that. And I still regret this 40 years later because linear algebra is so very useful in computing and in so many domains where computing is used (3d graphics being minor), and at least once a year I'm hitting something at work or home where it would be helpful to better understand it.

        Knowing more is always better. I really dislike the

      • Even working actual engineering jobs the calc 2 and linear algebra were unused. All the usual formulas already set up and used instead, just arithmetic and a nat log once in a blue moon.

        Most complicated thing I ever did at nuke plant job was figuring out how many bags of concrete for ellipsoidal bollard... and did you know there is no formula for perimeter of ellipse only approximations so all math education near useless for that half the problem and no calculus would help, hahaha.

    • Yeah if that's such a big deal, just have a shorter summer holiday for a few years. Bam, crisis averted, if there was one to begin with.

    • Most jobs for today's students will be done by robots and AI anyway. All that will be left are a few programming jobs, service jobs ("more towels, sir?"), and a few jobs in health care.
      • Yeah people have been making that absurd claim for half a century. Meanwhile, most jobs are done by humans and can't be done by robots, and no end of that in sight at all even if people are making hype claims about AIbots

  • by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @09:39PM (#63252661)
    Losing relatives is a far bigger blow to someone's concentration than some clock-puncher's time card. And I would add, losing hope based on media-driven apocalypse entertainment that couldn't be bothered to stay rooted in practicality rather than circus-ify everything.
    • Re: (Score:1, Troll)

      by boskone ( 234014 )

      And those officials who made it so we couldn't see dying relatives will not be forgotten.

      A LOT of people lost relatives who died alone in hospitals and nursing homes (not from Covid) that didn't get to see their families before they passed due to voodoo and witchcraft from the tin pot dictators.

      • Quarantine procedures are not "voodoo and witchcraft." Try not to over-generalize criticisms of specific applications of policies that are otherwise prudent.
    • Yes, I agree with this, but I also fell under it and I can state that a lot of my studies were avoided because it was pandemic, besides with the development of internet teaching technologies I found this source https://studymoose. com/free-essays/my-teacher-my-hero [studymoose.com] from where I started learning even more than I did in college and at this point I understood the idea with My Teacher My Hero, it really makes sense, now I love studies and will probably do another college, the point is that teachers usually don'
      • As someone who loved studying independently in college, I nevertheless came to appreciate the necessity of environmental factors in focus and motivation. When people are told to focus on something they can't control, they are demotivated. They look for, and easily find, excuses to see productive activity as pointless rather than seeking ways around emergent obstacles.
  • by jfdavis668 ( 1414919 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @10:08PM (#63252707)
    We lose that every year.
    • No, kids 5-7 yrs old with low attention spans arent forced to stare at a teacher on an ipad for 6-7 hours with the expectation of learning. You clearly dont have children. It was devastating for young children, imagine start Kindergarten staring at an ipad. Toss out the new generation for the old and sick (who already stay home).
  • by physicsphairy ( 720718 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @10:26PM (#63252729)

    If your engineering project had been on pause and then plagued by interruptions and setbacks for two years, what would would think of a boss who told you "That's alright, I just need you to worker harder for a while so we can catch up with the initial schedule."

    When something is predicated on continuous and sequential effort by fixed size team (the student) a delay is just a delay. We already do basically everything we can as a society to bring up educational performance, and if there were a way to magically jump further ahead, no one would be waiting for a post-pandemic crisis to implement it. Those kids are - almost certainly - permanently behind.

    The concern over learning loss was raised early in the pandemic. Here [mckinsey.com]'s an analysis published June 1, 2020 which uncannily matches the report linked in the summary:

    All told, we estimate that the average K–12 student in the United States could lose $61,000 to $82,000 in lifetime earnings (in constant 2020 dollars), or the equivalent of a year of full-time work, solely as a result of COVID-19–related learning losses.

    We also had good evidence by May of 2020 that children were not at additional risk from COVID in attending school [yahoo.com] and nor was the community [sciencedaily.com].

    But in the US, policy was dictated by politics [nypost.com] rather than an objective risk-benefit analysis based on accumulated evidence. The reason we are now, in 2023, finally taking seriously what was raised in 2020, is simply because we're past the point where it can affect the desired decisions.

    • by mobby_6kl ( 668092 ) on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @04:39AM (#63253113)

      The researchersâ(TM) analysis of data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that there were 821 Covid-19 deaths in this age group during a 12-month period from August 2021 to July 2022. That death rate â" about 1 for every 100,000 children ages 0 to 19 â" ranks eighth compared with the 2019 data. It ranks fifth among adolescents ages 15 to 19.

      Covid-19 deaths displace influenza and pneumonia, becoming the top cause of death caused by any infectious or respiratory disease. It caused âoesubstantiallyâ more deaths than any vaccine-preventable disease historically, the researchers wrote.

      https://edition.cnn.com/2023/0... [cnn.com]

      But you know, I'm sure it's more important to increase future earning potential by like $500 a year.

      • https://edition.cnn.com/2023/0... [cnn.com]

        But you know, I'm sure it's more important to increase future earning potential by like $500 a year.

        (a) You have constructed a false dichotomy. You need to establish that closing schools was an effective policy remediation against kids contracting covid before you can present it as a tradeoff. That requires knowing what the baseline is. The comparison for whether open schools has a net negative impact is to the actual scenario in which kids still contract covid in their friend groups, from parents and family, and when schools eventually do reopen - not to a fictitious universe where closing schools resul

    • What there's no way to recover from is long covid. Even young people can suffer lifelong health effects.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The problem is that the school system is a pipeline. If you delay one year's cohort for an additional year, you end up with two year's worth of students applying for university places at the same time, or enter the job market at the same time.

      The gaps could have been made up, over the summer, and with additional funding. Countries where the education system wasn't already on its knees tended to do better in that regard.

      Even so, some stuff was just unavoidably lost. Students who were supposed to do a year st

    • by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

      The learning loss is also definitely more than three months. My oldest started sixth grade this year, and the middle school gives parents access not only to per-semester grades, but for every single assignment. Along with that comes information about how the other kids in class did--not individually, but mean, median, high, and low scores for every assignment. I see tests where my (previously underperforming) student is scoring 20 points above median on a regular basis. I see test where the highest grad

    • by ranton ( 36917 )

      If your engineering project had been on pause and then plagued by interruptions and setbacks for two years, what would would think of a boss who told you "That's alright, I just need you to worker harder for a while so we can catch up with the initial schedule."

      I would be much more receptive if I had a job where I didn't work for 3 months per year, and for a couple years was paid extra to work those 3 months.

    • As is generally the case, and was pointed out before, Ron DeSantis was right again.
  • by joe_frisch ( 1366229 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @10:28PM (#63252733)
    Despite >100 million cases in the US and a million (X10 or 1/10) deaths, the data we have is of terrible quality. We don't really know how many people died or were permanently disabled because of different standards in different locations (dying OF covid vs dying WITH covid). We don't know how many deaths were people in such frail health that any illness would kill them, or how many shortened lives. We don't know how effective different mitigation methods were.

    We spent $&#& TRILLIONS of dollars on this and we have very little knowledge of the epidemiology of the disease.

    China just let covid go in the country and it looks like hundreds of millions of people caught it in a few weeks. But there is no trusted data on deaths, serious illnesses etc. Did China lose 3 MILLION people in 3 weeks? We don't know.

    Were shutdowns the right answer despite the cost? WE DON'T KNOW. We don't have any idea what to do next time because not only did we as a society fail utterly in fighting COVID, we didn't even learn anything from our failure.
    • Excess deaths, i.e. measuring changes in overall death rates, seemed to be the favoured approach. It makes sense & also catches secondary deaths, e.g. complications with other conditions where it's hard to determine exact cause of death.

      Different countries have data of different qualities & usefulness. It is possible to get some idea of what's been happening but it depends on what questions you want to ask of it.

      This report on education is doing the best it can with the data available. I'm sure
    • It was my impression that it is very well known what needs to be done with any pandemic. It isn't popular politically or financially/economically and requires a "heavy hand" which doesn't waver.

      That Spanish flu outbreak in the early 1900s? Town/cities that used the "heavy, unwavering hand"-method, suffered initially the most, but were all back on their feet in much less time than towns/cities where fear about politics and economics ruled. Because those fears resulted in a festering wound that easily takes 2

    • We also don't know how many people died because of the measures intended to stop COVID. My wife is the mammographer at our local hospital, and during the lockdown all mammograms were halted as they were not considered essential. She switched to doing regular modalities (CT, x-ray, etc) during this time. After several months, when they finally started mammograms again, the number of masses she found was the highest they had ever seen. Not only that, but they were also larger and more matured. There is no qu

    • I know, right? I can't even go to movies in the theatre anymore. Wait... yes I can. Well, I can't go to local coffeehouses anymore for fear of... oh, wait... yes I can. How was this a failure again? We failed so bad that two years later everything is mostly functioning as it was. What a travesty. What an utter disaster.

      A whole lot was learned, it just wasn't in front of your your face.

      • Can you? I have friends who think it still isn't safe to go out. Others who think the risk was never very high. Both groups intelligent well-read people.

        We lost trillions is productivity and months of global education, along with maybe a million dead. Maybe. What measures worked, which didn't. What is the current risk of serious illness per infection for a healthy person as a function of age? Did China's shutdows save lives? Are people in India naturally lower risk than in Europe? Why didn't mil
    • Given the shitty data, here’s a simple exercise everyone can do to help clear up the truth: without googling, list all the famous (even slightly well known politicians, actors, athletes, etc) people you had ears of before and that died of COVID. Personally, I can’t think of any. Now, that doesn’t mean the illness isn’t real nor that it isn’t deadly to certain demographics. It does however show that via statistical extrapolation, the death rate must be very very low. Viruses are
      • Toots Hibbert is the only one who comes to mind though unless you're into Jamaican music you probably never heard of him.
    • by kbahey ( 102895 )

      China just let covid go in the country and it looks like hundreds of millions of people caught it in a few weeks. But there is no trusted data on deaths, serious illnesses etc. Did China lose 3 MILLION people in 3 weeks? We don't know.

      While we don't have exact numbers, we do have various facts that point to increased hospitalization and deaths after the restrictions were lifted.

      Chinese officials called in a COVID tsunami [bbc.com]. The same link shows massive queues in front of clinics and pharmacies. Pharmacies ran

      • Its clear people died. Given its population, China would have seen a few million deaths in one month if they had the same total number of deaths per capita as the US or Europe. Its not clear to me if they were close to that number- and that helps inform whether their very broad lockdowns saved lives or not. (I'm not guessing an answer either way, I don't know)
  • by lsllll ( 830002 ) on Monday January 30, 2023 @11:02PM (#63252783)
    I was in 5th grade when the Iranian Revolution of 1979 happened. During that year we probably went to school only half the number of days we would have. Teachers had to scramble and squeeze material in to prepare us for our next grades. I don't feel it had much of an effect on me, but I could be wrong, and it could affect different people in different ways. But, In a way, I feel third-world countries are better equipped to deal with nuances like a revolution or a pandemic. The margin for failure is so narrow over there that you know you can't beat around the bush if you want to be successful.
    • The thing is, stable, well-organised, developed countries can & often do organise & optimise their education systems to be as effective & efficient as possible. I'm sure if they extended the OECD's PISA tests to developing & politically/economically unstable countries too, we'd see a marked difference in academic achievement. I'm pretty sure that literacy rates alone are strikingly uneven.

      As the education experts put it, what really matters, in terms of quality of life & standard or li
  • ...they can be politicians.

  • Sure that technology doesn't make them less educated.

  • No big deal. Those kids in the pipe will age into the workforce slightly less capable than they otherwise might have been (in general) and disappear. In 6 years or so the pipe will once again be filled with the wonder and promise of the next generation. We're going to be flush with white collar professionals anyway. If some folks are sluggish getting into an IT career, so much the better, with all the layoffs and adjustments happening now.

  • Not a Teacher (Score:4, Informative)

    by Ormy ( 1430821 ) on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @05:36AM (#63253213)
    I'm not a full-time teacher but I do some work on the side in various schools around the UK, mostly with 16-18 year olds and staff but occasionally with the younger ones. I can tell you a significant number are way more than a third of a year behind, more like a whole year to 18 months. The lockdowns exacerbated and amplified the differences already present within student cohorts. By that I mean; many students were encouraged to continue working/learning by their parents or were self-motivated to do it themselves while schools were closed, and some of them actually achieved more progress than they would have in school because they could go at their own pace and weren't distracted. On the other hand many students who were already disaffected or with family problems, financial deprivation etc etc spent the entire period of various lockdowns playing videogames, watching twitch, or on social media. While there was always an obvious gap between these two groups of students, the lockdowns have widened the gap massively.
  • Despite the disruption to university classes and the handing out of degrees without meaningful testing, later evidence shows that the graduates did as well as other cohorts who were put through the whole experience. This would appear to reflect the limited value of the higher education in terms of actual ability to do the jobs they end up. One suspects the same remains the case for higher education; the interesting question is when this effect kicks in within the longer education timespan.

  • From the NYTimes article.
    emphasis added

    In the United States, one study showed that the average public elementary or middle school student lost the equivalent of a half-year [harvard.edu] of learning in math, and 6 percent of students were in districts that lost more than a full year. Standardized math test scores in 2022 [stanford.edu], when compared with those in 2019, showed the largest drop ever recorded [nationsreportcard.gov] in the three decades since the exam was first administered.

  • I think the kids are going to be more upset about being forced to get infected with Covid over and over and over than they are about the time they spent learning remotely. Check in with them in 10 years and see.

Been Transferred Lately?

Working...