Supermarket Plastic Bag Charge Has Led To 98% Drop in Use in England, Data Shows 197
Environmental campaigners have called on the government to learn from its own successes after official figures showed the use of single-use supermarket plastic bags had fallen 98% since retailers in England began charging for them in 2015. From a report: Annual distribution of plastic carrier bags by seven leading grocery chains plummeted from 7.6bn in 2014 to 133m last year, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said on Monday. Rebecca Pow, the minister for environmental quality and resilience, said the policy had "helped to stop billions of single-use carrier bags littering our neighbourhoods or heading to landfill." The government claimed the average person in England now bought just two single-use carrier bags a year from major retailers.
Campaigners welcomed the finding but said the statistic did not account for all types of plastic bag . They also questioned the timing of the announcement, made as experts said plans for 100 new North Sea oil and gas wells, announced the same day by the prime minister would "send a wrecking ball through the UK's climate commitments." A 5p charge for carrier bags was introduced in English supermarkets in 2015. In 2021, the charge was increased to 10p and extended to all businesses. Since then, the number of plastic bags used across all retailers had fallen 35%, from 627m in 2019-20 to 406m in 2022-23, Defra said. Wales had introduced a 5p charge in 2011, Northern Ireland followed suit in 2013 and Scotland did so in 2014. Scotland and Northern Ireland have since raised their charges to 10p and 25p respectively.
Campaigners welcomed the finding but said the statistic did not account for all types of plastic bag . They also questioned the timing of the announcement, made as experts said plans for 100 new North Sea oil and gas wells, announced the same day by the prime minister would "send a wrecking ball through the UK's climate commitments." A 5p charge for carrier bags was introduced in English supermarkets in 2015. In 2021, the charge was increased to 10p and extended to all businesses. Since then, the number of plastic bags used across all retailers had fallen 35%, from 627m in 2019-20 to 406m in 2022-23, Defra said. Wales had introduced a 5p charge in 2011, Northern Ireland followed suit in 2013 and Scotland did so in 2014. Scotland and Northern Ireland have since raised their charges to 10p and 25p respectively.
98%? (Score:2)
I live in a state that just started requiring retailers to charge ($0.10) for plastic bags. I probably use fewer bags and sometimes bring a reusable bag, but I'm definitely not using 98% fewer bags. From looking at others at the checkout, it seems like others aren't using 98% fewer bags either. I imagine there must be more to the story than British people using 98% fewer grocery bags.
Re:98%? (Score:5, Insightful)
They're geared different culturally, that's all. Europeans generally are just more likely to align on something that is perceived as beneficial for all. Look at which countries were early adopters of laws phasing out incandescents - the EU, Switzerland, and Australia in 2009.
The unwillingness to accept even the tiniest inconvenience in the name of the collective good is something found mostly in North America., where individualism is almost toxic. Certainly not all Americans... just a very noisy subgroup. Like ex-presidents who don't like how toilets flush.
Re: (Score:2)
They're geared different culturally, that's all. Europeans generally are just more likely to align on something that is perceived as beneficial for all. Look at which countries were early adopters of laws phasing out incandescents - the EU, Switzerland, and Australia in 2009.
The unwillingness to accept even the tiniest inconvenience in the name of the collective good is something found mostly in North America., where individualism is almost toxic. Certainly not all Americans... just a very noisy subgroup. Like ex-presidents who don't like how toilets flush.
I think it has more to do with their willingness to accept top down decisions and centralized structures. For historical and cultural reasons. From the perspective of a dual US/EU citizen.
Re: (Score:2)
That's also fair. Agreed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Europeans generally are just more likely to align on something that is perceived as beneficial for all.
You are over-thinking it. The reason 98% of people in the UK don't buy the plastic bags is because they don't want to spend 10p for one.
Re: 98%? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I live in a state that just started requiring retailers to charge ($0.10) for plastic bags. I probably use fewer bags and sometimes bring a reusable bag, but I'm definitely not using 98% fewer bags. From looking at others at the checkout, it seems like others aren't using 98% fewer bags either. I imagine there must be more to the story than British people using 98% fewer grocery bags.
Part of the difference could be if they switched to paper, the article doesn't mention that but it's at least part of the answer [euronews.com].
Another thing could be cultural. The British don't really have a "thumb their nose at the environment" party the way the US does. So on the one hand you have a lot fewer people using plastic simply to spite the greenies, and at the same time they might have developed cultural norms that at the grocery store you use feel a bit of shame for using a disposable plastic bag.
Re: (Score:2)
When I needed a bag in a UK supermarket earlier this year, it certainly felt like plastic rather than paper, but it was moderately heavy-duty plastic, easily good for a dozen shopping trips. I think it's probably a combination of some people switching to heavy-duty plastic weave bags ("bags for life") and other people making a bit more of an effort to remember to grab a bag from the cupboard or the car when they go shopping.
Re: (Score:2)
We changed from disposable to re-usable bags, I am just concerned that the re-usable bags contain more plastic in 1 bag than the amount of 1 use plastic bags they replace.
Re: 98%? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly our government is moving towards anti-environmentalism. At the moment it's mostly pitched as not wanting to increase costs for anyone. The classic "make your kids pay for it" strategy.
Re: (Score:2)
Annual distribution of plastic carrier bags by seven leading grocery chains plummeted from 7.6bn in 2014 to 133m in 2022.
133 / 7600 = 1.75%.
Re: 98% fewer is an accounting trickery, not real (Score:2)
Not in 'merica! (Score:2)
Good for the UK!
I only wish so many people in the U.S. didn't believe it's their god given right to create mountains of plastic trash or fuel their cars with "recycled dinosaurs".
Lego is starting to switch away from their plastic packaging, but their manuals are still a problem. All too often, they use too many pages for steps that could have easily been printed on a single page. While their core product is made of plastic, I can't ever remember when I intentionally threw a single Lego in the trash going
Worked for me (Score:4)
Where I live in Canada, stores started charging 5 cents each for plastic bags. Since the reusable ones were only 25 cents it was a no-brainer to switch to reusable ones.
Now they've banned the plastic bags completely, but I didn't even notice, having switched already.
Re: (Score:2)
Here in New Zealand before they outlawed single use bags, they where 5 cents for a reusable and $5 for a reusable so not so obvious choice. It's unlikely you would reuse it 100 times before it broke or got lost.
Re: Worked for me (Score:2)
Re: Worked for me (Score:2)
Do the 5 cent plastic bags count as single use? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
7.6B isn't greater than 133M by a measly factor of 5, but by a factor of 57.
Of course you are right that success hinges on people re-using the reusable bags. In England, this data indicates that they do.
Re: (Score:2)
The probability of you throwing it away is much lower if a) it is sturdy enough to last 150 uses, and b) you had to pay for it.
Of course you were always paying for disposable bags too, but the cost was hidden in the price of the goods.
No Bans (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't care if you charge a few cents per bag. I usually bring reusable bags anyway. But don't do more damage to the environment if I forget them!
Re:No Bans (Score:4, Insightful)
So you're saying that you only need to use them 10 times to break even? So are you going to do it or are you just a bad person?
Re: (Score:3)
I just returned from a trip to Colorado and ended up with a massive pile of reusable bags due to their ban.
Why didn't you re use the bags rather than keep buying new ones to end up with a "massive pile"?
View from the UK (Score:5, Informative)
We did not switch to paper bags. Paper bags have almost never been a thing in England barring a few specific uses.
We simply reuse the plastic bags we already have now. Most people keep a stockpile of old ones (these tend to be the sturdier ones) in their homes/cars and we take those into the shops with us now.
Fruit and vegetables are largely put loose in with your shopping now and don't require a separate thing plastic bag anymore.
It took a few weeks to get used to, but everyone's fine with it now.
Re: (Score:2)
Geez, way to ruin a perfectly good uninformed argument with facts!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Paper bags have almost never been a thing in England barring a few specific uses.
Depends how far back you go. I am old enough to remember they were common both for small things like sweets and biscuits (usually sold loose) and for larger things you could buy a strong paper bag, almost as thick as cardboard with either re-inforced hand holes or string handles. My mother went shopping with a couple of large faux-leather shopping bags and some net-like string bags for things like potatoes; on foot of course.
Re:View from the UK (Score:5, Insightful)
Meanwhile, other studies have found an increase in the amount of plastic being used to make plastic bags because you have to reuse them a large number of times before they actually use less plastic than a disposable polypropylene bag. Estimates vary wildly, but it's anything from four to 40 times a bag has to be reused before it becomes more environmentally friendly - depending mostly on exactly which bag is taken as being representative.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah suck it environment. It's my constitutional motherfucking duty to be the biggest dickhead possible.
Re: (Score:2)
So mind-bogglingly stupid. He wastes his own money on the most expensive bag he can find, and then deliberately throws it away, all just to "own the libs" or whatever he thinks he's doing.
Probably pisses in his own cornflakes too.
Re: (Score:3)
Libertarianism is supposed to be about freedom, not a mandate to be the biggest possible plonker at all times.
But your post is a fantastic indication as to why it isn't av workable system: you are prepared to waste money and fuck up the commons just to prove a point. It's precisely because of people like you messing things up intentionally that we get more regulations. You are the very cause of the thing yippy most despise.
Bring your own bag (Score:2)
You can get a nice reusable bag at most stores for a couple of bucks that can last for quite some time. Bring it with you when you go shopping, problem solved.
... but (Score:2)
But... then I have to buy plastic bags to pick up dog poop, instead of reusing the grocery bags.
Re: (Score:2)
Or you can use the much smaller, much more convenient compostable dog poop bags that literally everyone here uses.
Third world country for you (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, would you look at that? The US has finally embraced LED lighting and reusable plastic bags! How absolutely charming that you've joined us in the modern world. It's endearing to witness such progress, albeit a bit late, from a country that once held such greatness. Keep it up, you're getting there!
Re: (Score:2)
What are you trying to accomplish? (Score:3)
I switched 20 years ago (Score:2)
Now I just have a collection (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do not drive and shop daily/erratically.
So?
I own no car and shop ad-hoc when I need it. Somehow I don't have a problem, because when I do go shopping, I take some bags with me. And when I'm out and about, I usually have some sort of day bag and keep a packable shopping bag which I ended up with just in case.
Re: (Score:2)
No it's not the same for you because you are accumulating hundreds of bags.
I'm not.
I've got a few. Some get used for rubbish occasionally. Others get used on the rare occasion I want to bag something like shoes which I don't watt to use a food/grocery bag for.
Trash bags (Score:2)
Plastic bags suck. (Score:3)
My wife has been using cloth freezer and non freezer bags for years. She takes them with her to the store in the van and then bags everything in them when she gets back to the van. They are SUPERIOR to plastic bags and she's been using the same bags for years now. All of the cold stuff in the freezer bags also means it's still nice and cold by the time she gets home. Plastic bags should have been outlawed decades ago. I've seen others use cardboard boxes too (at the local Aldi) which work just as well.
Here in the US (Score:2)
At the supermarket the bagger asks you "paper or plastic"
At Walmart you don't get a choice, plastic it is. Of course you still put those smaller plastic bagged stuff into the large reusables you brought with you once you get out of the checkout area so you can carry them onto the bus (limit 4 bags per person)
Maui ban (Score:2)
What environmental problem are they solving? (Score:3, Insightful)
So the bans aren't to save hydro carbons
They aren't so protect the environment from plastics
They aren't saving landfill space
And they sure as heck aren't to prevent global warming
This is yet again another virtue signaling circle jerk so we can pat ourselves on the back while not actually doing anything meaningful.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for doing the maths on this.
Paper bags and glass bottles (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fabric bags work better (Score:2)
I and many others use fabric bags and mesh bags are also an option.
I also use rugged plastic bins in my vehicles. Bags go in bins, then I slide bins onto my hand truck at home to bring them indoors. If you're doing to perform a task hundreds or thousands of times it's silly not to refine the process so I do. This works very well for the large shopping runs I do to keep a full pantry and make fewer shopping trips which which in excess are a time and fuel waster.
Truck owners note I use Contico bins but one
Trader Joe's (Score:2)
If you have a Trader Joes anywhere near you, their reusable bags are far superior to any others I have found. About the size of a traditional paper bag, but made of tear-resistant (woven) plastic and with long, strong handles. You can pack them heavy and pack them full with no issues. I've even used them to carry 12-packs of soda/beer with no risk of "tear out". I keep a dozen or so in each car and use them for most all my shopping, even at the home-stores.
Why single-use (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, markedly so.
They suck so much they encourage use of reusable bags and/or boxes, which, other than the initial headache of use and planning, actually work better long term (IMO).
Paper bags are also less ecologically destructive, and are renewable.
Re: (Score:2)
I find all sorts of re-uses for them, I save them after I unload my groceries...they get used for when I want to bring something somewhere (like a 6 of home brew to a friend's house)....and they're really useful, when walking the dog to pick up the poop out of peoples' yards.
The latter is my primary use, but aside from that, useful to bring lunches to work (back in the day), and when last minute you wanna carry something of unusu
Re:Switched to paper bags? (Score:5, Insightful)
> I find all sorts of re-uses for them
There may be a legit concern for single use plastic but I re-use all the grocery store bags at least once for garbage. By taking away plastic grocery bags I have to buy plastic garbage bags anyways.
Re: (Score:2)
There was a very brief period of time, somewhere around 2013 if memory serves, where almost everything came in extremely plastic-free packaging. Everything was (mostly uncoated) cardboard. All the kids toys that year were like that.
Then things went back to the abhorrent 1980s, 1990s "plastic and twist ties for everything".
I'm not sure why that happened, or why it reverted. But I wish it would go back to that again, for numerous reasons.
Re: (Score:2)
> I find all sorts of re-uses for them
There may be a legit concern for single use plastic but I re-use all the grocery store bags at least once for garbage. By taking away plastic grocery bags I have to buy plastic garbage bags anyways.
And those bags are way thicker than the single-use bags, so even if only one in five gets reused as a trash bag, you're probably still coming out ahead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:2)
Yes. The plastic bags I spend ten cents on now are good enough that I can reuse them a bunch of times. Then they commonly wind up as a trash bag for jobs the old ones wouldn't do, like greasy blue rags.
Re: (Score:2)
But no longer for free.
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:3)
WTF is all this off topic discussion. We still have plastic bags in England. They are actually now sturdier and better for reusing because you pay for them! You no longer get the flimsy freebies. Supermarkets even give you a lifetime warranty on them, you bring an old torn one, they give you a brand new for free!
Nobody switched to paper! Well, ok some clothing stores etc have paper bags, and some people like to use cloth bags everywhere, but that's a choice like everywhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
Paper bags can also be burned in the fireplace when the Government turns off the natgas supply.
Ok, a burning paper bag might not be as "energy dense" or long lasting as a block of wood, but it's something.
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What is the energy intensity of creating those plastic bags (as compared to plastic)?
What's the energy intensity of disposing of all the plastic bags put in the trash (or recycling).
More importantly, what's the energy intensity of picking up the plastic bags that don't actually make it into the garbage (those paper bags can break down in about a month).
One of the difficulties in doing a straight up cost/energy comparison is the number of externalities in play.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:3)
Why not answer them in the order in which they deserve to be answered? Then most of them never will be.
Any question which does not address the full lifetime of the bag is stupid, and probably intended to be misleading.
The question is, what are the comparative ecological impacts of paper, plastic, and various reusable bags over their lifespans. Production emissions, disposal, recycling if any, microplastics shed during use, etc.
Disposable plastics seem like a good deal until you figure out how many just beco
Re: (Score:2)
This.
The 10p light weight one-time use plastic bags which were then used for rubbish disposal, going neatly into the "recycling" process have been replaced by £1 "bags for life" with about 100 times more plastic in them, hang around for a while being used two or three times, and then split along the seams, then hang around a bit longer waiting to be returned for a free replaceme
Re: (Score:3)
Why are so many slashdotters incompetent at the basics in life like using bags.
I've got a rando collection of cloth bags and a few Sainsbury's reliabags and they basically work forever.
For the rest of us, it is a daily proof that politicians cannot be trusted to deliver a working policy on anything, anywhere, at any time.
Go move to a failed state and then tell me how politicians here can never deliver anything that works.
Why are my GBP turning into Australian pounds?
So what you're saying is the Australian
Re: (Score:2)
Costco used to have better boxes though, at least by me so many are shallow, display boxes, like those flat ones the pineapples come in and they kinda suck as a, well, a box. Maybe other Costco's have better options or maybe I get there after all the useful ones have been pilfered.
My favorite alternative though are those big blue Ikea bags. You can piile those fuckers high with lots and lots of items.
Agree 100% on oil, that shit is a miracle substance that we waste so much of.
Re: (Score:2)
So England (UK?) has licked a good part of the problem by making the bags cost money.
Now we need to do the same in the countries causing most plastic pollution in the environment.
For the past ~20 years I've been doing my shopping with a cotton bag I bought, of all places, in Dead Horse, Alaska.
(BTW, England was not exactly the only or first country with this successful p
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:2)
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm given to understand plastic shopping bags are made of distillates which would otherwise be useless and burned off.
If they are burned for heat or to generate electricity, that's not "useless"
Re: Re-usable in name only ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Switched to paper bags?
Got a citation for that, or did you pull it out of one of your orifices?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is that any better?
If you re-use it several times yes, otherwise no.
People seem to only focus on the bag after it's used, but taking into account the impact of making the various bags shows that the single-use plastic bag has the lowest impact -- unless the alternatives are re-used many times.
From Sustainable Shopping—Which Bag Is Best? [nationalgeographic.org]:
Studies have shown that, for a paper bag to neutralize its environmental impact compared to plastic, it would have to be used anywhere from three to 43 times. Since paper bags are the least durable of all the bagging options, it is unlikely that a person would get enough use out of any one bag to even out the environmental impact.
Other articles note the impact of other types of bags:
-- Plastic or paper: Which bag is greener? [bbc.com]
-- Plastic, Paper or Cotton: Which Shopping Bag is Best? [columbia.edu]
Google: paper bags vs p [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
"People seem to only focus on the bag after it's used, but taking into account the impact of making the various bags shows that the single-use plastic bag has the lowest impact -- unless the alternatives are re-used many times."
True enough
When we take our reusable bags, on a big shopping trip ($500-600) we use like 6-8 of them; vs 30+ of the single use bags. We also do not use the single use plastic bags as trash bags as assumed by the comparison -- why? They're too small, and frequently have small holes an
Re: (Score:3)
Where I live, the supermarkets helped the government write the new plastic bag laws, in an "industry partnership." No wonder the result was that now they charge money for something they used to give away for free. And no, there was no exemption for e.g compostable bags.
And yeah, those non-woven "green" bags are useless. No way would they last for the requisite 3 to 43 uses to break even. They literally crumble into dust (microplastics!) after being washed a couple of times.
We need to go to the source - if
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The drop in use shows people have quickly changed to multi use bags and we might assume around 98% less end up in the environment.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Because we weren't recycling paper or practicing sustainable logging back then.
Re:Switched to paper bags? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
In a word, no. Paper bags are still not a thing here in England.
My nearest Tescos provides paper bags in the fruit and veg area to put loose items in. The bottoms tear out if you put more than two parsnips in one, so I now put three of those bags inside each other. Also beware of McEwans Export beer cans sold in fours now held together with feeble cardboard "spectacles" that used to be plastic : the cardboard breaks as soon as you pick up a pack and the cans dent on the floor. The shelf nearby has lots of single dented cans and scraps of cardboard.
Re: (Score:2)
OK, the easy solution to that is to not buy the carbonated sewage known as McEwans.
Also, for some reason they don't supply those green compstable bags for the purpose. Those work fine and other countries do it. Kind of annoying, though I don't think my local greengrocer ever had plastic bags, they always had those paper ones since before the ban that supermarkets used to have when I was a kid. They seemed fine TBH.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm another victim of the McEwans Export cans. I remember the 'not again' look the Tesco employee gave me as a pack broke apart and spilled all over the aisle. Didn't help that they were on the top shelf so had a long way to fall.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I just buy the Plastic "T-Shirt" bags by the thousand and make sure each of the cars have a hundred or so for when we go shopping -- problem solved.
Re: Switched to paper bags? (Score:2)
No, switched to heavier duty plastic bags (Score:2)
Switched to paper bags? Is that any better?
No, while paper is an option people seem to general go with the heavier duty plastic bag that does not qualify as "single use" so is not banned.
Not much has changed except the bags don't become airborne from a light wind. The banned "single use", and the statutory "multiple use" plastic bag, they both hold about a days worth or trash and go into the landfill as trash bags.
Overall it's an improvement. The heavier duty bags are thick enough to make good trash bags. The single use were a little too fragi
Re: No, switched to heavier duty plastic bags (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, paper bags is a weird American thing. You can just about carry stuff to your car if you're lucky, but from the trolley (cart) to the boot (trunk) is usually OK.
We largely speaking use reusable bags. Some supermarkets sell basically extra thick carrier bags with better handles. Sainsbury's sells particularly good ones with elephant branding which are made with some sort of coated woven structure, which are exceptionally robust. They're god utility bags and I uses them for that rather than shopping. Mostl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Note: I recognize #2 is inhumane. Was just pointing out the reality. I am not advocating we should do that level of evil to birds.
Re: (Score:3)
According to google maps, Somerville - Everett is "4.1 miles, 19 minutes". Assuming an average car spends 7 L/100 km https://fr.statista.com/statis... [statista.com] and the price of fuel in USA is 1.077 $/L https://www.globalpetrolprices... [globalpetrolprices.com] , your two-way trip to Everett costs you 10 bags and 38 minutes driving.