Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI United States

White House To Unveil Sweeping AI Executive Order Next Week (washingtonpost.com) 26

The Biden administration on Monday is expected to unveil a long-anticipated artificial intelligence executive order, marking the U.S. government's most significant attempt to date to regulate the evolving technology that has sparked fear and hype around the world. Washington Post: The administration plans to release the order two days before government leaders, top Silicon Valley executives and civil society groups gather in Britain for an international summit focused on the potential risks that AI presents to society, according to four people familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private plans.

The sweeping order would leverage the U.S. government's role as a top technology customer by requiring advanced AI models to undergo assessments before they can be used by federal workers, according to three people involved in discussions about the order. The lengthy action would ease barriers to immigration for highly skilled workers, an attempt to boost the United States' technological edge. Federal government agencies -- including the Defense Department, Energy Department and intelligence agencies -- would be required to run assessments to determine how they might incorporate AI into their agencies' work, with a focus on bolstering national cyber defenses.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

White House To Unveil Sweeping AI Executive Order Next Week

Comments Filter:
  • by MIPSPro ( 10156657 ) on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @03:01PM (#63953957)
    They are using big AI backends to do assessments, resume analysis, and weird "social credit" style evaluations on people we hire. I had to fight with them recently to hire some guy that they claimed "scored poorly" on these metrics. I asked to see what they were talking about and I was horrified by what they were using/doing. He did fabulous in the techscreen and panel interview with the other engineers. I guess now I get to see if they were right. I overrode HR and he starts next week.
    • That's concerning. I wonder if we need rules creating a burden for AI or HR assessment disclosures, similar to how we have Credit reporting disclosures?

      Any opinion on that or what it would look like?

      • I guess they could require reporting by HR departments so folks know when and what-kind of system they use. Sounds awfully hard, though. Credit check companies only exist for that reason. However, folks might want to ask questions about a specific person to ChatGPT, for example, and it'd be a big job to track and report. Then there is the question of if they did anything wrong, etc...
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • they brought in some Type A asshole

        I agree with your assessment of HR folks, but I had a good one once a long time ago. So, I like you said, that was an honorable exception. However, this situation you are in sounds infuriating. Your "old way" sounded much better. Good luck. I hope she gets fired. Corporate culture is evil and insidious and I agree with your outlook on it's base nature.

      • by whitroth ( 9367 )

        Dead on. Even if HR *isn't* outsource - a *lot* of them are, and if not the whole department, major chunks of it are.

        Evidence: the *worst* job website in the world that I'm aware of is... USA jobs, the US federal government job site. About 10 years ago, I had an argument with someone from there: the computer-related jobs DO NOT TELL YOU what the job requirements are, or what the job actually is (programmer? dba? sysadmin? Who knows?!) - if you're lucky, the "sample questions" may give you a clue - but the j

    • M.OD.e.L has issued its results!

      Tsst. Nnn. Next reply results in payment of -100 Social Credits.
      M.OD.e.L rewards compliance. Buy--and be happy. Further Consumption results in positive net social credit! Be credit worthy, Citizen!

  • China certainly won't regulate it.
  • by Press2ToContinue ( 2424598 ) on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @03:19PM (#63954013)
    Crypto Regulation: Overreach stifled innovation while failing to prevent fraud. DMCA: Hindered fair use and innovation but didn't stop piracy. Net Neutrality Repeal: Promised better services, led to anti-competitive behavior. Software Patents: Intended to protect inventors, but enabled patent trolling. CFAA: Criminalized benign hacking activities, didn't deter malicious hacking. Data Localization Laws: Hindered global data flow while not improving data security. Online Privacy Acts: Added compliance costs for startups, didn't improve privacy. E-Voting Systems: Meant to modernize voting, led to security vulnerabilities. Facial Recognition Bans: Hindered benign uses, didn't stop misuse by authorities. Gig Economy Regulation: Aimed to protect workers, made flexible work less accessible. AI Regulations (fill in the blank below)
    • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday October 25, 2023 @03:37PM (#63954079)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • I actually would like to hear what you have to say about election machines, processes, etc. Not because I want to make some grand point or anything, I'm just interested. So if you have the time and don't mind I think that would be really cool.

      • by WDot ( 1286728 )
        Actually, the only “repeal” in hist post was the Net Neutrality repeal. Overwhelmingly, the post says that more laws just hindered benign uses without hindering the bad actors the law was made for, which is true.

        Also, lol, remember when nerds were reflexively suspicious of electronic voting? https://xkcd.com/463/ [xkcd.com] The original suspicions never changed (that software could easily, undetectably, manipulate the vote), just the party of the people who were bullish on electronic voting. Heck, the o
      • You've got quite the mix of lamenting regulation

        His post was absolutely excellent and pointed out some great and, at least to my value-system, completely valid examples. I get the feeling from the tone of your writing that his loud ringing of the "goverment corrupts what it touches, lies, and denies us the benefit of helpful tech" bell annoyed you. This type of thing typically annoys folks who think of themselves as pro-big-government and believe in big-government, centralized, authoritarian, solutions. Is that why you tried to throw some shade or do I h

  • The genie is out of the bottle -you cannot control it.

    You can only control how you (the government) interact with it.

    Be careful what you ask for -it will do what you ask (not what you meant). You may not like the results.

  • Would censorship by any other name smell as sweet? For this administration all censorship is sweet.

    Look to this order to censor AI to not provide "misinformation" or "disinformation" as defined by the administration. For example, no misgendering, no deadnaming, no lab leaks, no hunter laptop. No mention of Tainanmen Square, no caricatures of Chairman Xi.

  • "100% Top notched hacker" Overall: The support team is great, they helped me configuring the setup. Pros: After using the service, I was able to keep some tabs on my partner's iPhone. Reasons for chosing and recommending spyhackelite @gmail com: Reasonable price: you can contact him, just a mail to spyhackelite @gmail com. thanks

"You'll pay to know what you really think." -- J.R. "Bob" Dobbs

Working...