2023 on Track To Be the Hottest Year on Record, Say Scientists (theguardian.com) 166
The world is set to have been hotter in 2023 than in any other year on record, scientists have declared, before a landmark climate summit this month. From a report: "We can say with near certainty that 2023 will be the warmest year on record, and is currently 1.43C above the pre-industrial average," said Samantha Burgess, the deputy director of the Copernicus Climate Change Service. "The sense of urgency for ambitious climate action going into Cop28 has never been higher." The Copernicus scientists found last month was the hottest October on record globally, with temperatures 1.7C above what they were thought to have been during the average October in the late 1800s.
By burning fossil fuels and destroying nature, humans have pumped heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere that have raised the temperature of planet by 1.2C since the Industrial Revolution. The global temperature anomaly for October 2023 was the second highest across all months in its dataset, the scientists found, behind only the month before. "The fact that we're seeing this record hot year means record human suffering," said Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London. "Within this year, extreme heatwaves and droughts made much worse by these extreme temperatures have caused thousands of deaths, people losing their livelihoods, being displaced etc. These are the records that matter. That is why the Paris agreement is a human rights treaty, and not keeping to the goals in it, is violating human rights on a vast scale."
By burning fossil fuels and destroying nature, humans have pumped heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere that have raised the temperature of planet by 1.2C since the Industrial Revolution. The global temperature anomaly for October 2023 was the second highest across all months in its dataset, the scientists found, behind only the month before. "The fact that we're seeing this record hot year means record human suffering," said Friederike Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London. "Within this year, extreme heatwaves and droughts made much worse by these extreme temperatures have caused thousands of deaths, people losing their livelihoods, being displaced etc. These are the records that matter. That is why the Paris agreement is a human rights treaty, and not keeping to the goals in it, is violating human rights on a vast scale."
Tired of the clickbait. Do Better. (Score:1, Troll)
"above what they were thought to have been during the average October in the late 1800s...
Really? THAT bullshit is what we're supposed to hang some trillion-dollar emergency save-the-planet budget on? THAT, is sitting on the argument side of 'hottest ever'? Bullshit reads like the fantastical best guesstimate effort of a 4th grader giving a book report on something they've never read before.
There are plenty willing to take action...if and when a logical argument comes forward instead of this political clickbait bullshit. Do Better..
Re: (Score:2)
Just pay them a lot more taxes to save the world from hellfire, geekmux.
Did you see the Ted Koppel piece from 1982 that's been going around?
Florida may be half-submerged by the 1990's!
Meanwhile the government isn't panic-building a thousand nuclear reactors like Nixon called for.
Because they would if they believed their own propaganda. See the Club of Rome report from the mid-80's. Climate change, financial crashes, and pandemics will keep the people in a state of control.
Such a lucky GUESS!
Re: (Score:2)
Unsurprisingly, President Carter ALSO called for developing nuclear power for energy, BUT the fossil fuel industry had already started paying "environmental" groups to lobby against it, resulting in decades of coal power plant development and increasing the pace of climate change
It would be funny if it were not threatening our way of life
Re: (Score:2)
That would be a false equivalency
Nuclear power in the United States is well regulated and has not experienced any harm to the public while the alternative that was used as a result of environmental lawsuits was COAL, which has released tons of mercury, lead, arsenic, thorium and uranium into the atmosphere through fly ash over the past 50 [usgs.gov] years when we should have been going all-nuclear for electrical power generation
You really need to stop sucking at greenpeace/fossil fuel industry propaganda and learn abo
Re: (Score:2)
Do you feel better or worse after spewing the confirmation of human ignorance? Does it make Wisdom feel justified about any effort at all to educate those who don't give a shit enough to even save themselves? A GPS outage today would paralyze millions who can't navigate life without it. A food shortage for more than a week would starve millions more who don't care to plan beyond 24 hours. It's no longer a lucky guess assuming incompetence in leadership or the voters who elect them. It's more like a sur
Re: (Score:2)
You want humanity to do better and not fall for the same old bullshit...while peddling the same old bullshit.
Learn the difference between peddling solutions vs. bullshit. We've watched Al Gore fly a private plane all over this planet for far too long to not call him the hypocrite he is. Even the insufferable Greta Tunberg is on board with nuclear power now.
Nuclear reactors don't get built because we somehow believe they won't work or we can't make them much safer than before. They don't get built because Greed N. Corruption demands two fucking decades of red-tape profits first. Do Better. Fire Greed.
History of "hottest year on record" (Score:2, Informative)
First Google results for "Hottest Year on Record" site:slashdot.org [google.com] ... [slashdot.org] ... [slashdot.org] ... [slashdot.org]
* 2023 on Track To Be the Hottest Year on Record, Say
* The Hottest Eight Years On Record Were the Last
* 2022 Was One of Earth's Hottest Years [slashdot.org]
* Highest Temperatures Ever in 2021 Led To Catastrophic
* 2020 Was Second-Hottest Year On Record, NOAA Says [slashdot.org]
* Earth Hit Record Hot Year in 2016: NASA [slashdot.org]
* 2019 Was Hotter Than Any Year in the 20th Century [slashdot.org]
Re:History of "hottest year on record" (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That, and the records are overwhelmingly on the warm side as opposed to the even match you'd expect in a neutral climate.
Re: (Score:2)
Note that it won't change the solar irradiance level, which is also a limiting factor. In some areas it will be worse because the crops will overheat, but also not a long enough period of sunlight.
Re: (Score:2)
Carbon Negative Mass Heaters are one answer (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I'm definitely convinced by a janky website that looks like it crawled out of geocities and onto kickstarter.
I love the videos that look like they were illustrated by JeffK (for a contemporary reference on how the website looks).
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently, people don't care now. So I guess the answer is "some number less than or equal to the number of times they already have."
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:5, Informative)
People in the US already do not care, all they want is cheap auto fuel and drive their very large Pickups and SUVs to the corner store less than than 1000 feet (~300M) away. If the US Gov really wanted to get serious about Climate Change, they would remove all Oil Subsidiaries and let Gas Prices raise to what they are in Europe.
Gas prices are high in Europe because of high taxation, not "natural price".
Re: Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:2, Offtopic)
Wait until you find out what fuel would cost if it included enough carbon taxes to pay for fixing the emitted CO2, not that the revenue would be spent there even if we paid it
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Would you care to guess why that is?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ignoring the cost of the CO2 emitted by fossil fuels is a form of corporate welfare and does not provide a "natural price" in America
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Indeed. But you know, seeing this requires something called "rationality" and using it to generate something called "insight". Much simpler just to continue like always and convincing yourself there is no problem. Too many people are now permanently high on copium.
Re: (Score:2)
@down-modders: Your denial of reality does not change reality. And you are abusing the mod system to push personal opinion. Well, who can expect people like you to have honor or integrity. You probably do not even understand the concept.
Transportation is going to be subsidized (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
People in the US don't want to go broke with high prices, crazy eh?. Everything in my town is at least 15 min away by car. Good for you if you are young and live in a dense city where everything is within walking range and you have no kids to support.
Remove wind and solar subsidies also too.
Re: (Score:1)
and you have no kids to support.
If you have kids to support, you should be a bit more concerned about climate change, and not just about "high prices" that may mean you can't take your car as often. Your kids won't have half the luxury you think is normal. You will be long dead, they will be poor and curse your generation.
Maybe they will stumble on your post (glad you posted as Anonymous Coward, that way a lot of people can relate), and remember you that way.
Re: (Score:2)
Derp derp what? If most of your driving is 15 miles at a time, a plug in hybrid or cheapest eclectic will do you just fine. Maybe see a therapist for your EV Derangement Syndrome?
But what about his once a decade trip where he tows his boat up a mountain in the freezing cold?
If an EV can't do everything, it's not worth having.
Re: (Score:2)
Derp derp what? If most of your driving is 15 miles at a time, a plug in hybrid or cheapest eclectic will do you just fine. Maybe see a therapist for your EV Derangement Syndrome?
But what about his once a decade trip where he tows his boat up a mountain in the freezing cold? If an EV can't do everything, it's not worth having.
I live in the Rocky Mountains; I drive over a mountain just to get to my office! Not to mention going up the mountains for hiking, cutting down a Christmas tree, road trips to the national parks within a day's drive.
Re: (Score:2)
Derp derp what? If most of your driving is 15 miles at a time, a plug in hybrid or cheapest eclectic will do you just fine. Maybe see a therapist for your EV Derangement Syndrome?
The parent post said 15 minutes, not 15 miles. I'm in much of the same situation. New development and the city promised new stores close by, but then zoned everything for high density residential. I have an ICE vehicle because there aren't many places to charge yet and I like to go on road trips with my family.
Re: (Score:2)
If the US Gov really wanted to get serious about Climate Change, they would ...
They'd get voted out is what would happen. First you have to successfully convince the electorate that it's worth making a whole bunch of sacrifices today because every generation that came before, all the way back to the industrial revolution, kicked the can down the road. Besides, if you're having trouble affording gas you're probably also not in a situation where you can go out and buy a brand new EV, so higher gas prices will just ultimately suck money out of other areas in the economy. Do I want str
Re: (Score:2)
You've never been to FL. EVs are everywhere.
Florida is the #2 state for EV registrations. Met my partner out at Halloween Horror Nights last week and ended up parking between three Teslas and his Bolt EUV.
Of course, I had to yell "COMBO BREAKER!"
Re: (Score:1)
A major part of the US has decided to vote for bread & games and who cares if these run eventually out and then everything goes down the drains. Denying the problem exists will surely make it go away! Basically the same mind-set as looters that then eventually wonder (or not) why there are no shops anymore in their area.
They care (Score:2)
You can't just remove oil subsidies. Our entire economy is built on cars and cheap gas. It would just crash everything As the saying goes, for every sufficiently complex problem there's a solution that is simple and *wrong*.
What's needed is a transition to walkable cities and public transit. But you grow up with cars. You play with them non stop as a kid. You get laid as a teenager with them. They are deeply engrained in positive memories of most Americans
Re: (Score:2)
just not enough to give up cars and suburbs.
I can tell you've probably gone down the /r/fuckcars rabbit hole lately, but the subject here is climate change not the perceived negative effects of suburban sprawl and car culture. Zero carbon emission cars exists today. If my partner wasn't presently at work at the moment, I could look at my driveway and see one right now. Granted, the grid it plugs into today isn't emission free, but that's fixable.
There's also technically other ways to solve the issue while still retaining ICE, such as bio and synth
Re: (Score:3)
We'd all HAVE to walk or bike more. We'd all be healthier for it ...
Speak for yourself. If I lived in your car-free "biketopia" I'd mod my bike until it's essentially just an electric motorcycle. I'd be going Tim Allen with those damn lithium batteries. Exercise can kiss my zero emissions ass.
Re:Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd mod my bike until it's essentially just an electric motorcycle.
Been to China lately? The light traffic is all electric. E-scooters mostly - cheap, quiet, ubiquituous.
I was in Beijing a month ago and was totally blown away by this change. Fuel-based motos and scooters are not allowed in the city. The ban is well enforced, there really are none. Cars are mostly electric / hybrid as well, except their fleet of Porsches and Lamborghins. Thus all traffic is silent. Bizarre. You can stand on a busy street next to the traffic flow and talk to a friend in a normal voice.
Rest of the China is following suit. I also visited the rural South and Shanghai. There are still petrol scooters / motorcycles there, but the change is visible.
My friends tell me that S Korea and Japan are following the lead of electric transport rules. China can just enforce changes faster because of their authoritarian government. No politician in the West can tell all population "in 6 months all petrol motocycles go obsolete". China can.
Thus yeah, modding your bicycle to be electric totally makes sense.
Re: (Score:1)
You missed the memo - I said something lazy fat-asses didn't like, just as a theoretical to consider... and so my posts have been tagged as trolling and flamebait.
American Exceptionalism requires everyone to drive an oversized, heavy, gas hog and shout "America, FUCK YEAH!" as they get ever fatter and pollute ever more. (California at least partially excepted, I assume)
Re: (Score:2)
You missed the memo - I said something lazy fat-asses didn't like,
Oh I did get your sarcasm all right.
Outside Slashdot I am a daily urban cyclist. Not living in the US though.
Re: (Score:2)
Joke's on you, it's still better for you and everyone else than you driving.
Re:Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:4)
Yeah, we all want to live in the bullshit police state that it would take to enforce that. Are you insane?
Re: (Score:1)
You already live in the 'bullshit police state' that it would take. The same one with bylaw enforcement based on neighbour complaints. The one that usually results in trouble if you get drunk in public, or can pull your license if you drive dangerously.
It'd be just another rule. You'd adjust, you're a fish unaware of the water you're swimming in.
Re: (Score:2)
It'd suck to adjust to, but imagine if it was illegal for healthy people to drive for trips of less than 1 km when temperatures are above freezing, and that you could get a significant ticket if found deliberately driving further than you had to for shopping to exceed the 1km limit?
We'd all HAVE to walk or bike more. We'd all be healthier for it, and we have the time for it - we're currently spending it online or watching television.
In the US we tend to do one big shopping trip per week or pay period instead of running to the market every day. Combining trips lowers net car usage and is actually better for the environment. Of course, it's impossible to walk or bike while carrying groceries for. a family of four, so bit of a moot point.
Re: (Score:2)
And then, even nuclear supporters like Bill Gates start to see the current forms of it are not economically viable:
https://news.slashdot.org/stor... [slashdot.org]
But yes, I get it. That requires looking at this thing called "numbers" and that is too hard for most people.
Re: (Score:2)
Simplistic "analysis" is simplistic. Maybe look at actual facts and not immediately jump to the conclusion you like? Naa, that could give you actual insight. Cannot have that!
Re: (Score:2)
The fact I refer to here is the opinion that BG expressed. Nothing else. All the rest is something you constructed.
Re: (Score:2)
The era of baseload plants that just sit there and hum away at 100% capacity nonstop is over. Intermittent renewables killed it. And that means that the old solid-fuel steam bombs are economically dead in the water, because they are unbelievably slow to react to load changes - a limitation dictated by nuclear physics and there's nothing you can do about it.
Liquid fuel reactors have none of these pr
Re: (Score:2)
The thing is, new nuclear plants HAVE to be able to load follow,
Why? Why would nuclear power need to load follow when solar and wind power can't load follow? Well, they can load follow but only by wasting already scarce resources that are wind and sun.
and that means molten salt with storage.
No, that doesn't mean molten salt with storage. I'm thinking you've been drinking too much of Bill Gates' kool-aid. Nuclear power can use any of the energy storage methods that wind and solar can, and more because with nuclear fission producing an abundance of high temperature heat it becomes practical to use a number
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Why would nuclear power need to load follow when solar and wind power can't load follow?
Because solar and wind are cheaper.
Whenever it's windy or sunny, nuclear will have to be able to adjust its load. Or pay the solar and wind to adjust theirs. It's just how markets work.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
It seems like every year they announce that year is "on track to be the hottest year on record". How many times can they say it before people don't care any more?
It goes hand in hand with predictions on when we'll be under water. Meanwhile, the same policy makers that want you to give up your vehicles and food and house are paying exorbitant costs to purchase prime beachfront property. It's almost like they really don't believe in actual sea level rise themselves, and just find all the demand for more power over you... useful.
Re: Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:2)
" Meanwhile, the same policy makers that want you to give up your vehicles and food and house are paying exorbitant costs to purchase prime beachfront property. It's almost like they really don't believe in actual sea level rise themselves, "
No, it is like they are running off with all of our money, so they can afford to buy those things even though their time is limited. And also they expect to get a payout from the federal flood insurance program right before they terminate it for the rest of us. Are you
Re: (Score:2)
It seems like every year they announce that year is "on track to be the hottest year on record". How many times can they say it before people don't care any more?
It goes hand in hand with predictions on when we'll be under water.
Not sure what you mean by "we" will be underwater, but as an example prediction, the IPCC first assessment report 33 years ago predicted "20 cm rise in sea level by 2030, and 65 cm by the end of the next century." [www.ipcc.ch]
Does that count as "when we'll be underwater"?
Meanwhile, the same policy makers that want you to give up your vehicles and food and house are paying exorbitant costs to purchase prime beachfront property.
All of them more than 65 cm above sea level, so they should be good for the next 77 years at least.
Re:Boy Crying Wolf? (Score:5, Informative)
First, just because the last year was the hottest year on record doesn't mean this one can't be even hotter and be the new hottest year on record.
Second, you do know how that story ends, right? The wolf came and killed all the sheep.
Re: (Score:2)
First, just because the last year was the hottest year on record doesn't mean this one can't be even hotter and be the new hottest year on record.
In fact there have been many, many "record" years since we started measuring. There were indeed many records broken in every century going back to the last glacial period, including strings of multiple years. If the change was completely linear every year would be a new record.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of things affect the climate besides us. A good example is the el Nino la Nina cycle with all the really hot years being during el Nino cycles. Though now even the colder la Nina years are getting hot enough to break records, hit 45C here where 30+C is rare the other year. There are other similar cycles that affect the climate which is why the increase looks more like an escalator rather then a simple ramp.
As for records, most of them seem to be heat records with a scattering of cold records, where I a
Re: (Score:2)
First, just because the last year was the hottest year on record doesn't mean this one can't be even hotter and be the new hottest year on record.
Second, you do know how that story ends, right? The wolf came and killed all the sheep.
That's part of why I chose this particular story. The boy cried wolf so many times that the villagers began to ignore him, and no one came to help when the wolf actually showed up. I heard about possible global cooling in the 1970s, but global warming has been touted since the 1980s. With so many failed doomsday predictions, people are getting tired of the message. One day Doomsday will come.
Re: (Score:2)
The thing is that these cries over the wolf aren't just some prank. Sometimes it looked like the wolf actually showed up, and sometimes it actually did and we managed to get rid of it (e.g. with the CFCs and the ozone layer).
You think that ignoring it is the sensible thing to do? A smart wolf would just wait 'til you do and strike when you finally stop caring.
Jesus Fucking Christ (Score:5, Insightful)
Scientists: Climate change is causing rising temperatures!
NO SHIT SHERLOCK! We're hitting new records every here because temperatures are rising!!!! Sorry to shout... no, I'm not. I'm really not. I mean... all I can say is: "Pray thee Mr Babbage, if I put the wrong figures in will the right ones come out?"...
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah, so perhaps at long last you are now seeing the glaring evidence that the Russian mafia is manipulating the conversations here with sock-puppet moderation.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you saying that fossil fuel companies are part of the Russian Mafia?
Russia is the third-largest producer of oil worldwide, accounting for over 12 percent of global crude oil production [statista.com]
OK, I guess that checks out
Honestly I think we do have bots (Score:2)
I mean, remember when "slashdotting" was a thing?
Re: (Score:2)
Different web, different place. I miss the old /. with the longass threads of discussion and some well-considered answers that would go on for a page or two. Usually learned something, too, even if it was a perspective I didn't agree with.
We're all still on a list, yes. The intertubes don't forgive or forget. .....slashdotting: back in, eh, 97-98, one of my friends had a little site on the school's server. He gets a call from the admin screaming one day, saying that the traffic had gone up something like 10
Re: (Score:2)
Considering how cold it gets in Russia, they actually have a good reason to be pro climate change. Except for that whole throwing the rest of the world into turmoil thing, but hey, it's Russia - they don't think that far ahead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:[explicatives removed] (Score:2)
who in the name of all that's holy and some of which ain't modded this up?
Take a look at the moderation percentages again. 50% troll (how was this a troll???), 30% insightful, 20% overrated. It was a quip about if people keep hearing doom and gloom, soon that becomes the new normal and don't pay attention anymore. Like the story, the villagers didn't believe the boy's cry of "wolf" even when the wolf really came.
Re: (Score:2)
You should present your far more convincing rectally-derived explanation for the data.
Don't worry, 2023 won't be the hottest year on record for long. The current El Nino will probably last into 2024, so it'll be displaced next year.
Re:More bullcrap from the woketard department! (Score:5, Insightful)
I only have about 30 years left and have no kids, so I won't need that planet much longer and can trash it.
What's your excuse?
Re: (Score:3)
username checks out, lol
Re: (Score:2)
What's your excuse?
I'm gonna go with the irony of that, residing in Florida, the bulk of my electrical usage actually goes towards artificially keeping my home from becoming an indoor swamp. Which of course, contributes to carbon emissions that in turn make Florida even more hot and swampy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Second of all, the "little ice age" was a localized phenomenon. The global average during this period changed, over intervals measured in centuries, less than the amount that earth's average is currently soaring every 10-20 years. Even in Europe and North America where the LIA was focused, the depth of the drop was equivalent to... less than Earth has already warmed relative to the average over the last 2000 years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Once more into the breach (Score:5, Insightful)
"This is objectively false."
[citation needed]
Re: (Score:3)
"This is objectively false."
[citation needed]
Even without official data, I'll note that here it is, mid November, and the temperature hasn't gone below 32 F. That was not the norm in Pennsylvania, when you might expect a killing freeze in Early October. Anecdote? You betchya.
But it has been warming for many years now, so it's a large collection of anecdotes.early 90's we got some significant snow, but in the 30 years since, it's tapered off bigly. And since my snowblower metric has had me going from several tanks of fuel every winter, to a couple,
Re: (Score:2)
Kids in places that it now rarely snows: ask your grandpappy how much it used to snow here. 100%, the answer will be that it used to snow a LOT more.
Re: (Score:2)
^^^ This ^^^
Kids in places that it now rarely snows: ask your grandpappy how much it used to snow here. 100%, the answer will be that it used to snow a LOT more.
One of the things I was wrong about re global warming - I thought that the so called "snow belt" would move north to be in our area in PA. It didn't. We somehow skipped that. I think the snow belt more or less disappeared.
Our winters recently have a fair amount of rain, the occasional ice storm, and an occasional cold dip into the single digits - once or twice a winter. But most daylight times are above freezing.
Contrast that with a few years in the 1970's where it didn't get above freezing for about a
Re: (Score:3)
A slightly longer growing season is nice, but it seems to have bought an increase in tropical cyclones which is anything but nice.
I'm lucky in that I live in a fairly benign climate but there are places on the planet where survival is a bit tenuous and many of those places are going to be uninhabitable in the very ne
Re: (Score:2)
My anecdote is that I've been growing tomatoes in my garden for 25 years, and can plant them out 6 weeks earlier now than I ever could 25 years ago due to the complete lack of winter frosts.
A slightly longer growing season is nice, but it seems to have bought an increase in tropical cyclones which is anything but nice.
And probably some pests as well. Ticks, for which for most of my life, I never picked one up while spending a lot of time hiking and fishing, and I guess were kept in check by the winter temps, are now a year long problem. I even managed to catch Lyme Disease - you don't want Lyme disease. Sometimes it does nothing, other times it'll eat your joints big time.
I'm lucky in that I live in a fairly benign climate but there are places on the planet where survival is a bit tenuous and many of those places are going to be uninhabitable in the very near future. I wonder how India is going to react when 190 million Bangladeshis arrive looking for a dry place to live?
Exactly. And there, you hit on the really destabilizing problem with AGW. There are changes in weather. While the overall amount of precipitation will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And yet we've had near zero F temperatures a couple of times where I am.
Where are you at? Because the average global temperature doesn't men that there won't be cold places.
Reminds me of a few years back, every time it snowed her in PA, some denier would spout their mantra "So much for Global warming!"
You deniers have one big problem. You cannot explain how the energy retention characteristics of an atmosphere are increased or decreased by their gaseous composition. This has been proven for centuries now, every day by greenhouses, and grade school science fairs and planet
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When I was a kid, Halloween usually had a foot of snow on the ground as an expected probability. This year it was 60F after dark.
Wen I was a kid, and the trick part of halloween was more common, we had old frostbitten rotten tomatoes to throw, Leaves were all off the trees, and we usually wore a winter jacket under our costumes. There were always killing frosts before Halloween.
Triple digits used to be a rare occurrence that were talked about for a couple weeks after. Now it is just the norm.
I have a friend that lives in Phoenix. It's always been a hot place, but the triple digit season is now a ridiculous amount of the year. He and his wife travel a lot. They go to places that aren't so hellish. At least people in upper Alaska can bundle up and
Re: (Score:2)
Anecdotally, its actually getting colder where I live, so whats your point?
Weather is unstable at the moment. I used to travel to Florida every winter, so I have weather for those places on my phone. It is not unusual for my Pennsylvania weather to be warmer than many of those places during their cold months for the past couple of years. 55-60 degree weather in Middle of PA, while maybe mid 40's in Homosassa springs FL
Where do you live that the average temperature is going down? I love anomalies, and I can add that as an example.
Re: (Score:2)
Where do you live that the average temperature is going down?
nootsville
Careful, the CIA is tracking you with the Major league baseball's spy satellites.
Um... how so? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Obviously not. But some people have managed to get even deeper in denial and are now really excellent at looking away. Impressive feat, but not in a good way. Reminds me of the COVID deniers that while in the last stages of dying from it claimed COVID does not exists. Flat earthers are also hot candidates for competition.
What was that quote? Ah, yes:
"Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -- probably incorrectly attributed to A. Einstein.
It is also s
Re: (Score:2)
No. It's so bot swarms of ideological cultists can't bot swarm an account and bottom our their Karma to the point where they can't ever post again.
BOO FUCKING HOO
I've been dealing with the bot swarms of ignorant dumbfucks who mod me down any time I say anything negative about capitalism or religion for years and years. And I'm still standing. If I can do it then you should be able to do it, especially since people like you think you're so much smarter than people like me. If you're so fucking smart, why do you have to hide? Why aren't you better at playing the game that you want to make everything into, where the facts are all made up?
Because fuck you know-nothing social justice cock garglers.
You're a coward,
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Dr. Friederike Otto, a climate scientist from Imperial College London, said it is important to highlight that the October heat record should not be seen as “another big number that is statistically interesting.”
She added, “Within this year, extreme heatwaves and droughts made much worse by these extreme temperatures have caused thousands of deaths, people losing their livelihoods, being displaced etc.”
Here are Dr Otto's credentials [imperial.ac.uk]
Summary
Friederike (Fredi) is a Senior Lecturer in Cli
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Every accusation is, of course, a confession... in reality, doctors whose patients died of covid symptoms were, if they were in the sort of places you'd think, harassed, terrorized and even sued by lunatics claiming it was literally anything else. 'Cause once the maga cult bought into the "iTs jUsT a CoLd" lie, like every other clearly incorrect idea they have, they would burn their own houses down with th
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
Donald Trump says it isn't true. That's good enough for me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The right to pollute
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Fossil fuel plants kill birds an at extreme higher rate than windmills per KW/h.
Generally 90% of the people arguing about how many birds windmills kill are arguing in bad faith and don't care about birds at all (or have done zero research).
https://www.usnews.com/news/bl... [usnews.com]
Also bird deaths from any of these absolutely pale in comparison to cats. Build windmills and neuter your pets.
Re: (Score:2)
Also bird deaths from any of these absolutely pale in comparison to cats.
Cats don't kill eagles and condors, windmills do.
Build windmills and neuter your pets.
Sure, that is good advice but not for the reasons given.
Re: (Score:2)
You make good points about how certain species of bird get hit by windmills, but they'd still be affected by coal/gas power. It's just that the sight of birds bludgeoned to death under a windmill is more striking than some unhatched eggs or birds that died early due to respiratory problems.
Uhh, but your signature "We solved global warming, now stop scaring everyone's kids to death over it." really makes me wonder what your POV is as we're literally posting about a story that this is the world's hottest year
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
And never about having a long-term future. The next quarter is where it is at! 50 years from now? Who cares.
The one real problem the human race has is understanding what is going on. So far that only ever exterminated parts of it. What we currently see is probably the final test for this thing called "survivorship bias".
Re: (Score:1)
You misspelled 'whine'.