US To Award Samsung Up To $6.6 Billion Chip Subsidy For Texas Expansion (reuters.com) 48
The Biden administration plans to announce it is awarding more than $6 billion to South Korea's Samsung next week to expand its chip output in Taylor, Texas, as it seeks to ramp up chipmaking in the U.S., Reuters reported Tuesday, citing sources. From the report: The subsidy, which will be unveiled by Commerce Department Secretary Gina Raimondo, will go toward construction of four facilities in Taylor, including one $17 billion chipmaking plant that Samsung announced in 2021, another factory, an advanced packaging facility and a research and development center, one of the sources said.
It will also include an investment in another undisclosed location, the source said, adding that Samsung will more than double its U.S. investment to over $44 billion as part of the deal. One of the sources said it would be the third largest of the program, just behind Taiwan's TSMC, which was awarded $6.6 billion on Monday and agreed to expand its investment by $25 billion to $65 billion and to add a third Arizona factory by 2030.
It will also include an investment in another undisclosed location, the source said, adding that Samsung will more than double its U.S. investment to over $44 billion as part of the deal. One of the sources said it would be the third largest of the program, just behind Taiwan's TSMC, which was awarded $6.6 billion on Monday and agreed to expand its investment by $25 billion to $65 billion and to add a third Arizona factory by 2030.
'Murica (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I expect it's an attempt to buy votes, and I don't understand why the Democrats haven't figured out yet that doesn't work with these voters - they'll take the money, complain about the fact that you spent it on them, and then vote for the politician who promises to take it away again.
And it's Texas, a state that is actively persecuting over half its own population. You're not going to get top-tier people there... the top-tier people are leaving because they have the means and don't like the politics. The
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
And it's Texas, a state that is actively persecuting over half its own population.
You know you're allowed to form your own, nuanced, opinion on the issue right? You don't have to repeat the binary, hyperbolic garbage you're fed?
You're not going to get top-tier people there... the top-tier people are leaving because they have the means and don't like the politics. The state has been having a net population gain, but it's people drawn to the "Ya'll Quaida" politics. The young, educated, and politically more liberal people are leaving when they have the means.
Tell me you don't know Austin exists without telling me you don't know Austin exists.
Re: (Score:2)
Come on, we all know it's only a matter of time before Austin breaks away and forms the Texas People's Republic [i.redd.it] ;)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
>You don't have to repeat the binary, hyperbolic garbage you're fed?
Oh... so no problems with abortion rights in Texas, then. Phew.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck you and the disingenuous horse you rode in on.
Re:'Murica (Score:5, Interesting)
And yet, Abbott hasn't said a single word about all the companies he's investigated for hiring those illegals, or all the fines he's laid out, or those who have been arrested. All the home builders, construction firms, golf course, hotels, restaurants, landscapers, grocery stores, meat processing plants, farms, orchards, and everyone else who whines and bitches about illegals, yet willingly and knowingly hires them.
When Abbott starts advertising how many companies have been fined and the owners arrested for hiring illegals, let us know. Until then, it's all talk.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, some Americans can speak Spanish like a native, some Americans born in the U.S. do. As someone in Texas, it's most likely not American's doing that work, and seeming to ONLY speak Spanish. I consider myself on the more liberal side, and yes there is a lot of "hate" speech about immigration that should be directed elsewhere, but I honestly don't know how it affects American's pay, benefits, or ability to get a job. I haven't seen anyone point to any studies, that I recall. It would be lower paying jobs,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You’re referring to the illegal immigrants who entered a country illegally through a state that was harassed relentlessly for wanting to actually define and protect a border (otherwise known as that shit EVERY other country enforces). I’ve heard some bullshit verbiage used to dance around the illegal immigrant problem, but yours certainly takes the cake. What’s next, we gonna worry about the population in Texas that’s behind bars too? All those poor poor murderers and rapists.
Ronald Reagan had an interesting take on this matter. I always like to use him as a reference when talking modern republican politics.
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally,"
Looks like he'd he called a woke libtard.
Re: (Score:1)
You’re referring to the illegal immigrants who entered a country illegally through a state that was harassed relentlessly for wanting to actually define and protect a border (otherwise known as that shit EVERY other country enforces). I’ve heard some bullshit verbiage used to dance around the illegal immigrant problem, but yours certainly takes the cake. What’s next, we gonna worry about the population in Texas that’s behind bars too? All those poor poor murderers and rapists.
Ronald Reagan had an interesting take on this matter. I always like to use him as a reference when talking modern republican politics.
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally,"
Looks like he'd he called a woke libtard.
Funny how leftists are always 100% "no human is illegal" when talking about some brown person jumping Mexican border wall and stealing some redneck's job, but become 100% hardcore racists when talking about different-shade-of-brown person, landing at Los Angeles airport, H1B visa in hand, and heading for Silicon Valley to "steal" some hipster techie job. *Those* people need to be booted immediately. For their own good of course. Funny that.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny how leftists are always 100% "no human is illegal" when talking about some brown person jumping Mexican border wall and stealing some redneck's job, but become 100% hardcore racists when talking about different-shade-of-brown person, landing at Los Angeles airport, H1B visa in hand, and heading for Silicon Valley to "steal" some hipster techie job. *Those* people need to be booted immediately. For their own good of course. Funny that.
Funny how some people think that every job that an immigrant took is one that everyone wanted and the pay is what everyone will accept. How many of those rednecks actually want to work long hours outside for little pay? I would guess very few because no one is stopping them from showing up at a farm to pick crops. The best example of how flawed this line of thinking is Brexit.
One of the core reasons of Brexit was to control the borders so foreign (but legal) labor would be reduced. However for some industri
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So are you agreeing with me that Mexican illegals are not stealing redneck jobs?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
harassed relentlessly for wanting to actually define and protect a border
No, that's not what happened at all.
They were harassed a normal amount for wanting to deploy the military and allow civilians to shoot border-crossers on sight. Unarmed civilian border-crossers fleeing bad conditions, whom they don't know anything about, without any due process.
They were harassed (and still are, and still should be) for advocating for shooting immigrants just because they're crossing an imaginary line while at the same time outlawing public open carry because they finally realized th
Re: (Score:3)
It's a national security issue to increase domestic production of advanced chips, of course.
The inverse applies as well - China is likewise dumping money on trying to develop advanced chip fabs in-country, because *their* national security is threatened by outside entities controlling supplies of advanced chips.
Taiwan being a particularly key player globally.
Re: (Score:3)
Being like a Taiwanese just ain't the 'Murican way. Just look at the differences in public responses & social responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic; the two countries couldn't have been more different.
Re: (Score:2)
>Taiwan is how it is today because of decades of shrewd, well-informed leaders, excellent education, social values, etc.. The USA can't just import that
Well, Canada often sends its best down to the US, chasing that green paper that doesn't flow so well here.
But forget us. The US has plenty of places where it already has a sufficiently educated population and they live near the required resources to support these factories. And the majority of the consumers of those factories' output. They just don't ha
Re: (Score:2)
Think of it as an insurance policy for when China decides to go all in on Taiwan.
Re: (Score:1)
Then perhaps all those businesses we taxpayers keep endlessly propping up should be allowed to go bust.
But I don't expect you to get that.
Re: (Score:1)
and giving out money to welfare queens as a reward for staying unemployed. Then perhaps all those businesses we taxpayers keep endlessly propping up should be allowed to go bust. But I don't expect you to get that.
Ah yes, nice goalpost shift. Yes we should. Though your Dear Leader is just as unlikely to do that as anyone else. Now, back to the original topic?
Re: (Score:2)
Ah yes, nice goalpost shift. Yes we should. Though your Dear Leader is just as unlikely to do that as anyone else. Now, back to the original topic?
This IS the original topic. We give far more money to the wealthy than we do to the poor.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah yes, nice goalpost shift. Yes we should. Though your Dear Leader is just as unlikely to do that as anyone else. Now, back to the original topic?
This IS the original topic. We give far more money to the wealthy than we do to the poor.
If you have a plan to restart chip production in the US by increasing funding for welfare queens, I'm all ears.
Re: (Score:2)
If you have a plan to restart chip production in the US by increasing funding for welfare queens, I'm all ears.
Tariffs on products made with slave labor. Of course, we'd have to place them on many goods from our own country, but that's something we should be doing. From now on, we will call you "ears".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why should I try again? I named not only a solution, but what is reasonably the solution.
Re: It's amazing (Score:2)
I won't vote for him for other, more important reasons, like preserving what whisper of democracy we have.
Re: (Score:2)
Especially if you own a massive farm. https://www.texasobserver.org/... [texasobserver.org]
Money well spent (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Government giveaways, whether they're to corporations or "the poor and middle class", cause inflation, and inflation hurts the poor the most [compassion.com].
Re: (Score:2)
The US Government has a spending problem that it refuses to acknowledge.
Their fix, instead of getting their spending under control, is to simply find more ways to get more tax dollars out of all of us.
It's been this way since day one, irregardless of Team Red of Team Blue. They work together to get us to fight amongst each
other so they can continue doing what they've always done.
While we're too busy arguing over stupid shit, they're laughing all the way to the bank.
Show me any member of Congress who has be
Re: (Score:2)
Show me any member of Congress who has been there for more than ten years who ISN'T a multi-millionaire. :|
Then tell me how it's done legally on their salary.
It's done legally because they make the laws. It's not done ethically.
More Corporate subsidies (Score:1)
Really the sad part (Score:2)
Fuck Texas (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)