Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Youtube

The Majority of Gen Z Describe Themselves as Video Content Creators (washingtonpost.com) 31

Posted by msmash from the times,-they-are-a-changin' dept.
For the first two decades of the social internet, lurkers ruled. Among Gen Z, they're in the minority, according to survey data from YouTube. From a report: Tech industry insiders used to cite a rule of thumb stating that only one in ten of an online community's users generally post new content, with the masses logging on only to consume images, video or other updates. Now younger generations are flipping that divide, a survey by the video platform said. YouTube found that 65 percent of Gen Z, which it defined as people between the ages of 14 and 24, describe themselves as video content creators -- making lurkers a minority.

The finding came from responses from 350 members of Gen Z in the U.S., out of a wider survey that asked thousands of people about how they spend time online, including whether they consider themselves video creators. YouTube did the survey in partnership with research firm SmithGeiger, as part of its annual report on trends on the platform. YouTube's report says that after watching videos online, many members of Gen Z respond with videos of their own, uploading their own commentary, reaction videos, deep dives into content posted by others and more. This kind of interaction often develops in response to videos on pop culture topics such as "RuPaul's Drag Race" or the Fallout video game series. Fan-created content can win more watch time than the original source material, the report says.

The Majority of Gen Z Describe Themselves as Video Content Creators More | Reply

The Majority of Gen Z Describe Themselves as Video Content Creators

Comments Filter:

  • like the local band scene (Score:4, Interesting)

    by crgrace ( 220738 ) on Friday June 28, 2024 @02:53PM (#64585885)

    It's like the local band scene when I was still playing back in the 2000s. There were a lot of shows where 80% of the audience were people in other bands in a similar genre.

    Cat chasing its own tail.

    • I was about to make a similar comment. I remember going out drinking with friends and looking for a bar that hadn't yet reached capacity. We got to a bar that was "full" but had room yet for us. The guy at the door checking ID and taking admission made a big deal about how many bands were going to play that night. As the night ran on I realized that most of the people in the bar were those that had appeared on stage. All of the bands were forgettable. All I really remember is that the worst bands were

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by dimko ( 1166489 )
      But in reality they are... NPC...

    • Nailed it.

      The "I'm a Syndrome" never took over an entire generation before. Shit's gonna decline pretty fast, now.

      It's too bad civilization is circling the drain. Glad I won't see what it'll be like in 20 years.

      You younger people are really screwed.

  • If everybody does it (Score:3)

    by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Friday June 28, 2024 @02:53PM (#64585889)

    I guess the real creative types are the ones that don't "create content".

    • i create content every morining. though i just look at it and the flush it rather than sharing it.

      (may any gen z please indulge, no offense, i love that they use tech to communicate, it's just that the term "content creator" is so borderline retarded that i just felt like throwing a pun. i had to. ok, now ... flushhhhhhh)

  • This brings to mind a speech from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead:

    We're actors... We pledged our identities, secure in the conventions of our trade; that someone
    would be watching. And than, gradually, no one was. We were caught, high and dry. It was not until the
    murder's long soliloquy that we were able to look around; frozen we were in the profil, our eyes searched you out,
    first confidently, then hesitantly, then desperately as each patch of turf, each log, each exposed corned in
    every direction proved uninhabited, and all the while the murderous King addressed the horizon with his dreary
    interminable guilt... Our heads began to move, wary as lizards, the corpse of unsullied Rosalinda peeped through
    his fingers, and the King faltered. Even then, habit and a stubborn trust that our audience spied upon us from
    behind the nearest bush, forced our bodies to blunder on long after they had emptied of meaning, until like
    runaway carts they dragged to a halt. No one came forward. No one shouted at us. The silence was unbreakable, it
    imposed itself upon us; it was obscene.

  • The idea that 1 in 10 people have something worth saying, online or not, is ludicrous. We're drowning in the generated noise of the irrelevant and the uninteresting.

    I suppose that also includes me. I accept the label.

    • The idea that 1 in 10 people have something worth saying, online or not, is ludicrous. We're drowning in the generated noise of the irrelevant and the uninteresting.

      I suppose that also includes me. I accept the label.

      The difference between us and them is that we know we're ultimately irrelevant and uninteresting. They don't realize that they are, and if they did they wouldn't admit it even to themselves because it's a core component of their identities.

    • Even worse is that their chosen medium is video. For most things, I prefer text: easier to search and random access.

      I read programming blog sites and unfortunately most people can't write well either. (Shocker, I know.)

  • 99% of them have an audience of one. I have a feeling the vast majority of "content creators" might have a handful of subscribers, but mostly are doing it for themselves with hopes to someday go viral. lol
  • Identified as 'Big Money Hustlas' and drank Faygo. Where was the news about that? The sad part is that they still had a 100% better chance of becoming well-adjusted contributing adults than whatever society is currently doing to kids.

  • I doubt it (Score:3)

    by alta ( 1263 ) on Friday June 28, 2024 @04:02PM (#64586105) Homepage Journal

    Let me guess. This was an online survey. Using online tools. From people they, wait for it, found online...

    Prove to me you have a good population that includes people who are low income, people who work on farms, throw in a few Amish. And I'm assuming they're only talking about the US. Otherwise, if you're expanding this to be world wide, I REALLY doubt it's accuracy.

  • Not all content is created equal (Score:3)

    by Smonster ( 2884001 ) on Friday June 28, 2024 @04:09PM (#64586135)
    Anyone can upload a video to a website, but the majority of these folks are content creators the same way someone who practices guitar a few times every month is a musician. Technically true. But still...... Though I will say this, it is far better to create that just consume. Even if most of the creating does nothing more of greater value than bring the creator joy.

  • Remember Geocities?

    This is the same sense in which "everybody" is now a video creator. Your phone has a little button on it to record video. If you can push that, you're a video creator. It doesn't mean that it's worth watching.

  • Not a great signal. (Score:3)

    by Eunomion ( 8640039 ) on Friday June 28, 2024 @07:40PM (#64586637)
    It means they see online content creation as the main mode of self-expression, if not the only one. So they're basically being pimped by social media.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If you can, help others. If you can't, at least don't hurt others." -- the Dalai Lama

Close