Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Space

SpaceX Announces First Human Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles (arstechnica.com) 31

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: SpaceX will fly the first-ever human spaceflight over the Earth's poles, possibly before the end of this year, the company announced Monday. The private Crew Dragon mission will be led by a Chinese-born cryptocurrency entrepreneur named Chun Wang, and he will be joined by a polar explorer, a roboticist, and a filmmaker whom he has befriended in recent years. The "Fram2" mission, named after the Norwegian research ship Fram, will launch into a polar corridor from SpaceX's launch facilities in Florida and fly directly over the north and south poles. The three-to-five day mission is being timed to fly over Antarctica near the summer solstice in the Southern Hemisphere, to afford maximum lighting.

The four-person crew will fly, fittingly, aboard Crew Dragon Endurance, which is named after Ernest Shackleton's famous ship that was trapped in the Antarctic ice and eventually sunk there about a century ago. The spacecraft will be fitted with a cupola for both photography and filming. This will be SpaceX's third free-flying mission aboard Crew Dragon, following the Inspiration4 mission funded and commanded by US entrepreneur Jared Isaacman in 2021, and his forthcoming Polaris Dawn mission which may launch later this month. In an interview, Wang said he modeled the Fram2 mission's crew and public outreach programs on the template established by Isaacman.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SpaceX Announces First Human Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles

Comments Filter:
  • Why don't they stop off and rescue the astronauts stuck in the boeing capsule until next year?

    • by Gonoff ( 88518 )
      Possibly because a circumpolar orbit is a long way from the ISS one
    • If nobody did that by now it must be completely useless to do other than as a first.
      What other firsts will they hype next?

      • First time not panicking about "stranded" astronauts that want to be there
      • There's plenty of stuff in polar orbit - most of it spy satellites. Consider - if you want to image every point on the surface of the Earth, you put a satellite in polar orbit with a period != 1 day (shorter period is better, the ISS has a period ~90 minutes, I think?). If your scan width and orbital period are worked out right, you get one pass over the entire planet every twelve hours - but you have to get used to dealing with your satellite in batch mode. It's harder to maintain constant communication

  • What will the flat earthers do then?
  • "First Human Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles"

    Is that a fact?

    https://transportationhistory.... [transporta...istory.org]

    https://www.history.com/this-d... [history.com]

    Perhaps they meant to say "First Human Space Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles"

  • SpaceX Announces First Human Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles

    Other than Poland, which countries have a significant numbers of Poles?

    • by ls671 ( 1122017 )

      SpaceX Announces First Human Mission To Ever Fly Over the Planet's Poles

      Other than Poland, which countries have a significant numbers of Poles?

      I think none but planet Earth has two poles which commands a plural for "Poles". An orbit that flies over one should logically fly over the other as well.

  • SpaceX will fly the first-ever human spaceflight over the Earth's poles, possibly before the end of this year

    well, you can put your house on it NOT launching this year, thats for sure. all those retards that believed we'd be on the moon by now with not a shadow of skepticism are awfully quiet on the matter ten years later. nobody believe me then, and I wish id have put a bet on it

  • I thought polar orbits were to be avoided for humans. They will get nice shots of aurorae but at what cost?

  • They can go and make low angle lithographs to tell us the saga of the ice wall. Then claim it's not really the ice wall because their guidance system was fake and fooled them into thinking they were at the ice wall to hide the real ice wall.

  • Kill 'em in the ocean, kill 'em in space. Just keep knocking them off one by one in new and interesting ways.
  • I hope I'm wrong, but this flight really seems like its destined to go poorly, for a thousand different reasons. I really am getting the vibes all the pros were saying they felt BEFORE the Titanic sub failed. They all knew it was a bad idea and had less than perfectly executed engineering and construction.

    • The hardware for this flight is supplied by SpaceX, who have safely transported multiple crews already, and who are currently operating the most reliable rocket in history. They couldn't be farther from the Titan clusterfuck if they tried.

    • by necro81 ( 917438 )

      I hope I'm wrong, but this flight really seems like its destined to go poorly, for a thousand different reasons. I really am getting the vibes all the pros were saying they felt BEFORE the Titanic sub failed.

      A key difference is that SpaceX Dragon is an established design: it has brought crews to/from the ISS a dozen times. (The uncrewed Dragon Cargo vessel, very similar in design and operation, has flown >20 times.) This is not some shitcan cobbled together in a hangar, with a radically different des

      • I guess the vibes are related to the multiple public mishaps SpaceX has had lately and Musk's tendencies to overpromise.

        If you watched any of the news when the sub imploded, nearly every sub expert that knew about it (pre failure) said it was a bad idea and destined to fail sooner than later. I'm no expert, but I generally believe experts in a field when they have a consensus. From your description "shitcan cobbled together in a hangar, with a radically different design to other capsules", It sounds like yo

  • ... maximum lighting.

    I think maximum lighting would be during the Antarctic summer, when it's never dark. I suspect they mean an efficient quantity of daylight, since those endless summer days are a few months distant.

    Also, certain polar orbits result in the spaceship never having 'night-time'. Do they need night-time on the ship and the landmass, to calculate when lighting is optimal for their cameras?

Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger

Working...