Delhi Trudges Through Another Air Pollution Nightmare With No Answers (nytimes.com) 71
An anonymous reader shares a report: On Tuesday morning, the air quality in India's capital under a widely used index stood at 485. While that is almost five times the threshold for healthy breathing, it felt like a relief: The day before, the reading had shot up to 1,785. Infinitesimal air particles were still clogging lungs and arteries, but it was possible to see sunlight again, and to smell things.
[...] Every year this suffocating smog accompanies the drop in temperatures as the plains of north India shed their unbearable heat for wintertime cool. And like clockwork, political leaders roll out emergency measures intended to quit making the problem worse. Yet India seems powerless to reduce the effects of this public health catastrophe, as its politicians stay busy trading blame and trying to outmaneuver one another in legal battles.
The haze was so shocking this week that Delhi's chief minister, Atishi, who goes by one name, declared it a "medical emergency" endangering the lives of children and older people. The Supreme Court, whose members also live in the capital, chided the national government for responding too slowly and ordered special measures: halting construction work and blocking some vehicles from the roads. Schools were closed indefinitely to protect students.
[...] Every year this suffocating smog accompanies the drop in temperatures as the plains of north India shed their unbearable heat for wintertime cool. And like clockwork, political leaders roll out emergency measures intended to quit making the problem worse. Yet India seems powerless to reduce the effects of this public health catastrophe, as its politicians stay busy trading blame and trying to outmaneuver one another in legal battles.
The haze was so shocking this week that Delhi's chief minister, Atishi, who goes by one name, declared it a "medical emergency" endangering the lives of children and older people. The Supreme Court, whose members also live in the capital, chided the national government for responding too slowly and ordered special measures: halting construction work and blocking some vehicles from the roads. Schools were closed indefinitely to protect students.
Stop burning stuff then (Score:2)
Re:Stop burning stuff then (Score:5, Informative)
A significant source is burning fields to clear stubble in Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, but other sources of airborne particulates [indiatimes.com] contribute, too.
Your top line, however, is correct: ultimately: stop burning stuff, then.
Re: (Score:1)
So "old-fashion pollution" doesnt cause global warming? Burning crops only effects air quality?
I don't think you understand the issue of global warming like you seem to think you do.
Re:Stop burning stuff then (Score:5, Insightful)
So "old-fashion pollution" doesnt cause global warming?
This is particulate pollution. Particulates can be either warming or cooling, depending on the scattering albedo, but low level particulate pollution like this doesn't really have a significant climate impact, no.
Burning crops only effects air quality?
The article we're discussing is about air quality.
In addition to the particulates being discussed here, which causes the local pollution discussed here, burning fields releases carbon dioxide which of course does have greenhouse effect identical to any other carbon dioxide released. But that's not what is being discussed. It's also so tiny a portion of the carbon dioxide emitted worldwide (about 0.00001%) that you could not detect the greenhouse effect. If you want to complain about India's contribution to the greenhouse effect, complaing about their coal-fired power plants, the emissions from which dwarf the seasonal burning.
I don't think you understand the issue of global warming like you seem to think you do.
And I don't think you understand the issue of global warming at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Sure, a coal plant will contribute to smog but this is a smog particular to the season and the power plants are there the whole year.
What every year is special in this season is the burning of stubble, it is added to the already existing pollution resulting in grave smog.
Global warming is a global phenomena mainly caused by CO2 and methane, not local smog.
Politicians worth their keep would stop the burning of stubble and clean up the coal plants.
Re: (Score:1)
Sure, a coal plant will contribute to smog but this is a smog particular to the season and the power plants are there the whole year.
Their air quality is shit year round, it's just particularly bad this time of year.
https://www.iqair.com/us/india... [iqair.com]
"For a city to be in the unhealthy bracket as a year-round average, it is an indicator that there are significant health hazards from the air quality."
Global warming is a global phenomena mainly caused by CO2 and methane, not local smog.
Politicians worth their keep would stop the burning of stubble and clean up the coal plants.
I thought this was clearly spelled out in my last post but I'll speak more plainly here. The things that cause local smog are the same things that contribute to global warming.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly my point. Coal power plants. Both. Cars. Both. All the major sources are the same.
Re: (Score:2)
> Politicians worth their keep would stop the burning of stubble and clean up the coal plants.
They tried that already; One of the demands of that massive 2020 farmers protest was being allowed to burn stubble, as well as the release of farmers arrested for burning it. If you have to arrest people for it, I don't see them stopping it anytime soon.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet the conversation in this thread has always been about climate change. Try to keep up.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps we could fill the atmosphere with smart nanoparticles with programmable clumpiness/affinity to create cool-/hot-spots as needed.
Re: (Score:2)
But politicians claim that global warming is a hoax. All those billionaires can't all be wrong can they?
Re: (Score:2)
The real problem climate deniers are the folks who think we can fix the problem without inconveniencing them. They can add an electric car to the road and air condition their huge house with a heat pump and the problem will be solved. Oh, and buy carbon offsets when they fly off on vacation because that will magically eliminate the emissions from the plane. Of course a lot of the folks who deny climate change is happening at all are really just opposed to having to do anything about it. But they are less d
Re: (Score:2)
This must be incorrect as TFS -title states there are NO answers.
It's amazing (Score:2)
The sky is literally blocked out with pollution, it is impossible to breathe normally, and they're still really only taking last minute knee-jerk action with very short term partial effects.
Re:It's amazing (Score:5, Funny)
So...did anyone call the support number about this?
Re: It's amazing (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
>if y'all can do th'needful I'd be mighty obliged
Re: (Score:3)
I tried, but I just received a recorded message that the office was closed because of an air pollution emergency.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm contracting (remote work) with an Indian outfit and today their QHSE dept. send out a mail advising all on ways to survive the pollution.
They expect over the next weeks it could become worse...
Re: (Score:2)
Refuse to learn (Score:2)
Re:Refuse to learn (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is not just fossil fuels. Most of the pollution is coming from burning fields to clear crop residue. This practice is already against the law but apparently authorities are turning a blind eye. Perhaps they would be smarter to assist farmers in getting the tools they need to deal with residue without burning. Here in North America, burning crop residue generally requires permitting and is not usually done anymore on a large scale. Residue is dealt with in other ways, such as baling it for animal bedding or chopping it more finely and incorporating it into the soil. Burning crop residue is literally burning nutrients that will have to be purchased later in the form of fertilizers. There are options but no doubt Indian farmers don't have the resources, equipment, and knowledge to do it. Indian government has to step up and help them make this change. Food production is in everyone's interest in every country.
Re: (Score:2)
You are absolutely right, the government needs to step it up.
https://indianexpress.com/arti... [indianexpress.com]
"[Hay baler] machines have been around for a decade, and currently around 2,000 of them operate in Punjab. Of these 1,268 are highly subsidised (50-80%) under the Centre’s Crop Residue Management (CRM) scheme."
This is where government regulation, subsidies and enforcement are necessary. It's not like nobody knows the answers, they're just not implementing them until it becomes too big of a problem to ignore.
Re: (Score:3)
Burning fields is just obviously stupid. But alternatives require having more money, even if that money is for education (plow the old stuff under and rotate the crops). India is still fundamentally a third world developing country, with vast amounts of the country stuck where Europe was in the industrial revolution.
What worked when the population was smaller becomes a massive unworkable solution when the population has grown exponentially. Even greenhouse gases would not be a big problem if we only had
Field Burning for Weed Control (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good points. Crop residue burning is a major part of their current problems. If they could stop the practice, air quality would be a lot better (but still not awesome with all the coal burning and cars and trucks). As a farmer myself I hope it didn't appear that I was pointing fingers at the farmers. I'm completely in favor of countries assisting their farmers for the benefit of everyone.
Herbicide use comes with its own set of problems as you say. Cost is obvious a major one, but the herbicide resistance
Re: (Score:2)
It's almost as though people in general have forgotten where food comes from.
It comes from McDonald's, but not Old McDonald's Farm. You may be surprised how little people know about farming.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure that is the case if you have no standards for mining, no standards for smokestack emissions and no standards for ash disposal.
You can make coal quite cheap if you push all the costs onto someone else.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Until now, most countries (despite what many want to claim), have left it up to "the market".. and that works when there are cost effective alternatives.. but when your
Re: Refuse to learn (Score:2)
Because letting them die in the streets would be a viable political tactic, you think?
I guess they will find cleaner air (Score:2)
in lunar orbit https://science.slashdot.org/s... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Would a kind of X prize for solving the problem have potential? For those who are too young to know, the X prize for affordable space launches kick started exponential growth in launch technology.
Turns out it didn't. The X-prize did result in developent of the Space Ship One [space.com], a winged rocket vehicle launched by a carrier aircraft capable of carrying two people to an altitude above the Von Karmen line, 100 km. Space Ship One in turn led to Virgin Galactic's space tourism rocket, a venture that is still going, although it hasn't made a profit yet.
But that approach to launch wasn't what kick started exponential growth in rocket technology; turned out that was when one of the several "new space" compa
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently there is a $100million X-prize for carbon removal: https://www.xprize.org/prizes/... [xprize.org]
Funded by that one guy people hate, despite all the good things he's doing.
Re: (Score:2)
*measurably unhygienic
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, I just found a way to curb my appetite and help my diet. I have NO DESIRE to eat anything after watching just one of these disgusting videos.
Re: (Score:2)
Big Pharma doesn't want you to see those videos so you will continue to buy Ozempic/Wegovy.
Re: (Score:3)
Or, you know, India just has the standard problems that come with the combination of being poor and densely populated. Don't let that slow down you insane looking all caps speak and YouTube anecdotes though. The same anecdotal videos that could have been filmed in almost any third world country.
Re: (Score:2)
Or, you know, India just has the standard problems that come with the combination of being poor and densely populated. Don't let that slow down you insane looking all caps speak and YouTube anecdotes though. The same anecdotal videos that could have been filmed in almost any third world country.
All the above mentioned problems combined with government inaction. The problem could be fixed with money and government action, but that's not happening, and essentially that absence is the real problem.
Extending this conversation further, the big difference between India and China is government power and action. India doesn't have a strongman. Modi putatively holds power, but he can't speak words into action that same way that Xi can.
Re: (Score:2)
Well to be fair China doesn't have to give a toss about what voters think where as India does. For instance, I know a big area India needs to improve in is farming in regards to a number of things (as in not just the burning to clear land problem) but they get truly immense push back any time they try to change anything https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] .
Re: (Score:2)
No, they couldn't have been. Let's look at street food in Cambodia .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] notice all the vendors don't handle food with their hands, they pick up items with tongs. Cambodia is much poorer than India. It's an issue that requires cultural reform that encourages hygienic practices. Similar to the toilet issue. Many Indians didn't see the need to have toilets when they could easily top defecate outside. It's not that toilets are super expensive, they'll spend money on other things
Re: (Score:2)
You really have no idea why anecdotes are more or less meaningless do you? Those videos of poor food handling in India could have been literally the only bad instances to ever happen in that country and that Cambodian video could have been the only good instance of food handling in Cambodia.
Now I'm not saying that's the case but watching individual instances of something doesnt really inform you of anything aside from the one specific event you are watching.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry for the second post but I decided to just check proper statics since you werent properly supporting your own argument.
Turns out India has a significantly lower rate of per capita food born illness than Cambodia https://www.who.int/data/gho/d... [who.int]
Re: (Score:1)
Near me, in Florida, is a food establishment selling "Indian Street Food".
I can't think of anything less appetizing!
Re: (Score:2)
You're also describing Europeans from a couple centuries ago. Heck, you're describing the proposed Defense Secretary nominee who claimed he didn't wash his hands for a decade. It's no more racist than describing Europeans as slovenly barbarians who smell their own farts, and not just in the IT departments.
You think this is bad? Wait til they industrialize (Score:2)
Which India claimed they are doing.
How much worse will it get if more and more factories were built to made the cheap stuff for Americans? And the coal power plants that will need to built to power those factories? And add the trucks that will be transporting the coal?
"No answers"? There are plenty of answers! (Score:2)
And the first and most important ones are the assholes they elected to be their leaders.
Disparity of Wealth (Score:2)
India's problems are caused by the same thing as most countries now - disparity of wealth. Those with enough wealth can isolate themselves from social problems. These are the people who have money that could solve those problems but they aren't seriously effected by them so they don;t. We won't deal with global warming for the same reason.