Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Bitcoin United States

SEC Chair Gary Gensler To Step Down (axios.com) 58

Gary Gensler will step down as chair of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission at noon on Inauguration Day, the agency announced on Thursday. From a report: Gensler has had an aggressive tenure, marked by controversial rulemaking and a combative approach with the cryptocurrency industry.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler To Step Down

Comments Filter:
  • "You can't work for an asshole."

  • You have an overgrown graphics card maker worth more most countries economies, plus cryptocurrencies speculating on the Trump presidency. You shouldn't trust money at all, as to the "machine" it is all worthless. So is human intelligence as the masters degree unemployment story posted earlier proves. 1929 is coming up to a 100 years now, and we are going to make a huge sequel.
  • This piece isn't even worthy of a "slownewsday" mod - it's downright offtopic. It's not a story for nerds, but rather a story for herds.

    • Just words and turds for the birds.

    • Really?

      The guy who unconstitutionally abused his power to shut down several tech companies by pretending things like earning commissions on videos was "issuing securities"? When it was really about censoring voices that YouTube deplatformed?

      The guy who drew thunderous applause when Donald told a Fintech conference he'd fire him on Day One?

      Nothing to do with a tech news site?

      Really?

      Wait, you're not at SEC, are you? Word to the wise if you are: lawyer up. Conspiracy against Rights is going to be heavily pr

  • by CEC-P ( 10248912 )
    Thinking all crypto is the devil and if you pretend it doesn't exist, it goes away while doing fuck all about rug pull scams. He literally could not have done a worse job.
    • Re:Good riddance (Score:4, Informative)

      by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Thursday November 21, 2024 @02:46PM (#64963075)

      Thinking all crypto is the devil and if you pretend it doesn't exist, it goes away while doing fuck all about rug pull scams. He literally could not have done a worse job.

      He probably could and I'm guessing the next guy will show us how.

    • I'm still confused why people think currency not backed by anything(even a government) isn't a scam...
      • This is brought to you by the minds of a currency which *is* backed by the government being the scam. The entire premise of their belief is false and fuelled by a conspiracy nurtured through a complete lack of understand of basic economics.

      • Well the value of national currencies is backed by roughly speaking the real value per year of the economic churn (exchange) in the world that uses that national currency as its unit of exchange.

        If a whole bunch of global commerce ended up getting transacted using a cryptocurrency as the mechanism and unit of exchange, I don't see why that couldn't also have intrinsic value.

        In the national currency case, also, we have to remember that a huge percentage (is it 90% o something) of the total value being used i
    • Don't worry, we'll get a new guy with the capability to do a worse job.

  • Lots of old farts here, so some of us will die before the shit hits the fan, but let's talk about that shit and that fan.

    They're going to do securities backed by crypto. Like the mortgage backed securities that caused 2008.

    If you think the 2008 crash was bad wait until they do it with pretend money and DOGE coin.

    Again, if you're dead you win. You get to vote for insane shit and stick it to the libs or whatever and zero consequences.

    But I think most of us are going to be around for the conseq
    • The labor board, if it continues to exist, will become what all other government agencies are slowly becoming, shills for the corporations and the billionaires that own them. The rest of us don't deserve a voice. If we wanted one, we should have been born rich or lucked our way into wealth like those already at the top.

    • And all this before we talk about what's going to happen to interest rates

      I like having reasonably high interest rates.

      That means money I need to be liquid that is sitting in savings accounts actually makes money there, like it did in the older days when Iw as a kid.

      I remember it was natural to have home mortgages in the 10% range back in the 70's or so....and people bought and sold houses just fine then.

      So, having some interest out there, I don't see anything wrong with that. The problem is, it was ar

      • by Sebby ( 238625 )

        I remember it was natural to have home mortgages in the 10% range back in the 70's or so....and people bought and sold houses just fine then.

        Ignoring the fact that wages have been continually suppressed since that time, such that they didn't keep pace with inflation.

        • by jbengt ( 874751 )

          Ignoring the fact that wages have been continually suppressed since that time, such that they didn't keep pace with inflation.

          Median wages have overall risen faster than inflation since the late 70s. [americanprogress.org] More specifically, the real inflation-adjusted wages went down from the mid 1970s to 1983, stayed more or less steady during the Reagan-Bush years, went up during the Clinton presidency, went down during Bush 2, back up during Obama and early Trump, swung wildly up and down for Covid, [statista.com] and started to go back u

      • I remember it was natural to have home mortgages in the 10% range back in the 70's or so.

        Close. It was in the 80s during Reagan's two terms [themortgagereports.com] and Paul Volker went apeshit to bring rates down.You will note that is the ONLY time rates were above 10% in the past 50 years (though still above 10% during the first Bush presidency, but falling).

        and people bought and sold houses just fine then.

        You mean because Wall Street wasn't buying homes and keeping them off the market to drive up prices and flippe
      • by jbengt ( 874751 )

        I remember it was natural to have home mortgages in the 10% range back in the 70's or so....and people bought and sold houses just fine then.

        That was the late 70s thru the 80s, [stlouisfed.org] and the housing market was sluggish then compared with times with lower rates.

    • by Powercntrl ( 458442 ) on Thursday November 21, 2024 @03:11PM (#64963143) Homepage

      Musk literally admitted [marketwatch.com] that Trump's (and his, to whatever capacity Musk has to exert an influence) economic policies will cause a massive market crash. This was made news well before the election, but as usual, Fox [foxbusiness.com] put a positive spin on it and left out the whole "crashing the economy" part. When the market goes to shit, people who get their news from one source will receive exactly what they voted for, and low information voters are in for a rude awakening.

      • The fact is... I may not be a big Fox news follower, but they weren't necessarily wrong about any of this.

        Despite all the economic hardships people have been complaining about suffering over the last few years? You'll note the stock market has done amazingly well. And because of that, they keep making claims of a "strong economy" too.

        We've gotten pretty far from Wall Street success equating to automatic Main Street success.

        A lot of what Musk has been going on about has been a more libertarian concept, that

  • by Tony Isaac ( 1301187 ) on Thursday November 21, 2024 @01:49PM (#64962909) Homepage

    SBF, of course! He's got crypto cred AND experience dealing with the SEC!

    • by Sebby ( 238625 )

      SBF, of course! He's got crypto cred AND experience dealing with the SEC!

      Sad thing is that this is probably meant as a joke, but has a high likelihood of something along the same lines actually becoming true.

      • That Donald will nominate someone like the #2 donor to the DNC who laundered taxpayer funds through Ukraine back to US politicians?

        Really?

        Now maybe cz, who blew the whistle on the whole illegal scheme - sure, we need someone who can uncover crimes who's been a victim of lawfare himself as an advisor.

      • That likelihood did not escape me when I wrote the post.

    • by Pascoea ( 968200 )
      I miss the days when it was easy to tell between a headline on The Onion and a headline on The New York Times.
  • Guess he chose the weaker, easier path.
    • Yeah. Though to be fair to abdicating elites, the common clay of America have decided that they want what America's worst billionaires are selling. So why should Gensler invite four years of tax audits, when the Senate will allow a horse convinced of embezzlement and sex crimes to be his successor?

      The answer is that he is getting the audits no matter what. But hopefully less elite technocrats will have a bit more spine

  • Gensler has had an aggressive tenure

    Forget the Crypto drama.

    Under Ginzlers watch, MANY stocks suffered from very aggressive (and probably illegal) short selling. All reports to the SEC appear to have gone no-where.

    This is not just Tesla but lots of other stocks as well, and the SEC appeared not to care at all...

    The SEC appeared to have been captured by powerful interests that were able to run amok, so whatever comes next cannot be worse than what we are leaving.

  • But he used to teach blockchain in MIT business school so he knows crypto better than most and he knows what he's doing. Crypto bros hate him because he understands the grift and is trying to protect Americans from the grift.

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...