America Is Stuck With an Elevator Crisis (axios.com) 244
America's aging elevators are facing significant repair delays and rising costs, creating accessibility challenges and leaving vulnerable populations stranded. Experts argue that implementing federal standards and modernizing systems could address these issues. However, fixing the nation's approximately one million elevators is "becoming a heavy lift," reports Axios. From the report: America's aging elevators are time-consuming and costly to fix. The workforce of technicians who know how to fix them is aging. And buildings with elevators in need of repair often need to wait ages for replacement parts due to arcane supply-chain issues. [...] Elevator parts shortages appear to stem largely from two issues: Parts suppliers often prioritize their biggest customers, which in this case happens to be builders in China, where the vast majority of the world's new elevators are installed, according to [Stephen Smith, executive director of the Center for Building in North America]. And parts are often no longer available for aging -- and often obsolete -- elevators, meaning they often have to be custom made.
"In some cases, the entire elevator system may need to be modernized or replaced, leading to substantial costs and potential disruptions to building operations," an advisory called The Elevator Consultants reports. A patchwork of state regulations and union rules make it laborious for building owners and contractors to comply with current standards, according to Smith. who said the U.S. would benefit from federal elevator standards. "The feds have not involved themselves in regulations of the construction industry since Reagan took an axe to it in the 1980s," Smith said. The good news is that "about 80 percent of reliability issues can be solved by replacing the doors," Joseph Bera, at VP at Schindler Elevators, tells commercial real estate publication Propmodo.
"In some cases, the entire elevator system may need to be modernized or replaced, leading to substantial costs and potential disruptions to building operations," an advisory called The Elevator Consultants reports. A patchwork of state regulations and union rules make it laborious for building owners and contractors to comply with current standards, according to Smith. who said the U.S. would benefit from federal elevator standards. "The feds have not involved themselves in regulations of the construction industry since Reagan took an axe to it in the 1980s," Smith said. The good news is that "about 80 percent of reliability issues can be solved by replacing the doors," Joseph Bera, at VP at Schindler Elevators, tells commercial real estate publication Propmodo.
jobs for folk (Score:3)
Re:jobs for folk (Score:5, Insightful)
Could be a good time to train as an elevator technician, seems like there's going to be a demand for this type of work.
I suspect there's a subcontext behind the situation: nobody wants to pay for it.
There's apparently demand. Supply would exist if the demand would pay for the supply, be it parts or labour. That there isn't supply suggests strongly to me that the demand won't pay enough for the supply to exist.
This might be like bridges. At least in North America, and especially the US, there are hundreds of bridges that were funded and built which are now unsafe due to age. Only... nobody's willing to budget to fix or replace them. Everyone just says "this is already a hundred years old... this can last five more until I'm not in office, so I don't have to raise taxes." These private buildings are likely similar. If it ain't completely broke, why raise prices to maintain it?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Could be a good time to train as an elevator technician, seems like there's going to be a demand for this type of work.
I suspect there's a subcontext behind the situation: nobody wants to pay for it.
There's apparently demand. Supply would exist if the demand would pay for the supply, be it parts or labour. That there isn't supply suggests strongly to me that the demand won't pay enough for the supply to exist.
Or Americans will have to start using the stairs.
Re:jobs for folk (Score:5, Insightful)
Or Americans will have to start using the stairs.
Not everyone CAN use stairs. There are plenty of people in wheelchairs or old enough that just walking is barely possible.
Re: (Score:3)
Ever work on the 37th floor of a building? Before elevators became cheap and reliable almost no buildings were taller than six floors, and everything above the third floor was a lot less expensive. Ever carry a week's worth of groceries up to the sixth floor? Our modern cities require elevators.
Re: (Score:2)
Could be a good time to train as an elevator technician, seems like there's going to be a demand for this type of work.
I suspect there's a subcontext behind the situation: nobody wants to pay for it.
There's apparently demand. Supply would exist if the demand would pay for the supply, be it parts or labour.
Not really. What I've seen with people under 40 is that in America, no one wants to do any kind of manual labor for a living, even if the money is good. Everyone wants to sit at a desk in air conditioned comfort, even if the paycheck is lower. COVID intensified this trend. Younger folks know they could make more money in plumbing, welding, mechanical repair, etc. They just don't want to do it.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: jobs for folk (Score:4, Interesting)
No, he's just suggesting equal representation. It's long overdue in all dirty, physically demanding jobs.
Dirty jobs (Score:5, Insightful)
Read a few articles on why women are not in a particular skilled trade and they always have points about everything except that the physical demands and injury risk as a way to justify women not being in the dirty, demanding skilled trade job.
It's just a wash list of deflections - "unwelcoming", "locker room talk", etc. - instead of the primary reasons of physically demanding, dirty, health risk, injury risk, and shortened working life.
It's in the same realm politicians claiming some policy is "for the children" to hide that it is "for the money'.
Re: (Score:2)
What, you don't like admiring moobs? :-)
Re: (Score:3)
The Social Elevator (Score:2)
The Social Elevator is blocked since so many years that it does not work any more.
Re: (Score:2)
And also an opportunity for local tool fabs, for the cost of a few jigs you could be doing a bang up business manufacturing custom elevator doors.
Re: (Score:2)
The elevator guy at the university I worked for was always super busy, he was training a replacement when I retired.
It is impressive that they put up with the overhead hit of training, In my place, the bean counters sucked up every bit of overhead, then demanded other groups be cut back to get more money for their goal of having more beancounters.
Re: (Score:2)
A very accurate analysis of institutional/corporate America since the 1980s....Also why Education and Health Care have far exceeded the overall inflation rate over the last 3-4 decades, explosive growth in administration
This letter [grandforksherald.com] does a pretty good job of explaining it.
Sigh. (Score:4, Interesting)
Who'd have thunk that a large static, expensive, integrated thing with moving parts might require repairs, maintenance, spare parts, etc.
And who'd have thunk that it might be a good idea to secure those specifications to those parts so you can get them made anywhere if you needed to.
Oh, no, whatever will we do? Buy a new one, every 20 years? Or suffer the consequences?
Re:Sigh. (Score:5, Informative)
I don't know what its like in the US but here in Australia companies like Schindler and Kone and Otis regularly modernize old elevators, often without needing to replace the entire elevator.
As someone who has seen old elevators, it just doesn't make sense to try and fix something that's 40-50 or more years old running on relay logic. Newer elevators are almost certainly going to be more energy efficient, probably deliver a better quality ride for the users and be easier for people with various disabilities (e.g. blind people) to use.
Re: (Score:2)
The reason why a lot of old elevators get kept is because they fit the style of the building they're in.
Re: (Score:2)
Except in very rare cases, the "style" of the elevator is basically what thin veneer or foil is applied to its doors and interior and how its buttons look.
Re: (Score:2)
Except in very rare cases, the "style" of the elevator is basically what thin veneer or foil is applied to its doors and interior and how its buttons look.
Well, we have freight elevators, people elevators, and all manner of hybrid lifts. Many are pretty custom built.
Re: (Score:2)
Never seen a freight elevator where style is a prime concern.
Re: (Score:2)
They keep the car, they just swap out the control board, brakes, and lift system. Nobody using the elevator can tell that it's been retrofitted except maybe the neon lamps behind the buttons have been replaced by LEDs.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know what its like in the US but here in Australia companies like Schindler and Kone and Otis regularly modernize old elevators, often without needing to replace the entire elevator.
As someone who has seen old elevators, it just doesn't make sense to try and fix something that's 40-50 or more years old running on relay logic. Newer elevators are almost certainly going to be more energy efficient, probably deliver a better quality ride for the users and be easier for people with various disabilities (e.g. blind people) to use.
I think this is just a clickbait story. I don't know about other places, but there is a pretty strict inspection process for elevators, and if they fail inspection, they are tagged off and repaired ASAP. If there is any freight, it goes nowhere until the elevator is repaired. Right here in the USA. I've never seen one disabled more than a day.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know what its like in the US but here in Australia companies like Schindler and Kone and Otis regularly modernize old elevators, often without needing to replace the entire elevator.
As someone who has seen old elevators, it just doesn't make sense to try and fix something that's 40-50 or more years old running on relay logic. Newer elevators are almost certainly going to be more energy efficient, probably deliver a better quality ride for the users and be easier for people with various disabilities (e.g. blind people) to use.
I think that Americas problem is two fold.
1. They've so many lifts (elevator), many of them in places where most countries wouldn't bother putting them as it's just 1 or 2 flights of stairs.
2. No one wants to pay Otis or Schindler to maintain or service them. As long as it keeps working long enough to become someone else's problem, the ultimate expression of a disposable, consumerist society.
If you look at buying a flat here in the UK, the difference between buying in a building that has a lift and o
Re:Sigh. (Score:5, Informative)
In the USA you get buildings owned by out of state corps and slum lords. There isn't much the state or city can do besides call the owner or send them bills that will never get paid. Here's a prime example. https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsb... [cbsnews.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Years ago in a hostel in New Zealand somebody had written "Schindler's Lift" on the elevator door sill in black sharpie. I'm sure many people have made that connection (the sort of thing where I imagine employees are sick of hearing it from people who think they're the first), but as a simple label on the elevator, I got a good chuckle out of it.
Re: (Score:2)
"Jesus Christ, Hymie, what died inside your tuchus? I didn't survive the gas chambers to die in here because of you"
Re: (Score:2)
Every time I get in a Schindler lift I always think, "This thing feels like a cheap piece of garbage. I think I'll take the stairs instead."
Re: (Score:3)
Your post is hyperbole. This is not a problem of concept, we've had elevators now for over 100 years and no problems servicing, upgrading, or maintaining them. It's a recent supply chain issue only.
Buy a new one, every 20 years?
No every 30 years. That's literally the expected life expectancy of a well maintained elevator. Most core components needs to be completely replaced in that period, the only thing that remains are the visible mechanical components. You may think you're standing in a 60 year old elevator, and it may look like it w
Re: Sigh. (Score:2)
Yeah maybe shipping all our manufacturing offshore wasn't the greatest idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Your post is hyperbole. This is not a problem of concept, we've had elevators now for over 100 years and no problems servicing, upgrading, or maintaining them. It's a recent supply chain issue only.
Buy a new one, every 20 years?
No every 30 years. That's literally the expected life expectancy of a well maintained elevator. Most core components needs to be completely replaced in that period, the only thing that remains are the visible mechanical components. You may think you're standing in a 60 year old elevator, and it may look like it was built 60 years ago, but I guarantee the electronics and most of the active mechanical components are less than 30 years old.
And the elevators are inspected regularly, and better believe if a problem is found, it gets shut down until fixed. The inspectors take their jobs deadly seriously.
I've noticed in newer ones that there are replaceable panels to update the "looks", and for the multi-purpose ones in the places I worked over the years, there are tarps to hang over hooks when hauling big objects, to keep them clean and "pretty"
Re: (Score:3)
I'd rather ride in an elevator with decades old relay logic compared to some modern microcontroller board purchased from AliExpress.
Re: Sigh. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
about 70% of people of who buy cars. Just look at all the scam-y repair insurance commercials for things like car shield, where they breathless inform you that you could have to replace something like a transmission and it could cost as much ... as wait for it ... 5000 dollars!
People buy all kinds of things without considering the cost of ownership, depreciation, etc. Just ask any first time home buyer, when the HVAC guys informs them their heat exchanger has cracked or they discover wind can damage roofin
Re: the one constructing those are not the one mai (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? So when you buy an expensive mechanical object like a car. you will proceed as if that car will just need to be maintained forever and not be replaced? Who would do that?
There is a big difference between autos and elevators Autos are not built for the long haul, elevators are. It would be possible to build autos at a level that we would only ever buy one our entire life, and run pretty maintenance free the whole time other than accidents. Damn that would be expensive though.
Re: the one constructing those are not the one mai (Score:2)
Re: the one constructing those are not the one mai (Score:2)
Au (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: Au (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The question is how we solve the problem problem.
Point of order: This is a CRISES, not a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
The question is how we solve the problem problem.
Point of order: This is a CRISES, not a problem.
So is the lack of vegan options in the lunchroom.
Re: (Score:2)
In the future you can paste the entire contents of the article into Gemini. I usually get it in the clipboard, type what I'm looking for into the chat, then paste and go.
Elevators? (Score:2)
You mean Happy Vertical People Transporters, right? Equipped with Genuine People's Personality, correct?
It is clear why the maintenance failed - it did not include a psychologist!
Re: (Score:2)
Plugging Marvin in and having him explain his views on life is not a great solution, though.
Wonderful quote (Score:2)
It was worth following the article just for the following, completely idiotic, quote:
"Everyone is born needing an elevator, and if they're lucky they die needing one too," says Stephen Smith, executive director of the Center for Building in North America, who has studied America's elevator issues.
Re: (Score:3)
What makes it idiotic? How many flights of stairs do you think an infant or a 110-year-old can climb?
Re: (Score:2)
probably 1 and possibly 2 two if they are mobile enough to walk around at all but maybe not quickly.
Huge money in critical infrastructure. (Score:5, Interesting)
It's problems like these that these days make me regularly consider a career-switch from senior webdev to mechanical maintenance or trade work. There is a huge and growing backlog of issues in the real world that require crafty skill, brains and the readiness to get your hands dirty that pay well and are often waaaay less obnoxious and more straigh-forward occupations than building yet another half-assed digital product for people who expect magic, don't know what they want but know exactly what it may cost and when it needs to be finished.
Even "simple" jobs like interior construction, painting, electricity, plumbing etc. seem to have some real potential these days. In the last 15 years I've on and off toyed with the idea of getting some welding experience and certification. It also would be a nice shift away from the desk. I eventually might just get into something like that, and if only for kicks and fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Half my family works/worked in trades. Mostly carpentry, masonry, and pipe fitting. The pay is decent and you get good benefits if you can get into a union or go into business for yourself, but your body is destroyed by the time you are in your mid forties just from wear and tear, and hopefully you haven't suffered any kind of life changing accident. If you are lucky by then you can move up to some kind of supervisory role and take it easy a little bit, but I've got an uncle in his 70s who's still laying
Bridges and freeways too (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Americans maintaining their Navy ships during WW2 to such a high standard that their ships were known to take utterly insane levels of damage and be able to limp home to be repaired is legendary.
So no, if anything Americans are better than most at maintenance. Real question seems to be "can they agree on who should pay for the maintenance of these specific things?"
Re:Bridges and freeways too (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Maintenance is not sexy. That's the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of it has to with population and revenue shifts. Stuff gets built in places like Detroit and Yougstown to support a massive auto industry. When a bunch of the industry leaves and the population with it, both the money and young bodies needed to maintain it all are gone. You still need the roads, bridges, schools, etc but you might only need half as many lanes, and a quarter of the class rooms. Trouble is you can't really maintain just half a bridge, similarly you can't abandon half a building. You
Re: Bridges and freeways too (Score:2)
Demographic shifts are a large part of it. There are rural areas where bridges are just being abandoned, as they made sense when the countryside was full of farms but now with three families left they just dont. Which is hard, because those remaining people may have land just over the now defunct bridge that went from being a minute away to being 30 minutes away. It also can make trips to the nearest town far longer. But how can you justify a ten million dollar bridge for ten people, when they can go 20 min
Re:Bridges and freeways too (Score:5, Insightful)
Maintaining infrastructure costs money and when you have a group that equates taxation to theft then you have a bit of a dilemma. Are we supposed to sell the bridge to a private company and let them charge tolls while still deferring maintenance?
Reagan was right (Score:3, Insightful)
Reagan was correct when he said government was the problem. Then he went about showing in what way it was the problem by refusing to fund or support sensible government functions.
Lack of regulation was one of the contributing factors to the Great Recession, and that blame resides with the SEC. Bush Jr. installed a potted plant as head of the SEC and the result meant that Wall Street knew it could get away with all sorts of dubious practices. And Bush's reason for little regulation was because the Great Reagan had decreed that lack of regulation was somehow good for America.
And now Wall Street has been busy buying up residential properties and boxing them up as securities. Then then get rented out an exorbitant prices, and they are also off the market for would be home owners. Wall Street can easily outbid the regular folks and pay all cash. It will require legislation to fix. The odds of that happening with the R's controlling Congress are nil.
Re: Reagan was right (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Reagan was right (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Reagan caused the problem, it was a self-fulling claim.
Re:Reagan was right (Score:5, Informative)
"There you go again" trying to rewrite history. First off those liar loans and the real-estate bubble started blowing long before bush took office. If you want to blame someone you should probably look at Alan Greenspan, pretty critically.
Second Glassâ"Steagall was repealed by Bill Clinton and that was probably the biggest regulatory brake on the behaviors and financial structuring that ultimately allowed 2007-8 crisis to happen.
Now, Bush did nothing to change any of this, and Congressional GOP leadership certainty enabled Clinton, not only in deregulation but in his aggressive housing equity programs that further undermined the integrity of the underlying paper in terms of both borrower quality and excessive appreciation (bubble).
In short the financial crisis wasn't a 'Republican problem' it was a very bipartisan problem, Democrats are to blame when it gets down to why its still a problem. HARP for example is a big reasons why the dead wood still hasn't been cleared and housing still isnt actually affordable...
Re:Reagan was right (Score:5, Interesting)
Phil "nation of whiners" Gramm would take the lead of the assholes who "Enabled Clinton". That asshole was pushing to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act for years.
Bush W did more than nothing. Bush signed the American Dream Downpayment Act and proposed other legislation, including the Zero-Downpayment Initiative, a Single Family Affordable Housing Tax Credit, and more funding for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). The speech I remember is when he said he wanted "90% home ownership by 2021". He was not only driving the boat, he was driving it like a drunk.
Re: (Score:2)
That is true, Bush absolutely doubled down on push home ownership beyond common sense approach. It is a fair criticism for sure. My calling that 'nothing' probably wasn't a fair characterization.
This was late 90s politics in a nut shell though, both parties were trying very hard to sell a warmed over version of the 50s American dream of a house and two cars in every garage. Post cold war exuberance.
Re: (Score:2)
"that blame resides with the SEC. Bush Jr. installed a potted plant as head of the SEC and the result meant that Wall Street knew it could get away with all sorts of dubious practices."
It seems you believe that the SEC is supposed to regulate Wall Street.
Let me push further your understanding of the situation.
The SEC applies the regulations that were designed by ... Wall Street itself.
That is, the financial sector is SELF-REGULATED.
In other words, Wall Street decides what is legal for Wall Street to do.
Yes,
Re: (Score:2)
It will require legislation to fix. The odds of that happening with the R's controlling Congress are nil.
Sure, but the odds of it happening when the Ds were in control were also nil, and lo, it didn't happen. They are another party of big business and ultracapitalism. It's true that all of the congresspeople who care about other people who are not independents are Democrats, but that's not going to move the needle. Yes, the Democrats are better on human rights, but they do not address the biggest issues facing us because those issues are profitable. Everything is half-assed and then they compromise with the Rs
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. Put a ball and chain on someone's ankle then get mad at them for not being able to run.
private property (Score:5, Interesting)
"America's aging elevators" are not America's, they are private property. The few of them that are public property could easily be fixed, the ones that aren't are the owner's problem. It's not a natural disaster, there doesn't need to be aid nor any government involvement. Elevator companies know the nature of their product, we do not need to invent a solution to a problem for which there have been solutions longer than we have been alive.
"A patchwork of state regulations and union rules make it laborious for building owners and contractors to comply with current standards, according to Smith."
This is what it's really about, changing regulations to be more favorable to billionaires. And why bring it up now? Why not bring it up during the Biden administration? And what federal agency will SCOTUS recognize as providing sufficient expertise? Is Mike Johnson better at regulation than the states?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"America's aging elevators" are not America's, they are private property. The few of them that are public property could easily be fixed, the ones that aren't are the owner's problem. It's not a natural disaster, there doesn't need to be aid nor any government involvement.
"I'm sure glad this is the owner's problem regarding their private property," I'll think, as I plummet to my doom in the failing elevator in the office I have to go to every day. "Thank god the government didn't get involved" will be my final thought. I'll die knowing that there is never any intersection between private ownership and public good.
New elevators as well (Score:2)
I worked at a place where they built a brand new building to accommodate folks. A total of three stories. Two elevators were in the middle of the building. As soon as the building was completed we started receiving emails telling us one, or both, of the elevators were out. Sometimes just part of a day, sometimes over a week. This went on for over a year.
I didn't directly work at the building, but did have to visit from time to time. Each time I went I had to check to see if the elevators were working if
And replace the WINDOWS XP boxes with what? (Score:2)
And replace the WINDOWS XP boxes that run some systems with what?
Regulation is the answer? (Score:2)
I'm not confident that more government is the answer. Rockets are regulated, and SpaceX is complaining about getting timely permits. Bridges are regulated, and there's more in disrepair than ever. Roads are regulated, and I can't go a mile in California (~7th largest world economy) without seeing potholes and overdue maintenance.
Its more than a availability problem (Score:5, Interesting)
Supply chains? (Score:2)
What is with all of the supply chain issues? Covid was far too long ago to keep blaming it for this. If there are so many elevators needing repair then the demand should drive production to increase. Do they not want out money anymore?
Seeing all the construction around me I was just thinking "How are they keeping up with all of the elevators in these new apartment complexes in addition to the existing ones? I know my state is cheap as hell when it comes to covering things like inspectors."
just another example of crumbling transit infra (Score:2)
Forget self driving cars, what we really need is self walking shoes so people can take the stairs.
Re:Good (Score:4, Funny)
If Americans actually used stares their health might improve!
Yes. Of course elevators don’t exist in all those other healthy countries.
Neither do wheelchairs, knee replacements, old age, paraplegics..
Re: (Score:2)
If Americans actually used stares their health might improve!
Yes. Of course elevators don’t exist in all those other healthy countries.
Neither do wheelchairs, knee replacements, old age, paraplegics..
Amerihate is apparently something that makes the h8ers stupid. Or maybe they come from countries where Elevators are too much technology.
But yes, while these people are busy shitting on Americans, they are apparently so stupid they do not know that things get moved around in multi story buildings that have to go by elevators, that there are people who are not able to use the stairs.
While I used to use the stairs for everything except when I couldn't, as I grow older, the MCL/ACL/Meniscus problems crop u
Re: Good (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The obvious solution is to ban any building over 1 story tall so they don't need stairs that people with disabilities cannot climb, and so they also don't need elevators that can break down. Never mind that multistory buildings are more cost effective where land prices are high.
Also ban any building that doesn't have more than enough "free" parking for everyone, because some disabled people can only get around by car. Never mind that this also drives up the cost of housing. [streetsblog.org] (Or maybe that's a feature, becau
Re: Good (Score:2)
Re: Good (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think people calling the obese names in public is called "fat shaming" not a doctor suggesting weight loss. Nor is the nutrition guide that has existed and regularly updated for 60 years considered fat shaming. So nice story but I'm not going to entertain an argument made on one disability that you seem to have a personal beef with, of which you don't even have an accurate or level headed philosophy about.
A few things here - First one is that obesity is not something that only Americans are prey to, https://www.euronews.com/healt... [euronews.com] For those who don't follow links: "The data shows one in six Europeans with obese and over 50% of adults overweight." Next is there is some evidence that endocrine disrupters are causing obesity problems. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [nih.gov] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a... [nih.gov]
Making fun of the obese might be like making fun of someone with a broken arm.
Finally, ever notice th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how many skeletons are in old elevators stuck at the bottom of a lift well.
I wonder that as well. I've been in some really decerped old places where I've found very questionable things. (Old prisons or insane asylums are the absolute worst.) I wouldn't be surprised if I powered on some old 1930s elevator and found an incredible surprise. Hopefully after 50 years or so it won't smell anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Mr. Furious: Seems there was a little controversy there regarding your father's death.
The Bowler: Yes, the police said he fell down an elevator shaft. Onto some bullets.
--"Mystery Men"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. Disable the elevators.
What is your plan for when hardware or freight items need moved?
Re: (Score:2)
cars.
Re: (Score:3)
Make elevators illegal unless you have a doctor's certificate.
Because nobody in this country has a need for a wheelchair, and because that doctor's certificate is going to enable elevators to be added to a building in a day...
Because nobody ever gets injured and provisionally needs an elevator...
Because nobody has ever needed to carry a heavy box or hand truck of deliveries to a 2nd/3rd/38th floor, screw the FedEx guy...
Because moving into the upper floor of an apartment building isn't already enough of a pain, I'm sure you'd be willing to help me move my bed up the s
Re: (Score:2)
stairs even... stupid brain / auto correct
I used the stairs all the time. Works great, and going downstairs was fun. Kinda like parkour, you swing out over the banisters and drop about halfwy to the next floor down.
Probably the only time I used the elevators was for moving materials around, when it was meeting day and I was in a suit, and didn't want to be all sweaty.
Stair related accident numbers (Score:2)
Am J Emerg Med . 2018 Apr;36(4):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.034. Epub 2017 Sep 20. PMID: 28947224 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.034
Stair-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments
Danielle Herbert Blazewick, Thitphalak Chounthirath, Nichole L Hodges, Christy L Collins, Gary A Smith
Over a 23 year period,
- Estimated 24,760,843 patients were treated in emergency departments for a stair-related injury during the 23-year study period
- Averaging 1,076,558 patients annually, or 37.8 inj