


New York Lawmakers Reach Deal On 'Bell-To-Bell' School Cellphone Ban (cbsnews.com) 58
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul says a $254 billion state budget deal has been reached, including a "bell-to-bell" school cellphone ban. [...] The distraction-free policy would take effect next school year, making New York the largest state in the country with a "bell-to-bell" cellphone ban. Hochul says the plan will help protect children from addictive technology and improve their mental health. The New York State United Teachers union also came out in support of the ban, saying "we are at a crisis point."
The governor previously outlined the proposal back in January, saying it would ban the use of smartphones and other internet-enabled devices on school grounds during the school day. That includes classroom time, lunch and study hall periods. "A bell-to-bell ban, morning until the day is over, is not going to hurt your kids. It's going to help them emerge with stronger mental health and resiliency," she told CBS News New York at the time.
Hochul said the ban would include smartphones and other personal "smart" devices, like smartwatches. Exemptions could be made if a student requires a device to manage a medical condition or for translation purposes. Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed. The proposal would let individual schools come up with their own ways to implement the ban and store the devices, and schools would be able to decide whether to have students leave them in things like pouches, lockers or cubbies. It would also require schools to make sure parents have a way to contact their children during the day, if needed. "Protecting our communities requires more than streets where people feel safe. We need classrooms where young minds can flourish, and that means eliminating once and for all the digital distractions that steal our kids' attention," the governor said, adding, "We protected our kids before from cigarettes, alcohol and drunk driving, and now, we're protecting them from addictive technology designed to hijack their attention."
The governor previously outlined the proposal back in January, saying it would ban the use of smartphones and other internet-enabled devices on school grounds during the school day. That includes classroom time, lunch and study hall periods. "A bell-to-bell ban, morning until the day is over, is not going to hurt your kids. It's going to help them emerge with stronger mental health and resiliency," she told CBS News New York at the time.
Hochul said the ban would include smartphones and other personal "smart" devices, like smartwatches. Exemptions could be made if a student requires a device to manage a medical condition or for translation purposes. Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed. The proposal would let individual schools come up with their own ways to implement the ban and store the devices, and schools would be able to decide whether to have students leave them in things like pouches, lockers or cubbies. It would also require schools to make sure parents have a way to contact their children during the day, if needed. "Protecting our communities requires more than streets where people feel safe. We need classrooms where young minds can flourish, and that means eliminating once and for all the digital distractions that steal our kids' attention," the governor said, adding, "We protected our kids before from cigarettes, alcohol and drunk driving, and now, we're protecting them from addictive technology designed to hijack their attention."
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
republicans dont get to talk about free speech anymore, theyve abandoned that principle
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What better preparation for the neoliberal nightmare world you adults have created, which I have to survive in, and really want legal speedballs to help me, no?
Re: (Score:2)
Minors don't have the right to free speech.
Actually, they do. But schools tend to have a lot of leeway to force students to behave as required while they're on school grounds, which is reasonable when your goal is preventing distractions during class time, but a whole-day ban is a bit on the authoritarian side. Also, let's not forget these are students, not prisoners.
Re:Free speech (Score:5, Informative)
They're still free to say whatever they want on Instagram - just not while they're supposed to be in class. This is the same as it's ALWAYS been. If you skipped school to hang out with your buddies in the 80s you faced consequences for not going to school when you were supposed to.
Re: (Score:1)
It's effective during lunch and study hall. Neither one of which is when they are supposed to be "in class".
Re: (Score:1)
What if teachers competed directly for your attention by teaching you things you actually are curious about, and were perfectly patient and didn't grade you? Did we just discover why schools are so afraid of ChatGPT that they've banned it, because they can't justify their salaries anymore?
Re: (Score:2)
Aren't you smarties the ones that came up with the AI you have to ban now because you're so smart you created distractions that mean you can't teach them to be smart like you?
There is NO... (Score:1)
..legitimate need for phones in school
They are only a distraction, and a serious one
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
I used to work for a K-12 in IT support. School districts have systems or subscribe to services to blast-out notifications. Back when I was in it, those were voice messaging systems that would read out a prerecorded message to the phone of the guardian(s) on record. More modern systems may include SMS capability or even an app that ostensibly is for parents to interact with teachers, but supports more notification capabilities than just that.
Around fifteen years ago a new deputy superintendent tried to p
Re: (Score:2)
The proposed legislation allows this one. "bell to bell". Your classes finished, you can call your parents.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
The point is to inform them *before* the last class, so that they actually have time to come.
That's something the school should be doing rather than the student. The school has contact details for the parents and can (or should, my school can) send targeted SMS and email messages about things like this.
So the actual reason kids need phones (Score:1)
What the song doesn't address is where and why that isolation comes. It's because you're extremely spread out in the suburbs so you don't have a lot of opportunity for interacting with people outside of school and inside of school you don't get all that much time. You get 1 hour for lunch and if you're at a reall
Not a bad idea, but kids' health isn't the reason (Score:1, Troll)
The real reason is that they don't want kids reading news on social media that could radicalize them against a certain lobby
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/ameri... [aa.com.tr]
Hochul even wanted to ban facemasks (yes, a democrat banning masks) at protests
https://www.politico.com/news/... [politico.com]
The real lesson (Score:2)
That this idea is so divisive and evokes extreme reactions by everybody is crazy. Crazy like suggesing to an addict that being normal has advantages... like good heath and long life.
Re: The real lesson (Score:2)
How come I'm an ex-addict who wishes he were dead half the time?
Re: (Score:2)
It's not divisive (Score:2)
So we ban cell phones but we don't do anything about the kids not having any futures because they can't afford to go to college and no they can't all be plumbers and HVAC welders. We don't deal with the fact that a lot of those kids go hungry even in a we
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't help. It does not solve any of the underlying problems the kids are facing. It's a distraction because the people of the New York legislature and frankly the people of New York don't want to spend the time and money to help the kids for real.
I'll agree with that one.
So we ban cell phones but we don't do anything about the kids not having any futures because they can't afford to go to college and no they can't all be plumbers and HVAC welders. We don't deal with the fact that a lot of those kids go hungry even in a wealthy State like New York. We don't give parents the support they need to raise kids because if you try to everyone has a fucking fit about oh don't you tell me how to raise my kid (I speak from bitter experience, my mom was a nut job and I could have used with someone intervening)
So maybe I'm opening Pandora's Box here, but what would you suggest?
Re: (Score:2)
" what would you suggest?"
Why not legalize drugs, right to camp, and suicide, for a start, so we have an out from your stupid idiotic coercive violent system?
Re: (Score:2)
We are headed into a world where people must be connected to the internets like the Taelons were with the Commonality. It was wierdly disorienting for them, and for us apparently, to not be connected at all times. But people are different. A person needs time to be alone and/or quiet. That's why we have nap time in daycare.
I would argue that applying a Stoic concept, a bit of self deprivation helps understand something with a grea
Re: (Score:2)
That this idea is so divisive and evokes extreme reactions by everybody is crazy. Crazy like suggesing to an addict that being normal has advantages... like good heath and long life.
That's one of the things I definitely remember about pubic school. They have to hammer this idea into you that you must live your live your life exactly as you're been told, otherwise you'll end up a crackhead living in a cardboard box. You can't be trusted to use or do anything in a responsible manner, because that concept might give kids the impression that you're condoning such actions.
And of course, once the bell rings at the end of the day, most of the kids do all those things you don't want them to
Re: (Score:2)
Calculator in your pocket (Score:2)
When I was in school, teachers used to love saying "you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Teachers today: "NO, DON'T CARRY A GLOBALLY CONNECTED SUPER COMPUTER IN YOUR POCKET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111"
Re: (Score:2)
Learn how and why things work before turning to electronic aids to make performing the tasks easier.
If you don't learn how and why, then you won't be able to actually choose the right operations to run on that electronic toy.
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't learn how and why, then you won't be able to actually choose the right operations to run on that electronic toy.
Except the "how" is then proceeded by "now, demonstrate that you understand this concept by spending the rest of the period manually doing something that a machine could do instantly and with perfect precision".
It's like being taught culinary arts by someone who asks you to bake a loaf of bread, but won't accept your work unless you grow the wheat and mill the flour by hand.
Re: (Score:2)
"you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Slide rule.
Re: (Score:2)
When I was in school, teachers used to love saying "you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Yeah, that teacher-ism aged like milk.
What about e-readers (Score:2)
What about Kindles and e-readers that are not connected to the schools WiFi?
Are the kids allowed to read during their breaks?
Re: (Score:2)
TFA: "Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed."
we’ve seen this before. (Score:3, Insightful)
so tired of moral panics. remember that time when D&D was gonna turn your brain into goop? or when video games, particularly grand theft auto, was going to instantly convert children into serial killers? need more examples?
leave the kids alone!
Re: (Score:3)
I once played mortal Kombat for the Sega Genesis (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Difference is we weren't ignoring the teacher and playing D&D with each other actively during classes.
We also were playing GTA after school, not in our hands during school.
We weren't allowed handheld video games during classes. This is that. Not a moral issue.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with you, but there is a small difference. I guess it was allowed to play handheld games in between two classes, and in this example, it could have been a Game Boy Color with GTA. While the proposed legislation prohibits internet-capable devices including during recess.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Chromebooks are MANDATED at my kid's school (Score:2)
Who care about the cell phones when the school is the one handing every kid a Chromebook and then refusing to supervise their use when in classrooms. I hate when a teacher asks me to help keep my kid from being distracted on their Chromebook. I always just flatly say, take it away from them - I don't want them to have it in class anyways. This is 100% a problem of their making. Yes, they have net nannies, but their software doesn't adapt as quickly as these kids do.
joe.
Re: (Score:1)