


New York Lawmakers Reach Deal On 'Bell-To-Bell' School Cellphone Ban (cbsnews.com) 180
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CBS News: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul says a $254 billion state budget deal has been reached, including a "bell-to-bell" school cellphone ban. [...] The distraction-free policy would take effect next school year, making New York the largest state in the country with a "bell-to-bell" cellphone ban. Hochul says the plan will help protect children from addictive technology and improve their mental health. The New York State United Teachers union also came out in support of the ban, saying "we are at a crisis point."
The governor previously outlined the proposal back in January, saying it would ban the use of smartphones and other internet-enabled devices on school grounds during the school day. That includes classroom time, lunch and study hall periods. "A bell-to-bell ban, morning until the day is over, is not going to hurt your kids. It's going to help them emerge with stronger mental health and resiliency," she told CBS News New York at the time.
Hochul said the ban would include smartphones and other personal "smart" devices, like smartwatches. Exemptions could be made if a student requires a device to manage a medical condition or for translation purposes. Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed. The proposal would let individual schools come up with their own ways to implement the ban and store the devices, and schools would be able to decide whether to have students leave them in things like pouches, lockers or cubbies. It would also require schools to make sure parents have a way to contact their children during the day, if needed. "Protecting our communities requires more than streets where people feel safe. We need classrooms where young minds can flourish, and that means eliminating once and for all the digital distractions that steal our kids' attention," the governor said, adding, "We protected our kids before from cigarettes, alcohol and drunk driving, and now, we're protecting them from addictive technology designed to hijack their attention."
The governor previously outlined the proposal back in January, saying it would ban the use of smartphones and other internet-enabled devices on school grounds during the school day. That includes classroom time, lunch and study hall periods. "A bell-to-bell ban, morning until the day is over, is not going to hurt your kids. It's going to help them emerge with stronger mental health and resiliency," she told CBS News New York at the time.
Hochul said the ban would include smartphones and other personal "smart" devices, like smartwatches. Exemptions could be made if a student requires a device to manage a medical condition or for translation purposes. Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed. The proposal would let individual schools come up with their own ways to implement the ban and store the devices, and schools would be able to decide whether to have students leave them in things like pouches, lockers or cubbies. It would also require schools to make sure parents have a way to contact their children during the day, if needed. "Protecting our communities requires more than streets where people feel safe. We need classrooms where young minds can flourish, and that means eliminating once and for all the digital distractions that steal our kids' attention," the governor said, adding, "We protected our kids before from cigarettes, alcohol and drunk driving, and now, we're protecting them from addictive technology designed to hijack their attention."
The real lesson (Score:5, Insightful)
That this idea is so divisive and evokes extreme reactions by everybody is crazy. Crazy like suggesing to an addict that being normal has advantages... like good heath and long life.
It's not divisive (Score:2)
So we ban cell phones but we don't do anything about the kids not having any futures because they can't afford to go to college and no they can't all be plumbers and HVAC welders. We don't deal with the fact that a lot of those kids go hungry even in a we
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't help. It does not solve any of the underlying problems the kids are facing. It's a distraction because the people of the New York legislature and frankly the people of New York don't want to spend the time and money to help the kids for real.
I'll agree with that one.
So we ban cell phones but we don't do anything about the kids not having any futures because they can't afford to go to college and no they can't all be plumbers and HVAC welders. We don't deal with the fact that a lot of those kids go hungry even in a wealthy State like New York. We don't give parents the support they need to raise kids because if you try to everyone has a fucking fit about oh don't you tell me how to raise my kid (I speak from bitter experience, my mom was a nut job and I could have used with someone intervening)
So maybe I'm opening Pandora's Box here, but what would you suggest?
Re: (Score:2)
" what would you suggest?"
Why not legalize drugs, right to camp, and suicide, for a start, so we have an out from your stupid idiotic coercive violent system?
Re: (Score:2)
" what would you suggest?"
Why not legalize drugs, right to camp, and suicide, for a start, so we have an out from your stupid idiotic coercive violent system?
Perhaps we don't do those things because school aged children haven't fully developed and therefore cannot make rational decisions like what you suggest. Perhaps.
Re: (Score:2)
We are headed into a world where people must be connected to the internets like the Taelons were with the Commonality. It was wierdly disorienting for them, and for us apparently, to not be connected at all times. But people are different. A person needs time to be alone and/or quiet. That's why we have nap time in daycare.
I would argue that applying a Stoic concept, a bit of self deprivation helps understand something with a grea
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's an orthogonal issue. Suppose they did have a possible future: they'd still have the problem of classrooms being unviable because the kids are on their black mirrors instead of paying attention to class.
If you want to fix the economy or education funding or whatever, fine. Go for it! But while you're in the middle of that Herculea
Re: (Score:2)
That this idea is so divisive and evokes extreme reactions by everybody is crazy. Crazy like suggesing to an addict that being normal has advantages... like good heath and long life.
That's one of the things I definitely remember about pubic school. They have to hammer this idea into you that you must live your live your life exactly as you're been told, otherwise you'll end up a crackhead living in a cardboard box. You can't be trusted to use or do anything in a responsible manner, because that concept might give kids the impression that you're condoning such actions.
And of course, once the bell rings at the end of the day, most of the kids do all those things you don't want them to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it strikes me as kind of crazy when people describe cell phone bans as some kind of hardship for the kids involved. If it is for any of them, that just highlights the problem that's schools are trying to address.
Re: The real lesson (Score:2)
"They have to hammer this idea into you that you must live your live your life exactly as you're been told, otherwise you'll end up a crackhead living in a cardboard box"
That was most definitely not my experience. I had wide freedoms, though I went to school in the 80s/90s. In elementary school, I spent most Fridays bused off to some education enrichment center where we did independent learning. On other days I had to shuffle myself between classes alone to go to some alternate class for reading. One of my
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why can't you mind your own business, or legalize drugs and help those who ask for help? Why won't you give me the freedom to OD if I choose? Does your desire to control my behavior say more about you than about me?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I obviously can't tell you .. how long a piece of string is.
I'll bite: strlen("a piece of string");
Re: (Score:2)
I'll rephrase it then, smartass
How high is the sky?
I'll wait here.
Re: The real lesson (Score:2)
Every height. Everywhere is somewhere's sky.
Re: (Score:2)
How come I'm an ex-addict who wishes he were dead half the time?
Lets remember we’re talking about addiction of limited capacity here. Suffering like you describe usually does not continue to ravage ex-addicts unless the former addiction had crossed the line over into physical dependency. Digital addiction has its obvious limits of influence.
All that said, I truly hope you can find peace in some way as you remain on a disciplined path you likely cannot deviate from, and work very hard to stay on. Sobriety is the belief that being alive is better than being an ad
Calculator in your pocket (Score:2)
When I was in school, teachers used to love saying "you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Teachers today: "NO, DON'T CARRY A GLOBALLY CONNECTED SUPER COMPUTER IN YOUR POCKET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111"
Re: (Score:3)
Learn how and why things work before turning to electronic aids to make performing the tasks easier.
If you don't learn how and why, then you won't be able to actually choose the right operations to run on that electronic toy.
Re: (Score:2)
If you don't learn how and why, then you won't be able to actually choose the right operations to run on that electronic toy.
Except the "how" is then proceeded by "now, demonstrate that you understand this concept by spending the rest of the period manually doing something that a machine could do instantly and with perfect precision".
It's like being taught culinary arts by someone who asks you to bake a loaf of bread, but won't accept your work unless you grow the wheat and mill the flour by hand.
Re: (Score:2)
I find your analogy flawed.
If I was going to make a comparison with bread, it would be the difference between preparing the dough on the bench, putting it into the pan, and putting it into the oven, versus pouring the ingredients into the bread machine and hitting start.
Re: (Score:2)
"you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Slide rule.
Re: (Score:2)
When I was in school, teachers used to love saying "you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Yeah, that teacher-ism aged like milk.
Re: (Score:2)
When I was in school, teachers used to love saying "you wouldnt walk around with a calculator in your pocket all the time, would you?"
Ironically enough I wonder how many teachers suffer from the kinds of personal financial pitfalls easily avoided with the assistance of a certain calculating device being perhaps more readily available in their daily lives?
(Bankruptcy Office) “Check out the math teacher walking in. And we thought psychics were ironic..”
Re: (Score:2)
how would a calculator make them not be a teacher, at least in US teacher salaries seem indicate being a teacher is a financial pitfall.
What about e-readers (Score:2)
What about Kindles and e-readers that are not connected to the schools WiFi?
Are the kids allowed to read during their breaks?
Re: (Score:2)
TFA: "Cellphones that don't have internet capability and devices that are provided by the school for lesson plans would still be allowed."
Chromebooks are MANDATED at my kid's school (Score:3)
Who care about the cell phones when the school is the one handing every kid a Chromebook and then refusing to supervise their use when in classrooms. I hate when a teacher asks me to help keep my kid from being distracted on their Chromebook. I always just flatly say, take it away from them - I don't want them to have it in class anyways. This is 100% a problem of their making. Yes, they have net nannies, but their software doesn't adapt as quickly as these kids do.
joe.
Re: (Score:2)
It may shock you and your privileged kid, but no every kid is not being handed a Chromebook in the class. Don't let general solutions to wide spread problems be influenced by your fancy school's policy as its applying to your fancy kids.
Re: (Score:2)
It may shock you and your privileged kid, but no every kid is not being handed a Chromebook in the class.
Every child, in the class I referred to, is indeed being handed a chrome book. Don't let your lack of knowledge about a specific class make you think you know that there are exceptions in that specific class. I caveated my comment, you did not.
Re: Chromebooks are MANDATED at my kid's school (Score:2)
Those Chromebooks are probably centrally managed. The schools can do things like block access to various hosts and such, so they can easily shutdown things like Facebook or OnlyFans or even Internet access entirely.
It works (Score:5, Interesting)
My wife is a high school teacher. Her school enacted a policy this year that has the kids put their phones into little cubbyholes upon entering the classroom, and they grab them on their way out. She's seen a huge difference in attention, even among the kids using laptops. The kids can still use their phones between classes and in an emergency they can get to them. Her biggest issue now is kids with smart watches that are still connected to the phones, and ones with a non-school-issued laptop, where she can't see what they're looking at.
Lots of research shows this is beneficial from a learning perspective. Modern teachers would love to adapt and incorporate modern tech into their teaching approach, hence the enhanced use of graphing calculators when I was a kid and the current use of laptops loaded with learning apps. But cell phones are a double edged sword: they have a ton of potential for learning, but also a ton of distraction, moreso than laptops and TI-83's. Current high school students view the phone as primarily a social media device, not an educational resource that helps them learn.
Re: It works (Score:2)
Get some sort of faraday cage to put the phones in so watches can't be used to workaround the Internet access. A simple aluminum foil coating will probably suffice.
Why is this part of the budget? (Score:2)
Re: Why is this part of the budget? (Score:2)
If NY is anything like the federal government it's because budgets are "must pass", so attaching your pet policy to a budget is an effective way to drive it through without debate.
This is bullshit (Score:2)
We should not ban cellphones from students until we have eliminated the ability of disaffected youth to bring guns into school to murder their classmates. Every child deserves to have the ability to call for help or to tell their parents they love them one last time. I am not a fan of this stupid plan.
Re: This is bullshit (Score:2)
If your kid is so concerned with school rules that they won't break the rules to call in case of a shooting, then your kid is not the one that is going to save people.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
republicans dont get to talk about free speech anymore, theyve abandoned that principle
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Minors don't have the right to free speech.
Actually, they do. But schools tend to have a lot of leeway to force students to behave as required while they're on school grounds, which is reasonable when your goal is preventing distractions during class time, but a whole-day ban is a bit on the authoritarian side. Also, let's not forget these are students, not prisoners.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Also, let's not forget these are students, not prisoners."
Actually, they kinda are, in a way.
Law forces them to go to school. In most places they can't choose which school. You can't leave the grounds, or even the building except in limited cases. You are told where to go and when all day. You are told when and where you can speak, and what you can or can't say. You are told what you have to wear. You can't do X, Y, Z while there. In some places you have to go through searches. Etc.
I am not say
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Free speech (Score:2)
It doesn't have to be that. Other countries have respect for the food they feed their kids. Low funding in school meals makes it be: gruel.
Re: Free speech - no, it's not about free speech (Score:5, Interesting)
Calling phones free speech devices is silly.
What if, back in the day, there was a feasible way to bring in those bulky rotary dial phones to school? Would you permit each student to set their own phone on their desk and let it ring, whenever?
No? Then shrinking the phone won't work either.
Re: Free speech - no, it's not about free speech (Score:2)
Pagers were also banned in many schools.
Paradox of Tolerance (Score:2)
Interesting how many of the "free speech absolutists" don't want their actual identities associated with their speech.
The paradox is that the censors will insist they have the right to advocate censorship. And when their advocacy succeeds?
Re:Free speech (Score:5, Informative)
They're still free to say whatever they want on Instagram - just not while they're supposed to be in class. This is the same as it's ALWAYS been. If you skipped school to hang out with your buddies in the 80s you faced consequences for not going to school when you were supposed to.
Re: (Score:2)
They're still free to say whatever they want on Instagram - just not while they're supposed to be in class. This is the same as it's ALWAYS been. If you skipped school to hang out with your buddies in the 80s you faced consequences for not going to school when you were supposed to.
I pretty much agree. However I'm of the mind that this kind of thing should be decided on a school by school, if not class by class basis. No need to mandate it from on high aside from the policy that says "yes, a school may ban mobile devices" to stop any Karens who get ideas.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
yes
Free spam, ads and tittilation (Score:2)
There, fixed the subject line for you
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
all US if you really care to include universities.
Re: Free speech (Score:2)
Only, you don't need an electronic device to speak...
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re:There is NO... (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to work for a K-12 in IT support. School districts have systems or subscribe to services to blast-out notifications. Back when I was in it, those were voice messaging systems that would read out a prerecorded message to the phone of the guardian(s) on record. More modern systems may include SMS capability or even an app that ostensibly is for parents to interact with teachers, but supports more notification capabilities than just that.
Around fifteen years ago a new deputy superintendent tried to push for a BYOD policy for student devices, up to and including phones and obsolete PDAs like older Palm devices. The must've been pretty slick showing those old devices doing something meaningful because there was a hard push to make this happen. Ultimately where it was piloted it was basically not used, either because the kids didn't have personal devices to bring to begin with, or because the kids were doing anything except their actual lessons.
I would agree that there's basically no benefit to having cell phones during instruction time. For old kids, save 'em for passing periods, lunchtime, and before or after school. For younger kids, just don't even bother having them during school hours.
Re: (Score:2)
The proposed legislation allows this one. "bell to bell". Your classes finished, you can call your parents.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:There is NO... (Score:4, Informative)
The point is to inform them *before* the last class, so that they actually have time to come.
That's something the school should be doing rather than the student. The school has contact details for the parents and can (or should, my school can) send targeted SMS and email messages about things like this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: There is NO... (Score:2)
The school doesn't have to coordinate anything. All they have to do is send out a text to everyone on the contact list. Whoever gets the call can coordinate.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you need a phone for this? School admins have a landlines. Also school admins aren't banned from using mobile phones. Students should have no part of this.
Re: There is NO... (Score:2)
Wait so they have to hang around school instead of having their parents on a leash to "come" when told? What in the 1980s/1990s.... Oh noooo! Poor Johnny is gonna have to sit and read a book or something, lol
Re: There is NO... (Score:2)
Where I grew up in the 80s, no one would be hanging around for their parents unless there was something interfering with busing. They would all just go home early. Children were the job of teachers during the day, not parents. The parents would be absolutely furious at the school for not doing their job if they cancelled early.
We did not get sent home because the Challenger blew up. We went about our day.
Re: (Score:3)
Several times while I was in school it rained so badly that enough kids weren't able to get to school and they had to close for the day. Naturally, they couldn't let us go home on our own, so we had to wait for a parent or other responsible adult came to get us. Something like that would have been very useful. And, the day JFK was killed, they closed the school (I was in Junior High at the time; not Middl
Re:There is NO... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: There is NO... (Score:2)
This held all the way through the 80s as well.
I blame Dateline (1992) which is one of the earliest sensationalized "news" program. They were constantly harping about kidnappers and child molesters without the appropriate context that like 99.9% of kidnappers and child molesters are the parents.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So the actual reason kids need phones (Score:2, Troll)
What the song doesn't address is where and why that isolation comes. It's because you're extremely spread out in the suburbs so you don't have a lot of opportunity for interacting with people outside of school and inside of school you don't get all that much time. You get 1 hour for lunch and if you're at a reall
Re: (Score:2)
Also they're apparently using the Cobra weather dominator down in Florida...
There are no walkable cities in Florida. The only "walkable" anythings in Florida are indoor malls.
The rains are torrents. The sun is harsh. The humidity is oppressive. Florida Man didn't come about from nothing.
Re: There is NO... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
>"Schools have phones that can be used for that stuff. It worked well for the majority of the twentieth century."
Exactly. I went through school when there was no Internet or cell phones. But OMG, we survived just fine. If there was something urgent, the school office could contact the parent or the parent could contact the office who would then contact the child.
Sure, we had some limited distractions in classes- other stuff to read, calculators, some limited electronic games later on, a little note pa
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hangman you say? Clearly that shows some kind of homicidal tendencies and lust for violence just like supposedly biting a sandwich into something that might vaguely resemble a handgun. You must submit to mandatory reeducation.
Re: (Score:2)
There are legitimate reasons, e.g. informing parents that some classes at the end of the day have been cancelled. But they are rare.
You should probably ask for a rebate on your local taxes, since that grown-ass adult responsible for parental notifications clearly isn’t being employed anywhere nearby.
To clarify the parents point, there are no legitimate reasons a student needs a phone in school. There are legitimate emergencies that can and should be handled by the grown-ass adults in the room. As they were for decades prior to digital addiction being marketed and sold to every student.
Re: (Score:2)
You can't rely on those grown-ass adults.
I remember well the day during really severe weather, the administration didn't want to "disrupt" class time. I heard the tornado go over the school. It destroyed a warehouse a couple hundred yards down the road.
AFTER the tornado, they sounded the tornado alert and had everyone crouched in the halls. I suspected the storm was long over. A friend and I snuck out through a little used back door to find a bright clear sunny day (exactly the sort of weather that often ha
Re: (Score:2)
In the aftermath of a recent school shooting (4 dead), MANY parents were greatly comforted by their kids calling them and telling them they were OK before the big flashy headlines hit every TV and radio station in the area. Schools often bumble around in situations where a student (or ALL of the students) has a very legitimate reason to talk to a parent right now.
Re:we’ve seen this before. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:we’ve seen this before. (Score:5, Insightful)
Depends on what you're helping. Studies have shown that school grades are impacted. But many other things are. Class disruption is reduced, social interaction is improved, and staff have an easier time dealing with phone cheats when phones are blocked on the onset (doesn't stop cheating itself, but it does help with enforcement).
My wife's a teacher and she says the ban has had a quite dramatic change the class for the better. Maybe it won't be reflected in grades, but that's not the only thing school is about.
Re: (Score:2)
*aren't. Studies have shown that school grades aren't impacted.
Re: we’ve seen this before. (Score:2)
That's because even when they don't say they do so, all schools are effectively grading on a curve. If most kids aren't getting A's, they lower the difficulty of the class.
I once played mortal Kombat for the Sega Genesis (Score:2)
Re: I once played mortal Kombat for the Sega Genes (Score:2)
Fuck Tipper Gore.
Re: (Score:2)
Difference is we weren't ignoring the teacher and playing D&D with each other actively during classes.
We also were playing GTA after school, not in our hands during school.
We weren't allowed handheld video games during classes. This is that. Not a moral issue.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with you, but there is a small difference. I guess it was allowed to play handheld games in between two classes, and in this example, it could have been a Game Boy Color with GTA. While the proposed legislation prohibits internet-capable devices including during recess.
Re: (Score:2)
I know, my argument concerns the analogy with "playing GTA at school" which the parent poster made. My argument is that while previously the forbidden activity ("playing GTA") was only forbidden during instruction time, the new prohibition (applying to internet-connected devices) also applies during recess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
uh. In 2000-2002 or so, everyone with a TI-83 was playing drug wars and Doom, etc. Learn how to quickly swap to a math screen if the teacher stands up, etc.
Of course they were. But a modern smartphone is a little more compelling than Doom on a TI-83. A smartphone has audio, HD video and a fast internet connection. And can be used to distract other kids, whereas with Doom on a TI-83 you were only distracting yourself.
Re: Not a bad idea, but kids' health isn't the rea (Score:3)
You clearly don't know any high school teachers. Cell phones have massively affected students ability to focus. This is all about prying kids away from screens.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The root reason for the Tiktok ban is that Trump got butthurt that people used Tiktok to coordinate requests for tickets to a Trump rally that they never intended to attend. This left many empty seats at the rally and a very bruised ego for an orange narcissist.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, the ban originated before Trump was elected. Prior tiktok ban bill attempts were considered unpopular and were dead in the water until democrats got the message from their primary lobby that banning it is a must. It's not that Trump would take issue with the ban since that is also his primary lobby, but he was not the reason for the bill passing
https://matzko.substack.com/p/... [substack.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Because 10-15 years ago smartphones weren't in every high schooler's hands. It has become an ever more pressing issue in recent years with the explosion of social media platforms.
I'll believe this argument when there's actual evidence, as opposed to teachers' and school counselors' organizations that have been advocating for this for several years. As someone else said, high schoolers aren't using their phones the way adults do. They don't read the news in school, they don't care about current events in
Re: (Score:2)
"They don't read the news in school,"
That could be true, but the lobby is clearly trying to keep all critical discourse around the middle east out of schools, and keeping out phones is critical to that.
https://theintercept.com/2025/... [theintercept.com]
This is a top down effort, and keeping phones out of general ed has been a recent effort in France, in NYC, and even today with Finland in a separate story.
", they don't care about current events in the way adults do."
That part is wrong. the lobby is panicking that the younger
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Free Speech != Mobile Phones (Score:2)
Free != Libre.
Do we have to revisit this? This was table stakes knowledge for someone on Slashdot last I checked.