

The Newark Airport Crisis is About To Become Everyone's Problem (theverge.com) 147
Newark Liberty International Airport has suffered six radar and radio outages in nine months, with the most recent occurring May 9th when controllers told pilots "our scopes just went black again" before handing off flights to other facilities. The outages have forced flight cancellations, diversions, and delays lasting over a week as airlines repositioned aircraft and crews.
The Federal Aviation Administration created the problem by relocating Newark's air traffic control operations from the understaffed N90 facility on Long Island to Philadelphia in 2024. Only 17 of 33 controllers accepted the move despite $100,000 relocation bonuses, leaving operations short-staffed. Rather than build new STARS servers in Philadelphia, the FAA opted to send radar data over 130 miles of commercial copper telephone lines.
The remote feeds have experienced approximately 10 minutes of downtime over 10 months -- exceeding the agency's reliability standards and occurring 200 times more frequently than the FAA's internal analysis predicted. The agency simultaneously laid off over 100 maintenance technicians and telecommunications specialists in February, further straining an air traffic control system that suffers around 700 outages weekly nationwide while managing 16.8 million annual flights with 1990s-era technology.
The Federal Aviation Administration created the problem by relocating Newark's air traffic control operations from the understaffed N90 facility on Long Island to Philadelphia in 2024. Only 17 of 33 controllers accepted the move despite $100,000 relocation bonuses, leaving operations short-staffed. Rather than build new STARS servers in Philadelphia, the FAA opted to send radar data over 130 miles of commercial copper telephone lines.
The remote feeds have experienced approximately 10 minutes of downtime over 10 months -- exceeding the agency's reliability standards and occurring 200 times more frequently than the FAA's internal analysis predicted. The agency simultaneously laid off over 100 maintenance technicians and telecommunications specialists in February, further straining an air traffic control system that suffers around 700 outages weekly nationwide while managing 16.8 million annual flights with 1990s-era technology.
Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:3)
He took over the role of screen legend Lloyd picked-the-wrong-day-to-quit-smoking-crack Bridges
Re: (Score:2)
Mod parent funny, but so many stories with unfulfilled potential for funny these days...
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
ATC was screwed up decades before Trump. It's running on antiquated equipment.
Re:Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:5, Insightful)
ATC was screwed up decades before Trump. It's running on antiquated equipment.
So laying off 100 of the maintenance technicians and telecommunications specialists that kept it running was a genius idea, you say?
Re: Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:1)
The Federal Aviation Administration created the problem by relocating Newark's air traffic control operations from the understaffed N90 facility on Long Island to Philadelphia in 2024. Only 17 of 33 controllers accepted the move despite $100,000 relocation bonuses, leaving operations short-staffed.
If you're upset about having fewer Air Traffic Controllers, perhaps direct your ire towards the administration that chose to relocate the facility and in the process list half the Air Traffic Controllers?
Rather than build new STARS servers in Philadelphia, the FAA opted to send radar data over 130 miles of commercial copper telephone lines.
Sounds like the reliability issue was baked into the move under the previous administration - "opted to send radar data over 130 of commercial copper telephone lines."
The remote feeds have experienced approximately 10 minutes of downtime over 10 months -- exceeding the agency's reliability standards and occurring 200 times more frequently than the FAA's internal analysis predicted.
Apparently the decision to use commercial copper telephone lines" by the previous administration was a bad decision...
The agency simultaneously laid off over 100 maintenance technicians and telecommunications specialists in February, further straining an air traffic control system that suffers around 700 outages weekly nationwide while managing 16.8 million annual flights with 1990s-era technology.
The main problem in New
Re:Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:5, Informative)
Bullshit. This is a budget and management problem, not the operators and techs. You think they could simply buy a new system without suits being involved?
Re:Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:5, Insightful)
Seems to me that if you are unable or unwilling to buy updated equipment, firing the techs that keep the old equipment working is just about the worst move you could make...
=Smidge=
Re:Trump crashes the economy and planes (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't blame Trump for causing the issues, it's a longstanding problem. I can blame him for worsening it needlessly. I can blame him for putting Sean Duffy in charge and a general sense of disarray at the agency. I can blame him for piss poor communications this leading to rampant speculation. I can predict that he or his admin will kick the can down the road because he has ran out anyone with real ability.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it needless? Don't we have a gigantic budget deficit? Shouldn't we find every way we can to reduce spending? What's better, cutting radio and radar tech or cutting the benefits to your grandma on social security? See, there's lots worse stuff to pick to cut than radio and radar techs. But something must be cut. We should maybe make the entire air traffic control private, as well as privatizing the TSA checkpoints at airports? The airlines can do that shit, we don't need fed officials pawing thr
Re: (Score:1)
"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make".gif
Re: (Score:2)
Do we have a gigantic budget deficit because of 2017's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act? That cut taxes, but didn't really create jobs? Shouldn't we find every way we can to increase revenue? Like hiring more IRS agents to go after wealthy tax cheats? Oh, no, we have to let those people go because we have to reduce spending. Cutting staff at National Parks, where the park brings in more revenue than it costs to run? Got to cut those positions, too, even though people will have a worse time, and maybe not spend a
Nice false choice (Score:2)
Is it needless? Don't we have a gigantic budget deficit? Shouldn't we find every way we can to reduce spending? What's better, cutting radio and radar tech or cutting the benefits to your grandma on social security? See, there's lots worse stuff to pick to cut than radio and radar techs. But something must be cut./quote>
You'd have a leg to stand on here if Republicans werent in the middle of extending a major tax cut to the wealthy which even with all their cuts is going to add quite a lot to our debt. Considering this fact though, you don't.
Re: (Score:1)
Tax cuts for the wealthy? Trump is aiming at $0 tax for those making less than $150K a year. Is that a tax cut for the wealthy?
Re: (Score:1)
(oh And tax increases for everyone via tariffs.)
At least you'll get what you voted for and the libs will cry that tiny bit harder than you...
Re: (Score:2)
Connect the dots, is the deficit a concern or not? Are the rates for over 150k going up or down? The policy is incoherent.
Re: (Score:2)
What flavor is today's kool aid?
Re: (Score:2)
Tax cuts for the wealthy? Trump is aiming at $0 tax for those making less than $150K a year. Is that a tax cut for the wealthy?
And we should believe that this is different than the other dozens or hundreds of pie-in-the-sky claims he's made which failed to manifest? And if, in some virtually impossible scenario, he gets what he claims to want, and does implement this tax cut, it will be offset by the tariffs that he cites as the revenue replacement for these taxes -- except that those tariffs will hit the lower end of that less-than-150k scale the hardest. And even if, in some equally impossible scenario, the amount of money coming
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, Laffer curves are probably real to some degree. Did you also know most studies put the top of that curve for the US income tax somewhere between 60-70% ? Like just as there is a declining befit from raising rates there is a declining benefit from cutting rates.
Do we have any actual evidence besides a just-so anecdotal story from the former President who happened to make it his policy to cut those high rates? Especially when in that era of those high rates those workers had wages more inline with thei
Re: (Score:2)
Also let's go ahead and shut the fuck about the word "compliance" since if that was any sort of concern we wouldn't be ripping funds away from the IRS who had actually increased compliance and were pulling in more tax revenue via compliance well over what it cost to fund with no rate changes needed, so color me skeptical to hear conservatives whine about it, it's bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't blame Trump for causing the issues, it's a longstanding problem.
I understand reading comprehension is difficult.
Also you are right on Afghanistan, thank you for understand the Doha agreement. I don't know how the DOT was affected before here but on your premise alone would I prefer Mayor Pete or Sean Duffy? Pete all day every day, 1000% and he probably wasn't as qualified for DOT Secretary as I would want and yet he's miles ahead of who Trump appointed.
Re: (Score:1)
They were looking for a replacement system sometime within the last 20 years. I know this because the company I worked for at the time tried, really tried, to tender an offer but the bureaucratic nightmare that was government procurement meant that we ended up wasting all of our time. AND we had the backing of one of the larger networking/security vendors...
I don't know if it was because we didn't have any billionaire board members (we didn't have a board of directors at all), or the lack of McKinsey consu
Weird coincidence (Score:5, Informative)
But anyway, to your point, for some mysterious reason the antiquated system kept limping along until Stumpy and his Doge saboteurs took over.
Must be pure bad luck that massively fucking around with the agency happened at the same time, right?
Everything Trump touches turns to shit.
Re: (Score:2)
It's more nuanced than that. Funding was packaged together with other stuff in multiple proposed bills, so it's hard to pin blame on any one party. But it's fair to say Congress failed to do their job in general.
Re: (Score:3)
It still confuses me that the US populace takes this tactic of tacking everything onto one bill that is completely unrelated lying down.
That kind of open corruption is the biggest middle finger US politicians could give the people. They're actively ridiculing the voters and the voters just look elsewhere and get annoyed and comparatively minor issues.
Boggles the mind.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
ATC was screwed up decades before Trump. It's running on antiquated equipment.
Worse, the Philly control centre is connected to Newark via antiquated copper comm lines instead of fibre. Hell of a way to run a major hub...
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. I will blame Trump for a lot of things going to shits, but the American aviation infrastructure has been notoriously under funded for a while and has lacked the steps to modernise that we have seen elsewhere. The fault is likely on congress and those managing the infrastructure. Between the 737 Max and this, the FAA is probably going to improve how it does things, but here we can blame Trump for staffing that will lead to future issues.
What I am curious now is how they will address all of this goin
Re: (Score:2)
The decision to move control to from Long Island to Philly and to NOT upgrade the facilities or compensate for the many controllers who balked at relocation was made during Mr. Autopen's watch in 2024 and had zero to do with Trump.
Just sayin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What a stable genius!
We can blame Trump for a lot of things, but not this particular instance. This would have happened before Trump and I doubt Biden had any say in this either. This was either something coming from the FAA or congress (I haven’t read into the history of the move).
One thing I do question is given that some operators didn’t not want to move, that they didn’t opt for a hybrid solution, with some operators in the local location and some in the remote location. At the very least it would have pro
Re: (Score:1)
Looks like these problems have been festering since Obama was in the White House.
Re: (Score:1)
These problems have been festering for decades, through multiple presidencies.
But the DOGE assholes have probably been the stupidest idiots so far - firing people without even a hint of a plan or a clue, and making a problematic situation even worse.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That president did nothing but golf and steal taxpayer money.
STARS servers? (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry, I've only been a pilot for almost 20 years and I've never heard of "STARS servers".
N90 is an ARTCC and relocating that is something that has been done before, just not this incompetently. And no, it has nothing to do with copper, fiber, Elon interjecting his oversubscribed satelitte network, etc. It's poor design, lack of redundancy, and no testing.
It only matters that "so many people left" because Trump/DOGGIE let all the good ones (who could easily get other jobs) go.
The ARTCC network wasn't designed to have these kind of tsunamis. They handle gentle waves.
Please Congress, offer Trump and his cronies $100K to retire early. He can keep his massive grift (two cryptocoins, private use of the presidential seal and white house, and never-will-happen Qatari Air Force One.) Those guys have damage our infrastructure and EWR is just one example.
Re:STARS servers? (Score:5, Informative)
Sorry, I've only been a pilot for almost 20 years and I've never heard of "STARS servers".
https://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/... [dot.gov]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Who let the air traffic controllers go? TFS links to https://www.natca.org/2024/07/... [natca.org], which says:
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) is dismayed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that effective July 28, 2024, it is requiring the relocation of 12 air traffic controllers [...].
I'm pretty sure that wasn't a Trump or DOGE decision, unless people were hiding who was running the federal government in 2024 much more than has been apparent.
Re: (Score:1)
The OP did not specify air-traffic controllers.
You should read this link from the article:
https://theaircurrent.com/avia... [theaircurrent.com]
Re: (Score:2)
From TFS, we are taking about air traffic controllers:
The Federal Aviation Administration created the problem by relocating Newark's air traffic control operations
If the OP had some off topic rant, that's not my problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Please Congress, offer Trump and his cronies $100K to retire early.
Ummm, you do not realize what happened yet. Trump is King and Congress is irrelevant as is the Supreme Court. Even if the King 'retires', there will be another King installed. Your Constitution, your Rights, are all gone. You just don't realize it yet.
Sure glad the Bell System was destroyed (Score:5, Interesting)
In the Old Days(tm), say 1990, electric power companies depended on Bell System wires for the most critical protective relaying applications, and the Bell Operating Companies provided nine 9s reliability with latency approaching the speed of light. Television networks likewise: national distribution in as close to atomic time synchronization as was humanly possible.
Today one is lucky to be able to make a voice call from one medium sized city to another without dropouts, jitter, disconnections, and other digital voice garbage. Latency? Ha ha ha ha. Reliability? Not even funny.
Progress!
Re: (Score:3)
OK, but do you really want to go back to paying the current equivalent $10 per minute for the privilege of using a piece of dedicated copper for a cross-country call?
BTW, "nine 9s" is one just second downtime out of 30 years continuous service. I was there back in the day of analog long distance, and I can assure you that reliability was nowhere near that. For example, if you tried to make a call on Mother's day after dinner, your chances of actually getting through were often less than 50%.
Getting a "fast
Re: (Score:2)
" I was there back in the day of analog long distance, and I can assure you that reliability was nowhere near that."
For your home landline?
Or for the dedicated line you were contracted directly with Bell with to provide point-to-point connectivity for critical communications infrastructure?
They weren't offering lots of 9's on your consumer land line, but that didn't mean they weren't offering it.
Re: (Score:2)
point-to-point connectivity
I don't know why anyone would imply this level of service went away. If you want a direct link of fiber between two locations you can have it, you just have to pay for it. Meanwhile the base level of service has improved exponentially over the decades to where folks don't pay for those connections anymore even when they should.
Having however many nines you want in reliability is a business choice, not a technology one. In 1990 you just didn't happen to have as many ways to lower your cost's and get away w
Re: (Score:2)
I can assure you that reliability was nowhere near that. For example, if you tried to make a call on Mother's day after dinner, your chances of actually getting through were often less than 50%.
Sounds like you're conflating capability and reliability. If you couldn't get through it was probably because the system was saturated with other calls, not because it was down.
Re: (Score:2)
The difference doesn't mean a rat's ass to the customer. Either way, no phone call.
Re: Sure glad the Bell System was destroyed (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That must have been why flying was so much safer back in Ma Bell's heyday.
Re: (Score:3)
Back in the 90's Newark-Philly was close enough to the SONET Ring with multipathed fiber. You could get an OC-48 for reasonable money ($1300ish IIRC) with absurd uptime guarantees if the ring ran past your building. Backhoe Bobs couldn't take down your service without a coordinated attack.
Have we ripped all that out in the past thirty years?
You'd think ATC would be important enough to pay for reliable service.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Used to be that you could watch basic programming, even during severe weather events, in the sticks with just a pair of rabbit ears on top of the TV and a little static popping in and out due to interference. (In fact one of the justifications for such broadcasts was informing the public during such emergencies.) Heck you could even be sitting in a moving car with a portable TV (like my old RCA 16-3050.) and watch TV just fine on long car trips.
Today one is lucky to b
Re: (Score:2)
I thought that came from a Lilly Tomlinson comedy sketch where she played a bit of a snide telephone operator...?
Cause (Score:2)
The Federal Aviation Administration created the problem by relocating Newark's air traffic control operations from the understaffed N90 facility on Long Island to Philadelphia in 2024.
That isn't what created the problem. The FAA is moving operations to Philadelphia because they can't get enough staff to work in Newark. Long Island is having the same staffing problems but Dick Durban blocked the FAA from moving those staff to Philadelphia. It's been an issue for decades.
Source: My cousin flies for United.
Re: (Score:3)
It did create the problem because "the FAA opted to send radar data over 130 miles of commercial copper telephone lines" as part of this move. A) it's not efficient and 2) it's not secure.
Re: Cause (Score:2)
Re: Cause (Score:2)
Fax has no authentication or encryption. It is subject to MITM and definitely not secure.
You can, however, use secure protocols such as TLS over dedicated copper lines. Just not fax. But if the copper hasn't been maintained and the connection drops periodically, no amount of protocol security is going to help.
Re: (Score:2)
There is a reason why a fax still exists.
Yeah, because retards. Faxes aren't secure. Faxing isn't even a good technology. If your business still relies on fax machines, your business is shit.
130miles of dedicated copper isn't secure and it's slow in a profession where delays in information is bad. A copper line should be the last resort for something like this. They'd probably get better service by using satellites.
Re:No one wants to work anymore (Score:3)
If no one will work for the wages you offer, does the problem lie with you or everyone else?
Re: No one wants to work anymore (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean a Hooverville? I don't think the modern white collar worker is interested in living in a Hooverville. It's not like they're Okies fleeing the dust bowl.
The problem is really that they're not paid a fair wage for the area they live in, considering the importance of the labor they provide.
The other problem is the FAA's inability to get budget for maintenance and upgrades of facilities. TRACON deals with more air traffic than any region should.
Sabotage for privatization (Score:5, Insightful)
What you do is you sabotage the basic functionality of the government and then you get the voters to blame the government for their problems.
Then you campaign on fixing those problems with less government which means you can take necessary public services that would normally be done by the government because they are necessary public services and you can privatize them skimming off the top of basic functions of human civilization.
Florida I understand has it real bad right now with a whole shitload of government agencies cut past the bone. It's at the point that basic stuff like inspections and basic functions of the Courts are starting to be impacted.
It's just one of many tricks used for a tiny population of about 2,000 people to control a population of 350 million and steal their property and money.
I wish we would spend more time teaching about this crap in schools, hell anytime. But of course if you tried to those 2,000 people in charge would make damn sure you couldn't.
I mean it's not like the king let you teach people about democracies benefits right?
Re: (Score:2)
And when they try to privatize not only will everything be worse, but they'll lose their "government bad" excuse. Leaving them with "Biden bad".
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder when these greedy bastards are going to realize that one of the steadiest trends in industrial civilization is that fewer and fewer individuals can inflict higher and higher casualties, when they choose to go on the warpath. It only takes one little security breakdown to make a yacht or manor house or private airplane vulnerable to some kind of drone with a nasty payload.
They Already figured that out (Score:2)
They are acutely aware that the military's might turn on them but that just gets us to a junta and a different set of brutal dictators. Like how Russia traded the mob bosses for Vladimir Putin.
And of course they are aware of the military might turn on them and are working on automated killbots to replace the militaries. They will still have a handful of engineers to keep the killbots working but
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have any actual evidence that Florida is suffering from a non-functional court system? Sure looks like future budgets will be quite generous for the state court system:
https://flccoc.org/court-syste... [flccoc.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's the twenty thousand below the top-tier, that make the difference: They've got the wealth to get an education and see the world, first-hand. When the top-tier abuses them the same as poor people, that's when democracy and law becomes valued.
Modern talking-points are centered on the top 0.1% of the US wealth. Problem is, the US oligarchy extends down into the top 2%. Meaning, the time, knowledge and money to incite a rebellion, is missing from the USA. Worse, the schoolyard pledge to not fight the
Re: Sabotage for privatization (Score:2)
Wasn't this a decision by Mr Buttegeig & Mr Biden?
Re: (Score:2)
That would be the FAA's decision and they're standing by it.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what this is. It's an old trick of oligarchs and billionaires, it's so old that when it was first invented we had millionaires instead of billionaires (or the upcoming trillionaires which we should have after the big beautiful bill passes).
What you do is you sabotage the basic functionality of the government and then you get the voters to blame the government for their problems.
Then you campaign on fixing those problems with less government which means you can take necessary public services that would normally be done by the government because they are necessary public services and you can privatize them skimming off the top of basic functions of human civilization.
Florida I understand has it real bad right now with a whole shitload of government agencies cut past the bone. It's at the point that basic stuff like inspections and basic functions of the Courts are starting to be impacted.
It's just one of many tricks used for a tiny population of about 2,000 people to control a population of 350 million and steal their property and money.
I wish we would spend more time teaching about this crap in schools, hell anytime. But of course if you tried to those 2,000 people in charge would make damn sure you couldn't.
I mean it's not like the king let you teach people about democracies benefits right?
And the lords and barons behind this still don't get that the end game is when the people throw the ruling class onto the spears of the soldiers.
I'd rather not let it get so bad the world needs another communist revolution. They never turn out well. They can be avoided if the issues are dealt with in time and the power of the ultra wealthy is checked.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it better to be brought up on charges before Publix State Courts or Winn Dixie State Courts?
We're coming for you (Score:2, Troll)
You can run, and you might die of old age before our collapse spreads far enough that you can't anymore. But if you're under 60 that's probably not true.
What I don't get is why the rest of the world is letting Russia run roughshod over us. I don't think p
Re: (Score:1)
America has 11 fully armed aircraft carriers (Score:2)
And that was before the entire rest of the world besides Russia turned against china. It's why they're moving hard into Africa because they need the money they can generate from that continent.
Folks really don't understand the extent of the American empire because we cover the iron fist in a velvet glove. We rea
Re: (Score:1)
I don't think automation is a net negative though, just as the industrial revolution
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, hypersonic and drones are coming to the field but fact is the US has 9 carrier strike groups. That alone is an enormous and unmatched level of force projection not easily undone. Sure we see drones in the front lines of Ukraine but dozens or hundreds of miles in deep water swarmed by F35, Hornets and Prowlers? If your hypersonic launchers were not B2 bombed from Missouri first.
Fact is nobody knows how it would play out but the US military is simply the largest most comprehensive logistics network on
Re: (Score:2)
What did we see? The US lost more planes falling off ships. Also wasn't the carrier in the Red Sea for months?
Show me the "they played it out" and we are scrapping the centerpieces of us force projection. Why are we building like 7 more Ford class?
Re: (Score:2)
The Coca-Colonization of the World.
Re: (Score:2)
Your cavalier use of the term "we" is certainly interesting.
There's nothing cavalier about it (Score:1)
If you vote Republican and I'm pretty damn sure you do then you voted for this. And as the saying goes, I hope you have the day you voted for.
Re: (Score:2)
But then why can't they lay new cable?
Political hyperventilating aside: It's not the FAAs cable. They lease a dedicated twisted pair from the local telecom. They've been doing this for years and it suited their needs. But now it's failing and nobody is (yet) holding the phone companies feet to the fire. Somebody needs to find and dust off the performance specification for that leased line.
There is actually no need to "lay new cable". Virtual circuits are a thing and I'd be sorely surprised if there isn't more than enough room in the East Coast
looks almost deliberate (Score:1, Flamebait)
it's almost like someone who is responsible for maintaining the system has instead just been robbing it for their own personal gain, like a capitalist dirtbag thief might do, just take take taking, offering nothing at all of value. quite a lot like dog shit might. but no, go ahead, masturbate yourself about how good capitalism is like a typical slashtard. fuckin virgins
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Why not deploy more servers? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They don't have enough corroded copper wire to connect them.
Break it, and the fix it? (Score:1)
managing 16.8 million annual flights with 1990s-era technology.
That is the time when Elon Musk steps in to sell us some stuff to fix the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
If somebody told me that was the plan all along, I wouldn't exactly faint from shock.
Re:[Elon grift plan?] (Score:1)
Elon would move fast and break people. He'd probably try to use AI to avoid all the time needed to code a real app. His supporters can be the guinea pigs.
Everyone's? (Score:2)
You mean "everyone in one particular country", surely?
Airlines did this to us (Score:2)
Really (Score:2)
About To Become Everyone's Problem
Nicht mein Bier.
FAA was _directed_ to .... (Score:2)
Don't obfuscate who is calling the shots.
Also, the idea that government can be run like a business is ridiculous because:
1) government can't run a profit so there is missing the fundamental goal of a business enterprise; and
2) government can't run "cheap" because not only because its services have huge impact on the population, but mostly because everyone selling to government inflates their prices.
Want good quality ATC? Accept to government paying fair prices and wages, and start penalizing the profiteers
Maybe- (Score:2)
if they laid off more, they could then blame Obama?
If the airport can't fit. (Score:2)