Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
United States

RealPage Agrees To Settle Federal Rent-Collusion Case (nytimes.com) 19

The Justice Department has reached an agreement to settle an antitrust lawsuit against RealPage, a real estate software company that the government accused of enabling landlords to collude to raise rents. From a report: Using RealPage software, landlords shared information about their rents and occupancy rates with the company, after which an algorithm suggested what to charge renters. The government's suit, which was joined by several state attorneys general, accused RealPage of taking the confidential information and suggesting rents higher than those in a free market.

Under the settlement proposal, which requires approval by a federal judge overseeing the case in the Middle District of North Carolina, RealPage's software could no longer use information about current leases to train its algorithm. Nonpublic data from competing landlords would also be excluded when suggesting rents. "Competing companies must make independent pricing decisions, and with the rise of algorithmic and artificial intelligence tools, we will remain at the forefront of vigorous antitrust enforcement," said Gail Slater, who leads the antitrust division at the Department of Justice, in a news release.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

RealPage Agrees To Settle Federal Rent-Collusion Case

Comments Filter:
  • I'm reminded of what the Benetton F1 team did when rules specifically prevented teams from using wheel speed and gear information to run traction control systems. Instead they used a combination of incoming air stream pressure (similar to how an aircraft's pitot-static system works) in combination with some preloaded per-event data and track position information to make another traction control system that did the same job.

    Information about past leases and public data from competing landlords might still be

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:26PM (#65817641)
    My rent stopped going up. Like full stop.

    It's painfully obvious this is cost consumers hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars. The frustrating thing is as usual it's a settlement where they don't have to give up any of the ill-gotten gains. All any of these crooks ever have to do is hold out until there is a republican in the White House and then run it up to a federal court. It worked for Microsoft.

    Seriously go read up on their antitrust lawsuit. They just dragged it in court until Bush Jr got in charge and he gave them a sweetheart deal that included a significant expansion of their presence in public schools.
  • weak. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GonzoPhysicist ( 1231558 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:34PM (#65817651)

    So no actual punishment at all, just a promise to stop doing the most obviously illegal part?
    The company deserves to be liquidated and the all funds distributed to the renters they ripped off.

    • And no repayment to all the renters who have been gouged for years due to this price fixing, either.

    • Re:weak. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by larryjoe ( 135075 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:54PM (#65817683)

      So no actual punishment at all, just a promise to stop doing the most obviously illegal part?
      The company deserves to be liquidated and the all funds distributed to the renters they ripped off.

      It's just a promise that is guaranteed to be violated. Why? Because the only reason for RealPage's existence is to help landlords set rents. If non-public rent info cannot be used to set rents, RealPage has zero value and they would quickly go bankrupt. The mere continuance of their existence strongly suggests that they are violating their promise.

  • Which DOJ is this? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by toxonix ( 1793960 ) on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @04:38PM (#65817657)

    "we will remain at the forefront of vigorous antitrust enforcement," said Gail Slater
    I don't recognize this DOJ. Is this from 2023?
    Looks to me like RealPage is one of the few grift engines that didn't bribe Trump in time to have the DOJ forget about it.

  • So clearly we renters should be getting a nickle or something, right?

  • Nonpublic data from competing landlords would also be excluded when suggesting rents

    This is kind of like how hospitals are now required to make their prices "public." So they make a web page listing all the prices, but don't make it indexable by Google. They're technically complying with the law, but because Google can't find it, neither can potential patients.

    In the rent case, landlords can simply create "public" pages (not indexable by Google) listing their rents. Since they are now "public" the algorithm can use the prices, even if regular people can't find the pages.

  • is not only not giving up some of those ill-gotten gains, by at least, say, LOWERING THE RENT, but remember 40% or so of the rental market is now owned, directly or indirectly, by VC. There's no way they will stop colluding.

"Nature is very un-American. Nature never hurries." -- William George Jordan

Working...